From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <email@example.com> To: Martin Steigerwald <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <email@example.com>, Linus Torvalds <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: Linux 4.19-rc4 released, an apology, and a maintainership note Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:27:42 +0100 Message-ID: <CAPweEDxSHpBk7Hj4RdMKKPb05mxycE7JW2=pus6Zhdni+dKBkg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <8998740.bsg6g2nRDU@merkaba> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Martin Steigerwald <email@example.com> wrote: > firstname.lastname@example.org - 30.09.18, 14:09: >> the third is how UNICEF trains teachers to treat children as human >> beings. > > During releasing a lot of limiting "stuff" I found that probably nothing > written or said can hurt my feelings unless I let it do so or even… > unless I choose (!) to feel hurt about it. So at times I am clear about > this, I´d say: "I have chosen to feel hurt about what you did." it's interesting to me to note that you use the word "releasing". that's a keyword that i recognise from energy work, which, surprisingly is increasingly being recognised and used by individuals and businesses all over the world. it seems that people are beginning to recognise it's actually effective and no longer associated with cloud-cuckoo-land "detached-from-reality" new age hippies. i was going to [privately] recommend someone who specifically works with businesses and organisations to linus: i haven't heard from him yet. > However in this human experience a lot of people, including myself, > still hold on to a lot of limiting "stuff" which invites feeling hurt. > We, as humankind, have a history of hurting each other. this is why i recommended http://pndc.com in my earlier post. one of the documents there points out that due to our still-remaining "survival" instincts from millenia of evolution, words *literally* can have the same effect on us as if we were actually physically and i MEAN literally physically being attacked... [*IF WE CHOOSE* to be]. where people have not yet learned the difference between "that was a bad thing to do" and "YOU are bad" (and interpret those as being exactly the same thing), we have a compound effect. one person says "that's a really dumb piece of code", the person hearing it interprets it as "you're a fucking idiot", and has a LITERAL physical response to the words [that you didn't actually say] as if you'd just punched them in the mouth. > During this releasing work I also learned about two key ingredients of > successful relationships: Harmlessness and mutuality. I opted out of the > hurting cycle as best I can. And so I choose to write in a way that > moves around what from my own experience of feeling hurt I know could > hurt others. I choose to write in a harmless way so to say. While still > aiming to bring my point across. A very important ingredient for this is > to write from my own experience. yes, absolutely. that's pretty much word-for-word exactly the advice given on the _other_ resource i recommended to linus, http://www.crnhq.org/. let me find it.... ok, "appropriate assertiveness": http://www.crnhq.org/CR-Kit.aspx?rw=c#assertiveness quote: " The essence of Appropriate Assertiveness is being able to state your case without arousing the defences of the other person. The secret of success lies in saying how it is for you rather than what they should or shouldn't do. "The way I see it...", attached to your assertive statement, helps. A skilled "I" statement goes even further." and it goes on from there. > Of course others can feel hurt about something I would not feel hurt > about and I may not be aware that the other might feel hurt about. That > is why in such a case it is important to give and receive feedback. > Still when writing from my own experience without saying that anything > is wrong with the other, it appears to be unlikely to trigger hurt. That > is at least my experience so far. exactly. i believe you may be interested to know of the next phases in that: the crnhq's "appropriate assertiveness" advice has a really good template for keeping things to "I", and at the same time successfully getting the point across. i won't quote all of it to you. i believe crhnq is written by a guy who has stopped warring tribes from centuries of killing each other (and i don't mean metaphorically), so it's clearly effective. caveat: my only concern about these kinds of ways of thinking is, sometimes you do actually genuinely need to give people a short, sharp shock: that's part of NLP. *after* the shock, you can be "nice" to them: where previously they were pathologically unable to listen, a shock gets them out of the psychosis that they were in. it's also a recognised medical treatment for people who are hysterical in disaster / emergency scenarios to shock them out of their screaming fit. note: not recommended without proper training!! l.
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-09-16 19:22 Linus Torvalds 2018-09-16 21:42 ` [...] " Adam Borowski 2018-09-16 23:59 ` Moritz Obermeier 2018-09-17 0:18 ` Linux 4.19-rc4 released, " Rene Herman 2018-09-17 0:20 ` [...] " Andy Isaacson 2018-09-17 0:23 ` Linux 4.19-rc4 released, " Rene Herman 2018-09-17 6:57 ` opal hart 2018-09-17 7:57 ` […] " Martin Steigerwald 2018-09-17 8:53 ` Martin Steigerwald 2018-09-30 12:09 ` Re: Linux 4.19-rc4 released, " lkcl 2018-09-30 14:07 ` Martin Steigerwald 2018-09-30 16:27 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [this message] 2018-09-17 12:58 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-09-17 17:09 ` Joe Perches 2018-09-17 21:09 ` Michael Woods 2018-09-18 1:30 ` Pavel Snajdr 2018-09-21 22:13 ` Michael Woods 2018-10-04 14:57 ` ebiederm 2018-10-08 15:29 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult 2018-10-08 13:54 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult 2018-10-08 16:36 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult 2018-09-17 2:15 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton 2018-09-18 2:10 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton 2018-09-30 11:47 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
Reply instructions: You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAPweEDxSHpBk7Hj4RdMKKPb05mxycE7JW2=pus6Zhdni+dKBkg@mail.gmail.com' \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7 lkml/git/7.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml \ email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org public-inbox-index lkml Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox