SELinux Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com
Subject: [PATCH 26/90] IMA: Clean out lsm_export scaffolding
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:45:13 -0700
Message-ID: <20190419004617.64627-27-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190419004617.64627-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Clean out the scaffolding used in the lsm_export transition.
This requires changing some of the IMA internal interfaces
from u32 to struct lsm_export pointers.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h          | 10 ++++++----
 security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c      |  9 +++++----
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c |  4 +---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c     | 25 ++++++++-----------------
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c   | 14 +++++++-------
 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index d213e835c498..8b109ad0de2e 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -192,8 +192,9 @@ enum ima_hooks {
 };
 
 /* LIM API function definitions */
-int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid,
-		   int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr);
+int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred,
+		   struct lsm_export *l, int mask, enum ima_hooks func,
+		   int *pcr);
 int ima_must_measure(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func);
 int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
 			    struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size,
@@ -213,8 +214,9 @@ void ima_free_template_entry(struct ima_template_entry *entry);
 const char *ima_d_path(const struct path *path, char **pathbuf, char *filename);
 
 /* IMA policy related functions */
-int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid,
-		     enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr);
+int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred,
+		     struct lsm_export *l, enum ima_hooks func, int mask,
+		     int flags, int *pcr);
 void ima_init_policy(void);
 void ima_update_policy(void);
 void ima_update_policy_flag(void);
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
index c7505fb122d4..7e493af96134 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename,
  * ima_get_action - appraise & measure decision based on policy.
  * @inode: pointer to inode to measure
  * @cred: pointer to credentials structure to validate
- * @secid: secid of the task being validated
+ * @l: LAM data of the task being validated
  * @mask: contains the permission mask (MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC,
  *        MAY_APPEND)
  * @func: caller identifier
@@ -175,14 +175,15 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename,
  * Returns IMA_MEASURE, IMA_APPRAISE mask.
  *
  */
-int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid,
-		   int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr)
+int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred,
+		   struct lsm_export *l, int mask, enum ima_hooks func,
+		   int *pcr)
 {
 	int flags = IMA_MEASURE | IMA_AUDIT | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH;
 
 	flags &= ima_policy_flag;
 
-	return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, secid, func, mask, flags, pcr);
+	return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, l, func, mask, flags, pcr);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index be714afc9fd2..ba64b0b61383 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -50,15 +50,13 @@ bool is_ima_appraise_enabled(void)
  */
 int ima_must_appraise(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func)
 {
-	u32 secid;
 	struct lsm_export le;
 
 	if (!ima_appraise)
 		return 0;
 
 	security_task_getsecid(current, &le);
-	lsm_export_secid(&le, &secid);
-	return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), secid, func, mask,
+	return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), &le, func, mask,
 				IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL);
 }
 
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index f5efa9ef270d..22b973e743fe 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@ void ima_file_free(struct file *file)
 }
 
 static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
-			       u32 secid, char *buf, loff_t size, int mask,
-			       enum ima_hooks func)
+			       struct lsm_export *l, char *buf, loff_t size,
+			       int mask, enum ima_hooks func)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
 	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = NULL;
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
 	 * bitmask based on the appraise/audit/measurement policy.
 	 * Included is the appraise submask.
 	 */
-	action = ima_get_action(inode, cred, secid, mask, func, &pcr);
+	action = ima_get_action(inode, cred, l, mask, func, &pcr);
 	violation_check = ((func == FILE_CHECK || func == MMAP_CHECK) &&
 			   (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE));
 	if (!action && !violation_check)
@@ -335,13 +335,11 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
  */
 int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot)
 {
-	u32 secid;
 	struct lsm_export le;
 
 	if (file && (prot & PROT_EXEC)) {
 		security_task_getsecid(current, &le);
-		lsm_export_secid(&le, &secid);
-		return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), secid, NULL,
+		return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &le, NULL,
 					   0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK);
 	}
 
@@ -364,19 +362,16 @@ int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot)
 int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 {
 	int ret;
-	u32 secid;
 	struct lsm_export le;
 
 	security_task_getsecid(current, &le);
-	lsm_export_secid(&le, &secid);
-	ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), secid, NULL, 0,
+	ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), &le, NULL, 0,
 				  MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
 	security_cred_getsecid(bprm->cred, &le);
-	lsm_export_secid(&le, &secid);
-	return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, secid, NULL, 0,
+	return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, &le, NULL, 0,
 				   MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK);
 }
 
@@ -392,12 +387,10 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
  */
 int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask)
 {
-	u32 secid;
 	struct lsm_export le;
 
 	security_task_getsecid(current, &le);
-	lsm_export_secid(&le, &secid);
-	return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), secid, NULL, 0,
+	return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &le, NULL, 0,
 				   mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC |
 					   MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK);
 }
@@ -506,7 +499,6 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size,
 		       enum kernel_read_file_id read_id)
 {
 	enum ima_hooks func;
-	u32 secid;
 	struct lsm_export le;
 
 	if (!file && read_id == READING_FIRMWARE) {
@@ -530,8 +522,7 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size,
 
 	func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK;
 	security_task_getsecid(current, &le);
-	lsm_export_secid(&le, &secid);
-	return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), secid, buf, size,
+	return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &le, buf, size,
 				   MAY_READ, func);
 }
 
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 280f2410e551..fae4718d24f9 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static void ima_lsm_update_rules(void)
  * Returns true on rule match, false on failure.
  */
 static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
-			    const struct cred *cred, u32 secid,
+			    const struct cred *cred, struct lsm_export *l,
 			    enum ima_hooks func, int mask)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -345,8 +345,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
 		case LSM_SUBJ_USER:
 		case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE:
 		case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE:
-			lsm_export_to_all(&le, secid);
-			rc = security_filter_rule_match(&le,
+			rc = security_filter_rule_match(l,
 							rule->lsm[i].type,
 							Audit_equal,
 							rule->lsm[i].rule);
@@ -394,7 +393,7 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func)
  * @inode: pointer to an inode for which the policy decision is being made
  * @cred: pointer to a credentials structure for which the policy decision is
  *        being made
- * @secid: LSM secid of the task to be validated
+ * @l: LSM data of the task to be validated
  * @func: IMA hook identifier
  * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC)
  * @pcr: set the pcr to extend
@@ -406,8 +405,9 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func)
  * list when walking it.  Reads are many orders of magnitude more numerous
  * than writes so ima_match_policy() is classical RCU candidate.
  */
-int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid,
-		     enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr)
+int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred,
+		     struct lsm_export *l, enum ima_hooks func, int mask,
+		     int flags, int *pcr)
 {
 	struct ima_rule_entry *entry;
 	int action = 0, actmask = flags | (flags << 1);
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid,
 		if (!(entry->action & actmask))
 			continue;
 
-		if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, secid, func, mask))
+		if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, l, func, mask))
 			continue;
 
 		action |= entry->flags & IMA_ACTION_FLAGS;
-- 
2.19.1


  parent reply index

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-19  0:44 [PATCH 00/90] LSM: Module stacking for all Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 01/90] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 02/90] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 03/90] LSM: Infrastructure management of the key security blob Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 04/90] LSM: Create an lsm_export data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 05/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the inode_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 06/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the cred_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 07/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the ipc_getsecid and task_getsecid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 08/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the kernel_ask_as hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 09/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the getpeersec_dgram hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 10/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the audit_rule_match hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 11/90] LSM: Fix logical operation in lsm_export checks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 12/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the secid_to_secctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 13/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in the secctx_to_secid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 14/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 15/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 16/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_socket_getpeersec_dgram Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 17/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 18/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 19/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 20/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 21/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 22/90] LSM: Use lsm_export in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 23/90] Audit: Change audit_sig_sid to audit_sig_lsm Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 24/90] Audit: Convert target_sid to an lsm_export structure Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 25/90] Audit: Convert osid " Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 27/90] NET: Change the UNIXCB from a secid to an lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 28/90] NET: Remove scaffolding on secmarks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 29/90] NET: Remove scaffolding on new secmarks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 30/90] NET: Remove netfilter scaffolding for lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 31/90] Netlabel: Replace secids with lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 32/90] LSM: Remove lsm_export scaffolding functions Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 33/90] IMA: FIXUP prototype using lsm_export Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 34/90] Smack: Restore the release_secctx hook Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 35/90] AppArmor: Remove unnecessary hook stub Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 36/90] LSM: Limit calls to certain module hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 37/90] LSM: Create a data structure for a security context Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 38/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in secid_to_secctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 39/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in secctx_to_secid hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 40/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in inode_getsecctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 41/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in inode_notifysecctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 42/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in dentry_init_security hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 43/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 44/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_inode_notifysecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 45/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 46/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 47/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in release_secctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 48/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_release_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 49/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 50/90] fs: remove lsm_context scaffolding Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 51/90] LSM: Add the release function to the lsm_context Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 52/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in inode_setsecctx hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 53/90] LSM: Use lsm_context in security_inode_setsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 54/90] kernfs: remove lsm_context scaffolding Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 55/90] LSM: Remove unused macro Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 56/90] LSM: Special handling for secctx lsm hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 57/90] SELinux: Use blob offset in current_sid Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 58/90] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 59/90] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 60/90] LSM: Add secmark_relabel_packet to the set of one call hooks Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 61/90] LSM: Make getting the secmark right cleaner Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 62/90] netfilter: Fix memory leak introduced with lsm_context Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 63/90] Smack: Consolidate secmark conversions Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 64/90] netfilter: Remove unnecessary NULL check in lsm_context Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 65/90] LSM: Add secmark refcounting to call_one list Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 66/90] LSM: refactor security_setprocattr Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 67/90] Smack: Detect if secmarks can be safely used Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 68/90] LSM: Support multiple LSMs using inode_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 69/90] LSM: Use full security context in security_inode_setsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-04-22 13:13   ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-04-22 20:45     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-04-22 21:01       ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 70/90] LSM: Correct handling of ENOSYS in inode_setxattr Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 71/90] LSM: Infrastructure security blobs for mount options Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:45 ` [PATCH 72/90] LSM: Fix for security_init_inode_security Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 73/90] Smack: Advertise the secid to netlabel Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 74/90] LSM: Change error detection for UDP peer security Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 75/90] Smack: Fix setting of the CIPSO MLS_CAT flags Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 76/90] Smack: Set netlabel flags properly on new label import Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 77/90] Netlabel: Add a secattr comparison API function Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 78/90] Smack: Let netlabel do the work on the ambient domain Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 79/90] Smack: Don't set the socket label on each send Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 80/90] Smack: Let netlabel do the work on connections Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19  0:46 ` [PATCH 81/90] Netlabel: Return the labeling type on socket Casey Schaufler
2019-04-19 15:27 ` [PATCH 00/90] LSM: Module stacking for all Stephen Smalley
2019-04-21 17:31   ` Casey Schaufler
2019-04-22 12:46     ` Stephen Smalley
2019-04-22 16:10       ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190419004617.64627-27-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

SELinux Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/0 selinux/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 selinux selinux/ https://lore.kernel.org/selinux \
		selinux@vger.kernel.org selinux@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index selinux


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.selinux


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox