All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:01:33 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110629160133.372e53ed.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110627153522.8884b125.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi all,

On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:35:22 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:25:35 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_read_reg':
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:61:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_8'
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_write_reg':
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:67:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'out_8'
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_remove':
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:81:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iounmap'
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_probe':
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:113:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioremap_nocache'
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:113:7: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
> > 
> > Since this file has not been changed recently, I suspect that this was
> > caused by commit b7f080cfe223 ("net: remove mm.h inclusion from
> > netdevice.h").
> > 
> > I have left the build broken for now since it is also broken for other
> > reasons.
> 
> I am still getting these, is there a fix pending?

I have to wonder why this has taken so long to be fixed ...

I have applied this patch for today:

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:52:00 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] net: include io.h in for iounmap etc

fixes these build errors:

drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_read_reg':
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:61:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_8'
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_write_reg':
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:67:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'out_8'
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_remove':
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:81:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iounmap'
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_probe':
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:113:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioremap_nocache'
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:113:7: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast

Caused by commit b7f080cfe223 ("net: remove mm.h inclusion from
netdevice.h").

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c
index 9793df6..cee6ba2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/netdevice.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/can/dev.h>
 
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
-- 
1.7.5.4

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:01:33 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110629160133.372e53ed.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110627153522.8884b125.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi all,

On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:35:22 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:25:35 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_read_reg':
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:61:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_8'
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_write_reg':
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:67:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'out_8'
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_remove':
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:81:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iounmap'
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_probe':
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:113:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioremap_nocache'
> > drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:113:7: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
> > 
> > Since this file has not been changed recently, I suspect that this was
> > caused by commit b7f080cfe223 ("net: remove mm.h inclusion from
> > netdevice.h").
> > 
> > I have left the build broken for now since it is also broken for other
> > reasons.
> 
> I am still getting these, is there a fix pending?

I have to wonder why this has taken so long to be fixed ...

I have applied this patch for today:

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:52:00 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] net: include io.h in for iounmap etc

fixes these build errors:

drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_read_reg':
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:61:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_8'
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_write_reg':
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:67:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'out_8'
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_remove':
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:81:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iounmap'
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c: In function 'sja1000_ofp_probe':
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:113:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioremap_nocache'
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c:113:7: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast

Caused by commit b7f080cfe223 ("net: remove mm.h inclusion from
netdevice.h").

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c
index 9793df6..cee6ba2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_of_platform.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/netdevice.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/can/dev.h>
 
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
-- 
1.7.5.4

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-29  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-23  5:25 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-23  5:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-27  5:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-27  5:35   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  6:01   ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2011-06-29  6:01     ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  9:56     ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-09  5:38 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-09  5:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-09  6:52 ` David Miller
2012-01-16  7:36   ` Glauber Costa
2012-01-16  7:36     ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-22  6:07 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-22  6:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-22  6:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-22  7:01 ` David Miller
2011-11-02  5:37 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-02  5:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-02  5:50 ` David Miller
2011-08-15  5:20 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-15  5:56 ` David Miller
2011-08-16  5:28   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-16  6:11     ` David Miller
2011-08-16  6:57       ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-16  7:17         ` David Miller
2011-06-23  5:29 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-23  5:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-23 13:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-06-27  5:29   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  6:09     ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-29  9:58       ` David Miller
2011-06-08  5:54 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-08  5:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-08  7:16 ` David Miller
2011-04-21 22:10 Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-21 22:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-21 22:19 ` David Miller
2011-02-03  4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-03  4:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-03  4:46 ` David Miller
2011-02-03  5:14   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-15  0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-15  0:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-15 16:52 ` David Miller
2010-11-15 16:58   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-18  7:36 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-18  7:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-18  8:06 ` David Miller
2010-09-27  5:44 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-27  5:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-27  8:17 ` David Miller
2010-09-27 15:55 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 15:55   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 18:04   ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 18:18     ` David Miller
2010-09-27 18:25       ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 18:38         ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 18:44           ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 19:01             ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 19:06               ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-27 19:44                 ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 19:44                   ` John W. Linville
2010-09-27 20:18                   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-09-03  1:47 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  1:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  1:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  1:52   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-03  2:16   ` David Miller
2010-09-03  2:14 ` David Miller
2010-08-31  3:18 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-31  3:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-31  4:43 ` David Miller
2010-08-30  3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-30  3:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-30  3:29 ` Simon Horman
2010-08-30  4:23   ` David Miller
2010-08-25  2:09 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-25  2:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-25  4:22 ` Rasesh Mody
2010-08-25  7:35   ` David Miller
2010-08-25 20:59     ` David Miller
2010-08-25 21:53       ` Rasesh Mody
2010-08-25 21:53         ` Rasesh Mody
2010-08-26  1:05       ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-23  3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-23  3:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-23  3:31 ` David Miller
2010-07-29  4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-29  4:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-29  5:21 ` David Miller
2010-04-27  5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-27  5:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-04-27 16:34 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 17:18   ` David Miller
2010-04-28  1:11     ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-29  6:43 Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-29  6:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-29  6:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-29  6:59   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-29  8:01     ` David Miller
2010-03-29  8:04       ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-29  7:01   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-18  4:23 Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-18  4:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-18  6:23 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110629160133.372e53ed.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.