linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 21/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap invalidated roots via asynchronous worker
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 19:11:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b8c28cf-cf54-f889-be7d-afc9f5430ecd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YiI4AmYkm2oiuiio@google.com>

On 3/4/22 17:02, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 3/3/22 22:32, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> I didn't remove the paragraph from the commit message, but I think it's
>> unnecessary now.  The workqueue is flushed in kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() and
>> kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(), unlike the buggy patch, so it doesn't need to take
>> a reference to the VM.
>>
>> I think I don't even need to check kvm->users_count in the defunct root
>> case, as long as kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu() flushes and destroys the workqueue
>> before it checks that the lists are empty.
> 
> Yes, that should work.  IIRC, the WARN_ONs will tell us/you quite quickly if
> we're wrong :-)  mmu_notifier_unregister() will call the "slow" kvm_mmu_zap_all()
> and thus ensure all non-root pages zapped, but "leaking" a worker will trigger
> the WARN_ON that there are no roots on the list.

Good, for the record these are the commit messages I have:

     KVM: x86/mmu: Zap invalidated roots via asynchronous worker
     
     Use the system worker threads to zap the roots invalidated
     by the TDP MMU's "fast zap" mechanism, implemented by
     kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots().
     
     At this point, apart from allowing some parallelism in the zapping of
     roots, the workqueue is a glorified linked list: work items are added and
     flushed entirely within a single kvm->slots_lock critical section.  However,
     the workqueue fixes a latent issue where kvm_mmu_zap_all_invalidated_roots()
     assumes that it owns a reference to all invalid roots; therefore, no
     one can set the invalid bit outside kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast().  Putting the
     invalidated roots on a linked list... erm, on a workqueue ensures that
     tdp_mmu_zap_root_work() only puts back those extra references that
     kvm_mmu_zap_all_invalidated_roots() had gifted to it.

and

     KVM: x86/mmu: Zap defunct roots via asynchronous worker
     
     Zap defunct roots, a.k.a. roots that have been invalidated after their
     last reference was initially dropped, asynchronously via the existing work
     queue instead of forcing the work upon the unfortunate task that happened
     to drop the last reference.
     
     If a vCPU task drops the last reference, the vCPU is effectively blocked
     by the host for the entire duration of the zap.  If the root being zapped
     happens be fully populated with 4kb leaf SPTEs, e.g. due to dirty logging
     being active, the zap can take several hundred seconds.  Unsurprisingly,
     most guests are unhappy if a vCPU disappears for hundreds of seconds.
     
     E.g. running a synthetic selftest that triggers a vCPU root zap with
     ~64tb of guest memory and 4kb SPTEs blocks the vCPU for 900+ seconds.
     Offloading the zap to a worker drops the block time to <100ms.
     
     There is an important nuance to this change.  If the same work item
     was queued twice before the work function has run, it would only
     execute once and one reference would be leaked.  Therefore, now that
     queueing items is not anymore protected by write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock),
     kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots() has to check root->role.invalid and
     skip already invalid roots.  On the other hand, kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast()
     must return only after those skipped roots have been zapped as well.
     These two requirements can be satisfied only if _all_ places that
     change invalid to true now schedule the worker before releasing the
     mmu_lock.  There are just two, kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root() and
     kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots().

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-04 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-03 19:38 [PATCH v4 00/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 01/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for present SPTE when clearing dirty bit in TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 02/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong/misleading comments in TDP MMU fast zap Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 03/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Formalize TDP MMU's (unintended?) deferred TLB flush logic Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 23:39   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 04/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Document that zapping invalidated roots doesn't need to flush Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 05/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write in unyielding root iter Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 06/30] KVM: x86/mmu: only perform eager page splitting on valid roots Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 20:03   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 07/30] KVM: x86/mmu: do not allow readers to acquire references to invalid roots Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 20:12   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 08/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for !leaf=>leaf, not PFN change, in TDP MMU SP removal Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 09/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Batch TLB flushes from TDP MMU for MMU notifier change_spte Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 10/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop RCU after processing each root in MMU notifier hooks Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 11/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helpers to read/write TDP MMU SPTEs and document RCU Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 12/30] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if old _or_ new SPTE is REMOVED in non-atomic path Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 13/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor low-level TDP MMU set SPTE helper to take raw values Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 14/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only the target TDP MMU shadow page in NX recovery Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 15/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip remote TLB flush when zapping all of TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 16/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Add dedicated helper to zap TDP MMU root shadow page Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04  0:07   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 17/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write to zap TDP MMU range Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04  0:14   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 18/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only TDP MMU leafs in kvm_zap_gfn_range() Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04  1:16   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-04 16:11     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04 18:00       ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-04 18:42         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 15:09   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-13 18:40   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-25 15:13     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-26 18:10       ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-28 15:06         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 19/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Do remote TLB flush before dropping RCU in TDP MMU resched Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04  1:19   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 20/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Defer TLB flush to caller when freeing TDP MMU shadow pages Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 21/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap invalidated roots via asynchronous worker Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 20:54   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 21:06     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 21:20   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 21:32     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04  6:48       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-04 16:02         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04 18:11           ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-03-05  0:34             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-05 19:53               ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 21:29                 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 17:50                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 22/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding when zapping GFNs for defunct TDP MMU root Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 23/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap roots in two passes to avoid inducing RCU stalls Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 24/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap defunct roots via asynchronous worker Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 22:08   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 25/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for a REMOVED leaf SPTE before making the SPTE Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 26/30] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN on any attempt to atomically update REMOVED SPTE Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 27/30] KVM: selftests: Move raw KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION helper to utils Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 28/30] KVM: selftests: Split out helper to allocate guest mem via memfd Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 29/30] KVM: selftests: Define cpu_relax() helpers for s390 and x86 Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-03 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 30/30] KVM: selftests: Add test to populate a VM with the max possible guest mem Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 14:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-08 15:36     ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-03-08 21:09     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-08 17:25 ` [PATCH v4 00/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8b8c28cf-cf54-f889-be7d-afc9f5430ecd@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).