From: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>
To: Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dtor_core@ameritech.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:10:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43D143C2.3060507@superbug.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E27F809F04C1C673D283E84F@d216-220-25-20.dynip.modwest.com>
Michael Loftis wrote:
> To more fully respond though....
>
> Weeks is fine, and better than never. And there may be cases in which
> the decision has to be made to 'abandon' a particular stable release in
> favor of a newer version because of the difficulty or inability to
> backport fixes.
>
> I think that it's fine to push the maintenance effort away from the
> mainline developers, probably even desireable, but then the
> bugfixing/etc tends to happen in a disparate manner, off on lots of
> forks at different places without them making their way back to some
> central place.
>
Please be more specific or stop posting. No one is going to bother
answering you with any useful answer unless you are more specific.
From the general trend of the thread so far, it seems like a fairly
pointless request to me.
All well known distros had absolutely no problem with devfs -> udevd
transition, so why are you having problems?
If you stop spending time posting, you might actually have time to fix
your problems.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-20 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-20 15:17 Development tree, PLEASE? Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 15:31 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 15:59 ` Marc Koschewski
2006-01-20 16:07 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 16:34 ` Marc Koschewski
2006-01-20 17:04 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 16:35 ` Marc Koschewski
2006-01-20 17:06 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 17:31 ` Diego Calleja
2006-01-20 20:43 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-20 16:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-20 17:14 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 19:43 ` Greg KH
2006-01-20 20:56 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 21:06 ` Christopher Friesen
2006-01-20 23:00 ` Horst von Brand
2006-01-20 23:17 ` Russell King
2006-01-20 23:33 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 23:55 ` Russell King
2006-01-21 0:05 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-21 0:26 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2006-01-20 23:27 ` Greg KH
2006-01-20 23:52 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-21 0:03 ` Russell King
2006-01-21 1:38 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-20 20:25 ` Russell King
2006-01-20 22:05 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 22:54 ` Horst von Brand
2006-01-20 16:40 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-01-20 16:48 ` Marc Koschewski
2006-01-20 16:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
[not found] ` <20060120172431.GE5873@stiffy.osknowledge.org>
2006-01-20 17:43 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-01-20 17:53 ` Marc Koschewski
2006-01-20 18:00 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-01-20 18:06 ` Marc Koschewski
2006-02-13 17:17 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-01-20 16:29 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-01-20 16:36 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 16:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-01-20 17:31 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 19:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-01-20 19:10 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 23:20 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-20 23:54 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 19:21 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 19:24 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-01-20 20:00 ` Russell King
2006-01-20 21:21 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 21:40 ` Doug McNaught
2006-01-20 22:09 ` Michael Loftis
2006-02-02 12:16 ` David Weinehall
2006-02-02 18:25 ` Michael Loftis
2006-02-02 20:10 ` Dave Jones
2006-02-02 22:05 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-02-02 22:10 ` Dave Jones
2006-02-02 22:19 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-02-02 22:31 ` Dave Jones
2006-02-02 22:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-02-03 1:29 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-03 4:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-02-03 12:28 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-03 16:04 ` Dave Jones
2006-02-02 22:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-02-02 22:31 ` Christopher Friesen
2006-02-03 5:08 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-02-02 22:15 ` David Weinehall
2006-02-02 22:47 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 20:10 ` James Courtier-Dutton [this message]
2006-01-20 20:20 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-20 21:48 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 22:00 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-01-20 22:14 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-21 9:22 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-21 14:52 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-21 17:03 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-20 21:50 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-21 9:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-20 16:53 ` Joe George
2006-01-20 17:03 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-20 17:33 ` Joe George
[not found] ` <20060120121116.62a8f0a6.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
2006-01-20 17:11 ` sean
2006-01-20 17:56 ` Development tree, please? Michael Loftis
[not found] ` <20060120131120.338ebf17.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
2006-01-20 18:11 ` sean
2006-01-20 18:43 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 17:11 ` Development tree, PLEASE? Diego Calleja
2006-01-21 1:56 ` Matthew Frost
2006-01-21 3:19 ` Matthew Frost
2006-01-21 7:22 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-21 7:38 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-21 21:56 ` Sven-Haegar Koch
2006-01-21 22:18 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-21 22:40 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-21 22:47 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-21 22:51 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-22 8:57 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-22 9:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-01-22 16:09 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-22 22:59 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-01-21 22:49 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-21 23:03 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-22 9:03 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-22 17:03 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-25 21:30 ` Nix
2006-01-25 21:36 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-25 22:12 ` Nix
2006-01-26 8:44 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-26 21:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-26 21:44 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-22 17:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-22 17:24 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-21 11:28 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-21 18:09 ` Horst von Brand
2006-01-20 17:08 ` Gábor Lénárt
2006-01-21 0:36 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-20 19:16 ` Greg KH
2006-01-20 19:27 ` Ben Collins
2006-01-20 22:04 ` Vincent Hanquez
2006-01-21 18:29 ` Johan Kullstam
2006-01-23 13:45 ` Vincent Hanquez
2006-01-24 15:35 ` Bob Copeland
2006-01-21 11:41 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-21 6:58 Michael Loftis
2006-03-14 13:57 Chuck Ebbert
2006-03-14 14:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-16 20:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-16 20:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43D143C2.3060507@superbug.co.uk \
--to=james@superbug.co.uk \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mloftis@wgops.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).