qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v6] nvme: allow cmb and pmr emulation on same device
@ 2020-07-29 22:01 Andrzej Jakowski
  2020-07-29 22:01 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] nvme: indicate CMB support through controller capabilities register Andrzej Jakowski
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Jakowski @ 2020-07-29 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbusch, kwolf, mreitz; +Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-block

Resending series recently posted on mailing list related to nvme device
extension with couple of fixes after review.

This patch series does following:
 - Fixes problem where CMBS bit was not set in controller capabilities
   register, so support for CMB was not correctly advertised to guest.
   This is resend of patch that has been submitted and reviewed by
   Klaus [1]
 - Introduces BAR4 sharing between MSI-X vectors and CMB. This allows
   to have CMB and PMR emulated on the same device. This extension
   was indicated by Keith [2]

v6:
 - instead of using memory_region_to_absolute_addr() function local helper has
   been defined (nvme_cmb_to_absolute_addr()) to calculate absolute address of
   CMB in simplified way. Also a number of code style changes has been done
   (function rename, use literal instead of macro definition, etc.)

v5:
 - fixed problem introduced in v4 where CMB buffer was represented as
   subregion of BAR4 memory region. In that case CMB address was used
   incorrectly as it was relative to BAR4 and not absolute. Appropriate
   changes were added to v5 to calculate CMB address properly ([6])

v4:
 - modified BAR4 initialization, so now it consists of CMB, MSIX and
   PBA memory regions overlapping on top of it. This reduces patch
   complexity significantly (Klaus [5])

v3:
 - code style fixes including: removal of spurious line break, moving
   define into define section and code alignment (Klaus [4])
 - removed unintended code reintroduction (Klaus [4])

v2:
 - rebase on Kevin's latest block branch (Klaus [3])
 - improved comments section (Klaus [3])
 - simplified calculation of BAR4 size (Klaus [3])

v1:
 - initial push of the patch

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200408055607.g2ii7gwqbnv6cd3w@apples.localdomain/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200330165518.GA8234@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200605181043.28782-1-andrzej.jakowski@linux.intel.com/
[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200618092524.posxi5mysb3jjtpn@apples.localdomain/
[5]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200626055033.6vxqvi4s5pll7som@apples.localdomain/
[6]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/9143a543-d32d-f3e7-c37b-b3df7f853952@linux.intel.com/




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 1/2] nvme: indicate CMB support through controller capabilities register
  2020-07-29 22:01 [PATCH v6] nvme: allow cmb and pmr emulation on same device Andrzej Jakowski
@ 2020-07-29 22:01 ` Andrzej Jakowski
  2020-07-29 22:01 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] nvme: allow cmb and pmr to be enabled on same device Andrzej Jakowski
  2020-09-28 10:51 ` [PATCH v6] nvme: allow cmb and pmr emulation " Klaus Jensen
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Jakowski @ 2020-07-29 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbusch, kwolf, mreitz
  Cc: Klaus Jensen, Andrzej Jakowski, Maxim Levitsky, qemu-devel, qemu-block

This patch sets CMBS bit in controller capabilities register when user
configures NVMe driver with CMB support, so capabilites are correctly
reported to guest OS.

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Jakowski <andrzej.jakowski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsky@gmail.com>
---
 hw/block/nvme.c      |  1 +
 include/block/nvme.h | 10 +++++++---
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
index 841c18920c..43866b744f 100644
--- a/hw/block/nvme.c
+++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
@@ -2198,6 +2198,7 @@ static void nvme_init_ctrl(NvmeCtrl *n, PCIDevice *pci_dev)
     NVME_CAP_SET_TO(n->bar.cap, 0xf);
     NVME_CAP_SET_CSS(n->bar.cap, 1);
     NVME_CAP_SET_MPSMAX(n->bar.cap, 4);
+    NVME_CAP_SET_CMBS(n->bar.cap, n->params.cmb_size_mb ? 1 : 0);
 
     n->bar.vs = NVME_SPEC_VER;
     n->bar.intmc = n->bar.intms = 0;
diff --git a/include/block/nvme.h b/include/block/nvme.h
index 370df7fc05..d641ca6649 100644
--- a/include/block/nvme.h
+++ b/include/block/nvme.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ enum NvmeCapShift {
     CAP_MPSMIN_SHIFT   = 48,
     CAP_MPSMAX_SHIFT   = 52,
     CAP_PMR_SHIFT      = 56,
+    CAP_CMB_SHIFT      = 57,
 };
 
 enum NvmeCapMask {
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ enum NvmeCapMask {
     CAP_MPSMIN_MASK    = 0xf,
     CAP_MPSMAX_MASK    = 0xf,
     CAP_PMR_MASK       = 0x1,
+    CAP_CMB_MASK       = 0x1,
 };
 
 #define NVME_CAP_MQES(cap)  (((cap) >> CAP_MQES_SHIFT)   & CAP_MQES_MASK)
@@ -78,9 +80,11 @@ enum NvmeCapMask {
 #define NVME_CAP_SET_MPSMIN(cap, val) (cap |= (uint64_t)(val & CAP_MPSMIN_MASK)\
                                                            << CAP_MPSMIN_SHIFT)
 #define NVME_CAP_SET_MPSMAX(cap, val) (cap |= (uint64_t)(val & CAP_MPSMAX_MASK)\
-                                                            << CAP_MPSMAX_SHIFT)
-#define NVME_CAP_SET_PMRS(cap, val) (cap |= (uint64_t)(val & CAP_PMR_MASK)\
-                                                            << CAP_PMR_SHIFT)
+                                                           << CAP_MPSMAX_SHIFT)
+#define NVME_CAP_SET_PMRS(cap, val)   (cap |= (uint64_t)(val & CAP_PMR_MASK)   \
+                                                           << CAP_PMR_SHIFT)
+#define NVME_CAP_SET_CMBS(cap, val)   (cap |= (uint64_t)(val & CAP_CMB_MASK)   \
+                                                           << CAP_CMB_SHIFT)
 
 enum NvmeCcShift {
     CC_EN_SHIFT     = 0,
-- 
2.25.4



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v6 2/2] nvme: allow cmb and pmr to be enabled on same device
  2020-07-29 22:01 [PATCH v6] nvme: allow cmb and pmr emulation on same device Andrzej Jakowski
  2020-07-29 22:01 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] nvme: indicate CMB support through controller capabilities register Andrzej Jakowski
@ 2020-07-29 22:01 ` Andrzej Jakowski
  2020-07-29 22:50   ` Klaus Jensen
  2020-09-28 10:51 ` [PATCH v6] nvme: allow cmb and pmr emulation " Klaus Jensen
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Jakowski @ 2020-07-29 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbusch, kwolf, mreitz; +Cc: Andrzej Jakowski, qemu-devel, qemu-block

So far it was not possible to have CMB and PMR emulated on the same
device, because BAR2 was used exclusively either of PMR or CMB. This
patch places CMB at BAR4 offset so it not conflicts with MSI-X vectors.

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Jakowski <andrzej.jakowski@linux.intel.com>
---
 hw/block/nvme.c      | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 hw/block/nvme.h      |   1 +
 include/block/nvme.h |   4 +-
 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
index 43866b744f..292bca445f 100644
--- a/hw/block/nvme.c
+++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
@@ -22,12 +22,13 @@
  *              [pmrdev=<mem_backend_file_id>,] \
  *              max_ioqpairs=<N[optional]>
  *
- * Note cmb_size_mb denotes size of CMB in MB. CMB is assumed to be at
- * offset 0 in BAR2 and supports only WDS, RDS and SQS for now.
+ * Note cmb_size_mb denotes size of CMB in MB. CMB when configured is assumed
+ * to be resident in BAR4 at offset that is 2MiB aligned. When CMB is emulated
+ * on Linux guest it is recommended to make cmb_size_mb multiple of 2. Both
+ * size and alignment restrictions are imposed by Linux guest.
  *
- * cmb_size_mb= and pmrdev= options are mutually exclusive due to limitation
- * in available BAR's. cmb_size_mb= will take precedence over pmrdev= when
- * both provided.
+ * pmrdev is assumed to be resident in BAR2/BAR3. When configured it consumes
+ * whole BAR2/BAR3 exclusively.
  * Enabling pmr emulation can be achieved by pointing to memory-backend-file.
  * For example:
  * -object memory-backend-file,id=<mem_id>,share=on,mem-path=<file_path>, \
@@ -57,7 +58,6 @@
 #define NVME_MAX_IOQPAIRS 0xffff
 #define NVME_DB_SIZE  4
 #define NVME_SPEC_VER 0x00010300
-#define NVME_CMB_BIR 2
 #define NVME_PMR_BIR 2
 #define NVME_TEMPERATURE 0x143
 #define NVME_TEMPERATURE_WARNING 0x157
@@ -109,18 +109,25 @@ static uint16_t nvme_sqid(NvmeRequest *req)
     return le16_to_cpu(req->sq->sqid);
 }
 
+static inline hwaddr nvme_cmb_to_absolute_addr(NvmeCtrl *n)
+{
+    return n->bar4.addr + n->ctrl_mem.addr;
+}
+
 static bool nvme_addr_is_cmb(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr)
 {
-    hwaddr low = n->ctrl_mem.addr;
-    hwaddr hi  = n->ctrl_mem.addr + int128_get64(n->ctrl_mem.size);
+    hwaddr low = nvme_cmb_to_absolute_addr(n);
+    hwaddr hi  = low + int128_get64(n->ctrl_mem.size);
 
     return addr >= low && addr < hi;
 }
 
 static void nvme_addr_read(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr, void *buf, int size)
 {
+    hwaddr cmb_addr = nvme_cmb_to_absolute_addr(n);
+
     if (n->bar.cmbsz && nvme_addr_is_cmb(n, addr)) {
-        memcpy(buf, (void *)&n->cmbuf[addr - n->ctrl_mem.addr], size);
+        memcpy(buf, (void *)&n->cmbuf[addr - cmb_addr], size);
         return;
     }
 
@@ -207,17 +214,18 @@ static uint16_t nvme_map_prp(QEMUSGList *qsg, QEMUIOVector *iov, uint64_t prp1,
                              uint64_t prp2, uint32_t len, NvmeCtrl *n)
 {
     hwaddr trans_len = n->page_size - (prp1 % n->page_size);
+    hwaddr cmb_addr = nvme_cmb_to_absolute_addr(n);
     trans_len = MIN(len, trans_len);
     int num_prps = (len >> n->page_bits) + 1;
 
     if (unlikely(!prp1)) {
         trace_pci_nvme_err_invalid_prp();
         return NVME_INVALID_FIELD | NVME_DNR;
-    } else if (n->bar.cmbsz && prp1 >= n->ctrl_mem.addr &&
-               prp1 < n->ctrl_mem.addr + int128_get64(n->ctrl_mem.size)) {
+    } else if (n->bar.cmbsz && prp1 >= cmb_addr &&
+               prp1 < cmb_addr + int128_get64(n->ctrl_mem.size)) {
         qsg->nsg = 0;
         qemu_iovec_init(iov, num_prps);
-        qemu_iovec_add(iov, (void *)&n->cmbuf[prp1 - n->ctrl_mem.addr], trans_len);
+        qemu_iovec_add(iov, (void *)&n->cmbuf[prp1 - cmb_addr], trans_len);
     } else {
         pci_dma_sglist_init(qsg, &n->parent_obj, num_prps);
         qemu_sglist_add(qsg, prp1, trans_len);
@@ -262,7 +270,7 @@ static uint16_t nvme_map_prp(QEMUSGList *qsg, QEMUIOVector *iov, uint64_t prp1,
                 if (qsg->nsg){
                     qemu_sglist_add(qsg, prp_ent, trans_len);
                 } else {
-                    qemu_iovec_add(iov, (void *)&n->cmbuf[prp_ent - n->ctrl_mem.addr], trans_len);
+                    qemu_iovec_add(iov, (void *)&n->cmbuf[prp_ent - cmb_addr], trans_len);
                 }
                 len -= trans_len;
                 i++;
@@ -275,7 +283,7 @@ static uint16_t nvme_map_prp(QEMUSGList *qsg, QEMUIOVector *iov, uint64_t prp1,
             if (qsg->nsg) {
                 qemu_sglist_add(qsg, prp2, len);
             } else {
-                qemu_iovec_add(iov, (void *)&n->cmbuf[prp2 - n->ctrl_mem.addr], trans_len);
+                qemu_iovec_add(iov, (void *)&n->cmbuf[prp2 - cmb_addr], trans_len);
             }
         }
     }
@@ -1980,7 +1988,7 @@ static void nvme_check_constraints(NvmeCtrl *n, Error **errp)
         return;
     }
 
-    if (!n->params.cmb_size_mb && n->pmrdev) {
+    if (n->pmrdev) {
         if (host_memory_backend_is_mapped(n->pmrdev)) {
             char *path = object_get_canonical_path_component(OBJECT(n->pmrdev));
             error_setg(errp, "can't use already busy memdev: %s", path);
@@ -2042,33 +2050,73 @@ static void nvme_init_namespace(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeNamespace *ns, Error **errp)
     id_ns->nuse = id_ns->ncap;
 }
 
-static void nvme_init_cmb(NvmeCtrl *n, PCIDevice *pci_dev)
+static void nvme_init_bar4(PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error **errp)
 {
-    NVME_CMBLOC_SET_BIR(n->bar.cmbloc, NVME_CMB_BIR);
-    NVME_CMBLOC_SET_OFST(n->bar.cmbloc, 0);
+    NvmeCtrl *n = NVME(pci_dev);
+    int status;
+    uint64_t bar_size, cmb_offset = 0;
+    uint32_t msix_vectors;
+    uint32_t nvme_pba_offset;
+    uint32_t cmb_size_units;
+
+    msix_vectors = n->params.msix_qsize;
+    nvme_pba_offset = PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE * msix_vectors;
+    bar_size = nvme_pba_offset + QEMU_ALIGN_UP(msix_vectors, 64) / 8;
+
+    if (n->params.cmb_size_mb) {
+        NVME_CMBSZ_SET_SQS(n->bar.cmbsz, 1);
+        NVME_CMBSZ_SET_CQS(n->bar.cmbsz, 0);
+        NVME_CMBSZ_SET_LISTS(n->bar.cmbsz, 0);
+        NVME_CMBSZ_SET_RDS(n->bar.cmbsz, 1);
+        NVME_CMBSZ_SET_WDS(n->bar.cmbsz, 1);
+        NVME_CMBSZ_SET_SZU(n->bar.cmbsz, 2); /* MBs */
+        NVME_CMBSZ_SET_SZ(n->bar.cmbsz, n->params.cmb_size_mb);
+
+        cmb_size_units = NVME_CMBSZ_GETSIZEUNITS(n->bar.cmbsz);
+        /* Linux guest requires it to be 2MiB aligned */
+        cmb_offset = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(bar_size, 2 * MiB);
+
+        NVME_CMBLOC_SET_BIR(n->bar.cmbloc, 4);
+        NVME_CMBLOC_SET_OFST(n->bar.cmbloc, cmb_offset / cmb_size_units);
+
+        n->cmbuf = g_malloc0(NVME_CMBSZ_GETSIZE(n->bar.cmbsz));
 
-    NVME_CMBSZ_SET_SQS(n->bar.cmbsz, 1);
-    NVME_CMBSZ_SET_CQS(n->bar.cmbsz, 0);
-    NVME_CMBSZ_SET_LISTS(n->bar.cmbsz, 0);
-    NVME_CMBSZ_SET_RDS(n->bar.cmbsz, 1);
-    NVME_CMBSZ_SET_WDS(n->bar.cmbsz, 1);
-    NVME_CMBSZ_SET_SZU(n->bar.cmbsz, 2); /* MBs */
-    NVME_CMBSZ_SET_SZ(n->bar.cmbsz, n->params.cmb_size_mb);
+        bar_size += cmb_offset;
+        bar_size += NVME_CMBSZ_GETSIZE(n->bar.cmbsz);
+    }
+
+    bar_size = pow2ceil(bar_size);
 
-    n->cmbuf = g_malloc0(NVME_CMBSZ_GETSIZE(n->bar.cmbsz));
-    memory_region_init_io(&n->ctrl_mem, OBJECT(n), &nvme_cmb_ops, n,
-                          "nvme-cmb", NVME_CMBSZ_GETSIZE(n->bar.cmbsz));
-    pci_register_bar(pci_dev, NVME_CMBLOC_BIR(n->bar.cmbloc),
+    /*
+     * Create memory region for BAR4, then overlap cmb, msix and pba
+     * tables on top of it.
+     */
+    memory_region_init(&n->bar4, OBJECT(n), "nvme-bar4", bar_size);
+
+    if (n->params.cmb_size_mb) {
+        memory_region_init_io(&n->ctrl_mem, OBJECT(n), &nvme_cmb_ops, n,
+                              "nvme-cmb", NVME_CMBSZ_GETSIZE(n->bar.cmbsz));
+
+        memory_region_add_subregion(&n->bar4, cmb_offset, &n->ctrl_mem);
+    }
+
+    status = msix_init(pci_dev, n->params.msix_qsize,
+                       &n->bar4, 4, 0,
+                       &n->bar4, 4, nvme_pba_offset,
+                       0, errp);
+
+    if (status) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    pci_register_bar(pci_dev, 4,
                      PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY |
                      PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 |
-                     PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH, &n->ctrl_mem);
+                     PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH, &n->bar4);
 }
 
 static void nvme_init_pmr(NvmeCtrl *n, PCIDevice *pci_dev)
 {
-    /* Controller Capabilities register */
-    NVME_CAP_SET_PMRS(n->bar.cap, 1);
-
     /* PMR Capabities register */
     n->bar.pmrcap = 0;
     NVME_PMRCAP_SET_RDS(n->bar.pmrcap, 0);
@@ -2126,13 +2174,10 @@ static void nvme_init_pci(NvmeCtrl *n, PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error **errp)
                           n->reg_size);
     pci_register_bar(pci_dev, 0, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY |
                      PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64, &n->iomem);
-    if (msix_init_exclusive_bar(pci_dev, n->params.msix_qsize, 4, errp)) {
-        return;
-    }
 
-    if (n->params.cmb_size_mb) {
-        nvme_init_cmb(n, pci_dev);
-    } else if (n->pmrdev) {
+    nvme_init_bar4(pci_dev, errp);
+
+    if (n->pmrdev) {
         nvme_init_pmr(n, pci_dev);
     }
 }
@@ -2199,6 +2244,7 @@ static void nvme_init_ctrl(NvmeCtrl *n, PCIDevice *pci_dev)
     NVME_CAP_SET_CSS(n->bar.cap, 1);
     NVME_CAP_SET_MPSMAX(n->bar.cap, 4);
     NVME_CAP_SET_CMBS(n->bar.cap, n->params.cmb_size_mb ? 1 : 0);
+    NVME_CAP_SET_PMRS(n->bar.cap, n->pmrdev ? 1 : 0);
 
     n->bar.vs = NVME_SPEC_VER;
     n->bar.intmc = n->bar.intms = 0;
diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.h b/hw/block/nvme.h
index 0b6a8ae665..f291395cd0 100644
--- a/hw/block/nvme.h
+++ b/hw/block/nvme.h
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ typedef struct NvmeCtrl {
     PCIDevice    parent_obj;
     MemoryRegion iomem;
     MemoryRegion ctrl_mem;
+    MemoryRegion bar4;
     NvmeBar      bar;
     BlockConf    conf;
     NvmeParams   params;
diff --git a/include/block/nvme.h b/include/block/nvme.h
index d641ca6649..77b59d18dd 100644
--- a/include/block/nvme.h
+++ b/include/block/nvme.h
@@ -217,9 +217,11 @@ enum NvmeCmbszMask {
     (cmbsz |= (uint64_t)(val & CMBSZ_SZU_MASK) << CMBSZ_SZU_SHIFT)
 #define NVME_CMBSZ_SET_SZ(cmbsz, val)    \
     (cmbsz |= (uint64_t)(val & CMBSZ_SZ_MASK) << CMBSZ_SZ_SHIFT)
+#define NVME_CMBSZ_GETSIZEUNITS(cmbsz) \
+    (1 << (12 + 4 * NVME_CMBSZ_SZU(cmbsz)))
 
 #define NVME_CMBSZ_GETSIZE(cmbsz) \
-    (NVME_CMBSZ_SZ(cmbsz) * (1 << (12 + 4 * NVME_CMBSZ_SZU(cmbsz))))
+    (NVME_CMBSZ_SZ(cmbsz) * NVME_CMBSZ_GETSIZEUNITS(cmbsz))
 
 enum NvmePmrcapShift {
     PMRCAP_RDS_SHIFT      = 3,
-- 
2.25.4



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] nvme: allow cmb and pmr to be enabled on same device
  2020-07-29 22:01 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] nvme: allow cmb and pmr to be enabled on same device Andrzej Jakowski
@ 2020-07-29 22:50   ` Klaus Jensen
  2020-08-17  6:29     ` Klaus Jensen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Klaus Jensen @ 2020-07-29 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Jakowski; +Cc: kbusch, kwolf, qemu-devel, qemu-block, mreitz

On Jul 29 15:01, Andrzej Jakowski wrote:
> So far it was not possible to have CMB and PMR emulated on the same
> device, because BAR2 was used exclusively either of PMR or CMB. This
> patch places CMB at BAR4 offset so it not conflicts with MSI-X vectors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Jakowski <andrzej.jakowski@linux.intel.com>
> ---

Well, I'm certainly happy now. LGTM!

Reviewed-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] nvme: allow cmb and pmr to be enabled on same device
  2020-07-29 22:50   ` Klaus Jensen
@ 2020-08-17  6:29     ` Klaus Jensen
  2020-09-22  9:04       ` Klaus Jensen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Klaus Jensen @ 2020-08-17  6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Jakowski; +Cc: kbusch, kwolf, qemu-devel, qemu-block, mreitz

On Jul 30 00:50, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Jul 29 15:01, Andrzej Jakowski wrote:
> > So far it was not possible to have CMB and PMR emulated on the same
> > device, because BAR2 was used exclusively either of PMR or CMB. This
> > patch places CMB at BAR4 offset so it not conflicts with MSI-X vectors.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Jakowski <andrzej.jakowski@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> 
> Well, I'm certainly happy now. LGTM!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> 

Are anyone willing to chip in with another review on this?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] nvme: allow cmb and pmr to be enabled on same device
  2020-08-17  6:29     ` Klaus Jensen
@ 2020-09-22  9:04       ` Klaus Jensen
  2020-09-22 15:30         ` Keith Busch
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Klaus Jensen @ 2020-09-22  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Jakowski; +Cc: kbusch, kwolf, qemu-devel, qemu-block, mreitz

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1045 bytes --]

On Aug 17 08:29, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Jul 30 00:50, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > On Jul 29 15:01, Andrzej Jakowski wrote:
> > > So far it was not possible to have CMB and PMR emulated on the same
> > > device, because BAR2 was used exclusively either of PMR or CMB. This
> > > patch places CMB at BAR4 offset so it not conflicts with MSI-X vectors.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Jakowski <andrzej.jakowski@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Well, I'm certainly happy now. LGTM!
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> > 
> 
> Are anyone willing to chip in with another review on this?
> 

I think this patch is ready (and have been for some time) for inclusion,
but would really like an additional review on this; preferably from
Keith, since he is the one that originally mentioned that we could do
something like this.

I've mentioned it before, but I would prefer that the MSI-X stuff was in
BAR0 instead of mixing it with the CMB, but that's bikeshedding and my
R-b still holds of course.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] nvme: allow cmb and pmr to be enabled on same device
  2020-09-22  9:04       ` Klaus Jensen
@ 2020-09-22 15:30         ` Keith Busch
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Keith Busch @ 2020-09-22 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Klaus Jensen; +Cc: kwolf, Andrzej Jakowski, qemu-devel, qemu-block, mreitz

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:04:25AM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Aug 17 08:29, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > On Jul 30 00:50, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > > On Jul 29 15:01, Andrzej Jakowski wrote:
> > > > So far it was not possible to have CMB and PMR emulated on the same
> > > > device, because BAR2 was used exclusively either of PMR or CMB. This
> > > > patch places CMB at BAR4 offset so it not conflicts with MSI-X vectors.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Jakowski <andrzej.jakowski@linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > Well, I'm certainly happy now. LGTM!
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> > > 
> > 
> > Are anyone willing to chip in with another review on this?
> > 
> 
> I think this patch is ready (and have been for some time) for inclusion,
> but would really like an additional review on this; preferably from
> Keith, since he is the one that originally mentioned that we could do
> something like this.

Yes, this does look good to me too.

Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6] nvme: allow cmb and pmr emulation on same device
  2020-07-29 22:01 [PATCH v6] nvme: allow cmb and pmr emulation on same device Andrzej Jakowski
  2020-07-29 22:01 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] nvme: indicate CMB support through controller capabilities register Andrzej Jakowski
  2020-07-29 22:01 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] nvme: allow cmb and pmr to be enabled on same device Andrzej Jakowski
@ 2020-09-28 10:51 ` Klaus Jensen
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Klaus Jensen @ 2020-09-28 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Jakowski; +Cc: kbusch, kwolf, qemu-devel, qemu-block, mreitz

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2563 bytes --]

On Jul 29 15:01, Andrzej Jakowski wrote:
> Resending series recently posted on mailing list related to nvme device
> extension with couple of fixes after review.
> 
> This patch series does following:
>  - Fixes problem where CMBS bit was not set in controller capabilities
>    register, so support for CMB was not correctly advertised to guest.
>    This is resend of patch that has been submitted and reviewed by
>    Klaus [1]
>  - Introduces BAR4 sharing between MSI-X vectors and CMB. This allows
>    to have CMB and PMR emulated on the same device. This extension
>    was indicated by Keith [2]
> 
> v6:
>  - instead of using memory_region_to_absolute_addr() function local helper has
>    been defined (nvme_cmb_to_absolute_addr()) to calculate absolute address of
>    CMB in simplified way. Also a number of code style changes has been done
>    (function rename, use literal instead of macro definition, etc.)
> 
> v5:
>  - fixed problem introduced in v4 where CMB buffer was represented as
>    subregion of BAR4 memory region. In that case CMB address was used
>    incorrectly as it was relative to BAR4 and not absolute. Appropriate
>    changes were added to v5 to calculate CMB address properly ([6])
> 
> v4:
>  - modified BAR4 initialization, so now it consists of CMB, MSIX and
>    PBA memory regions overlapping on top of it. This reduces patch
>    complexity significantly (Klaus [5])
> 
> v3:
>  - code style fixes including: removal of spurious line break, moving
>    define into define section and code alignment (Klaus [4])
>  - removed unintended code reintroduction (Klaus [4])
> 
> v2:
>  - rebase on Kevin's latest block branch (Klaus [3])
>  - improved comments section (Klaus [3])
>  - simplified calculation of BAR4 size (Klaus [3])
> 
> v1:
>  - initial push of the patch
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200408055607.g2ii7gwqbnv6cd3w@apples.localdomain/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200330165518.GA8234@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com/
> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200605181043.28782-1-andrzej.jakowski@linux.intel.com/
> [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200618092524.posxi5mysb3jjtpn@apples.localdomain/
> [5]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200626055033.6vxqvi4s5pll7som@apples.localdomain/
> [6]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/9143a543-d32d-f3e7-c37b-b3df7f853952@linux.intel.com/
> 

Hi Andrzej,

Any chance you can respin this on git.infradead.org/qemu-nvme.git
nvme-next branch?


Thanks,
Klaus

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-28 11:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-29 22:01 [PATCH v6] nvme: allow cmb and pmr emulation on same device Andrzej Jakowski
2020-07-29 22:01 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] nvme: indicate CMB support through controller capabilities register Andrzej Jakowski
2020-07-29 22:01 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] nvme: allow cmb and pmr to be enabled on same device Andrzej Jakowski
2020-07-29 22:50   ` Klaus Jensen
2020-08-17  6:29     ` Klaus Jensen
2020-09-22  9:04       ` Klaus Jensen
2020-09-22 15:30         ` Keith Busch
2020-09-28 10:51 ` [PATCH v6] nvme: allow cmb and pmr emulation " Klaus Jensen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).