* [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
@ 2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
---
This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
and added on top of the below patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
@@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
spi_2: spi at 12d40000 {
status = "disabled";
};
+
+ gpio_keys {
+ compatible = "gpio-keys";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ menu {
+ label = "SW-TACT2";
+ gpios = <&gpx1 4 0 0x10000 2>;
+ linux,code = <139>;
+ gpio-key,wakeup;
+ };
+
+ home {
+ label = "SW-TACT3";
+ gpios = <&gpx1 5 0 0x10000 2>;
+ linux,code = <102>;
+ gpio-key,wakeup;
+ };
+
+ up {
+ label = "SW-TACT4";
+ gpios = <&gpx1 6 0 0x10000 2>;
+ linux,code = <103>;
+ gpio-key,wakeup;
+ };
+
+ down {
+ label = "SW-TACT5";
+ gpios = <&gpx1 7 0 0x10000 2>;
+ linux,code = <108>;
+ gpio-key,wakeup;
+ };
+
+ back {
+ label = "SW-TACT6";
+ gpios = <&gpx2 0 0 0x10000 2>;
+ linux,code = <158>;
+ gpio-key,wakeup;
+ };
+
+ wakeup {
+ label = "SW-TACT7";
+ gpios = <&gpx2 1 0 0x10000 2>;
+ linux,code = <143>;
+ gpio-key,wakeup;
+ };
+ };
};
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add PMIC node entry
2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
@ 2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, devicetree-discuss
Cc: kgene.kim, patches, Amit Daniel Kachhap
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Added S5M8767 PMIC DT nodes to Arndale board.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
index 9ce40df..b40a02f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
@@ -25,7 +25,218 @@
};
i2c@12C60000 {
- status = "disabled";
+ status = "okay";
+ samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>;
+ samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <20000>;
+ samsung,i2c-slave-addr = <0x66>;
+ gpios = <&gpb3 0 2 3 0>,
+ <&gpb3 1 2 3 0>;
+
+ s5m8767_pmic@66 {
+ compatible = "samsung,s5m8767-pmic";
+ reg = <0x66>;
+
+ s5m8767,pmic-buck2-dvs-voltage = <1300000>;
+ s5m8767,pmic-buck3-dvs-voltage = <1100000>;
+ s5m8767,pmic-buck4-dvs-voltage = <1200000>;
+ s5m8767,pmic-buck-dvs-gpios = <&gpd1 0 1 0 0>,
+ <&gpd1 1 1 0 0>,
+ <&gpd1 2 1 0 0>;
+ s5m8767,pmic-buck-ds-gpios = <&gpx2 3 1 0 0>,
+ <&gpx2 4 1 0 0>,
+ <&gpx2 5 1 0 0>;
+ regulators {
+ ldo1_reg: LDO1 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_ALIVE_1.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo2_reg: LDO2 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_28IO_DP_1.35V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo3_reg: LDO3 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_COMMON1_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo4_reg: LDO4 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_IOPERI_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo5_reg: LDO5 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_EXT_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo6_reg: LDO6 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_MPLL_1.1V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo7_reg: LDO7 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_XPLL_1.1V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo8_reg: LDO8 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_COMMON2_1.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo9_reg: LDO9 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_33ON_3.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo10_reg: LDO10 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_COMMON3_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo11_reg: LDO11 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_ABB2_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo12_reg: LDO12 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_USB_3.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo13_reg: LDO13 {
+ regulator-name = "VDDQ_C2C_W_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo14_reg: LDO14 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD18_ABB0_3_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo15_reg: LDO15 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD10_COMMON4_1.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo16_reg: LDO16 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD18_HSIC_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo17_reg: LDO17 {
+ regulator-name = "VDDQ_MMC2_3_2.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo18_reg: LDO18 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_33ON_2.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ buck1_reg: BUCK1 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_MIF_1.2V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <950000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ buck2_reg: BUCK2 {
+ regulator-name = "vdd_arm";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <925000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ buck3_reg: BUCK3 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_INT_1.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <900000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ buck4_reg: BUCK4 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_G3D_1.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ buck5_reg: BUCK5 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_MEM_1.35V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <750000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1355000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ };
+ };
};
i2c@12C70000 {
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add PMIC node entry
@ 2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Added S5M8767 PMIC DT nodes to Arndale board.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
index 9ce40df..b40a02f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
@@ -25,7 +25,218 @@
};
i2c at 12C60000 {
- status = "disabled";
+ status = "okay";
+ samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>;
+ samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <20000>;
+ samsung,i2c-slave-addr = <0x66>;
+ gpios = <&gpb3 0 2 3 0>,
+ <&gpb3 1 2 3 0>;
+
+ s5m8767_pmic at 66 {
+ compatible = "samsung,s5m8767-pmic";
+ reg = <0x66>;
+
+ s5m8767,pmic-buck2-dvs-voltage = <1300000>;
+ s5m8767,pmic-buck3-dvs-voltage = <1100000>;
+ s5m8767,pmic-buck4-dvs-voltage = <1200000>;
+ s5m8767,pmic-buck-dvs-gpios = <&gpd1 0 1 0 0>,
+ <&gpd1 1 1 0 0>,
+ <&gpd1 2 1 0 0>;
+ s5m8767,pmic-buck-ds-gpios = <&gpx2 3 1 0 0>,
+ <&gpx2 4 1 0 0>,
+ <&gpx2 5 1 0 0>;
+ regulators {
+ ldo1_reg: LDO1 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_ALIVE_1.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo2_reg: LDO2 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_28IO_DP_1.35V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo3_reg: LDO3 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_COMMON1_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo4_reg: LDO4 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_IOPERI_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo5_reg: LDO5 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_EXT_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo6_reg: LDO6 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_MPLL_1.1V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo7_reg: LDO7 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_XPLL_1.1V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo8_reg: LDO8 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_COMMON2_1.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo9_reg: LDO9 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_33ON_3.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo10_reg: LDO10 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_COMMON3_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo11_reg: LDO11 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_ABB2_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo12_reg: LDO12 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_USB_3.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo13_reg: LDO13 {
+ regulator-name = "VDDQ_C2C_W_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo14_reg: LDO14 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD18_ABB0_3_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo15_reg: LDO15 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD10_COMMON4_1.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo16_reg: LDO16 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD18_HSIC_1.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo17_reg: LDO17 {
+ regulator-name = "VDDQ_MMC2_3_2.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ ldo18_reg: LDO18 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_33ON_2.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ buck1_reg: BUCK1 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_MIF_1.2V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <950000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ buck2_reg: BUCK2 {
+ regulator-name = "vdd_arm";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <925000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ buck3_reg: BUCK3 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_INT_1.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <900000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ buck4_reg: BUCK4 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_G3D_1.0V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ buck5_reg: BUCK5 {
+ regulator-name = "VDD_MEM_1.35V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <750000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1355000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ op_mode = <1>;
+ };
+
+ };
+ };
};
i2c at 12C70000 {
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add PMIC node entry
2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
@ 2013-02-07 5:49 ` Kumar, Anil
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Kumar, Anil @ 2013-02-07 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tushar Behera, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, devicetree-discuss
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap, kgene.kim, patches
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:26, Tushar Behera wrote:
> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>
> Added S5M8767 PMIC DT nodes to Arndale board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> index 9ce40df..b40a02f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> @@ -25,7 +25,218 @@
> };
>
> i2c@12C60000 {
> - status = "disabled";
> + status = "okay";
Is there any need to change status "okay" here as in dtsi file it is
by default okay ?
> + samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>;
> + samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <20000>;
> + samsung,i2c-slave-addr = <0x66>;
> + gpios = <&gpb3 0 2 3 0>,
> + <&gpb3 1 2 3 0>;
> +
> + s5m8767_pmic@66 {
> + compatible = "samsung,s5m8767-pmic";
> + reg = <0x66>;
> +
> + s5m8767,pmic-buck2-dvs-voltage = <1300000>;
> + s5m8767,pmic-buck3-dvs-voltage = <1100000>;
> + s5m8767,pmic-buck4-dvs-voltage = <1200000>;
> + s5m8767,pmic-buck-dvs-gpios = <&gpd1 0 1 0 0>,
> + <&gpd1 1 1 0 0>,
> + <&gpd1 2 1 0 0>;
> + s5m8767,pmic-buck-ds-gpios = <&gpx2 3 1 0 0>,
> + <&gpx2 4 1 0 0>,
> + <&gpx2 5 1 0 0>;
> + regulators {
> + ldo1_reg: LDO1 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_ALIVE_1.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo2_reg: LDO2 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_28IO_DP_1.35V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo3_reg: LDO3 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_COMMON1_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo4_reg: LDO4 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_IOPERI_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo5_reg: LDO5 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_EXT_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo6_reg: LDO6 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_MPLL_1.1V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo7_reg: LDO7 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_XPLL_1.1V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo8_reg: LDO8 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_COMMON2_1.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo9_reg: LDO9 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_33ON_3.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo10_reg: LDO10 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_COMMON3_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo11_reg: LDO11 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_ABB2_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo12_reg: LDO12 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_USB_3.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo13_reg: LDO13 {
> + regulator-name = "VDDQ_C2C_W_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo14_reg: LDO14 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD18_ABB0_3_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo15_reg: LDO15 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD10_COMMON4_1.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo16_reg: LDO16 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD18_HSIC_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo17_reg: LDO17 {
> + regulator-name = "VDDQ_MMC2_3_2.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo18_reg: LDO18 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_33ON_2.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + buck1_reg: BUCK1 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_MIF_1.2V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <950000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + buck2_reg: BUCK2 {
> + regulator-name = "vdd_arm";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <925000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + buck3_reg: BUCK3 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_INT_1.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <900000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + buck4_reg: BUCK4 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_G3D_1.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + buck5_reg: BUCK5 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_MEM_1.35V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <750000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1355000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + };
> + };
> };
>
> i2c@12C70000 {
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add PMIC node entry
@ 2013-02-07 5:49 ` Kumar, Anil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Kumar, Anil @ 2013-02-07 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:26, Tushar Behera wrote:
> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>
> Added S5M8767 PMIC DT nodes to Arndale board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> index 9ce40df..b40a02f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> @@ -25,7 +25,218 @@
> };
>
> i2c at 12C60000 {
> - status = "disabled";
> + status = "okay";
Is there any need to change status "okay" here as in dtsi file it is
by default okay ?
> + samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>;
> + samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <20000>;
> + samsung,i2c-slave-addr = <0x66>;
> + gpios = <&gpb3 0 2 3 0>,
> + <&gpb3 1 2 3 0>;
> +
> + s5m8767_pmic at 66 {
> + compatible = "samsung,s5m8767-pmic";
> + reg = <0x66>;
> +
> + s5m8767,pmic-buck2-dvs-voltage = <1300000>;
> + s5m8767,pmic-buck3-dvs-voltage = <1100000>;
> + s5m8767,pmic-buck4-dvs-voltage = <1200000>;
> + s5m8767,pmic-buck-dvs-gpios = <&gpd1 0 1 0 0>,
> + <&gpd1 1 1 0 0>,
> + <&gpd1 2 1 0 0>;
> + s5m8767,pmic-buck-ds-gpios = <&gpx2 3 1 0 0>,
> + <&gpx2 4 1 0 0>,
> + <&gpx2 5 1 0 0>;
> + regulators {
> + ldo1_reg: LDO1 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_ALIVE_1.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo2_reg: LDO2 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_28IO_DP_1.35V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo3_reg: LDO3 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_COMMON1_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo4_reg: LDO4 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_IOPERI_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo5_reg: LDO5 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_EXT_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo6_reg: LDO6 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_MPLL_1.1V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo7_reg: LDO7 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_XPLL_1.1V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo8_reg: LDO8 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_COMMON2_1.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo9_reg: LDO9 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_33ON_3.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo10_reg: LDO10 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_COMMON3_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo11_reg: LDO11 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_ABB2_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo12_reg: LDO12 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_USB_3.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo13_reg: LDO13 {
> + regulator-name = "VDDQ_C2C_W_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo14_reg: LDO14 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD18_ABB0_3_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo15_reg: LDO15 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD10_COMMON4_1.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo16_reg: LDO16 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD18_HSIC_1.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo17_reg: LDO17 {
> + regulator-name = "VDDQ_MMC2_3_2.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ldo18_reg: LDO18 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_33ON_2.8V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + buck1_reg: BUCK1 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_MIF_1.2V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <950000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + buck2_reg: BUCK2 {
> + regulator-name = "vdd_arm";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <925000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + buck3_reg: BUCK3 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_INT_1.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <900000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + buck4_reg: BUCK4 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_G3D_1.0V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + buck5_reg: BUCK5 {
> + regulator-name = "VDD_MEM_1.35V";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <750000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1355000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + op_mode = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + };
> + };
> };
>
> i2c at 12C70000 {
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add PMIC node entry
2013-02-07 5:49 ` Kumar, Anil
@ 2013-02-07 5:56 ` Tushar Behera
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kumar, Anil
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, devicetree-discuss,
Amit Daniel Kachhap, kgene.kim, patches
On 02/07/2013 11:19 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:26, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>>
>> Added S5M8767 PMIC DT nodes to Arndale board.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>> index 9ce40df..b40a02f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>> @@ -25,7 +25,218 @@
>> };
>>
>> i2c@12C60000 {
>> - status = "disabled";
>> + status = "okay";
>
> Is there any need to change status "okay" here as in dtsi file it is
> by default okay ?
>
Right, there is no need for setting it as "okay" explicitly.
--
Tushar Behera
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add PMIC node entry
@ 2013-02-07 5:56 ` Tushar Behera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 02/07/2013 11:19 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:26, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>>
>> Added S5M8767 PMIC DT nodes to Arndale board.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>> index 9ce40df..b40a02f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>> @@ -25,7 +25,218 @@
>> };
>>
>> i2c at 12C60000 {
>> - status = "disabled";
>> + status = "okay";
>
> Is there any need to change status "okay" here as in dtsi file it is
> by default okay ?
>
Right, there is no need for setting it as "okay" explicitly.
--
Tushar Behera
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add PMIC node entry
2013-02-07 5:56 ` Tushar Behera
@ 2013-02-11 0:38 ` amit daniel kachhap
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: amit daniel kachhap @ 2013-02-11 0:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tushar Behera
Cc: Kumar, Anil, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc,
devicetree-discuss, kgene.kim, patches
The V2 of this patch is posted with comments suggested by Anil and
some missing LDO's.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 11:19 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:26, Tushar Behera wrote:
>>> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>>>
>>> Added S5M8767 PMIC DT nodes to Arndale board.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 1 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> index 9ce40df..b40a02f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> @@ -25,7 +25,218 @@
>>> };
>>>
>>> i2c@12C60000 {
>>> - status = "disabled";
>>> + status = "okay";
>>
>> Is there any need to change status "okay" here as in dtsi file it is
>> by default okay ?
>>
>
> Right, there is no need for setting it as "okay" explicitly.
>
> --
> Tushar Behera
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add PMIC node entry
@ 2013-02-11 0:38 ` amit daniel kachhap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: amit daniel kachhap @ 2013-02-11 0:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The V2 of this patch is posted with comments suggested by Anil and
some missing LDO's.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 11:19 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:26, Tushar Behera wrote:
>>> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>>>
>>> Added S5M8767 PMIC DT nodes to Arndale board.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 1 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> index 9ce40df..b40a02f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> @@ -25,7 +25,218 @@
>>> };
>>>
>>> i2c at 12C60000 {
>>> - status = "disabled";
>>> + status = "okay";
>>
>> Is there any need to change status "okay" here as in dtsi file it is
>> by default okay ?
>>
>
> Right, there is no need for setting it as "okay" explicitly.
>
> --
> Tushar Behera
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add PMIC node entry
2013-02-11 0:38 ` amit daniel kachhap
@ 2013-03-11 2:05 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2013-03-11 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'amit daniel kachhap', 'Tushar Behera'
Cc: 'Kumar, Anil',
linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, devicetree-discuss, patches
amit daniel kachhap wrote:
>
> The V2 of this patch is posted with comments suggested by Anil and
> some missing LDO's.
>
OK, I see.
- Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add vmmc regulator support
2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
@ 2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, devicetree-discuss
Cc: kgene.kim, patches, Sachin Kamat
From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Added vmmc regulator node to Arndale DT file.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 11 +++++++++++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
index b40a02f..d018fd2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@
samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <2 3>;
samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <1 2>;
+ vmmc-supply = <&mmc_reg>;
slot@0 {
reg = <0>;
@@ -304,6 +305,7 @@
samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <2 3>;
samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <1 2>;
+ vmmc-supply = <&mmc_reg>;
slot@0 {
reg = <0>;
@@ -378,4 +380,13 @@
gpio-key,wakeup;
};
};
+
+ mmc_reg: voltage-regulator {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ regulator-name = "VDD_33ON_2.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>;
+ gpio = <&gpx1 1 0 0 2>;
+ enable-active-high;
+ };
};
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add vmmc regulator support
@ 2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Added vmmc regulator node to Arndale DT file.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 11 +++++++++++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
index b40a02f..d018fd2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@
samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <2 3>;
samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <1 2>;
+ vmmc-supply = <&mmc_reg>;
slot at 0 {
reg = <0>;
@@ -304,6 +305,7 @@
samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <2 3>;
samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <1 2>;
+ vmmc-supply = <&mmc_reg>;
slot at 0 {
reg = <0>;
@@ -378,4 +380,13 @@
gpio-key,wakeup;
};
};
+
+ mmc_reg: voltage-regulator {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ regulator-name = "VDD_33ON_2.8V";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>;
+ gpio = <&gpx1 1 0 0 2>;
+ enable-active-high;
+ };
};
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add MFC codec support
2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
@ 2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, devicetree-discuss
Cc: kgene.kim, patches, Sachin Kamat
From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Added MFC codec node to Arndale DT file.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
index d018fd2..6162a72 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@
bootargs = "console=ttySAC2,115200";
};
+ codec@11000000 {
+ samsung,mfc-r = <0x43000000 0x800000>;
+ samsung,mfc-l = <0x51000000 0x800000>;
+ };
+
i2c@12C60000 {
status = "okay";
samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>;
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add MFC codec support
@ 2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Added MFC codec node to Arndale DT file.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
index d018fd2..6162a72 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@
bootargs = "console=ttySAC2,115200";
};
+ codec at 11000000 {
+ samsung,mfc-r = <0x43000000 0x800000>;
+ samsung,mfc-l = <0x51000000 0x800000>;
+ };
+
i2c at 12C60000 {
status = "okay";
samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>;
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add HDMI HPD and regulator node
2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
@ 2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, devicetree-discuss
Cc: kgene.kim, patches, Sachin Kamat
From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Added HDMI hot plug and regulator nodes to Arndale DT file.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 12 ++++++++++++
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
index 6162a72..7b891a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
@@ -386,6 +386,13 @@
};
};
+ hdmi {
+ hpd-gpio = <&gpx3 7 0xf 1 3>;
+ vdd_osc-supply = <&ldo10_reg>;
+ vdd_pll-supply = <&ldo8_reg>;
+ vdd-supply = <&ldo8_reg>;
+ };
+
mmc_reg: voltage-regulator {
compatible = "regulator-fixed";
regulator-name = "VDD_33ON_2.8V";
@@ -394,4 +401,9 @@
gpio = <&gpx1 1 0 0 2>;
enable-active-high;
};
+
+ reg_hdmi_en: fixedregulator@0 {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ regulator-name = "hdmi-en";
+ };
};
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add HDMI HPD and regulator node
@ 2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Added HDMI hot plug and regulator nodes to Arndale DT file.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 12 ++++++++++++
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
index 6162a72..7b891a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
@@ -386,6 +386,13 @@
};
};
+ hdmi {
+ hpd-gpio = <&gpx3 7 0xf 1 3>;
+ vdd_osc-supply = <&ldo10_reg>;
+ vdd_pll-supply = <&ldo8_reg>;
+ vdd-supply = <&ldo8_reg>;
+ };
+
mmc_reg: voltage-regulator {
compatible = "regulator-fixed";
regulator-name = "VDD_33ON_2.8V";
@@ -394,4 +401,9 @@
gpio = <&gpx1 1 0 0 2>;
enable-active-high;
};
+
+ reg_hdmi_en: fixedregulator at 0 {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ regulator-name = "hdmi-en";
+ };
};
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
@ 2013-02-07 6:17 ` Kumar, Anil
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Kumar, Anil @ 2013-02-07 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tushar Behera, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, devicetree-discuss
Cc: kgene.kim, patches
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
> ---
> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
> and added on top of the below patch:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
> spi_2: spi@12d40000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
> +
> + gpio_keys {
> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
Just want to understand why these properties are here?
As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
anyone is using here.
Sorry if I have misunderstood.
> +
> + menu {
> + label = "SW-TACT2";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 4 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <139>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + home {
> + label = "SW-TACT3";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 5 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <102>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + up {
> + label = "SW-TACT4";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 6 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <103>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + down {
> + label = "SW-TACT5";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 7 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <108>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + back {
> + label = "SW-TACT6";
> + gpios = <&gpx2 0 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <158>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + wakeup {
> + label = "SW-TACT7";
> + gpios = <&gpx2 1 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <143>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> + };
> };
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
@ 2013-02-07 6:17 ` Kumar, Anil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Kumar, Anil @ 2013-02-07 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
> ---
> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
> and added on top of the below patch:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
> spi_2: spi at 12d40000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
> +
> + gpio_keys {
> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
Just want to understand why these properties are here?
As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
anyone is using here.
Sorry if I have misunderstood.
> +
> + menu {
> + label = "SW-TACT2";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 4 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <139>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + home {
> + label = "SW-TACT3";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 5 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <102>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + up {
> + label = "SW-TACT4";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 6 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <103>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + down {
> + label = "SW-TACT5";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 7 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <108>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + back {
> + label = "SW-TACT6";
> + gpios = <&gpx2 0 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <158>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + wakeup {
> + label = "SW-TACT7";
> + gpios = <&gpx2 1 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <143>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> + };
> };
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
2013-02-07 6:17 ` Kumar, Anil
@ 2013-02-07 6:26 ` Tushar Behera
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kumar, Anil
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, devicetree-discuss,
kgene.kim, patches
On 02/07/2013 11:47 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
>> and added on top of the below patch:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
>> spi_2: spi@12d40000 {
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>> +
>> + gpio_keys {
>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>
> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
> anyone is using here.
>
That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
--
Tushar Behera
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
@ 2013-02-07 6:26 ` Tushar Behera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 02/07/2013 11:47 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
>> and added on top of the below patch:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
>> spi_2: spi at 12d40000 {
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>> +
>> + gpio_keys {
>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>
> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
> anyone is using here.
>
That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
--
Tushar Behera
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
2013-02-07 6:26 ` Tushar Behera
@ 2013-02-07 6:36 ` Manish Badarkhe
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Manish Badarkhe @ 2013-02-07 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tushar Behera
Cc: Kumar, Anil, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc,
devicetree-discuss, kgene.kim, patches
Hi Tushar
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 11:47 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
>>> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
>>> and added on top of the below patch:
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
>>> spi_2: spi@12d40000 {
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + gpio_keys {
>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
>> anyone is using here.
>>
>
> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in following link:
http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&stable=1#CPU_addressing
which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
of address-cells and size-cells propeties.
Correct me if I am wrong here?
Thanks
Manish Badarkhe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
@ 2013-02-07 6:36 ` Manish Badarkhe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Manish Badarkhe @ 2013-02-07 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Tushar
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 11:47 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
>>> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
>>> and added on top of the below patch:
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
>>> spi_2: spi at 12d40000 {
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + gpio_keys {
>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
>> anyone is using here.
>>
>
> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in following link:
http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&stable=1#CPU_addressing
which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
of address-cells and size-cells propeties.
Correct me if I am wrong here?
Thanks
Manish Badarkhe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
2013-02-07 6:36 ` Manish Badarkhe
@ 2013-02-07 6:56 ` Tushar Behera
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manish Badarkhe
Cc: Kumar, Anil, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc,
devicetree-discuss, kgene.kim, patches
On 02/07/2013 12:06 PM, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
> Hi Tushar
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 02/07/2013 11:47 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
>>>> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
>>>> and added on top of the below patch:
>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>>> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>>> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
>>>> spi_2: spi@12d40000 {
>>>> status = "disabled";
>>>> };
>>>> +
>>>> + gpio_keys {
>>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>
>>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
>>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
>>> anyone is using here.
>>>
>>
>> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
>
> I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in following link:
> http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&stable=1#CPU_addressing
>
> which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
> I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
> of address-cells and size-cells propeties.
>
Please check Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
And whether these properties are required or not, I will let device tree
experts to comment on that.
As such, currently all node entries for gpio_keys use these properties.
--
Tushar Behera
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
@ 2013-02-07 6:56 ` Tushar Behera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 02/07/2013 12:06 PM, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
> Hi Tushar
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 02/07/2013 11:47 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
>>>> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
>>>> and added on top of the below patch:
>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>>> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>>> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
>>>> spi_2: spi at 12d40000 {
>>>> status = "disabled";
>>>> };
>>>> +
>>>> + gpio_keys {
>>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>
>>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
>>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
>>> anyone is using here.
>>>
>>
>> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
>
> I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in following link:
> http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&stable=1#CPU_addressing
>
> which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
> I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
> of address-cells and size-cells propeties.
>
Please check Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
And whether these properties are required or not, I will let device tree
experts to comment on that.
As such, currently all node entries for gpio_keys use these properties.
--
Tushar Behera
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
2013-02-07 6:56 ` Tushar Behera
@ 2013-02-07 7:43 ` Girish KS
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Girish KS @ 2013-02-07 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tushar Behera
Cc: Manish Badarkhe, kgene.kim, patches, devicetree-discuss,
linux-samsung-soc, Kumar, Anil, linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 12:06 PM, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
>> Hi Tushar
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On 02/07/2013 11:47 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
>>>>> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
>>>>> and added on top of the below patch:
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>>>> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>>>> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
>>>>> spi_2: spi@12d40000 {
>>>>> status = "disabled";
>>>>> };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + gpio_keys {
>>>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>>
>>>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
>>>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
>>>> anyone is using here.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
>>
>> I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in following link:
>> http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&stable=1#CPU_addressing
>>
>> which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
>> I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
>> of address-cells and size-cells propeties.
>>
>
> Please check Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
>
> And whether these properties are required or not, I will let device tree
> experts to comment on that.
>
> As such, currently all node entries for gpio_keys use these properties.
you can just verify by a simple test.
delete the 2 lines. address-cells and size cells.
this will have no affect.
now with these 2 lines deleted lines add a dummy reg property with
address and cell. dtb compiler will warn.
So I think what manish reffered is right.
There is also a reference of smdk4210 for kepads.
>
> --
> Tushar Behera
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
@ 2013-02-07 7:43 ` Girish KS
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Girish KS @ 2013-02-07 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 12:06 PM, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
>> Hi Tushar
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On 02/07/2013 11:47 AM, Kumar, Anil wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:45:25, Tushar Behera wrote:
>>>>> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
>>>>> and added on top of the below patch:
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>>>> index 63572f9..9ce40df 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
>>>>> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
>>>>> spi_2: spi at 12d40000 {
>>>>> status = "disabled";
>>>>> };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + gpio_keys {
>>>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>>
>>>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
>>>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
>>>> anyone is using here.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
>>
>> I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in following link:
>> http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&stable=1#CPU_addressing
>>
>> which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
>> I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
>> of address-cells and size-cells propeties.
>>
>
> Please check Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
>
> And whether these properties are required or not, I will let device tree
> experts to comment on that.
>
> As such, currently all node entries for gpio_keys use these properties.
you can just verify by a simple test.
delete the 2 lines. address-cells and size cells.
this will have no affect.
now with these 2 lines deleted lines add a dummy reg property with
address and cell. dtb compiler will warn.
So I think what manish reffered is right.
There is also a reference of smdk4210 for kepads.
>
> --
> Tushar Behera
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
2013-02-07 7:43 ` Girish KS
@ 2013-02-07 9:40 ` Tushar Behera
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Girish KS
Cc: Manish Badarkhe, kgene.kim, patches, devicetree-discuss,
linux-samsung-soc, Kumar, Anil, linux-arm-kernel, david, dtor
+CC: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
+CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
On 02/07/2013 01:13 PM, Girish KS wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + gpio_keys {
>>>>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>>>
>>>>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
>>>>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
>>>>> anyone is using here.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
>>>
>>> I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in following link:
>>> http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&stable=1#CPU_addressing
>>>
>>> which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
>>> I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
>>> of address-cells and size-cells propeties.
>>>
>>
>> Please check Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
>>
>> And whether these properties are required or not, I will let device tree
>> experts to comment on that.
>>
>> As such, currently all node entries for gpio_keys use these properties.
> you can just verify by a simple test.
> delete the 2 lines. address-cells and size cells.
> this will have no affect.
> now with these 2 lines deleted lines add a dummy reg property with
> address and cell. dtb compiler will warn.
> So I think what manish reffered is right.
> There is also a reference of smdk4210 for kepads.
Right. Compilation is ok even after removing the address-cell and
size-cell properties.
But since this is used across all the instances, I would like to know
the view of the authors on this.
David, Dimitry,
Can you please let us know your opinion on this? If these properties are
not required, then we can remove them from the documentation and from
node entries in several other dts files.
>>
>> --
>> Tushar Behera
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
Tushar Behera
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
@ 2013-02-07 9:40 ` Tushar Behera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-02-07 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
+CC: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
+CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
On 02/07/2013 01:13 PM, Girish KS wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + gpio_keys {
>>>>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>>>
>>>>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
>>>>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
>>>>> anyone is using here.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
>>>
>>> I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in following link:
>>> http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&stable=1#CPU_addressing
>>>
>>> which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
>>> I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
>>> of address-cells and size-cells propeties.
>>>
>>
>> Please check Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
>>
>> And whether these properties are required or not, I will let device tree
>> experts to comment on that.
>>
>> As such, currently all node entries for gpio_keys use these properties.
> you can just verify by a simple test.
> delete the 2 lines. address-cells and size cells.
> this will have no affect.
> now with these 2 lines deleted lines add a dummy reg property with
> address and cell. dtb compiler will warn.
> So I think what manish reffered is right.
> There is also a reference of smdk4210 for kepads.
Right. Compilation is ok even after removing the address-cell and
size-cell properties.
But since this is used across all the instances, I would like to know
the view of the authors on this.
David, Dimitry,
Can you please let us know your opinion on this? If these properties are
not required, then we can remove them from the documentation and from
node entries in several other dts files.
>>
>> --
>> Tushar Behera
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
Tushar Behera
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
2013-02-07 9:40 ` Tushar Behera
@ 2013-02-07 11:25 ` Tomasz Figa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2013-02-07 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devicetree-discuss
Cc: Tushar Behera, Girish KS, linux-samsung-soc, patches, dtor,
Manish Badarkhe, kgene.kim, david, Kumar, Anil, linux-arm-kernel
On Thursday 07 of February 2013 15:10:27 Tushar Behera wrote:
> +CC: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
> +CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
>
> On 02/07/2013 01:13 PM, Girish KS wrote:
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + gpio_keys {
> >>>>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
> >>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >>>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
> >>>>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
> >>>>> anyone is using here.
> >>>>
> >>>> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
> >>>
> >>> I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in
> >>> following link:
> >>> http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&s
> >>> table=1#CPU_addressing
> >>>
> >>> which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
> >>> I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
> >>> of address-cells and size-cells propeties.
> >>
> >> Please check Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
> >>
> >> And whether these properties are required or not, I will let device
> >> tree experts to comment on that.
> >>
> >> As such, currently all node entries for gpio_keys use these
> >> properties.
> >
> > you can just verify by a simple test.
> > delete the 2 lines. address-cells and size cells.
> > this will have no affect.
> > now with these 2 lines deleted lines add a dummy reg property with
> > address and cell. dtb compiler will warn.
> > So I think what manish reffered is right.
> > There is also a reference of smdk4210 for kepads.
>
> Right. Compilation is ok even after removing the address-cell and
> size-cell properties.
>
> But since this is used across all the instances, I would like to know
> the view of the authors on this.
>
> David, Dimitry,
>
> Can you please let us know your opinion on this? If these properties are
> not required, then we can remove them from the documentation and from
> node entries in several other dts files.
The #address-cells and #size-cells are used only together with reg
properties of sub nodes. They define how many cells in reg specifier are
used for registers address and length.
So, if you have #address-cells = <1> and #size-cells = <0>, then your reg
specifier will be simply <addr>. You can get more complex specifiers using
more address cells and size cells, like:
#address-cells = <3>;
#size-cells = <1>;
subdev@1,2,3 {
reg = <1 2 3 0x1000>;
/* ... */
};
If you don't intend to use reg property for child device addressing then
you don't define #address-cells and #size-cells properties.
I think that the documentation of gpio_keys binding should be corrected
and possibly also moved to bindings/input instead of bindings/gpio, as
this directory is intended to be used for GPIO controllers, not GPIO
consumers.
Best regards,
--
Tomasz Figa
Samsung Poland R&D Center
SW Solution Development, Linux Platform
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
@ 2013-02-07 11:25 ` Tomasz Figa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2013-02-07 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thursday 07 of February 2013 15:10:27 Tushar Behera wrote:
> +CC: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
> +CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
>
> On 02/07/2013 01:13 PM, Girish KS wrote:
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + gpio_keys {
> >>>>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
> >>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >>>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just want to understand why these properties are here?
> >>>>> As these properties are for child dt node. But have not seen
> >>>>> anyone is using here.
> >>>>
> >>>> That is how gpio_keys node entries are defined in other .dts files.
> >>>
> >>> I have gone through example for address-cells and size-cells in
> >>> following link:
> >>> http://devicetree.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Device_Tree_Usage&s
> >>> table=1#CPU_addressing
> >>>
> >>> which indicates that these fields are for child "reg".
> >>> I think, here in child node there is no "reg". so there is no use
> >>> of address-cells and size-cells propeties.
> >>
> >> Please check Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_keys.txt
> >>
> >> And whether these properties are required or not, I will let device
> >> tree experts to comment on that.
> >>
> >> As such, currently all node entries for gpio_keys use these
> >> properties.
> >
> > you can just verify by a simple test.
> > delete the 2 lines. address-cells and size cells.
> > this will have no affect.
> > now with these 2 lines deleted lines add a dummy reg property with
> > address and cell. dtb compiler will warn.
> > So I think what manish reffered is right.
> > There is also a reference of smdk4210 for kepads.
>
> Right. Compilation is ok even after removing the address-cell and
> size-cell properties.
>
> But since this is used across all the instances, I would like to know
> the view of the authors on this.
>
> David, Dimitry,
>
> Can you please let us know your opinion on this? If these properties are
> not required, then we can remove them from the documentation and from
> node entries in several other dts files.
The #address-cells and #size-cells are used only together with reg
properties of sub nodes. They define how many cells in reg specifier are
used for registers address and length.
So, if you have #address-cells = <1> and #size-cells = <0>, then your reg
specifier will be simply <addr>. You can get more complex specifiers using
more address cells and size cells, like:
#address-cells = <3>;
#size-cells = <1>;
subdev at 1,2,3 {
reg = <1 2 3 0x1000>;
/* ... */
};
If you don't intend to use reg property for child device addressing then
you don't define #address-cells and #size-cells properties.
I think that the documentation of gpio_keys binding should be corrected
and possibly also moved to bindings/input instead of bindings/gpio, as
this directory is intended to be used for GPIO controllers, not GPIO
consumers.
Best regards,
--
Tomasz Figa
Samsung Poland R&D Center
SW Solution Development, Linux Platform
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
2013-02-07 5:15 ` Tushar Behera
@ 2013-02-07 10:30 ` Tomasz Figa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2013-02-07 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tushar Behera
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, devicetree-discuss,
kgene.kim, patches, Thomas Abraham
Hi,
I'm wondering why Exynos5250 has not been migrated to use pinctrl yet.
Support for it in pinctrl-samsung driver has been already merged, but I
don't see any pinctrl nodes in exynos5250.dtsi.
This is important because the legacy gpio-samsung support is going to be
dropped, as it already happened in case of Exynos 4.
CC'ing Thomas Abraham as he might know something.
Best regards,
--
Tomasz Figa
Samsung Poland R&D Center
SW Solution Development, Linux Platform
On Thursday 07 of February 2013 10:45:25 Tushar Behera wrote:
> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
> ---
> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
> and added on top of the below patch:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0
> deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts index 63572f9..9ce40df
> 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
> spi_2: spi@12d40000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
> +
> + gpio_keys {
> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + menu {
> + label = "SW-TACT2";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 4 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <139>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + home {
> + label = "SW-TACT3";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 5 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <102>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + up {
> + label = "SW-TACT4";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 6 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <103>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + down {
> + label = "SW-TACT5";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 7 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <108>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + back {
> + label = "SW-TACT6";
> + gpios = <&gpx2 0 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <158>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + wakeup {
> + label = "SW-TACT7";
> + gpios = <&gpx2 1 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <143>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> + };
> };
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
@ 2013-02-07 10:30 ` Tomasz Figa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2013-02-07 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi,
I'm wondering why Exynos5250 has not been migrated to use pinctrl yet.
Support for it in pinctrl-samsung driver has been already merged, but I
don't see any pinctrl nodes in exynos5250.dtsi.
This is important because the legacy gpio-samsung support is going to be
dropped, as it already happened in case of Exynos 4.
CC'ing Thomas Abraham as he might know something.
Best regards,
--
Tomasz Figa
Samsung Poland R&D Center
SW Solution Development, Linux Platform
On Thursday 07 of February 2013 10:45:25 Tushar Behera wrote:
> Added GPIO buttons DT node to Arndale board file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
> ---
> This series is based on for-next branch of Kukjin Kim's tree
> and added on top of the below patch:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2042451/
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 48
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0
> deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts index 63572f9..9ce40df
> 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts
> @@ -119,4 +119,52 @@
> spi_2: spi at 12d40000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
> +
> + gpio_keys {
> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + menu {
> + label = "SW-TACT2";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 4 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <139>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + home {
> + label = "SW-TACT3";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 5 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <102>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + up {
> + label = "SW-TACT4";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 6 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <103>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + down {
> + label = "SW-TACT5";
> + gpios = <&gpx1 7 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <108>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + back {
> + label = "SW-TACT6";
> + gpios = <&gpx2 0 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <158>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> +
> + wakeup {
> + label = "SW-TACT7";
> + gpios = <&gpx2 1 0 0x10000 2>;
> + linux,code = <143>;
> + gpio-key,wakeup;
> + };
> + };
> };
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
2013-02-07 10:30 ` Tomasz Figa
@ 2013-03-11 2:05 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2013-03-11 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Tomasz Figa', 'Tushar Behera'
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, devicetree-discuss, patches,
'Thomas Abraham'
Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering why Exynos5250 has not been migrated to use pinctrl yet.
>
> Support for it in pinctrl-samsung driver has been already merged, but I
> don't see any pinctrl nodes in exynos5250.dtsi.
>
> This is important because the legacy gpio-samsung support is going to be
> dropped, as it already happened in case of Exynos 4.
>
> CC'ing Thomas Abraham as he might know something.
>
Tushar and all,
I agree with Tomasz's opinion to support pinctrl instead of gpio on exynos5250
stuff.
Please re-submit with using pinctrl is in samsung tree.
If any problems, please let us know.
Thanks.
- Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
@ 2013-03-11 2:05 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2013-03-11 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering why Exynos5250 has not been migrated to use pinctrl yet.
>
> Support for it in pinctrl-samsung driver has been already merged, but I
> don't see any pinctrl nodes in exynos5250.dtsi.
>
> This is important because the legacy gpio-samsung support is going to be
> dropped, as it already happened in case of Exynos 4.
>
> CC'ing Thomas Abraham as he might know something.
>
Tushar and all,
I agree with Tomasz's opinion to support pinctrl instead of gpio on exynos5250
stuff.
Please re-submit with using pinctrl is in samsung tree.
If any problems, please let us know.
Thanks.
- Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
2013-03-11 2:05 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2013-03-11 9:44 ` Tushar Behera
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-03-11 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim
Cc: 'Tomasz Figa',
linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, devicetree-discuss, patches,
'Thomas Abraham'
On 03/11/2013 07:35 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm wondering why Exynos5250 has not been migrated to use pinctrl yet.
>>
>> Support for it in pinctrl-samsung driver has been already merged, but I
>> don't see any pinctrl nodes in exynos5250.dtsi.
>>
>> This is important because the legacy gpio-samsung support is going to be
>> dropped, as it already happened in case of Exynos 4.
>>
>> CC'ing Thomas Abraham as he might know something.
>>
> Tushar and all,
>
> I agree with Tomasz's opinion to support pinctrl instead of gpio on exynos5250
> stuff.
>
> Please re-submit with using pinctrl is in samsung tree.
>
Ok. I will rebase the patchset on for-next branch and re-submit.
--
Tushar Behera
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/5] ARM: dts: exynos5250-arndale: Add node entry for gpio-buttons
@ 2013-03-11 9:44 ` Tushar Behera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2013-03-11 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 03/11/2013 07:35 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm wondering why Exynos5250 has not been migrated to use pinctrl yet.
>>
>> Support for it in pinctrl-samsung driver has been already merged, but I
>> don't see any pinctrl nodes in exynos5250.dtsi.
>>
>> This is important because the legacy gpio-samsung support is going to be
>> dropped, as it already happened in case of Exynos 4.
>>
>> CC'ing Thomas Abraham as he might know something.
>>
> Tushar and all,
>
> I agree with Tomasz's opinion to support pinctrl instead of gpio on exynos5250
> stuff.
>
> Please re-submit with using pinctrl is in samsung tree.
>
Ok. I will rebase the patchset on for-next branch and re-submit.
--
Tushar Behera
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread