linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)

All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:18:12 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100831131812.1b8eb758.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 732 bytes --]

Hi ,

After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:

drivers/net/starfire.c: In function 'starfire_init':
drivers/net/starfire.c:2081: error: negative width in bit-field '<anonymous>'

This is:
	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(dma_addr_t) != sizeof(netdrv_addr_t));
in starfire_init().

Immediate cause is commit 56543af9563d91c1c5596a7980b416389bdea071
("starfire: use BUILD_BUG_ON for netdrv_addr_t").

The real cause is the complete mess at the start of starfire.c that
tries to determine if dma_addr_t is 64 bits or not ...

I have reverted that commit for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:18:12 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100831131812.1b8eb758.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 732 bytes --]

Hi ,

After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:

drivers/net/starfire.c: In function 'starfire_init':
drivers/net/starfire.c:2081: error: negative width in bit-field '<anonymous>'

This is:
	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(dma_addr_t) != sizeof(netdrv_addr_t));
in starfire_init().

Immediate cause is commit 56543af9563d91c1c5596a7980b416389bdea071
("starfire: use BUILD_BUG_ON for netdrv_addr_t").

The real cause is the complete mess at the start of starfire.c that
tries to determine if dma_addr_t is 64 bits or not ...

I have reverted that commit for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

next             reply	other threads:[~2010-08-31  3:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-31  3:18 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2010-08-31  3:18 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-31  4:43 ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-09  5:38 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-09  5:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-09  6:52 ` David Miller
2012-01-16  7:36   ` Glauber Costa
2012-01-16  7:36     ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-22  6:07 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-22  6:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-22  6:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-22  7:01 ` David Miller
2011-11-02  5:37 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-02  5:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-02  5:50 ` David Miller
2011-08-15  5:20 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-15  5:56 ` David Miller
2011-08-16  5:28   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-16  6:11     ` David Miller
2011-08-16  6:57       ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-16  7:17         ` David Miller
2011-06-23  5:29 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-23  5:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-23 13:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-06-27  5:29   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  6:09     ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  9:58       ` David Miller
2011-06-23  5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-23  5:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-27  5:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-27  5:35   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  6:01   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  6:01     ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  9:56     ` David Miller
2011-06-08  5:54 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-08  5:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-08  7:16 ` David Miller
2011-04-21 22:10 Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-21 22:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-21 22:19 ` David Miller
2011-02-03  4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-03  4:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-03  4:46 ` David Miller
2011-02-03  5:14   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-15  0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-15  0:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-15 16:52 ` David Miller
2010-11-15 16:58   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-18  7:36 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-18  7:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-18  8:06 ` David Miller
2010-09-27  5:44 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-27  5:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-27  8:17 ` David Miller
2010-09-27 15:55 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 15:55   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 18:04   ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 18:18     ` David Miller
2010-09-27 18:25       ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 18:38         ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 18:44           ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 19:01             ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 19:06               ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 19:44                 ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 19:44                   ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 20:18                   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-03  1:47 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  1:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  1:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  1:52   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  2:16   ` David Miller
2010-09-03  2:14 ` David Miller
2010-08-30  3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-30  3:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-30  3:29 ` Simon Horman
2010-08-30  4:23   ` David Miller
2010-08-25  2:09 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-25  2:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-25  4:22 ` Rasesh Mody
2010-08-25  7:35   ` David Miller
2010-08-25 20:59     ` David Miller
2010-08-25 21:53       ` Rasesh Mody
2010-08-25 21:53         ` Rasesh Mody
2010-08-26  1:05       ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-23  3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-23  3:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-23  3:31 ` David Miller
2010-07-29  4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-29  4:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-29  5:21 ` David Miller
2010-04-27  5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-27  5:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-27 16:34 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 17:18   ` David Miller
2010-04-28  1:11     ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-29  6:43 Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-29  6:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-29  6:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-29  6:59   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-29  8:01     ` David Miller
2010-03-29  8:04       ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-29  7:01   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-18  4:23 Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-18  4:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-18  6:23 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100831131812.1b8eb758.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.