From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, tee-dev@lists.linaro.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] xen/arm: add generic TEE mediator framework Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 04:02:18 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5CE51E2A020000780023144D@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <55b6761c-152a-a6fa-085d-5f78443831d1@arm.com> >>> On 22.05.19 at 11:27, <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote: > > On 22/05/2019 09:45, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 21.05.19 at 23:25, <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com> wrote: >>> MAINTAINERS | 6 ++ >>> xen/arch/arm/Kconfig | 7 +++ >>> xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 1 + >>> xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 18 ++++++ >>> xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 2 + >>> xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile | 1 + >>> xen/arch/arm/tee/tee.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> xen/arch/arm/vsmc.c | 5 ++ >>> xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S | 7 +++ >>> xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 1 + >>> xen/include/asm-arm/tee/tee.h | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 3 + >>> 12 files changed, 253 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile >>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/tee/tee.c >>> create mode 100644 xen/include/asm-arm/tee/tee.h >> >> I don't think I'm asking this for the first time: Why am I being Cc-ed >> here? It's all Arm code that gets changed, and the MAINTAINERS >> addition alone imo doesn't warrant widening the Cc list. > > A lot of users uses the scripts/{add, get}_maintainers.pl to get the list of > > maintainers to CCed. Both of them output "THE REST" because of the file > MAINTAINERS is modified. > > I don't think it is sensible to expect users to know when to strip the > list... Hmm, well, I see your point, but I think applying some common sense still can be expected. It's also not sensible for unrelated people to get Cc-ed. I think anyone knowing enough to modify MAINTAINERS can be expected to know whom to Cc. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> To: "Julien Grall" <julien.grall@arm.com> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, tee-dev@lists.linaro.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 01/10] xen/arm: add generic TEE mediator framework Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 04:02:18 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5CE51E2A020000780023144D@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20190522100218.Lvuiesk84YDiFFKy5XIfDogipeVPHF6TIFa4ZkN6G9w@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <55b6761c-152a-a6fa-085d-5f78443831d1@arm.com> >>> On 22.05.19 at 11:27, <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote: > > On 22/05/2019 09:45, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 21.05.19 at 23:25, <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com> wrote: >>> MAINTAINERS | 6 ++ >>> xen/arch/arm/Kconfig | 7 +++ >>> xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 1 + >>> xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 18 ++++++ >>> xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 2 + >>> xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile | 1 + >>> xen/arch/arm/tee/tee.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> xen/arch/arm/vsmc.c | 5 ++ >>> xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S | 7 +++ >>> xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 1 + >>> xen/include/asm-arm/tee/tee.h | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 3 + >>> 12 files changed, 253 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile >>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/tee/tee.c >>> create mode 100644 xen/include/asm-arm/tee/tee.h >> >> I don't think I'm asking this for the first time: Why am I being Cc-ed >> here? It's all Arm code that gets changed, and the MAINTAINERS >> addition alone imo doesn't warrant widening the Cc list. > > A lot of users uses the scripts/{add, get}_maintainers.pl to get the list of > > maintainers to CCed. Both of them output "THE REST" because of the file > MAINTAINERS is modified. > > I don't think it is sensible to expect users to know when to strip the > list... Hmm, well, I see your point, but I think applying some common sense still can be expected. It's also not sensible for unrelated people to get Cc-ed. I think anyone knowing enough to modify MAINTAINERS can be expected to know whom to Cc. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-22 10:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-05-21 21:25 [PATCH v5 00/10] TEE mediator (and OP-TEE) support in XEN Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] xen/arm: add generic TEE mediator framework Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-22 8:45 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-22 8:45 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-22 9:27 ` Julien Grall 2019-05-22 9:27 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-22 10:02 ` Jan Beulich [this message] 2019-05-22 10:02 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-22 12:04 ` Julien Grall 2019-05-22 12:04 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-03 11:46 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 11:46 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-03 11:48 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 11:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-06 16:02 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-07 9:36 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-11 18:18 ` Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-11 18:26 ` Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] xen/arm: optee: add OP-TEE header files Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 11:49 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 11:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-10 18:20 ` Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-10 18:53 ` Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] xen/arm: optee: add OP-TEE mediator skeleton Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:34 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:34 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] xen/arm: optee: add fast calls handling Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:34 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:34 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] xen/arm: optee: add std call handling Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:34 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:34 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] xen/arm: optee: add support for RPC SHM buffers Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:33 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:33 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] xen/arm: optee: add support for arbitrary shared memory Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:29 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:29 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] xen/arm: optee: add support for RPC commands Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:33 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:33 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] tools/arm: tee: add "tee" option for xl.cfg Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 12:44 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-03 12:44 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-03 14:47 ` Ian Jackson 2019-06-03 14:47 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Jackson 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] tools/arm: optee: create optee firmware node in DT if tee=optee Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-05-21 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-03 14:50 ` Ian Jackson 2019-06-03 14:50 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Jackson 2019-06-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] TEE mediator (and OP-TEE) support in XEN Julien Grall 2019-06-01 14:50 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-01 16:07 ` Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-01 16:07 ` [Xen-devel] " Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-01 16:55 ` Julien Grall 2019-06-01 16:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-06-04 13:31 ` Volodymyr Babchuk 2019-06-06 15:33 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=5CE51E2A020000780023144D@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com \ --to=jbeulich@suse.com \ --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \ --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \ --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \ --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \ --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \ --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \ --cc=tee-dev@lists.linaro.org \ --cc=tim@xen.org \ --cc=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \ --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \ --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).