From: Luca Fancellu <luca.fancellu@arm.com>
To: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com>
Cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"Ian Jackson" <iwj@xenproject.org>,
"Rahul Singh" <Rahul.Singh@arm.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
"Volodymyr Babchuk" <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
"Paul Durrant" <paul@xen.org>,
"Oleksandr Andrushchenko" <Oleksandr_Andrushchenko@epam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] xen/arm: Enable the existing x86 virtual PCI support for ARM.
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:13:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E80D6A5A-2556-49C4-A9F0-E85CCD44D1A8@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CD9B29B0-31FD-4E09-93E3-7124C724BC23@arm.com>
> On 15 Oct 2021, at 10:52, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Roger,
>
>> On 15 Oct 2021, at 09:32, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:49:50PM +0100, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> From: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@arm.com>
>>>
>>> The existing VPCI support available for X86 is adapted for Arm.
>>> When the device is added to XEN via the hyper call
>>> “PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add”, VPCI handler for the config space
>>> access is added to the Xen to emulate the PCI devices config space.
>>>
>>> A MMIO trap handler for the PCI ECAM space is registered in XEN
>>> so that when guest is trying to access the PCI config space,XEN
>>> will trap the access and emulate read/write using the VPCI and
>>> not the real PCI hardware.
>>>
>>> For Dom0less systems scan_pci_devices() would be used to discover the
>>> PCI device in XEN and VPCI handler will be added during XEN boots.
>>>
>>> This patch is also doing some small fixes to fix compilation errors on
>>> arm32 of vpci:
>>> - add a cast to unsigned long in print in header.c
>>> - add a cast to uint64_t in vpci_ecam_mmio_write
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@arm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v6:
>>> - Use new vpci_ecam_ helpers for PCI access
>>> - Do not set XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci for dom0 for now (will be done in a
>>> future patch once everything is ready)
>>
>> Isn't the series missing a revert of XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci? I think
>> that's what we agreed would be the way forward.
>
> A separate reverse patch for that has already been merged:
> https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=9516d01ac3015f522528ed6dafb3f584eaa7ed2c
>
>>
>>> - rename REGISTER_OFFSET to ECAM_REG_OFFSET and move it to pci.h
>>> - remove not needed local variables in vpci_mmio_write, the one in read
>>> has been kept to ensure proper compilation on arm32
>>> - move call to vpci_add_handlers before iommu init to simplify exit path
>>> - move call to pci_cleanup_msi in the out section of pci_add_device if
>>> pdev is not NULL and on error
>>> - initialize pdev to NULL to handle properly exit path call of
>>> pci_cleanup_msi
>>> - keep has_vpci to return false for now as CFG_vpci has been removed.
>>> Added a comment on top of the definition.
>>> - fix compilation errors on arm32 (print in header.c, cast missing in
>>> mmio_write.
>>> - local variable was kept in vpci_mmio_read on arm to prevent a cast
>>> error in arm32.
>>> Change in v5:
>>> - Add pci_cleanup_msi(pdev) incleanup part.
>>> - Added Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
>>> Change in v4:
>>> - Move addition of XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci flag to separate patch
>>> Change in v3:
>>> - Use is_pci_passthrough_enabled() in place of pci_passthrough_enabled variable
>>> - Reject XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci for x86 in arch_sanitise_domain_config()
>>> - Remove IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_VPCI) from has_vpci()
>>> Change in v2:
>>> - Add new XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci flag
>>> - modify has_vpci() to include XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci
>>> - enable vpci support when pci-passthough option is enabled.
>>> ---
>>> ---
>>> xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 1 +
>>> xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 4 ++
>>> xen/arch/arm/vpci.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> xen/arch/arm/vpci.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++
>>> xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c | 18 ++++++++-
>>> xen/drivers/vpci/header.c | 3 +-
>>> xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c | 2 +-
>>> xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 1 +
>>> xen/include/asm-x86/pci.h | 2 -
>>> xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 7 ++++
>>> xen/include/xen/pci.h | 3 ++
>>> 11 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/vpci.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
>>> index 64518848b2..07f634508e 100644
>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ ifneq ($(CONFIG_NO_PLAT),y)
>>> obj-y += platforms/
>>> endif
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_TEE) += tee/
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_HAS_VPCI) += vpci.o
>>>
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_HAS_ALTERNATIVE) += alternative.o
>>> obj-y += bootfdt.init.o
>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
>>> index eef0661beb..96e1b23550 100644
>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
>>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>>> #include <asm/vgic.h>
>>> #include <asm/vtimer.h>
>>>
>>> +#include "vpci.h"
>>> #include "vuart.h"
>>>
>>> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vcpu *, curr_vcpu);
>>> @@ -773,6 +774,9 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d,
>>> if ( is_hardware_domain(d) && (rc = domain_vuart_init(d)) )
>>> goto fail;
>>>
>>> + if ( (rc = domain_vpci_init(d)) != 0 )
>>> + goto fail;
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> fail:
>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000..7c3552b65d
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>>> + */
>>> +#include <xen/sched.h>
>>> +#include <xen/vpci.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include <asm/mmio.h>
>>> +
>>> +static int vpci_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info,
>>> + register_t *r, void *p)
>>> +{
>>> + pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
>>> + /* data is needed to prevent a pointer cast on 32bit */
>>> + unsigned long data = ~0ul;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + /* We ignore segment part and always handle segment 0 */
>>> + sbdf.sbdf = ECAM_BDF(info->gpa);
>>> +
>>> + ret = vpci_ecam_mmio_read(sbdf, ECAM_REG_OFFSET(info->gpa),
>>> + 1U << info->dabt.size, &data);
>>> +
>>> + *r = data;
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int vpci_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info,
>>> + register_t r, void *p)
>>> +{
>>> + pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
>>> +
>>> + /* We ignore segment part and always handle segment 0 */
>>> + sbdf.sbdf = ECAM_BDF(info->gpa);
>>> +
>>> + return vpci_ecam_mmio_write(sbdf, ECAM_REG_OFFSET(info->gpa),
>>> + 1U << info->dabt.size, r);
>>> +}
>>
>> I'm not sure returning an error value here is helpful, as I'm not sure
>> how native Arm behaves and how this error is propagated into the
>> guest. FWIWreturning ~0 or dropping writes is what we do in x86 when
>> vPCI is not capable of handling the access.
>
> Mmio handlers can take a return code on arm if something did not work
> so I think this is the right way to do it on arm.
> Now has agreed with Jan, we will change the return type of
> vpci_ecam_write (also renamed) to be a boolean.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> +static const struct mmio_handler_ops vpci_mmio_handler = {
>>> + .read = vpci_mmio_read,
>>> + .write = vpci_mmio_write,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d)
>>> +{
>>> + if ( !has_vpci(d) )
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler,
>>> + GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE, GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_SIZE, NULL);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Local variables:
>>> + * mode: C
>>> + * c-file-style: "BSD"
>>> + * c-basic-offset: 4
>>> + * indent-tabs-mode: nil
>>> + * End:
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000..d8a7b0e3e8
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * xen/arch/arm/vpci.h
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef __ARCH_ARM_VPCI_H__
>>> +#define __ARCH_ARM_VPCI_H__
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_VPCI
>>> +int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d);
>>> +#else
>>> +static inline int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d)
>>> +{
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> +#endif /* __ARCH_ARM_VPCI_H__ */
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Local variables:
>>> + * mode: C
>>> + * c-file-style: "BSD"
>>> + * c-basic-offset: 4
>>> + * indent-tabs-mode: nil
>>> + * End:
>>> + */
>>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
>>> index 3aa8c3175f..8cc529ecec 100644
>>> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
>>> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
>>> @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ int pci_add_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 devfn,
>>> const struct pci_dev_info *info, nodeid_t node)
>>> {
>>> struct pci_seg *pseg;
>>> - struct pci_dev *pdev;
>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
>>> unsigned int slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn), func = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
>>> const char *pdev_type;
>>> int ret;
>>> @@ -752,6 +752,19 @@ int pci_add_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 devfn,
>>>
>>> check_pdev(pdev);
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>>> + /*
>>> + * On ARM PCI devices discovery will be done by Dom0. Add vpci handler when
>>> + * Dom0 inform XEN to add the PCI devices in XEN.
>>> + */
>>> + ret = vpci_add_handlers(pdev);
>>> + if ( ret )
>>> + {
>>> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "Setup of vPCI failed: %d\n", ret);
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>>> +#endif
>>
>> I think vpci_add_handlers should be called after checking that
>> pdev->domain is != NULL, so I would move this chunk a bit below.
>
> On arm this would prevent the dom0less use case or to have the PCI
> bus enumerated from an other domain.
> @oleksandr: can you comment on this one, you might have a better
> answer than me on this ?
For my understanding, as also Jan pointed out, this should be put inside the
If ( !pdev->domain ) because also as the comment suggests, this operation
should be performed only when there is a Dom0 and when we are using
a dom0less setup the pdev->domain should be NULL if I’m not wrong.
@oleksandr maybe can confirm
>
>>
>>> +
>>> ret = 0;
>>> if ( !pdev->domain )
>>> {
>>> @@ -784,6 +797,9 @@ out:
>>> &PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, slot, func));
>>> }
>>> }
>>> + else if ( pdev )
>>> + pci_cleanup_msi(pdev);
>>
>> I'm slightly lost at why you add this chunk, is this strictly related
>> to the patch?
>
> This was discussed a lot in previous version of the patch and
> requested by Stefano. The idea here is that as soon as handlers
> are added some bits might be modified in the PCI config space
> leading possibly to msi interrupts. So it is safer to cleanup on the
> error path. For references please see discussion on v4 and v5 where
> this was actually added (to much references as the discussion was
> long so here [1] and [2] are the patchwork thread).
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/xen-devel/patch/9bdca2cda5d2e83f94dc2423e55714273539760a.1633540842.git.rahul.singh@arm.com/
> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/xen-devel/patch/f093de681c2560a7196895bcd666ef8840885c1d.1633340795.git.rahul.singh@arm.com/
>
> Regards
> Bertrand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-15 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 190+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-06 17:40 [PATCH v5 00/11] PCI devices passthrough on Arm Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] xen/arm: xc_domain_ioport_permission(..) not supported on ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-11 11:47 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 12:11 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 13:20 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 13:40 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 13:57 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 14:16 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 16:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 17:11 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 8:29 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 8:41 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 9:32 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 9:38 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-12 10:01 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 10:06 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-12 10:20 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 10:41 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 10:44 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 14:53 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-12 16:15 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 16:29 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-12 20:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-13 8:07 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 11:52 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-13 8:02 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 12:02 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-12 9:40 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 10:03 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 14:16 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] xen/arm: Add PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_(*add/remove) support for ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 0:05 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-07 12:58 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-21 9:28 ` xen/arm: Missing appropriate locking for the IOMMU (WAS Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] xen/arm: Add PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_(*add/remove) support for ARM) Julien Grall
2021-10-21 13:15 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-21 13:47 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-21 13:52 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] xen/arm: Add cmdline boot option "pci-passthrough = <boolean>" Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 8:27 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-07 8:32 ` Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 12:59 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] xen/arm: PCI host bridge discovery within XEN on ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] xen/arm: Add support for Xilinx ZynqMP PCI host controller Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] xen/arm: Implement pci access functions Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] xen/domctl: Introduce XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci flag Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 13:08 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-08 18:06 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-10-08 21:12 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-08 21:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-11 9:24 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-11 11:29 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-11 11:35 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 13:17 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 9:48 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-11 9:27 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 12:06 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-12 10:38 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-13 8:30 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 9:36 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 10:56 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 12:11 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 12:57 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 20:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-14 6:23 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-14 7:53 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 14:28 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 20:53 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-13 23:21 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-12 21:48 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-13 6:18 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 7:11 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] xen/arm: Enable the existing x86 virtual PCI support for ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 13:43 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 12:41 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 13:09 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 13:34 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 14:10 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 14:52 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 18:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-12 8:04 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 21:37 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-13 6:10 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 10:02 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 12:21 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 15:04 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-12 16:12 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 16:20 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-12 17:50 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 10:51 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 16:12 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 16:20 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-11 16:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 17:15 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 18:30 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-11 19:27 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-12 5:34 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-12 7:44 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 14:32 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-12 14:34 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 8:45 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 9:48 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 10:33 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 13:00 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 14:51 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-13 15:15 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 19:27 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-14 6:33 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-14 7:53 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 9:03 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 9:24 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] xen/arm: Transitional change to build HAS_VPCI on ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-11 11:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 12:15 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 1:32 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 18:01 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-07 0:26 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-07 15:31 ` Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 10:53 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-07 15:29 ` Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 16:11 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-11 13:46 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-14 17:16 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 14:49 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] PCI devices passthrough on Arm Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 14:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] xen/vpci: Move ecam access functions to common code Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 16:06 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-14 17:09 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 6:29 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 7:37 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 8:13 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 8:20 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 8:24 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 9:49 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-14 23:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-15 7:44 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 7:53 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 9:53 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 10:12 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:14 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-14 14:49 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] xen/arm: Enable the existing x86 virtual PCI support for ARM Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 23:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-15 6:40 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 9:59 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 10:10 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 8:00 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 10:09 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:14 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 10:18 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 11:35 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 12:13 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 12:18 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 12:28 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 13:00 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 13:10 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:38 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 8:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 8:42 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 9:52 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:13 ` Luca Fancellu [this message]
2021-10-15 10:17 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:19 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 10:31 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:24 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 10:33 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:41 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 10:48 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:51 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 11:08 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 13:47 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 14:00 ` Luca Fancellu
2021-10-15 14:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-14 14:49 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 17:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2021-10-14 23:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-15 7:28 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-15 7:41 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 9:01 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-15 10:02 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 10:58 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 11:04 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 11:46 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 11:53 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 12:10 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-15 12:14 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 12:13 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-12 15:03 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl Ian Jackson
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] xen/arm: Add linux,pci-domain property for hwdom if not available Rahul Singh
2021-10-13 20:54 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] PCI devices passthrough on Arm Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-07 21:29 ` Rahul Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E80D6A5A-2556-49C4-A9F0-E85CCD44D1A8@arm.com \
--to=luca.fancellu@arm.com \
--cc=Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com \
--cc=Oleksandr_Andrushchenko@epam.com \
--cc=Rahul.Singh@arm.com \
--cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=paul@xen.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).