From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] entry: Pass pt_regs to irqentry_exit_cond_resched()
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 19:38:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvFKHaRdOkg5RHtv@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvFJGxU0k492npYT@iweiny-desk3>
On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 10:34:19AM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> I thought about that but generally have been steered away from using bool
> arguments like this.
The reason being?
> Looking this over I think this may be a reasonable use of a flag like
> that.
>
> I'm not sure if this series is going to land given the discussion of
> performance.
Well, the only way to talk performance is to have something to measure
it with. But let me finish going through the rest of your set first.
> Would this clean up be welcome on its own? I'm willing to respin
> this patch and submit if so.
Depends on who steered you away from the bool thing and why?
:-)
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-08 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-05 17:30 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Print CPU at segfault time ira.weiny
2022-08-05 17:30 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] entry: Pass pt_regs to irqentry_exit_cond_resched() ira.weiny
2022-08-05 18:33 ` Rik van Riel
2022-08-08 10:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-08 17:34 ` Ira Weiny
2022-08-08 17:38 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2022-08-08 17:43 ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-08 17:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-09 23:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-08-10 7:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-08-05 17:30 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] entry: Add calls for save/restore auxiliary pt_regs ira.weiny
2022-08-05 18:34 ` Rik van Riel
2022-08-09 12:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-09 18:38 ` Ira Weiny
2022-08-09 18:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-09 21:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-08-09 21:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-09 22:33 ` Ira Weiny
2022-08-09 21:49 ` Ira Weiny
2022-08-09 23:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-08-05 17:30 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] x86/entry: Add auxiliary pt_regs space ira.weiny
2022-08-05 18:45 ` Rik van Riel
2022-08-05 17:30 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] x86,mm: print likely CPU at segfault time ira.weiny
2022-08-05 17:30 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] x86/entry: Store CPU info on exception entry ira.weiny
2022-08-05 18:46 ` Rik van Riel
2022-08-05 18:47 ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-06 9:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-06 9:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-07 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-07 10:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-07 20:02 ` Ira Weiny
2022-08-08 11:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-08 12:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-08-09 20:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-08-08 16:16 ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-08 17:24 ` Rik van Riel
2022-08-09 21:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvFKHaRdOkg5RHtv@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).