tpmdd-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFT PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: simplify crq initialization and document crq format
@ 2017-02-24 19:35 ` Michal Suchanek
  2017-08-17 22:21   ` msuchanek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Michal Suchanek @ 2017-02-24 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	Ashley Lai, Peter Huewe, Marcel Selhorst, Jarkko Sakkinen,
	Jason Gunthorpe, linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
	tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
  Cc: Michal Suchanek

The crq is passed in registers and is the same on BE and LE hosts.
However, current implementation allocates a structure on-stack to
represent the crq, initializes the members swapping them to BE, and
loads the structure swapping it from BE. This is pointless and causes
GCC warnings about ununitialized members. Get rid of the structure and
the warnings.

Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
---
v2

fix typos and spelling in comments
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index 1b9d61ffe991..89027339d55f 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -39,19 +39,63 @@ static struct vio_device_id tpm_ibmvtpm_device_table[] = {
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(vio, tpm_ibmvtpm_device_table);
 
 /**
+ *
+ * ibmvtpm_send_crq_word - Send a CRQ request
+ * @vdev:	vio device struct
+ * @w1:		pre-constructed first word of tpm crq (second word is reserved)
+ *
+ * Return:
+ *	0 - Success
+ *	Non-zero - Failure
+ */
+static int ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(struct vio_dev *vdev, u64 w1)
+{
+	return plpar_hcall_norets(H_SEND_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, w1, 0);
+}
+
+/**
+ *
  * ibmvtpm_send_crq - Send a CRQ request
  *
  * @vdev:	vio device struct
- * @w1:		first word
- * @w2:		second word
+ * @valid:	Valid field
+ * @msg:	Type field
+ * @len:	Length field
+ * @data:	Data field
+ *
+ * The ibmvtpm crq is defined as follows:
+ *
+ * Byte  |   0   |   1   |   2   |   3   |   4   |   5   |   6   |   7
+ * -----------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * Word0 | Valid | Type  |     Length    |              Data
+ * -----------------------------------------------------------------------
+ * Word1 |                Reserved
+ * -----------------------------------------------------------------------
+ *
+ * Which matches the following structure (on bigendian host):
+ *
+ * struct ibmvtpm_crq {
+ *         u8 valid;
+ *         u8 msg;
+ *         __be16 len;
+ *         __be32 data;
+ *         __be64 reserved;
+ * } __attribute__((packed, aligned(8)));
+ *
+ * However, the value is passed in a register so just compute the numeric value
+ * to load into the register avoiding byteswap altogether. Endian only affects
+ * memory loads and stores - registers are internally represented the same.
  *
  * Return:
- *	0 -Sucess
+ *	0 (H_SUCCESS) - Success
  *	Non-zero - Failure
  */
-static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vio_dev *vdev, u64 w1, u64 w2)
+static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vio_dev *vdev,
+		u8 valid, u8 msg, u16 len, u32 data)
 {
-	return plpar_hcall_norets(H_SEND_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, w1, w2);
+	u64 w1 = ((u64)valid << 56) | ((u64)msg << 48) | ((u64)len << 32) |
+		(u64)data;
+	return ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(vdev, w1);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -109,8 +153,6 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
 static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
 {
 	struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
-	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
-	__be64 *word = (__be64 *)&crq;
 	int rc, sig;
 
 	if (!ibmvtpm->rtce_buf) {
@@ -137,10 +179,6 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
 	spin_lock(&ibmvtpm->rtce_lock);
 	ibmvtpm->res_len = 0;
 	memcpy((void *)ibmvtpm->rtce_buf, (void *)buf, count);
-	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
-	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_TPM_COMMAND;
-	crq.len = cpu_to_be16(count);
-	crq.data = cpu_to_be32(ibmvtpm->rtce_dma_handle);
 
 	/*
 	 * set the processing flag before the Hcall, since we may get the
@@ -148,8 +186,9 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
 	 */
 	ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd = true;
 
-	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, be64_to_cpu(word[0]),
-			      be64_to_cpu(word[1]));
+	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
+			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_TPM_COMMAND,
+			count, ibmvtpm->rtce_dma_handle);
 	if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
 		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_send failed rc=%d\n", rc);
 		rc = 0;
@@ -182,15 +221,10 @@ static u8 tpm_ibmvtpm_status(struct tpm_chip *chip)
  */
 static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
 {
-	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
-	u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
 	int rc;
 
-	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
-	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_GET_RTCE_BUFFER_SIZE;
-
-	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
-			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
+	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
+			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_GET_RTCE_BUFFER_SIZE, 0, 0);
 	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
 		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
 			"ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size failed rc=%d\n", rc);
@@ -210,15 +244,10 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
  */
 static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_version(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
 {
-	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
-	u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
 	int rc;
 
-	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
-	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_GET_VERSION;
-
-	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
-			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
+	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
+			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_GET_VERSION, 0, 0);
 	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
 		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
 			"ibmvtpm_crq_get_version failed rc=%d\n", rc);
@@ -238,7 +267,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
 {
 	int rc;
 
-	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD, 0);
+	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD);
 	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
 		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
 			"ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete failed rc=%d\n", rc);
@@ -258,7 +287,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_send_init(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
 {
 	int rc;
 
-	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD, 0);
+	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD);
 	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
 		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
 			"ibmvtpm_crq_send_init failed rc=%d\n", rc);
@@ -336,15 +365,10 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
-	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
-	u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
 	int rc = 0;
 
-	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
-	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND;
-
-	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
-			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
+	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
+			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND, 0, 0);
 	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
 		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
 			"tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend failed rc=%d\n", rc);
-- 
2.10.2


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix
@ 2017-07-29  7:24 SZ Lin
  2017-02-24 19:35 ` [RFT PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: simplify crq initialization and document crq format Michal Suchanek
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: SZ Lin @ 2017-07-29  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ashleydlai
  Cc: benh, paulus, mpe, peterhuewe, tpmdd, jarkko.sakkinen,
	jgunthorpe, tpmdd-devel, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, SZ Lin

Fix styling WARNINGs and Errors of tpm_ibmvtpm.c driver by using checkpatch.pl

SZ Lin (5):
  Fix packed and aligned attribute warnings.
  Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible"
  Fix 'void function return statements are not generally useful' warning
  Remove unneccessary 'out of memory' message
  Use __func__ instead of function name

 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--
2.13.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/5] Fix packed and aligned attribute warnings.
  2017-07-29  7:24 [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix SZ Lin
  2017-02-24 19:35 ` [RFT PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: simplify crq initialization and document crq format Michal Suchanek
@ 2017-07-29  7:24 ` SZ Lin
  2017-07-31 13:27   ` David Laight
  2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible" SZ Lin
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: SZ Lin @ 2017-07-29  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ashleydlai
  Cc: benh, paulus, mpe, peterhuewe, tpmdd, jarkko.sakkinen,
	jgunthorpe, tpmdd-devel, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, SZ Lin

WARNING: __packed is preferred over __attribute__((packed))
+} __attribute__((packed, aligned(8)));

WARNING: __aligned(size) is preferred over __attribute__((aligned(size)))
+} __attribute__((packed, aligned(8)));

Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
index 91dfe766d080..9f708ca3dc84 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct ibmvtpm_crq {
 	__be16 len;
 	__be32 data;
 	__be64 reserved;
-} __attribute__((packed, aligned(8)));
+} __packed __aligned(8);
 
 struct ibmvtpm_crq_queue {
 	struct ibmvtpm_crq *crq_addr;
-- 
2.13.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/5] Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible"
  2017-07-29  7:24 [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix SZ Lin
  2017-02-24 19:35 ` [RFT PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: simplify crq initialization and document crq format Michal Suchanek
  2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] Fix packed and aligned attribute warnings SZ Lin
@ 2017-07-29  7:24 ` SZ Lin
  2017-07-31 10:25   ` Michael Ellerman
  2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] Fix 'void function return statements are not generally useful' warning SZ Lin
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: SZ Lin @ 2017-07-29  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ashleydlai
  Cc: benh, paulus, mpe, peterhuewe, tpmdd, jarkko.sakkinen,
	jgunthorpe, tpmdd-devel, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, SZ Lin

ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
+^I^I         "Need to wait for TPM to finish\n");$

Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index f01d083eced2..23913fc86158 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
 
 	if (ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd) {
 		dev_info(ibmvtpm->dev,
-		         "Need to wait for TPM to finish\n");
+			"Need to wait for TPM to finish\n");
 		/* wait for previous command to finish */
 		sig = wait_event_interruptible(ibmvtpm->wq, !ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd);
 		if (sig)
-- 
2.13.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/5] Fix 'void function return statements are not generally useful' warning
  2017-07-29  7:24 [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix SZ Lin
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible" SZ Lin
@ 2017-07-29  7:24 ` SZ Lin
  2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] Remove unneccessary 'out of memory' message SZ Lin
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: SZ Lin @ 2017-07-29  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ashleydlai
  Cc: benh, paulus, mpe, peterhuewe, tpmdd, jarkko.sakkinen,
	jgunthorpe, tpmdd-devel, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, SZ Lin

WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
+       return;
+}

Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index 23913fc86158..e53b9fb517d9 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -531,7 +531,6 @@ static void ibmvtpm_crq_process(struct ibmvtpm_crq *crq,
 			return;
 		}
 	}
-	return;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.13.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/5] Remove unneccessary 'out of memory' message
  2017-07-29  7:24 [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix SZ Lin
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] Fix 'void function return statements are not generally useful' warning SZ Lin
@ 2017-07-29  7:24 ` SZ Lin
  2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] Use __func__ instead of function name SZ Lin
  2017-08-02 12:36 ` [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix Jarkko Sakkinen
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: SZ Lin @ 2017-07-29  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ashleydlai
  Cc: benh, paulus, mpe, peterhuewe, tpmdd, jarkko.sakkinen,
	jgunthorpe, tpmdd-devel, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, SZ Lin

WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message
+                       if (!ibmvtpm->rtce_buf) {
+                               dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "Failed to allocate memory for rtce buffer\n");

WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message
+       if (!ibmvtpm) {
+               dev_err(dev, "kzalloc for ibmvtpm failed\n");

Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index e53b9fb517d9..e75a674b44ac 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -501,10 +501,8 @@ static void ibmvtpm_crq_process(struct ibmvtpm_crq *crq,
 			ibmvtpm->rtce_size = be16_to_cpu(crq->len);
 			ibmvtpm->rtce_buf = kmalloc(ibmvtpm->rtce_size,
 						    GFP_ATOMIC);
-			if (!ibmvtpm->rtce_buf) {
-				dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "Failed to allocate memory for rtce buffer\n");
+			if (!ibmvtpm->rtce_buf)
 				return;
-			}
 
 			ibmvtpm->rtce_dma_handle = dma_map_single(ibmvtpm->dev,
 				ibmvtpm->rtce_buf, ibmvtpm->rtce_size,
@@ -584,10 +582,8 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev,
 		return PTR_ERR(chip);
 
 	ibmvtpm = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ibmvtpm_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!ibmvtpm) {
-		dev_err(dev, "kzalloc for ibmvtpm failed\n");
+	if (!ibmvtpm)
 		goto cleanup;
-	}
 
 	ibmvtpm->dev = dev;
 	ibmvtpm->vdev = vio_dev;
-- 
2.13.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5/5] Use __func__ instead of function name
  2017-07-29  7:24 [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix SZ Lin
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] Remove unneccessary 'out of memory' message SZ Lin
@ 2017-07-29  7:24 ` SZ Lin
       [not found]   ` <20170729072433.13194-6-sz.lin-D4fb9hXD9d4@public.gmane.org>
  2017-08-19  7:58   ` 김동현
  2017-08-02 12:36 ` [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix Jarkko Sakkinen
  6 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: SZ Lin @ 2017-07-29  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ashleydlai
  Cc: benh, paulus, mpe, peterhuewe, tpmdd, jarkko.sakkinen,
	jgunthorpe, tpmdd-devel, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, SZ Lin

Fix following checkpatch.pl warning:
WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using
the function's name, in a string

Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index e75a674b44ac..2d33acc43e25 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
 	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, be64_to_cpu(word[0]),
 			      be64_to_cpu(word[1]));
 	if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
-		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_send failed rc=%d\n", rc);
+		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
 		rc = 0;
 		ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd = false;
 	} else
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
 			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
 	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
 		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
-			"ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size failed rc=%d\n", rc);
+			"%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
 
 	return rc;
 }
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_version(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
 			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
 	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
 		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
-			"ibmvtpm_crq_get_version failed rc=%d\n", rc);
+			"%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
 
 	return rc;
 }
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
 	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD, 0);
 	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
 		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
-			"ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete failed rc=%d\n", rc);
+			"%s rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
 
 	return rc;
 }
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_send_init(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
 	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD, 0);
 	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
 		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
-			"ibmvtpm_crq_send_init failed rc=%d\n", rc);
+			"%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
 
 	return rc;
 }
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend(struct device *dev)
 			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
 	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
 		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
-			"tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend failed rc=%d\n", rc);
+			"%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
 
 	return rc;
 }
-- 
2.13.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/5] Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible"
  2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible" SZ Lin
@ 2017-07-31 10:25   ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2017-07-31 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ashleydlai
  Cc: benh, paulus, peterhuewe, tpmdd, jarkko.sakkinen, jgunthorpe,
	tpmdd-devel, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, SZ Lin

SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com> writes:

> ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
> +^I^I         "Need to wait for TPM to finish\n");$
>
> Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> index f01d083eced2..23913fc86158 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
>  
>  	if (ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd) {
>  		dev_info(ibmvtpm->dev,
> -		         "Need to wait for TPM to finish\n");
> +			"Need to wait for TPM to finish\n");

There's no reason for that to be on a separate line at all. Just make it
a single line dev_info( ... );

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH 1/5] Fix packed and aligned attribute warnings.
  2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] Fix packed and aligned attribute warnings SZ Lin
@ 2017-07-31 13:27   ` David Laight
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: David Laight @ 2017-07-31 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'SZ Lin', ashleydlai
  Cc: linux-kernel, jarkko.sakkinen, jgunthorpe, tpmdd-devel, paulus,
	peterhuewe, linuxppc-dev, tpmdd

From: SZ Lin
> Sent: 29 July 2017 08:24
...
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
> index 91dfe766d080..9f708ca3dc84 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct ibmvtpm_crq {
>  	__be16 len;
>  	__be32 data;
>  	__be64 reserved;
> -} __attribute__((packed, aligned(8)));
> +} __packed __aligned(8);

You can't need __packed and __aligned(8) on that structure.
There are no gaps and you are saying it is always aligned.

So just remove the pointless attributes.

	David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix
  2017-07-29  7:24 [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix SZ Lin
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] Use __func__ instead of function name SZ Lin
@ 2017-08-02 12:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2017-08-02 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: SZ Lin
  Cc: ashleydlai, benh, paulus, mpe, peterhuewe, tpmdd, jgunthorpe,
	tpmdd-devel, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel

On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 03:24:28PM +0800, SZ Lin wrote:
> Fix styling WARNINGs and Errors of tpm_ibmvtpm.c driver by using checkpatch.pl

Changes are great but you should revise the patch series so that you
expain in each commit what goes wrong instead of copy paste of the
checkpatch output and why your changes fixes the problem.

> 
> SZ Lin (5):
>   Fix packed and aligned attribute warnings.
>   Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible"
>   Fix 'void function return statements are not generally useful' warning
>   Remove unneccessary 'out of memory' message
>   Use __func__ instead of function name
> 
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.13.3
> 

/Jarkko

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFT PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: simplify crq initialization and document crq format
  2017-02-24 19:35 ` [RFT PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: simplify crq initialization and document crq format Michal Suchanek
@ 2017-08-17 22:21   ` msuchanek
  2017-08-19 17:18     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: msuchanek @ 2017-08-17 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	Ashley Lai, Peter Huewe, Marcel Selhorst, Jarkko Sakkinen,
	Jason Gunthorpe, linuxppc-dev, tpmdd-devel, linux-kernel
  Cc: tpmdd

ping?

On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:35:16 +0100
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de> wrote:

> The crq is passed in registers and is the same on BE and LE hosts.
> However, current implementation allocates a structure on-stack to
> represent the crq, initializes the members swapping them to BE, and
> loads the structure swapping it from BE. This is pointless and causes
> GCC warnings about ununitialized members. Get rid of the structure and
> the warnings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> v2
> 
> fix typos and spelling in comments
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 96
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 60
> insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c index 1b9d61ffe991..89027339d55f
> 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> @@ -39,19 +39,63 @@ static struct vio_device_id
> tpm_ibmvtpm_device_table[] = { MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(vio,
> tpm_ibmvtpm_device_table); 
>  /**
> + *
> + * ibmvtpm_send_crq_word - Send a CRQ request
> + * @vdev:	vio device struct
> + * @w1:		pre-constructed first word of tpm crq (second
> word is reserved)
> + *
> + * Return:
> + *	0 - Success
> + *	Non-zero - Failure
> + */
> +static int ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(struct vio_dev *vdev, u64 w1)
> +{
> +	return plpar_hcall_norets(H_SEND_CRQ, vdev->unit_address,
> w1, 0); +}
> +
> +/**
> + *
>   * ibmvtpm_send_crq - Send a CRQ request
>   *
>   * @vdev:	vio device struct
> - * @w1:		first word
> - * @w2:		second word
> + * @valid:	Valid field
> + * @msg:	Type field
> + * @len:	Length field
> + * @data:	Data field
> + *
> + * The ibmvtpm crq is defined as follows:
> + *
> + * Byte  |   0   |   1   |   2   |   3   |   4   |   5   |   6   |
> 7
> + *
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> + * Word0 | Valid | Type  |     Length    |              Data
> + *
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> + * Word1 |                Reserved
> + *
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> + *
> + * Which matches the following structure (on bigendian host):
> + *
> + * struct ibmvtpm_crq {
> + *         u8 valid;
> + *         u8 msg;
> + *         __be16 len;
> + *         __be32 data;
> + *         __be64 reserved;
> + * } __attribute__((packed, aligned(8)));
> + *
> + * However, the value is passed in a register so just compute the
> numeric value
> + * to load into the register avoiding byteswap altogether. Endian
> only affects
> + * memory loads and stores - registers are internally represented
> the same. *
>   * Return:
> - *	0 -Sucess
> + *	0 (H_SUCCESS) - Success
>   *	Non-zero - Failure
>   */
> -static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vio_dev *vdev, u64 w1, u64 w2)
> +static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vio_dev *vdev,
> +		u8 valid, u8 msg, u16 len, u32 data)
>  {
> -	return plpar_hcall_norets(H_SEND_CRQ, vdev->unit_address,
> w1, w2);
> +	u64 w1 = ((u64)valid << 56) | ((u64)msg << 48) | ((u64)len
> << 32) |
> +		(u64)data;
> +	return ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(vdev, w1);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -109,8 +153,6 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_recv(struct tpm_chip
> *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct
> tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) {
>  	struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> -	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> -	__be64 *word = (__be64 *)&crq;
>  	int rc, sig;
>  
>  	if (!ibmvtpm->rtce_buf) {
> @@ -137,10 +179,6 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip
> *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) spin_lock(&ibmvtpm->rtce_lock);
>  	ibmvtpm->res_len = 0;
>  	memcpy((void *)ibmvtpm->rtce_buf, (void *)buf, count);
> -	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> -	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_TPM_COMMAND;
> -	crq.len = cpu_to_be16(count);
> -	crq.data = cpu_to_be32(ibmvtpm->rtce_dma_handle);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * set the processing flag before the Hcall, since we may
> get the @@ -148,8 +186,9 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct
> tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) */
>  	ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd = true;
>  
> -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, be64_to_cpu(word[0]),
> -			      be64_to_cpu(word[1]));
> +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> +			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_TPM_COMMAND,
> +			count, ibmvtpm->rtce_dma_handle);
>  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
>  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_send failed
> rc=%d\n", rc); rc = 0;
> @@ -182,15 +221,10 @@ static u8 tpm_ibmvtpm_status(struct tpm_chip
> *chip) */
>  static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
>  {
> -	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> -	u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
>  	int rc;
>  
> -	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> -	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_GET_RTCE_BUFFER_SIZE;
> -
> -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
> -			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> +			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD,
> VTPM_GET_RTCE_BUFFER_SIZE, 0, 0); if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
>  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
>  			"ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size failed rc=%d\n",
> rc); @@ -210,15 +244,10 @@ static int
> ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm) */
>  static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_version(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
>  {
> -	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> -	u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
>  	int rc;
>  
> -	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> -	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_GET_VERSION;
> -
> -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
> -			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> +			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_GET_VERSION, 0, 0);
>  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
>  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
>  			"ibmvtpm_crq_get_version failed rc=%d\n",
> rc); @@ -238,7 +267,7 @@ static int
> ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm) {
>  	int rc;
>  
> -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD, 0);
> +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD);
>  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
>  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
>  			"ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete failed
> rc=%d\n", rc); @@ -258,7 +287,7 @@ static int
> ibmvtpm_crq_send_init(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm) {
>  	int rc;
>  
> -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD, 0);
> +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD);
>  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
>  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
>  			"ibmvtpm_crq_send_init failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> @@ -336,15 +365,10 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend(struct device
> *dev) {
>  	struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> -	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> -	u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
>  	int rc = 0;
>  
> -	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> -	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND;
> -
> -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
> -			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> +			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND,
> 0, 0); if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
>  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
>  			"tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend failed rc=%d\n", rc);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5/5] Use __func__ instead of function name
       [not found]   ` <20170729072433.13194-6-sz.lin-D4fb9hXD9d4@public.gmane.org>
@ 2017-08-18  8:03     ` Michal Suchánek
       [not found]       ` <0e2d9ac4f5ee02e9df98610ed07eaec9-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Michal Suchánek @ 2017-08-18  8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: SZ Lin
  Cc: Linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA,
	jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/,
	tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f,
	paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg, ashleydlai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
	linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
	tpmdd-yWjUBOtONeeDGRHsOpWV0g

On 2017-07-29 09:24, SZ Lin wrote:
> Fix following checkpatch.pl warning:
> WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using
> the function's name, in a string
> 
> Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin-D4fb9hXD9d4@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c 
> b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> index e75a674b44ac..2d33acc43e25 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> u8 *buf, size_t count)
>  	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, be64_to_cpu(word[0]),
>  			      be64_to_cpu(word[1]));
>  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
> -		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_send failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> +		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);

Can function name contain a %?

I would prefer dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, __func__ " failed rc=%d\n", rc);

It's not what checkpatch advises in the above message, though.

Presumably with many messages from the same function using %s would
save space but that is not the usual case.

Thanks

Michal



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5/5] Use __func__ instead of function name
       [not found]       ` <0e2d9ac4f5ee02e9df98610ed07eaec9-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
@ 2017-08-18 11:25         ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2017-08-18 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michal Suchánek, SZ Lin
  Cc: Linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	jarkko.sakkinen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA,
	jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/,
	tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f,
	paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg, ashleydlai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
	linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
	tpmdd-yWjUBOtONeeDGRHsOpWV0g

Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de> writes:

> On 2017-07-29 09:24, SZ Lin wrote:
>> Fix following checkpatch.pl warning:
>> WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using
>> the function's name, in a string
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 12 ++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c 
>> b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
>> index e75a674b44ac..2d33acc43e25 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
>> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip,
>> u8 *buf, size_t count)
>>  	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, be64_to_cpu(word[0]),
>>  			      be64_to_cpu(word[1]));
>>  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
>> -		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_send failed rc=%d\n", rc);
>> +		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
>
> Can function name contain a %?

Let's hope not.

$ git grep "%s.*__func__" | wc -l
16937

cheers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 5/5] Use __func__ instead of function name
  2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] Use __func__ instead of function name SZ Lin
       [not found]   ` <20170729072433.13194-6-sz.lin-D4fb9hXD9d4@public.gmane.org>
@ 2017-08-19  7:58   ` 김동현
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: 김동현 @ 2017-08-19  7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: SZ Lin
  Cc: ashleydlai, benh, paulus, mpe, peterhuewe, tpmdd,
	jarkko.sakkinen, jgunthorpe, tpmdd-devel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel

I guess below code would be better idea to gather more debug information.
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index 643bba7..0aae785 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip
*chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
                return -EIO;
        }

+       if (!buf) {
+               dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "%s buf null at %d \n",__func__,
rc, __LINE__);
+               return 0;
+       }
+
        spin_lock(&ibmvtpm->rtce_lock);
        memcpy((void *)ibmvtpm->rtce_buf, (void *)buf, count);
        crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
@@ -150,8 +155,9 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip,
u8 *buf, size_t count)

        rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, be64_to_cpu(word[0]),
                              be64_to_cpu(word[1]));
+
        if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
-               dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_send failed rc=%d\n", rc);
+               dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "%s failed rc=%d at %d
\n",__func__, rc, __LINE__);
                rc = 0;
        } else
                rc = count;

2017-07-29 16:24 GMT+09:00 SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>:
> Fix following checkpatch.pl warning:
> WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using
> the function's name, in a string
>
> Signed-off-by: SZ Lin <sz.lin@moxa.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> index e75a674b44ac..2d33acc43e25 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
>         rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, be64_to_cpu(word[0]),
>                               be64_to_cpu(word[1]));
>         if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
> -               dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_send failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> +               dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
>                 rc = 0;
>                 ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd = false;
>         } else
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
>                               cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
>         if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
>                 dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> -                       "ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> +                       "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
>
>         return rc;
>  }
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_version(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
>                               cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
>         if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
>                 dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> -                       "ibmvtpm_crq_get_version failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> +                       "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
>
>         return rc;
>  }
> @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
>         rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD, 0);
>         if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
>                 dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> -                       "ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> +                       "%s rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
>
>         return rc;
>  }
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int ibmvtpm_crq_send_init(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
>         rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD, 0);
>         if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
>                 dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> -                       "ibmvtpm_crq_send_init failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> +                       "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
>
>         return rc;
>  }
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend(struct device *dev)
>                               cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
>         if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
>                 dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> -                       "tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> +                       "%s failed rc=%d\n", __func__, rc);
>
>         return rc;
>  }
> --
> 2.13.3
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFT PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: simplify crq initialization and document crq format
  2017-08-17 22:21   ` msuchanek
@ 2017-08-19 17:18     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  2017-08-19 17:24       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2017-08-19 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: msuchanek
  Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	Ashley Lai, Peter Huewe, Marcel Selhorst, Jason Gunthorpe,
	linuxppc-dev, tpmdd-devel, linux-kernel

Ugh. I'll apply this. My apologies.

/Jarkko

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:21:45AM +0200, msuchanek wrote:
> ping?
> 
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:35:16 +0100
> Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > The crq is passed in registers and is the same on BE and LE hosts.
> > However, current implementation allocates a structure on-stack to
> > represent the crq, initializes the members swapping them to BE, and
> > loads the structure swapping it from BE. This is pointless and causes
> > GCC warnings about ununitialized members. Get rid of the structure and
> > the warnings.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > v2
> > 
> > fix typos and spelling in comments
> > ---
> >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 96
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 60
> > insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c index 1b9d61ffe991..89027339d55f
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> > @@ -39,19 +39,63 @@ static struct vio_device_id
> > tpm_ibmvtpm_device_table[] = { MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(vio,
> > tpm_ibmvtpm_device_table); 
> >  /**
> > + *
> > + * ibmvtpm_send_crq_word - Send a CRQ request
> > + * @vdev:	vio device struct
> > + * @w1:		pre-constructed first word of tpm crq (second
> > word is reserved)
> > + *
> > + * Return:
> > + *	0 - Success
> > + *	Non-zero - Failure
> > + */
> > +static int ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(struct vio_dev *vdev, u64 w1)
> > +{
> > +	return plpar_hcall_norets(H_SEND_CRQ, vdev->unit_address,
> > w1, 0); +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + *
> >   * ibmvtpm_send_crq - Send a CRQ request
> >   *
> >   * @vdev:	vio device struct
> > - * @w1:		first word
> > - * @w2:		second word
> > + * @valid:	Valid field
> > + * @msg:	Type field
> > + * @len:	Length field
> > + * @data:	Data field
> > + *
> > + * The ibmvtpm crq is defined as follows:
> > + *
> > + * Byte  |   0   |   1   |   2   |   3   |   4   |   5   |   6   |
> > 7
> > + *
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > + * Word0 | Valid | Type  |     Length    |              Data
> > + *
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > + * Word1 |                Reserved
> > + *
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > + *
> > + * Which matches the following structure (on bigendian host):
> > + *
> > + * struct ibmvtpm_crq {
> > + *         u8 valid;
> > + *         u8 msg;
> > + *         __be16 len;
> > + *         __be32 data;
> > + *         __be64 reserved;
> > + * } __attribute__((packed, aligned(8)));
> > + *
> > + * However, the value is passed in a register so just compute the
> > numeric value
> > + * to load into the register avoiding byteswap altogether. Endian
> > only affects
> > + * memory loads and stores - registers are internally represented
> > the same. *
> >   * Return:
> > - *	0 -Sucess
> > + *	0 (H_SUCCESS) - Success
> >   *	Non-zero - Failure
> >   */
> > -static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vio_dev *vdev, u64 w1, u64 w2)
> > +static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vio_dev *vdev,
> > +		u8 valid, u8 msg, u16 len, u32 data)
> >  {
> > -	return plpar_hcall_norets(H_SEND_CRQ, vdev->unit_address,
> > w1, w2);
> > +	u64 w1 = ((u64)valid << 56) | ((u64)msg << 48) | ((u64)len
> > << 32) |
> > +		(u64)data;
> > +	return ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(vdev, w1);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -109,8 +153,6 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_recv(struct tpm_chip
> > *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct
> > tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) {
> >  	struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > -	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> > -	__be64 *word = (__be64 *)&crq;
> >  	int rc, sig;
> >  
> >  	if (!ibmvtpm->rtce_buf) {
> > @@ -137,10 +179,6 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip
> > *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) spin_lock(&ibmvtpm->rtce_lock);
> >  	ibmvtpm->res_len = 0;
> >  	memcpy((void *)ibmvtpm->rtce_buf, (void *)buf, count);
> > -	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> > -	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_TPM_COMMAND;
> > -	crq.len = cpu_to_be16(count);
> > -	crq.data = cpu_to_be32(ibmvtpm->rtce_dma_handle);
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * set the processing flag before the Hcall, since we may
> > get the @@ -148,8 +186,9 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct
> > tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) */
> >  	ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd = true;
> >  
> > -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, be64_to_cpu(word[0]),
> > -			      be64_to_cpu(word[1]));
> > +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> > +			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_TPM_COMMAND,
> > +			count, ibmvtpm->rtce_dma_handle);
> >  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
> >  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_send failed
> > rc=%d\n", rc); rc = 0;
> > @@ -182,15 +221,10 @@ static u8 tpm_ibmvtpm_status(struct tpm_chip
> > *chip) */
> >  static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
> >  {
> > -	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> > -	u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
> >  	int rc;
> >  
> > -	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> > -	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_GET_RTCE_BUFFER_SIZE;
> > -
> > -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
> > -			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> > +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> > +			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD,
> > VTPM_GET_RTCE_BUFFER_SIZE, 0, 0); if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> >  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> >  			"ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size failed rc=%d\n",
> > rc); @@ -210,15 +244,10 @@ static int
> > ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm) */
> >  static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_version(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
> >  {
> > -	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> > -	u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
> >  	int rc;
> >  
> > -	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> > -	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_GET_VERSION;
> > -
> > -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
> > -			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> > +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> > +			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_GET_VERSION, 0, 0);
> >  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> >  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> >  			"ibmvtpm_crq_get_version failed rc=%d\n",
> > rc); @@ -238,7 +267,7 @@ static int
> > ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm) {
> >  	int rc;
> >  
> > -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD, 0);
> > +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD);
> >  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> >  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> >  			"ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete failed
> > rc=%d\n", rc); @@ -258,7 +287,7 @@ static int
> > ibmvtpm_crq_send_init(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm) {
> >  	int rc;
> >  
> > -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD, 0);
> > +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD);
> >  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> >  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> >  			"ibmvtpm_crq_send_init failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> > @@ -336,15 +365,10 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend(struct device
> > *dev) {
> >  	struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >  	struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > -	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> > -	u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
> >  	int rc = 0;
> >  
> > -	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> > -	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND;
> > -
> > -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
> > -			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> > +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> > +			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND,
> > 0, 0); if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> >  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> >  			"tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFT PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: simplify crq initialization and document crq format
  2017-08-19 17:18     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
@ 2017-08-19 17:24       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2017-08-19 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: msuchanek
  Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	Ashley Lai, Peter Huewe, Marcel Selhorst, Jason Gunthorpe,
	linuxppc-dev, tpmdd-devel, linux-kernel

Applied. I'll put this to 4.14 PR.

/Jarkko

On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 08:18:59PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Ugh. I'll apply this. My apologies.
> 
> /Jarkko
> 
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:21:45AM +0200, msuchanek wrote:
> > ping?
> > 
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:35:16 +0100
> > Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > The crq is passed in registers and is the same on BE and LE hosts.
> > > However, current implementation allocates a structure on-stack to
> > > represent the crq, initializes the members swapping them to BE, and
> > > loads the structure swapping it from BE. This is pointless and causes
> > > GCC warnings about ununitialized members. Get rid of the structure and
> > > the warnings.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2
> > > 
> > > fix typos and spelling in comments
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 96
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 60
> > > insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> > > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c index 1b9d61ffe991..89027339d55f
> > > 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
> > > @@ -39,19 +39,63 @@ static struct vio_device_id
> > > tpm_ibmvtpm_device_table[] = { MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(vio,
> > > tpm_ibmvtpm_device_table); 
> > >  /**
> > > + *
> > > + * ibmvtpm_send_crq_word - Send a CRQ request
> > > + * @vdev:	vio device struct
> > > + * @w1:		pre-constructed first word of tpm crq (second
> > > word is reserved)
> > > + *
> > > + * Return:
> > > + *	0 - Success
> > > + *	Non-zero - Failure
> > > + */
> > > +static int ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(struct vio_dev *vdev, u64 w1)
> > > +{
> > > +	return plpar_hcall_norets(H_SEND_CRQ, vdev->unit_address,
> > > w1, 0); +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + *
> > >   * ibmvtpm_send_crq - Send a CRQ request
> > >   *
> > >   * @vdev:	vio device struct
> > > - * @w1:		first word
> > > - * @w2:		second word
> > > + * @valid:	Valid field
> > > + * @msg:	Type field
> > > + * @len:	Length field
> > > + * @data:	Data field
> > > + *
> > > + * The ibmvtpm crq is defined as follows:
> > > + *
> > > + * Byte  |   0   |   1   |   2   |   3   |   4   |   5   |   6   |
> > > 7
> > > + *
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > + * Word0 | Valid | Type  |     Length    |              Data
> > > + *
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > + * Word1 |                Reserved
> > > + *
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > + *
> > > + * Which matches the following structure (on bigendian host):
> > > + *
> > > + * struct ibmvtpm_crq {
> > > + *         u8 valid;
> > > + *         u8 msg;
> > > + *         __be16 len;
> > > + *         __be32 data;
> > > + *         __be64 reserved;
> > > + * } __attribute__((packed, aligned(8)));
> > > + *
> > > + * However, the value is passed in a register so just compute the
> > > numeric value
> > > + * to load into the register avoiding byteswap altogether. Endian
> > > only affects
> > > + * memory loads and stores - registers are internally represented
> > > the same. *
> > >   * Return:
> > > - *	0 -Sucess
> > > + *	0 (H_SUCCESS) - Success
> > >   *	Non-zero - Failure
> > >   */
> > > -static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vio_dev *vdev, u64 w1, u64 w2)
> > > +static int ibmvtpm_send_crq(struct vio_dev *vdev,
> > > +		u8 valid, u8 msg, u16 len, u32 data)
> > >  {
> > > -	return plpar_hcall_norets(H_SEND_CRQ, vdev->unit_address,
> > > w1, w2);
> > > +	u64 w1 = ((u64)valid << 56) | ((u64)msg << 48) | ((u64)len
> > > << 32) |
> > > +		(u64)data;
> > > +	return ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(vdev, w1);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  /**
> > > @@ -109,8 +153,6 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_recv(struct tpm_chip
> > > *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct
> > > tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) {
> > >  	struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > > -	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> > > -	__be64 *word = (__be64 *)&crq;
> > >  	int rc, sig;
> > >  
> > >  	if (!ibmvtpm->rtce_buf) {
> > > @@ -137,10 +179,6 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip
> > > *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) spin_lock(&ibmvtpm->rtce_lock);
> > >  	ibmvtpm->res_len = 0;
> > >  	memcpy((void *)ibmvtpm->rtce_buf, (void *)buf, count);
> > > -	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> > > -	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_TPM_COMMAND;
> > > -	crq.len = cpu_to_be16(count);
> > > -	crq.data = cpu_to_be32(ibmvtpm->rtce_dma_handle);
> > >  
> > >  	/*
> > >  	 * set the processing flag before the Hcall, since we may
> > > get the @@ -148,8 +186,9 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct
> > > tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) */
> > >  	ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd = true;
> > >  
> > > -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, be64_to_cpu(word[0]),
> > > -			      be64_to_cpu(word[1]));
> > > +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> > > +			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_TPM_COMMAND,
> > > +			count, ibmvtpm->rtce_dma_handle);
> > >  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS) {
> > >  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev, "tpm_ibmvtpm_send failed
> > > rc=%d\n", rc); rc = 0;
> > > @@ -182,15 +221,10 @@ static u8 tpm_ibmvtpm_status(struct tpm_chip
> > > *chip) */
> > >  static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
> > >  {
> > > -	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> > > -	u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
> > >  	int rc;
> > >  
> > > -	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> > > -	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_GET_RTCE_BUFFER_SIZE;
> > > -
> > > -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
> > > -			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> > > +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> > > +			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD,
> > > VTPM_GET_RTCE_BUFFER_SIZE, 0, 0); if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> > >  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> > >  			"ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size failed rc=%d\n",
> > > rc); @@ -210,15 +244,10 @@ static int
> > > ibmvtpm_crq_get_rtce_size(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm) */
> > >  static int ibmvtpm_crq_get_version(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm)
> > >  {
> > > -	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> > > -	u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
> > >  	int rc;
> > >  
> > > -	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> > > -	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_GET_VERSION;
> > > -
> > > -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
> > > -			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> > > +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> > > +			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_GET_VERSION, 0, 0);
> > >  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> > >  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> > >  			"ibmvtpm_crq_get_version failed rc=%d\n",
> > > rc); @@ -238,7 +267,7 @@ static int
> > > ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm) {
> > >  	int rc;
> > >  
> > > -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD, 0);
> > > +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_COMP_CMD);
> > >  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> > >  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> > >  			"ibmvtpm_crq_send_init_complete failed
> > > rc=%d\n", rc); @@ -258,7 +287,7 @@ static int
> > > ibmvtpm_crq_send_init(struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm) {
> > >  	int rc;
> > >  
> > > -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD, 0);
> > > +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq_word(ibmvtpm->vdev, INIT_CRQ_CMD);
> > >  	if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> > >  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> > >  			"ibmvtpm_crq_send_init failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> > > @@ -336,15 +365,10 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend(struct device
> > > *dev) {
> > >  	struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > >  	struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > > -	struct ibmvtpm_crq crq;
> > > -	u64 *buf = (u64 *) &crq;
> > >  	int rc = 0;
> > >  
> > > -	crq.valid = (u8)IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD;
> > > -	crq.msg = (u8)VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND;
> > > -
> > > -	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev, cpu_to_be64(buf[0]),
> > > -			      cpu_to_be64(buf[1]));
> > > +	rc = ibmvtpm_send_crq(ibmvtpm->vdev,
> > > +			IBMVTPM_VALID_CMD, VTPM_PREPARE_TO_SUSPEND,
> > > 0, 0); if (rc != H_SUCCESS)
> > >  		dev_err(ibmvtpm->dev,
> > >  			"tpm_ibmvtpm_suspend failed rc=%d\n", rc);
> > 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-19 17:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-29  7:24 [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix SZ Lin
2017-02-24 19:35 ` [RFT PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: simplify crq initialization and document crq format Michal Suchanek
2017-08-17 22:21   ` msuchanek
2017-08-19 17:18     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-08-19 17:24       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] Fix packed and aligned attribute warnings SZ Lin
2017-07-31 13:27   ` David Laight
2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] Fix "ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible" SZ Lin
2017-07-31 10:25   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] Fix 'void function return statements are not generally useful' warning SZ Lin
2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] Remove unneccessary 'out of memory' message SZ Lin
2017-07-29  7:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] Use __func__ instead of function name SZ Lin
     [not found]   ` <20170729072433.13194-6-sz.lin-D4fb9hXD9d4@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-18  8:03     ` Michal Suchánek
     [not found]       ` <0e2d9ac4f5ee02e9df98610ed07eaec9-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-18 11:25         ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-19  7:58   ` 김동현
2017-08-02 12:36 ` [PATCH 0/5] tpm: tpm_ibmvtpm: - style fix Jarkko Sakkinen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).