SELinux Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com
Subject: [PATCH 10/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the audit_rule_match hooks
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:44:57 -0700
Message-ID: <20190419004617.64627-11-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190419004617.64627-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Convert the audit_rule_match hooks to use the lsm_export
structure instead of a u32 secid. There is quite a bit of scaffolding
involved that will be removed when security_audit_rule_match()
is updated.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
 include/linux/lsm_hooks.h         |  5 +++--
 security/apparmor/audit.c         |  4 ++--
 security/apparmor/include/audit.h |  2 +-
 security/apparmor/include/secid.h |  2 +-
 security/apparmor/secid.c         | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 security/security.c               |  7 ++++++-
 security/selinux/hooks.c          | 17 -----------------
 security/selinux/include/audit.h  |  5 +++--
 security/selinux/include/objsec.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 security/selinux/ss/services.c    |  6 +++++-
 security/smack/smack_lsm.c        |  7 +++++--
 11 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
index 59f38c18426a..690ab020508e 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
@@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@
  * @audit_rule_match:
  *	Determine if given @secid matches a rule previously approved
  *	by @audit_rule_known.
- *	@secid contains the security id in question.
+ *	@l points to the security data in question.
  *	@field contains the field which relates to current LSM.
  *	@op contains the operator that will be used for matching.
  *	@rule points to the audit rule that will be checked against.
@@ -1786,7 +1786,8 @@ union security_list_options {
 	int (*audit_rule_init)(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
 				void **lsmrule);
 	int (*audit_rule_known)(struct audit_krule *krule);
-	int (*audit_rule_match)(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule);
+	int (*audit_rule_match)(struct lsm_export *l, u32 field, u32 op,
+				void *lsmrule);
 	void (*audit_rule_free)(void *lsmrule);
 #endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
 
diff --git a/security/apparmor/audit.c b/security/apparmor/audit.c
index 5a8b9cded4f2..bea59bfad332 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/audit.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/audit.c
@@ -225,13 +225,13 @@ int aa_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *rule)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int aa_audit_rule_match(u32 sid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule)
+int aa_audit_rule_match(struct lsm_export *l, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule)
 {
 	struct aa_audit_rule *rule = vrule;
 	struct aa_label *label;
 	int found = 0;
 
-	label = aa_secid_to_label(sid);
+	label = aa_secid_to_label(l);
 
 	if (!label)
 		return -ENOENT;
diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/audit.h b/security/apparmor/include/audit.h
index ee559bc2acb8..372ba4fada9c 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/audit.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/audit.h
@@ -192,6 +192,6 @@ static inline int complain_error(int error)
 void aa_audit_rule_free(void *vrule);
 int aa_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **vrule);
 int aa_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *rule);
-int aa_audit_rule_match(u32 sid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule);
+int aa_audit_rule_match(struct lsm_export *l, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule);
 
 #endif /* __AA_AUDIT_H */
diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/secid.h b/security/apparmor/include/secid.h
index fa2062711b63..c283c620efe3 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/secid.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/secid.h
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct aa_label;
 /* secid value that matches any other secid */
 #define AA_SECID_WILDCARD 1
 
-struct aa_label *aa_secid_to_label(u32 secid);
+struct aa_label *aa_secid_to_label(struct lsm_export *l);
 int apparmor_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen);
 int apparmor_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen, u32 *secid);
 void apparmor_release_secctx(char *secdata, u32 seclen);
diff --git a/security/apparmor/secid.c b/security/apparmor/secid.c
index 05373d9a3d6a..1546c45a2a18 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/secid.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/secid.c
@@ -61,9 +61,12 @@ void aa_secid_update(u32 secid, struct aa_label *label)
  *
  * see label for inverse aa_label_to_secid
  */
-struct aa_label *aa_secid_to_label(u32 secid)
+struct aa_label *aa_secid_to_label(struct lsm_export *l)
 {
 	struct aa_label *label;
+	u32 secid;
+
+	secid = (l->flags & LSM_EXPORT_APPARMOR) ? l->apparmor : 0;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	label = idr_find(&aa_secids, secid);
@@ -72,12 +75,22 @@ struct aa_label *aa_secid_to_label(u32 secid)
 	return label;
 }
 
+static inline void aa_import_secid(struct lsm_export *l, u32 secid)
+{
+	l->flags = LSM_EXPORT_APPARMOR;
+	l->apparmor = secid;
+}
+
 int apparmor_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen)
 {
 	/* TODO: cache secctx and ref count so we don't have to recreate */
-	struct aa_label *label = aa_secid_to_label(secid);
+	struct lsm_export data;
+	struct aa_label *label;
 	int len;
 
+	aa_import_secid(&data, secid);
+	label = aa_secid_to_label(&data);
+
 	AA_BUG(!seclen);
 
 	if (!label)
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 2f1355d10e0d..60dd064c0531 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -2477,7 +2477,12 @@ void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
 
 int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule)
 {
-	return call_int_hook(audit_rule_match, 0, secid, field, op, lsmrule);
+	int rc;
+	struct lsm_export data = { .flags = LSM_EXPORT_NONE };
+
+	rc = call_int_hook(audit_rule_match, 0, &data, field, op, lsmrule);
+	lsm_export_secid(&data, &secid);
+	return rc;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
 
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 03dfa0cd6739..bfd0f1f5979f 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -213,23 +213,6 @@ static void cred_init_security(void)
 	tsec->osid = tsec->sid = SECINITSID_KERNEL;
 }
 
-/*
- * Set the SELinux secid in an lsm_export structure
- */
-static inline void selinux_export_secid(struct lsm_export *l, u32 secid)
-{
-	l->selinux = secid;
-	l->flags |= LSM_EXPORT_SELINUX;
-}
-
-static inline void selinux_import_secid(struct lsm_export *l, u32 *secid)
-{
-	if (l->flags | LSM_EXPORT_SELINUX)
-		*secid = l->selinux;
-	else
-		*secid = SECSID_NULL;
-}
-
 /*
  * get the security ID of a set of credentials
  */
diff --git a/security/selinux/include/audit.h b/security/selinux/include/audit.h
index 682e2b5de2a4..92dd5ab15fb2 100644
--- a/security/selinux/include/audit.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/audit.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ void selinux_audit_rule_free(void *rule);
 
 /**
  *	selinux_audit_rule_match - determine if a context ID matches a rule.
- *	@sid: the context ID to check
+ *	@l: points to the context ID to check
  *	@field: the field this rule refers to
  *	@op: the operater the rule uses
  *	@rule: pointer to the audit rule to check against
@@ -47,7 +47,8 @@ void selinux_audit_rule_free(void *rule);
  *	Returns 1 if the context id matches the rule, 0 if it does not, and
  *	-errno on failure.
  */
-int selinux_audit_rule_match(u32 sid, u32 field, u32 op, void *rule);
+int selinux_audit_rule_match(struct lsm_export *l, u32 field, u32 op,
+			     void *rule);
 
 /**
  *	selinux_audit_rule_known - check to see if rule contains selinux fields.
diff --git a/security/selinux/include/objsec.h b/security/selinux/include/objsec.h
index 3b78aa4ee98f..d7efc5f23c1e 100644
--- a/security/selinux/include/objsec.h
+++ b/security/selinux/include/objsec.h
@@ -50,6 +50,23 @@ static inline u32 current_sid(void)
 	return tsec->sid;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Set the SELinux secid in an lsm_export structure
+ */
+static inline void selinux_export_secid(struct lsm_export *l, u32 secid)
+{
+	l->selinux = secid;
+	l->flags |= LSM_EXPORT_SELINUX;
+}
+
+static inline void selinux_import_secid(struct lsm_export *l, u32 *secid)
+{
+	if (l->flags | LSM_EXPORT_SELINUX)
+		*secid = l->selinux;
+	else
+		*secid = SECSID_NULL;
+}
+
 enum label_initialized {
 	LABEL_INVALID,		/* invalid or not initialized */
 	LABEL_INITIALIZED,	/* initialized */
diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/services.c b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
index e3f5d6aece66..626b877363fb 100644
--- a/security/selinux/ss/services.c
+++ b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
@@ -3395,13 +3395,15 @@ int selinux_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *rule)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int selinux_audit_rule_match(u32 sid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule)
+int selinux_audit_rule_match(struct lsm_export *l, u32 field, u32 op,
+			     void *vrule)
 {
 	struct selinux_state *state = &selinux_state;
 	struct context *ctxt;
 	struct mls_level *level;
 	struct selinux_audit_rule *rule = vrule;
 	int match = 0;
+	u32 sid;
 
 	if (unlikely(!rule)) {
 		WARN_ONCE(1, "selinux_audit_rule_match: missing rule\n");
@@ -3415,6 +3417,8 @@ int selinux_audit_rule_match(u32 sid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	selinux_import_secid(l, &sid);
+
 	ctxt = sidtab_search(state->ss->sidtab, sid);
 	if (unlikely(!ctxt)) {
 		WARN_ONCE(1, "selinux_audit_rule_match: unrecognized SID %d\n",
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 5318b9e6820a..0e048c1456ed 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -4369,7 +4369,7 @@ static int smack_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
 
 /**
  * smack_audit_rule_match - Audit given object ?
- * @secid: security id for identifying the object to test
+ * @l: security id for identifying the object to test
  * @field: audit rule flags given from user-space
  * @op: required testing operator
  * @vrule: smack internal rule presentation
@@ -4377,10 +4377,12 @@ static int smack_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
  * The core Audit hook. It's used to take the decision of
  * whether to audit or not to audit a given object.
  */
-static int smack_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule)
+static int smack_audit_rule_match(struct lsm_export *l, u32 field, u32 op,
+				  void *vrule)
 {
 	struct smack_known *skp;
 	char *rule = vrule;
+	u32 secid;
 
 	if (unlikely(!rule)) {
 		WARN_ONCE(1, "Smack: missing rule\n");
@@ -4390,6 +4392,7 @@ static int smack_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule)
 	if (field != AUDIT_SUBJ_USER && field != AUDIT_OBJ_USER)
 		return 0;
 
+	smack_import_secid(l, &secid);
 	skp = smack_from_secid(secid);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.19.1


  parent reply index

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-19  0:44 [PATCH 00/90] LSM: Module stacking for all Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 01/90] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 02/90] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 03/90] LSM: Infrastructure management of the key security blob Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 04/90] LSM: Create an lsm_export data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 05/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the inode_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 06/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the cred_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 07/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the ipc_getsecid and task_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 08/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the kernel_ask_as hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 09/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the getpeersec_dgram hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 11/90] LSM: Fix logical operation in lsm_export checks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 12/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the secid_to_secctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 13/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the secctx_to_secid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 14/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 15/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 16/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_socket_getpeersec_dgram Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 17/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 18/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 19/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 20/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 21/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 22/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 23/90] Audit: Change audit_sig_sid to audit_sig_lsm Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 24/90] Audit: Convert target_sid to an lsm_export structure Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 25/90] Audit: Convert osid " Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 26/90] IMA: Clean out lsm_export scaffolding Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 27/90] NET: Change the UNIXCB from a secid to an lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 28/90] NET: Remove scaffolding on secmarks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 29/90] NET: Remove scaffolding on new secmarks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 30/90] NET: Remove netfilter scaffolding for lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 31/90] Netlabel: Replace secids with lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 32/90] LSM: Remove lsm_export scaffolding functions Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 33/90] IMA: FIXUP prototype using lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 34/90] Smack: Restore the release_secctx hook Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 35/90] AppArmor: Remove unnecessary hook stub Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 36/90] LSM: Limit calls to certain module hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 37/90] LSM: Create a data structure for a security context Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 38/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in secid_to_secctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 39/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in secctx_to_secid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 40/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in inode_getsecctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 41/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in inode_notifysecctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 42/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in dentry_init_security hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 43/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 44/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_inode_notifysecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 45/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 46/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 47/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in release_secctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 48/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_release_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 49/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 50/90] fs: remove lsm_context scaffolding Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 51/90] LSM: Add the release function to the lsm_context Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 52/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in inode_setsecctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 53/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_inode_setsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 54/90] kernfs: remove lsm_context scaffolding Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 55/90] LSM: Remove unused macro Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 56/90] LSM: Special handling for secctx lsm hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 57/90] SELinux: Use blob offset in current_sid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 58/90] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 59/90] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 60/90] LSM: Add secmark_relabel_packet to the set of one call hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 61/90] LSM: Make getting the secmark right cleaner Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 62/90] netfilter: Fix memory leak introduced with lsm_context Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 63/90] Smack: Consolidate secmark conversions Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 64/90] netfilter: Remove unnecessary NULL check in lsm_context Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 65/90] LSM: Add secmark refcounting to call_one list Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 66/90] LSM: refactor security_setprocattr Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 67/90] Smack: Detect if secmarks can be safely used Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 68/90] LSM: Support multiple LSMs using inode_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 69/90] LSM: Use full security context in security_inode_setsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-22 13:13   ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-04-22 20:45     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-04-22 21:01       ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 70/90] LSM: Correct handling of ENOSYS in inode_setxattr Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 71/90] LSM: Infrastructure security blobs for mount options Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 72/90] LSM: Fix for security_init_inode_security Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 73/90] Smack: Advertise the secid to netlabel Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 74/90] LSM: Change error detection for UDP peer security Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 75/90] Smack: Fix setting of the CIPSO MLS_CAT flags Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 76/90] Smack: Set netlabel flags properly on new label import Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 77/90] Netlabel: Add a secattr comparison API function Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 78/90] Smack: Let netlabel do the work on the ambient domain Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 79/90] Smack: Don't set the socket label on each send Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 80/90] Smack: Let netlabel do the work on connections Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 81/90] Netlabel: Return the labeling type on socket Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 00/90] LSM: Module stacking for all Stephen Smalley
2019-04-21 17:31   ` Casey Schaufler
2019-04-22 12:46     ` Stephen Smalley
2019-04-22 16:10       ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190419004617.64627-11-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

SELinux Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/0 selinux/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 selinux selinux/ https://lore.kernel.org/selinux \
		selinux@vger.kernel.org selinux@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index selinux


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.selinux


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox