xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: "Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"Chao Gao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 04/15] microcode: introduce a global cache of ucode patch
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:25:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1566177928-19114-5-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1566177928-19114-1-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com>

to replace the current per-cpu cache 'uci->mc'.

With the assumption that all CPUs in the system have the same signature
(family, model, stepping and 'pf'), one microcode update matches with
one cpu should match with others. Having multiple microcode revisions
on different cpus would cause system unstable and should be avoided.
Hence, caching only one microcode update is good enough for all cases.

Introduce a global variable, microcode_cache, to store the newest
matching microcode update. Whenever we get a new valid microcode update,
its revision id is compared against that of the microcode update to
determine whether the "microcode_cache" needs to be replaced. And
this global cache is loaded to cpu in apply_microcode().

All operations on the cache is protected by 'microcode_mutex'.

Note that I deliberately avoid touching the old per-cpu cache ('uci->mc')
as I am going to remove it completely in the following patches. We copy
everything to create the new cache blob to avoid reusing some buffers
previously allocated for the old per-cpu cache. It is not so efficient,
but it is already corrected by a patch later in this series.

Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
---
Changes in v9:
 - on Intel side, ->compare_patch just checks the patch revision number.
 - explain why all buffers are copied in alloc_microcode_patch() in
 patch description.

Changes in v8:
 - Free generic wrapper struct in general code
 - Try to update cache as long as a patch covers current cpu. Previsouly,
 cache is updated only if the patch is newer than current update revision in
 the CPU. The small difference can work around a broken bios which only
 applies microcode update to BSP and software has to apply the same
 update to other CPUs.

Changes in v7:
 - reworked to cache only one microcode patch rather than a list of
 microcode patches.
---
 xen/arch/x86/microcode.c        | 39 ++++++++++++++++++
 xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c    | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c  | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h | 17 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
index 421d57e..0ecd2fd 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ static struct ucode_mod_blob __initdata ucode_blob;
  */
 static bool_t __initdata ucode_scan;
 
+/* Protected by microcode_mutex */
+static struct microcode_patch *microcode_cache;
+
 void __init microcode_set_module(unsigned int idx)
 {
     ucode_mod_idx = idx;
@@ -262,6 +265,42 @@ int microcode_resume_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
     return err;
 }
 
+void microcode_free_patch(struct microcode_patch *microcode_patch)
+{
+    microcode_ops->free_patch(microcode_patch->mc);
+    xfree(microcode_patch);
+}
+
+const struct microcode_patch *microcode_get_cache(void)
+{
+    ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&microcode_mutex));
+
+    return microcode_cache;
+}
+
+/* Return true if cache gets updated. Otherwise, return false */
+bool microcode_update_cache(struct microcode_patch *patch)
+{
+
+    ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&microcode_mutex));
+
+    if ( !microcode_cache )
+        microcode_cache = patch;
+    else if ( microcode_ops->compare_patch(patch,
+                                           microcode_cache) == NEW_UCODE )
+    {
+        microcode_free_patch(microcode_cache);
+        microcode_cache = patch;
+    }
+    else
+    {
+        microcode_free_patch(patch);
+        return false;
+    }
+
+    return true;
+}
+
 static int microcode_update_cpu(const void *buf, size_t size)
 {
     int err;
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
index 3db3555..30129ca 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
@@ -190,24 +190,83 @@ static enum microcode_match_result microcode_fits(
     return NEW_UCODE;
 }
 
+static bool match_cpu(const struct microcode_patch *patch)
+{
+    if ( !patch )
+        return false;
+    return microcode_fits(patch->mc_amd, smp_processor_id()) == NEW_UCODE;
+}
+
+static struct microcode_patch *alloc_microcode_patch(
+    const struct microcode_amd *mc_amd)
+{
+    struct microcode_patch *microcode_patch = xmalloc(struct microcode_patch);
+    struct microcode_amd *cache = xmalloc(struct microcode_amd);
+    void *mpb = xmalloc_bytes(mc_amd->mpb_size);
+    struct equiv_cpu_entry *equiv_cpu_table =
+                                xmalloc_bytes(mc_amd->equiv_cpu_table_size);
+
+    if ( !microcode_patch || !cache || !mpb || !equiv_cpu_table )
+    {
+        xfree(microcode_patch);
+        xfree(cache);
+        xfree(mpb);
+        xfree(equiv_cpu_table);
+        return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+    }
+
+    memcpy(mpb, mc_amd->mpb, mc_amd->mpb_size);
+    cache->mpb = mpb;
+    cache->mpb_size = mc_amd->mpb_size;
+    memcpy(equiv_cpu_table, mc_amd->equiv_cpu_table,
+           mc_amd->equiv_cpu_table_size);
+    cache->equiv_cpu_table = equiv_cpu_table;
+    cache->equiv_cpu_table_size = mc_amd->equiv_cpu_table_size;
+    microcode_patch->mc_amd = cache;
+
+    return microcode_patch;
+}
+
+static void free_patch(void *mc)
+{
+    struct microcode_amd *mc_amd = mc;
+
+    xfree(mc_amd->equiv_cpu_table);
+    xfree(mc_amd->mpb);
+    xfree(mc_amd);
+}
+
+static enum microcode_match_result compare_patch(
+    const struct microcode_patch *new, const struct microcode_patch *old)
+{
+    const struct microcode_amd *new_mc = new->mc_amd;
+    const struct microcode_header_amd *new_header = new_mc->mpb;
+    const struct microcode_amd *old_mc = old->mc_amd;
+    const struct microcode_header_amd *old_header = old_mc->mpb;
+
+    if ( new_header->processor_rev_id == old_header->processor_rev_id )
+        return (new_header->patch_id > old_header->patch_id) ?
+                NEW_UCODE : OLD_UCODE;
+
+    return MIS_UCODE;
+}
+
 static int apply_microcode(unsigned int cpu)
 {
     unsigned long flags;
     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu);
     uint32_t rev;
-    struct microcode_amd *mc_amd = uci->mc.mc_amd;
-    struct microcode_header_amd *hdr;
     int hw_err;
+    const struct microcode_header_amd *hdr;
+    const struct microcode_patch *patch = microcode_get_cache();
 
     /* We should bind the task to the CPU */
     BUG_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu);
 
-    if ( mc_amd == NULL )
+    if ( !match_cpu(patch) )
         return -EINVAL;
 
-    hdr = mc_amd->mpb;
-    if ( hdr == NULL )
-        return -EINVAL;
+    hdr = patch->mc_amd->mpb;
 
     spin_lock_irqsave(&microcode_update_lock, flags);
 
@@ -496,7 +555,21 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(unsigned int cpu, const void *buf,
     while ( (error = get_ucode_from_buffer_amd(mc_amd, buf, bufsize,
                                                &offset)) == 0 )
     {
-        if ( microcode_fits(mc_amd, cpu) == NEW_UCODE )
+        struct microcode_patch *new_patch = alloc_microcode_patch(mc_amd);
+
+        if ( IS_ERR(new_patch) )
+        {
+            error = PTR_ERR(new_patch);
+            break;
+        }
+
+        /* Update cache if this patch covers current CPU */
+        if ( microcode_fits(new_patch->mc_amd, cpu) != MIS_UCODE )
+            microcode_update_cache(new_patch);
+        else
+            microcode_free_patch(new_patch);
+
+        if ( match_cpu(microcode_get_cache()) )
         {
             error = apply_microcode(cpu);
             if ( error )
@@ -640,6 +713,9 @@ static const struct microcode_ops microcode_amd_ops = {
     .collect_cpu_info                 = collect_cpu_info,
     .apply_microcode                  = apply_microcode,
     .start_update                     = start_update,
+    .free_patch                       = free_patch,
+    .compare_patch                    = compare_patch,
+    .match_cpu                        = match_cpu,
 };
 
 int __init microcode_init_amd(void)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
index c185b5c..14485dc 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
@@ -259,6 +259,31 @@ static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc)
     return 0;
 }
 
+static bool match_cpu(const struct microcode_patch *patch)
+{
+    if ( !patch )
+        return false;
+
+    return microcode_update_match(&patch->mc_intel->hdr,
+                                  smp_processor_id()) == NEW_UCODE;
+}
+
+static void free_patch(void *mc)
+{
+    xfree(mc);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Both patches to compare are supposed to be applicable to local CPU.
+ * Just compare the revision number.
+ */
+static enum microcode_match_result compare_patch(
+    const struct microcode_patch *new, const struct microcode_patch *old)
+{
+    return (new->mc_intel->hdr.rev > old->mc_intel->hdr.rev) ?  NEW_UCODE :
+                                                                OLD_UCODE;
+}
+
 /*
  * return 0 - no update found
  * return 1 - found update
@@ -269,10 +294,26 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(const void *mc, unsigned int cpu)
     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu);
     const struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header = mc;
     unsigned long total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
-    void *new_mc;
+    void *new_mc = xmalloc_bytes(total_size);
+    struct microcode_patch *new_patch = xmalloc(struct microcode_patch);
 
-    if ( microcode_update_match(mc, cpu) != NEW_UCODE )
+    if ( !new_patch || !new_mc )
+    {
+        xfree(new_patch);
+        xfree(new_mc);
+        return -ENOMEM;
+    }
+    memcpy(new_mc, mc, total_size);
+    new_patch->mc_intel = new_mc;
+
+    /* Make sure that this patch covers current CPU */
+    if ( microcode_update_match(mc, cpu) == MIS_UCODE )
+    {
+        microcode_free_patch(new_patch);
         return 0;
+    }
+
+    microcode_update_cache(new_patch);
 
     pr_debug("microcode: CPU%d found a matching microcode update with"
              " version %#x (current=%#x)\n",
@@ -297,18 +338,22 @@ static int apply_microcode(unsigned int cpu)
     unsigned int val[2];
     unsigned int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
     struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = &per_cpu(ucode_cpu_info, cpu_num);
+    const struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
+    const struct microcode_patch *patch = microcode_get_cache();
 
     /* We should bind the task to the CPU */
     BUG_ON(cpu_num != cpu);
 
-    if ( uci->mc.mc_intel == NULL )
+    if ( !match_cpu(patch) )
         return -EINVAL;
 
+    mc_intel = patch->mc_intel;
+
     /* serialize access to the physical write to MSR 0x79 */
     spin_lock_irqsave(&microcode_update_lock, flags);
 
     /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
-    wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)uci->mc.mc_intel->bits);
+    wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc_intel->bits);
     wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0x0ULL);
 
     /* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
@@ -319,19 +364,17 @@ static int apply_microcode(unsigned int cpu)
     val[1] = (uint32_t)(msr_content >> 32);
 
     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&microcode_update_lock, flags);
-    if ( val[1] != uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.rev )
+    if ( val[1] != mc_intel->hdr.rev )
     {
         printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d update from revision "
                "%#x to %#x failed. Resulting revision is %#x.\n", cpu_num,
-               uci->cpu_sig.rev, uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.rev, val[1]);
+               uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc_intel->hdr.rev, val[1]);
         return -EIO;
     }
     printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: CPU%d updated from revision "
            "%#x to %#x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x \n",
-           cpu_num, uci->cpu_sig.rev, val[1],
-           uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.year,
-           uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.month,
-           uci->mc.mc_intel->hdr.day);
+           cpu_num, uci->cpu_sig.rev, val[1], mc_intel->hdr.year,
+           mc_intel->hdr.month, mc_intel->hdr.day);
     uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
 
     return 0;
@@ -371,7 +414,6 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(unsigned int cpu, const void *buf,
     long offset = 0;
     int error = 0;
     void *mc;
-    unsigned int matching_count = 0;
 
     /* We should bind the task to the CPU */
     BUG_ON(cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
@@ -389,10 +431,8 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(unsigned int cpu, const void *buf,
          * lets keep searching till the latest version
          */
         if ( error == 1 )
-        {
-            matching_count++;
             error = 0;
-        }
+
         xfree(mc);
     }
     if ( offset > 0 )
@@ -400,7 +440,7 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(unsigned int cpu, const void *buf,
     if ( offset < 0 )
         error = offset;
 
-    if ( !error && matching_count )
+    if ( !error && match_cpu(microcode_get_cache()) )
         error = apply_microcode(cpu);
 
     return error;
@@ -416,6 +456,9 @@ static const struct microcode_ops microcode_intel_ops = {
     .cpu_request_microcode            = cpu_request_microcode,
     .collect_cpu_info                 = collect_cpu_info,
     .apply_microcode                  = apply_microcode,
+    .free_patch                       = free_patch,
+    .compare_patch                    = compare_patch,
+    .match_cpu                        = match_cpu,
 };
 
 int __init microcode_init_intel(void)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
index 882f560..42949b1 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
@@ -12,6 +12,14 @@ enum microcode_match_result {
 struct cpu_signature;
 struct ucode_cpu_info;
 
+struct microcode_patch {
+    union {
+        struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
+        struct microcode_amd *mc_amd;
+        void *mc;
+    };
+};
+
 struct microcode_ops {
     int (*microcode_resume_match)(unsigned int cpu, const void *mc);
     int (*cpu_request_microcode)(unsigned int cpu, const void *buf,
@@ -19,6 +27,11 @@ struct microcode_ops {
     int (*collect_cpu_info)(unsigned int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
     int (*apply_microcode)(unsigned int cpu);
     int (*start_update)(void);
+    void (*free_patch)(void *mc);
+    bool (*match_cpu)(const struct microcode_patch *patch);
+    enum microcode_match_result (*compare_patch)(
+            const struct microcode_patch *new,
+            const struct microcode_patch *old);
 };
 
 struct cpu_signature {
@@ -39,4 +52,8 @@ struct ucode_cpu_info {
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct ucode_cpu_info, ucode_cpu_info);
 extern const struct microcode_ops *microcode_ops;
 
+const struct microcode_patch *microcode_get_cache(void);
+bool microcode_update_cache(struct microcode_patch *patch);
+void microcode_free_patch(struct microcode_patch *patch);
+
 #endif /* ASM_X86__MICROCODE_H */
-- 
1.8.3.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-19  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-19  1:25 [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 00/15] improve late microcode loading Chao Gao
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 01/15] microcode/intel: extend microcode_update_match() Chao Gao
2019-08-28 15:12   ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-29  7:15     ` Chao Gao
2019-08-29  7:14       ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 02/15] microcode/amd: fix memory leak Chao Gao
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 03/15] microcode/amd: distinguish old and mismatched ucode in microcode_fits() Chao Gao
2019-08-19  1:25 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2019-08-22 11:11   ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 04/15] microcode: introduce a global cache of ucode patch Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-28 15:21   ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-29 10:18   ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 05/15] microcode: clean up microcode_resume_cpu Chao Gao
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 06/15] microcode: remove struct ucode_cpu_info Chao Gao
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 07/15] microcode: remove pointless 'cpu' parameter Chao Gao
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 08/15] microcode/amd: call svm_host_osvw_init() in common code Chao Gao
2019-08-22 13:08   ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-28 15:26   ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 09/15] microcode: pass a patch pointer to apply_microcode() Chao Gao
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 10/15] microcode: split out apply_microcode() from cpu_request_microcode() Chao Gao
2019-08-22 13:59   ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-29 10:06     ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-30  3:22       ` Chao Gao
2019-08-30  7:25         ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-29 10:19   ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 11/15] microcode: unify loading update during CPU resuming and AP wakeup Chao Gao
2019-08-22 14:10   ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-22 16:44     ` Chao Gao
2019-08-23  9:09       ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-29  7:37         ` Chao Gao
2019-08-29  8:16           ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-29 10:26           ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-29 10:29   ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 12/15] microcode: reduce memory allocation and copy when creating a patch Chao Gao
2019-08-23  8:11   ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-26  7:03     ` Chao Gao
2019-08-26  8:11       ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-29 10:47   ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 13/15] x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading Chao Gao
2019-08-19 10:27   ` Sergey Dyasli
2019-08-19 14:49     ` Chao Gao
2019-08-29 12:06   ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-30  3:30     ` Chao Gao
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 14/15] microcode: remove microcode_update_lock Chao Gao
2019-08-19  1:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 15/15] microcode: block #NMI handling when loading an ucode Chao Gao
2019-08-23  8:46   ` Sergey Dyasli
2019-08-26  8:07     ` Chao Gao
2019-08-27  4:52       ` Chao Gao
2019-08-28  8:52         ` Sergey Dyasli
2019-08-29 12:11         ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-30  6:35           ` Chao Gao
2019-09-09  5:52             ` Chao Gao
2019-09-09  6:16               ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-29 12:22   ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-30  6:33     ` Chao Gao
2019-08-30  7:30       ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-22  7:51 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 00/15] improve late microcode loading Sergey Dyasli
2019-08-22 15:39   ` Chao Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1566177928-19114-5-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).