From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/10] xen/arm: keep track of reserved-memory regions
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:47:46 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906211532220.25730@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a897193b-8dd2-2874-ea62-c9f404d14936@arm.com>
On Wed, 1 May 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 30/04/2019 22:02, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > As we parse the device tree in Xen, keep track of the reserved-memory
> > regions as they need special treatment (follow-up patches will make use
> > of the stored information.)
> >
> > Reuse process_memory_node to add reserved-memory regions to the
> > bootinfo.reserved_mem array. Remove the warning if there is no reg in
> > process_memory_node because it is a normal condition for
> > reserved-memory.
>
> And it is not a normal condition for /memory... So your argument here is not
> sufficient for me to not keep the warning here for /memory.
You are right, I'll put the warning back in place.
> Rather than trying to re-purpose process_memory_node, I would prefer if you
> move out the parsing of "reg" and then provide 2 functions (one for /memory
> and one for /reserved-memory).
>
> The parsing function will return an error if "reg" is not present, but it can
> be ignored by /reserved-memory and a warning is added for /memory.
I am OK with making this change, but I gave a look at the code for some
time and I cannot exactly figure out the interface you have in mind. I
understand completely separating the functions as I did in v1, but not
the partial split you are suggesting here.
I managed to address your other comments keeping a single function. I
suggest you take a look at the new version, then maybe write some
psedo-code to help me figure out what you would like me to do?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Not done: create an e820-like structure on ARM.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - call process_memory_node from process_reserved_memory_node to avoid
> > duplication
> > ---
> > xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
> > index b6600ab..9355a6e 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
> > @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ static int __init process_memory_node(const void *fdt,
> > int node,
> > const __be32 *cell;
> > paddr_t start, size;
> > u32 reg_cells = address_cells + size_cells;
> > + struct meminfo *mem;
> > + bool reserved = (bool)data;
> > if ( address_cells < 1 || size_cells < 1 )
> > {
> > @@ -143,29 +145,39 @@ static int __init process_memory_node(const void *fdt,
> > int node,
> > return 0;
> > }
> > + if ( reserved )
> > + mem = &bootinfo.reserved_mem;
> > + else
> > + mem = &bootinfo.mem;
> > +
> > prop = fdt_get_property(fdt, node, "reg", NULL);
> > if ( !prop )
> > - {
> > - printk("fdt: node `%s': missing `reg' property\n", name);
> > return 0;
> > - }
> > cell = (const __be32 *)prop->data;
> > banks = fdt32_to_cpu(prop->len) / (reg_cells * sizeof (u32));
> > - for ( i = 0; i < banks && bootinfo.mem.nr_banks < NR_MEM_BANKS; i++ )
> > + for ( i = 0; i < banks && mem->nr_banks < NR_MEM_BANKS; i++ )
>
> As I pointed out on v1, this is pretty fragile. While ignoring /memory bank is
> fine if we have no more space, for /reserved-region this may mean using them
> in Xen allocator with the consequences we all know.
Yeah, we don't want that.
> If you split the function properly, then you will be able to treat
> reserved-regions and memory differently.
I did so, but without splitting the functions.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-21 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-30 21:02 [PATCH v2 0/10] iomem memory policy Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] xen: add a p2mt parameter to map_mmio_regions Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-02 14:59 ` Jan Beulich
2019-05-02 14:59 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-05-02 18:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-02 18:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-15 13:39 ` Oleksandr
2019-05-15 13:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Oleksandr
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] xen: rename un/map_mmio_regions to un/map_regions Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-01 9:22 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-01 9:22 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-06-17 21:24 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-06-18 11:05 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-18 20:19 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-02 15:03 ` Jan Beulich
2019-05-02 15:03 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-05-02 18:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-02 18:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] xen: extend XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping to handle memory policy Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-02 15:12 ` Jan Beulich
2019-05-02 15:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-06-17 21:28 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-06-18 8:59 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-18 20:32 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-06-18 23:15 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-06-19 6:53 ` Jan Beulich
2019-05-07 16:41 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-07 16:41 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-06-17 22:43 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-06-18 11:13 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-15 14:40 ` Oleksandr
2019-05-15 14:40 ` [Xen-devel] " Oleksandr
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] libxc: introduce xc_domain_mem_map_policy Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] libxl/xl: add memory policy option to iomem Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-01 9:42 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-01 9:42 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-06-17 22:32 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-06-18 11:09 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-18 11:15 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-18 22:07 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-06-18 22:20 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-18 22:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] xen/arm: extend device_tree_for_each_node Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-07 17:12 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-07 17:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] xen/arm: make process_memory_node a device_tree_node_func Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-01 9:47 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-01 9:47 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] xen/arm: keep track of reserved-memory regions Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-01 10:03 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-01 10:03 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-06-21 23:47 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2019-05-07 17:21 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-07 17:21 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] xen/arm: map reserved-memory regions as normal memory in dom0 Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-07 19:52 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-07 19:52 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] xen/arm: add reserved-memory regions to the dom0 memory node Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-30 21:02 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-07 20:15 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-07 20:15 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-10 20:51 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-10 20:51 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-10 21:43 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-10 21:43 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-11 12:40 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-11 12:40 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-20 21:26 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-20 21:26 ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-20 22:38 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-20 22:38 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-06-05 16:30 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-21 23:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-05-16 16:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/10] iomem memory policy Oleksandr
2019-05-16 16:52 ` [Xen-devel] " Oleksandr
2019-06-21 23:48 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1906211532220.25730@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s \
--to=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=stefanos@xilinx.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).