xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
Cc: "Rahul Singh" <Rahul.Singh@arm.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	"Andre Przywara" <Andre.Przywara@arm.com>,
	"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	"Volodymyr Babchuk" <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	"Ian Jackson" <iwj@xenproject.org>,
	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: xen/arm: Missing appropriate locking for the IOMMU (WAS Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] xen/arm: Add PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_(*add/remove) support for ARM)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:15:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75784F90-198E-400D-877B-CF62ED69F409@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99f6d6c4-bcc6-03a9-ef9b-0d01be0fd7f1@xen.org>

Hi Julien,

> On 21 Oct 2021, at 10:28, Julien Grall <julien@xen.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> While going through the passthrough code. I noticed that we don't have a common lock for the IOMMU between the PCI and DT code.
> 
> This is going to be an issue given it would technically be possible to add a PCI device while assigning a DT.
> 
> Rahul, Bertrand, Oleksandr, can you have a look at the issue?

Yes we can have a look at this.

Right now pci device add is done by dom0 so I do not think we have an issue in practice unless I wrongly understood something.
But for sure in theory yes we need to look at this.

Cheers
Bertrand 

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> On 06/10/2021 18:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> Hardware domain is in charge of doing the PCI enumeration and will
>> discover the PCI devices and then will communicate to XEN via hyper
>> call PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add(..) to add the PCI devices in XEN.
>> Also implement PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove(..) to remove the PCI device.
>> As most of the code for PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_* is the same between x86
>> and ARM, move the code to a common file to avoid duplication.
>> There are other PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_* operations to add PCI devices.
>> Currently implemented PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove(..) and
>> PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add(..) only as those are minimum required to
>> support PCI passthrough on ARM.
>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Change in v5:
>> - Move the pci_physdev_op() stub to xen/arch/arm/physdev.c.
>> Change in v4:
>> - Move file commom/physdev.c to drivers/pci/physdev.c
>> - minor comments.
>> Change in v3: Fixed minor comment.
>> Change in v2:
>> - Add support for PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove()
>> - Move code to common code
>> ---
>> ---
>>  xen/arch/arm/physdev.c        |  6 ++-
>>  xen/arch/x86/physdev.c        | 52 +----------------------
>>  xen/arch/x86/x86_64/physdev.c |  2 +-
>>  xen/drivers/pci/Makefile      |  1 +
>>  xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c     | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  xen/include/public/arch-arm.h |  4 +-
>>  xen/include/xen/hypercall.h   |  4 ++
>>  7 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/physdev.c b/xen/arch/arm/physdev.c
>> index e91355fe22..f9aa274dda 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/physdev.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/physdev.c
>> @@ -8,13 +8,17 @@
>>  #include <xen/lib.h>
>>  #include <xen/errno.h>
>>  #include <xen/sched.h>
>> -#include <asm/hypercall.h>
>> +#include <xen/hypercall.h>
>>      int do_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
>>  {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI
>> +    return pci_physdev_op(cmd, arg);
>> +#else
>>      gdprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, "PHYSDEVOP cmd=%d: not implemented\n", cmd);
>>      return -ENOSYS;
>> +#endif
>>  }
>>    /*
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
>> index 23465bcd00..ea38be8b79 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
>>  #include <asm/io_apic.h>
>>  #include <asm/msi.h>
>>  #include <asm/hvm/irq.h>
>> -#include <asm/hypercall.h>
>> +#include <xen/hypercall.h>
>>  #include <public/xen.h>
>>  #include <public/physdev.h>
>>  #include <xsm/xsm.h>
>> @@ -480,54 +480,6 @@ ret_t do_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
>>          break;
>>      }
>>  -    case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add: {
>> -        struct physdev_pci_device_add add;
>> -        struct pci_dev_info pdev_info;
>> -        nodeid_t node;
>> -
>> -        ret = -EFAULT;
>> -        if ( copy_from_guest(&add, arg, 1) != 0 )
>> -            break;
>> -
>> -        pdev_info.is_extfn = !!(add.flags & XEN_PCI_DEV_EXTFN);
>> -        if ( add.flags & XEN_PCI_DEV_VIRTFN )
>> -        {
>> -            pdev_info.is_virtfn = 1;
>> -            pdev_info.physfn.bus = add.physfn.bus;
>> -            pdev_info.physfn.devfn = add.physfn.devfn;
>> -        }
>> -        else
>> -            pdev_info.is_virtfn = 0;
>> -
>> -        if ( add.flags & XEN_PCI_DEV_PXM )
>> -        {
>> -            uint32_t pxm;
>> -            size_t optarr_off = offsetof(struct physdev_pci_device_add, optarr) /
>> -                                sizeof(add.optarr[0]);
>> -
>> -            if ( copy_from_guest_offset(&pxm, arg, optarr_off, 1) )
>> -                break;
>> -
>> -            node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
>> -        }
>> -        else
>> -            node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>> -
>> -        ret = pci_add_device(add.seg, add.bus, add.devfn, &pdev_info, node);
>> -        break;
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove: {
>> -        struct physdev_pci_device dev;
>> -
>> -        ret = -EFAULT;
>> -        if ( copy_from_guest(&dev, arg, 1) != 0 )
>> -            break;
>> -
>> -        ret = pci_remove_device(dev.seg, dev.bus, dev.devfn);
>> -        break;
>> -    }
>> -
>>      case PHYSDEVOP_prepare_msix:
>>      case PHYSDEVOP_release_msix: {
>>          struct physdev_pci_device dev;
>> @@ -663,7 +615,7 @@ ret_t do_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
>>      }
>>        default:
>> -        ret = -ENOSYS;
>> +        ret = pci_physdev_op(cmd, arg);
>>          break;
>>      }
>>  diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/physdev.c b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/physdev.c
>> index 0a50cbd4d8..e3cbd5ebcb 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/physdev.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/physdev.c
>> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ EMIT_FILE;
>>  #include <compat/xen.h>
>>  #include <compat/event_channel.h>
>>  #include <compat/physdev.h>
>> -#include <asm/hypercall.h>
>> +#include <xen/hypercall.h>
>>    #define do_physdev_op compat_physdev_op
>>  diff --git a/xen/drivers/pci/Makefile b/xen/drivers/pci/Makefile
>> index a98035df4c..972c923db0 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/pci/Makefile
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/pci/Makefile
>> @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>>  obj-y += pci.o
>> +obj-y += physdev.o
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c b/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..4f3e1a96c0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
>> +
>> +#include <xen/guest_access.h>
>> +#include <xen/hypercall.h>
>> +#include <xen/init.h>
>> +
>> +#ifndef COMPAT
>> +typedef long ret_t;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +ret_t pci_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
>> +{
>> +    ret_t ret;
>> +
>> +    switch ( cmd )
>> +    {
>> +    case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add: {
>> +        struct physdev_pci_device_add add;
>> +        struct pci_dev_info pdev_info;
>> +        nodeid_t node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>> +
>> +        ret = -EFAULT;
>> +        if ( copy_from_guest(&add, arg, 1) != 0 )
>> +            break;
>> +
>> +        pdev_info.is_extfn = (add.flags & XEN_PCI_DEV_EXTFN);
>> +        if ( add.flags & XEN_PCI_DEV_VIRTFN )
>> +        {
>> +            pdev_info.is_virtfn = true;
>> +            pdev_info.physfn.bus = add.physfn.bus;
>> +            pdev_info.physfn.devfn = add.physfn.devfn;
>> +        }
>> +        else
>> +            pdev_info.is_virtfn = false;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> +        if ( add.flags & XEN_PCI_DEV_PXM )
>> +        {
>> +            uint32_t pxm;
>> +            size_t optarr_off = offsetof(struct physdev_pci_device_add, optarr) /
>> +                                sizeof(add.optarr[0]);
>> +
>> +            if ( copy_from_guest_offset(&pxm, arg, optarr_off, 1) )
>> +                break;
>> +
>> +            node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
>> +        }
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +        ret = pci_add_device(add.seg, add.bus, add.devfn, &pdev_info, node);
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove: {
>> +        struct physdev_pci_device dev;
>> +
>> +        ret = -EFAULT;
>> +        if ( copy_from_guest(&dev, arg, 1) != 0 )
>> +            break;
>> +
>> +        ret = pci_remove_device(dev.seg, dev.bus, dev.devfn);
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    default:
>> +        ret = -ENOSYS;
>> +        break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Local variables:
>> + * mode: C
>> + * c-file-style: "BSD"
>> + * c-basic-offset: 4
>> + * tab-width: 4
>> + * indent-tabs-mode: nil
>> + * End:
>> + */
>> diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
>> index 6b5a5f818a..d46c61fca9 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h
>> @@ -107,7 +107,9 @@
>>   *   All generic sub-operations
>>   *
>>   *  HYPERVISOR_physdev_op
>> - *   No sub-operations are currenty supported
>> + *   Exactly these sub-operations are supported:
>> + *   PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add
>> + *   PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove
>>   *
>>   *  HYPERVISOR_sysctl
>>   *   All generic sub-operations, with the exception of:
>> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h b/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
>> index 3771487a30..07b10ec230 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/hypercall.h
>> @@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ extern long
>>  do_platform_op(
>>      XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_platform_op_t) u_xenpf_op);
>>  +extern long
>> +pci_physdev_op(
>> +    int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg);
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * To allow safe resume of do_memory_op() after preemption, we need to know
>>   * at what point in the page list to resume. For this purpose I steal the
> 
> -- 
> Julien Grall



  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-21 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 190+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-06 17:40 [PATCH v5 00/11] PCI devices passthrough on Arm Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] xen/arm: xc_domain_ioport_permission(..) not supported on ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-11 11:47   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 12:11     ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 13:20       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 13:40         ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 13:57           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 14:16             ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 16:32               ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 17:11                 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12  8:29                   ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12  8:41                     ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12  9:32                       ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12  9:38                         ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-12 10:01                           ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 10:06                             ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-12 10:20                               ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 10:41                                 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 10:44                                   ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 14:53                                   ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-12 16:15                                     ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 16:29                                       ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-12 20:42                                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-13  8:07                                           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 11:52                                             ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-13  8:02                                       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 12:02                                         ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-12  9:40                         ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 10:03                           ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 14:16           ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] xen/arm: Add PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_(*add/remove) support for ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-07  0:05   ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-07 12:58     ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-21  9:28   ` xen/arm: Missing appropriate locking for the IOMMU (WAS Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] xen/arm: Add PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_(*add/remove) support for ARM) Julien Grall
2021-10-21 13:15     ` Bertrand Marquis [this message]
2021-10-21 13:47       ` Julien Grall
2021-10-21 13:52         ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] xen/arm: Add cmdline boot option "pci-passthrough = <boolean>" Rahul Singh
2021-10-07  8:27   ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-07  8:32     ` Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 12:59   ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] xen/arm: PCI host bridge discovery within XEN on ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] xen/arm: Add support for Xilinx ZynqMP PCI host controller Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] xen/arm: Implement pci access functions Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] xen/domctl: Introduce XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci flag Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 13:08   ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-08 18:06   ` Andrew Cooper
2021-10-08 21:12     ` Julien Grall
2021-10-08 21:46       ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-11  9:24         ` Julien Grall
2021-10-11 11:29         ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-11 11:35           ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 13:17             ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11  9:48     ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-11  9:27   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 12:06     ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-12 10:38     ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-13  8:30       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13  9:36         ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 10:56           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 12:11             ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 12:57               ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 20:41                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-14  6:23                   ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-14  7:53                     ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 14:28               ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 20:53             ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-13 23:21               ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-12 21:48     ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-13  6:18       ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13  7:11         ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] xen/arm: Enable the existing x86 virtual PCI support for ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 13:43   ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 12:41     ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 13:09       ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 13:34         ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 14:10           ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 14:52             ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 18:18             ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-12  8:04               ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 21:37                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-13  6:10                   ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 10:02                     ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 12:21                       ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 15:04       ` Julien Grall
2021-10-12 16:12         ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 16:20           ` Julien Grall
2021-10-12 17:50             ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 10:51   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 16:12     ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 16:20       ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-11 16:43         ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 17:15           ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 18:30             ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-11 19:27               ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-12  5:34                 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-12  7:44                 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 14:32   ` Julien Grall
2021-10-12 14:34     ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13  8:45   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13  9:48     ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 10:33       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 13:00     ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 14:51       ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-13 15:15         ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 19:27           ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-14  6:33             ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-14  7:53               ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14  9:03               ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14  9:24                 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] xen/arm: Transitional change to build HAS_VPCI on ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-11 11:43   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 12:15     ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12  1:32       ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 18:01   ` Julien Grall
2021-10-07  0:26     ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-07 15:31       ` Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 10:53     ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-07 15:29       ` Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 16:11         ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-11 13:46           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-14 17:16           ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 14:49             ` [PATCH v6 0/3] PCI devices passthrough on Arm Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 14:49               ` [PATCH v6 1/3] xen/vpci: Move ecam access functions to common code Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 16:06                 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-14 17:09                   ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15  6:29                     ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15  7:37                       ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15  8:13                         ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15  8:20                           ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15  8:24                             ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15  9:49                           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-14 23:47                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-15  7:44                 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15  7:53                   ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15  9:53                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 10:12                       ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:14                       ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-14 14:49               ` [PATCH v6 2/3] xen/arm: Enable the existing x86 virtual PCI support for ARM Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 23:49                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-15  6:40                   ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15  9:59                     ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 10:10                   ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15  8:00                 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 10:09                   ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:14                     ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 10:18                       ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 11:35                         ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 12:13                           ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 12:18                             ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 12:28                               ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 13:00                                 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 13:10                                   ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:38                     ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15  8:32                 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15  8:42                   ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15  9:52                   ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:13                     ` Luca Fancellu
2021-10-15 10:17                       ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:19                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 10:31                       ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:24                     ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 10:33                       ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:41                         ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 10:48                           ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:51                             ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 11:08                               ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 13:47                             ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 14:00                               ` Luca Fancellu
2021-10-15 14:32                                 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-14 14:49               ` [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 17:54                 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2021-10-14 23:50                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-15  7:28                   ` Julien Grall
2021-10-15  7:41                     ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15  9:01                       ` Julien Grall
2021-10-15 10:02                     ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 10:58                       ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 11:04                         ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 11:46                         ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 11:53                           ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 12:10                             ` Julien Grall
2021-10-15 12:14                               ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 12:13                             ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-12 15:03   ` [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl Ian Jackson
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] xen/arm: Add linux,pci-domain property for hwdom if not available Rahul Singh
2021-10-13 20:54   ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] PCI devices passthrough on Arm Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-07 21:29   ` Rahul Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75784F90-198E-400D-877B-CF62ED69F409@arm.com \
    --to=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=Andre.Przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=Rahul.Singh@arm.com \
    --cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).