From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Maciej Żenczykowski" <zenczykowski@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>,
astrachan@google.com, liuhangbin@gmail.com,
Linux NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
mateusz.bajorski@nokia.com, dsa@cumulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] fib_rules: return 0 directly if an exactly same rule exists when NLM_F_EXCL not supplied
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 02:32:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190601093244.GB1783@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHo-OozeC3o9avh5kgKpXq1koRH0fVtNRaM9mb=vduYRNX0T7g@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 06:43:42PM -0700, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> FYI, this userspace visible change in behaviour breaks Android.
>
> We rely on being able to add a rule and either have a dup be created
> (in which case we'll remove it later) or have it fail with EEXIST (in
> which case we won't remove it later).
>
> Returning 0 makes atomically changing a rule difficult.
>
> Please revert.
That's crazy, but makes sense in an odd way :)
And it explains why my "fix up of the patch" also breaks things, both
patches need to be reverted in the stable trees. Do you need me to make
a patch to revert this in Linus's tree now, or can you do that? Just
asking for an existing commit to be reverted is usually a bit harder as
that's not most maintainer's workflow (I know it's not mine.)
thanks,
gre gk-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-01 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-07 9:11 [PATCH net] fib_rules: return 0 directly if an exactly same rule exists when NLM_F_EXCL not supplied Hangbin Liu
2019-05-08 16:35 ` David Miller
2019-06-01 1:43 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2019-06-01 9:32 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-06-05 1:43 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-06-05 1:47 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2019-06-05 2:15 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-06-05 2:25 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2019-06-05 3:29 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-06-05 3:43 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2019-06-05 4:05 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-06-05 3:57 ` David Ahern
2019-06-05 4:08 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-06-05 4:58 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2019-06-05 15:33 ` David Ahern
2019-06-06 23:01 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190601093244.GB1783@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=astrachan@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=lorenzo@google.com \
--cc=mateusz.bajorski@nokia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zenczykowski@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).