All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:16:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1324534592.2621.37.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111222170726.b16565ef7d1434cc4ec170d7@canb.auug.org.au>

Le jeudi 22 décembre 2011 à 17:07 +1100, Stephen Rothwell a écrit :
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> net/ipv4/route.c: In function 'rt_check_expire':
> net/ipv4/route.c:873:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'prefetch' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 
> Caused by commit 9f28a2fc0bd7 ("ipv4: reintroduce route cache garbage
> collector").
> 
> Linus, that commit is in the latest pull request you have from Dave ...
> 
> I applied the following patch for today:
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:03:29 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] ipv4: using prefetch requires including prefetch.h
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/route.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
> index 7460483..9c01f56 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@
>  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>  #include <linux/times.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/prefetch.h>
>  #include <net/dst.h>
>  #include <net/net_namespace.h>
>  #include <net/protocol.h>
> -- 
> 1.7.8.197.g73c6b
> 

Thanks Stephen

I did a revert of a previous patch, and at that time prefetch() was
probably included in some header.

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>



  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-22  6:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-22  6:07 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-22  6:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-22  6:16 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-12-22  7:01 ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-09  5:38 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-09  5:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-09  6:52 ` David Miller
2012-01-16  7:36   ` Glauber Costa
2012-01-16  7:36     ` Glauber Costa
2011-11-02  5:37 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-02  5:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-02  5:50 ` David Miller
2011-08-15  5:20 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-15  5:56 ` David Miller
2011-08-16  5:28   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-16  6:11     ` David Miller
2011-08-16  6:57       ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-16  7:17         ` David Miller
2011-06-23  5:29 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-23  5:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-23 13:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-06-27  5:29   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  6:09     ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  9:58       ` David Miller
2011-06-23  5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-23  5:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-27  5:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-27  5:35   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  6:01   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  6:01     ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  9:56     ` David Miller
2011-06-08  5:54 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-08  5:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-08  7:16 ` David Miller
2011-04-21 22:10 Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-21 22:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-21 22:19 ` David Miller
2011-02-03  4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-03  4:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-03  4:46 ` David Miller
2011-02-03  5:14   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-15  0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-15  0:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-15 16:52 ` David Miller
2010-11-15 16:58   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-18  7:36 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-18  7:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-18  8:06 ` David Miller
2010-09-27  5:44 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-27  5:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-27  8:17 ` David Miller
2010-09-27 15:55 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 15:55   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 18:04   ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 18:18     ` David Miller
2010-09-27 18:25       ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 18:38         ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 18:44           ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 19:01             ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 19:06               ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 19:44                 ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 19:44                   ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 20:18                   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-03  1:47 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  1:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  1:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  1:52   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  2:16   ` David Miller
2010-09-03  2:14 ` David Miller
2010-08-31  3:18 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-31  3:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-31  4:43 ` David Miller
2010-08-30  3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-30  3:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-30  3:29 ` Simon Horman
2010-08-30  4:23   ` David Miller
2010-08-25  2:09 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-25  2:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-25  4:22 ` Rasesh Mody
2010-08-25  7:35   ` David Miller
2010-08-25 20:59     ` David Miller
2010-08-25 21:53       ` Rasesh Mody
2010-08-25 21:53         ` Rasesh Mody
2010-08-26  1:05       ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-23  3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-23  3:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-23  3:31 ` David Miller
2010-07-29  4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-29  4:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-29  5:21 ` David Miller
2010-04-27  5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-27  5:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-27 16:34 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 17:18   ` David Miller
2010-04-28  1:11     ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-29  6:43 Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-29  6:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-29  6:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-29  6:59   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-29  8:01     ` David Miller
2010-03-29  8:04       ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-29  7:01   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-18  4:23 Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-18  4:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-18  6:23 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1324534592.2621.37.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.