From: LABBE Corentin <clabbe@baylibre.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: gemini: add device tree for edimax NS2502
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 15:02:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKZd/+zHlKwag2bs@Red> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYqaoggyBO9=fdi2iUh9O0Y_jT5jnc7+qbE9HzEWK57Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Le Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:17:59AM +0200, Linus Walleij a écrit :
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:55 AM LABBE Corentin <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:
> > Le Tue, May 18, 2021 at 01:46:20AM +0200, Linus Walleij a écrit :
>
> > > Is the FIS broken since you hardcode the partitions?
> > >
> > > Doesn't this work:
> > >
> > > partitions {
> > > compatible = "redboot-fis";
> > > /* Eraseblock at 0x7e0000 */
> > > fis-index-block = <0xfc>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > (Needs CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS)
> >
> > No it does not.
> >
> > physmap-flash 30000000.flash: no enabled pin control state
> > physmap-flash 30000000.flash: no disabled pin control state
> > physmap-flash 30000000.flash: initialized Gemini-specific physmap control
> > physmap-flash 30000000.flash: physmap platform flash device: [mem 0x30000000-0x331fffff]
> > 30000000.flash: Found 1 x16 devices at 0x0 in 16-bit bank. Manufacturer ID 0x000001 Chip ID 0x002201
> > number of CFI chips: 1
> > Searching for RedBoot partition table in 30000000.flash at offset 0x1fe0000
> > No RedBoot partition table detected in 30000000.flash
> > Searching for RedBoot partition table in 30000000.flash at offset 0x1fe0000
> > No RedBoot partition table detected in 30000000.flash
>
> Hm since it searches at 0x1fe0000 that's where it thinks the last
> eraseblock is so the erase blocks are 0x20000 (128KB).
>
> FIS at 0x7e0000 should be erase block
> 0x7e0000/0x20000 = 0x3f
>
> Can you test fis-index-block = <0x3f> and see what happens?
>
With 0x7F it works.
When testing, I found that fis-index-block was ignored. I just sent a patch fixing this.
Regards
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: LABBE Corentin <clabbe@baylibre.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: gemini: add device tree for edimax NS2502
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 15:02:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKZd/+zHlKwag2bs@Red> (raw)
Message-ID: <20210520130255.oBoLYHPp7j_kWclsBvRBZ3XatHTJ5_tSViW_L_qCO8Q@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYqaoggyBO9=fdi2iUh9O0Y_jT5jnc7+qbE9HzEWK57Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Le Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:17:59AM +0200, Linus Walleij a écrit :
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:55 AM LABBE Corentin <clabbe@baylibre.com> wrote:
> > Le Tue, May 18, 2021 at 01:46:20AM +0200, Linus Walleij a écrit :
>
> > > Is the FIS broken since you hardcode the partitions?
> > >
> > > Doesn't this work:
> > >
> > > partitions {
> > > compatible = "redboot-fis";
> > > /* Eraseblock at 0x7e0000 */
> > > fis-index-block = <0xfc>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > (Needs CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS)
> >
> > No it does not.
> >
> > physmap-flash 30000000.flash: no enabled pin control state
> > physmap-flash 30000000.flash: no disabled pin control state
> > physmap-flash 30000000.flash: initialized Gemini-specific physmap control
> > physmap-flash 30000000.flash: physmap platform flash device: [mem 0x30000000-0x331fffff]
> > 30000000.flash: Found 1 x16 devices at 0x0 in 16-bit bank. Manufacturer ID 0x000001 Chip ID 0x002201
> > number of CFI chips: 1
> > Searching for RedBoot partition table in 30000000.flash at offset 0x1fe0000
> > No RedBoot partition table detected in 30000000.flash
> > Searching for RedBoot partition table in 30000000.flash at offset 0x1fe0000
> > No RedBoot partition table detected in 30000000.flash
>
> Hm since it searches at 0x1fe0000 that's where it thinks the last
> eraseblock is so the erase blocks are 0x20000 (128KB).
>
> FIS at 0x7e0000 should be erase block
> 0x7e0000/0x20000 = 0x3f
>
> Can you test fis-index-block = <0x3f> and see what happens?
>
With 0x7F it works.
When testing, I found that fis-index-block was ignored. I just sent a patch fixing this.
Regards
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-17 19:32 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: gemini: add two more board Corentin Labbe
2021-05-17 19:32 ` Corentin Labbe
2021-05-17 19:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: gemini: add labels for USB, IDE, flash and ethernet Corentin Labbe
2021-05-17 19:32 ` Corentin Labbe
2021-05-17 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: add vendor prefix for edimax Corentin Labbe
2021-05-17 19:32 ` Corentin Labbe
2021-05-19 19:50 ` Rob Herring
2021-05-19 19:50 ` Rob Herring
2021-05-17 19:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: add vendor prefix for ssi Corentin Labbe
2021-05-17 19:32 ` Corentin Labbe
2021-05-19 19:50 ` Rob Herring
2021-05-19 19:50 ` Rob Herring
2021-05-17 19:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: gemini: add device tree for edimax NS2502 Corentin Labbe
2021-05-17 19:32 ` Corentin Labbe
2021-05-17 23:46 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-17 23:46 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-17 23:46 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-18 9:54 ` LABBE Corentin
2021-05-18 9:54 ` LABBE Corentin
2021-05-18 9:54 ` LABBE Corentin
2021-05-18 23:17 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-18 23:17 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-18 23:17 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-20 13:02 ` LABBE Corentin [this message]
2021-05-20 13:02 ` LABBE Corentin
2021-05-20 13:02 ` LABBE Corentin
2021-05-17 19:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gemini: add device tree for ssi1328 Corentin Labbe
2021-05-17 19:32 ` Corentin Labbe
2021-05-17 23:47 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-17 23:47 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-17 23:47 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YKZd/+zHlKwag2bs@Red \
--to=clabbe@baylibre.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
--cc=ulli.kroll@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).