From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>, Colin Ngam <cngam@sgi.com>,
Patrick Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 21:33:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041006203330.GH16153@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410061327.28572.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:27:28PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Though now what's there seems awfully redundant, wouldn't you say? Just
> allowing direct access to pci_root_ops is a much simpler approach and gets
> rid of a bunch of extra, unneeded code (i.e. closer to Pat's original
> version).
now that I understand what's going on, I think it's better to make
pci_root_ops non-static. Of course, it'd be better if SN2 used acpi to
discover its root busses, but I guess that'll take longer to implement.
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>, Colin Ngam <cngam@sgi.com>,
Patrick Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 20:33:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041006203330.GH16153@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410061327.28572.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:27:28PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Though now what's there seems awfully redundant, wouldn't you say? Just
> allowing direct access to pci_root_ops is a much simpler approach and gets
> rid of a bunch of extra, unneeded code (i.e. closer to Pat's original
> version).
now that I understand what's going on, I think it's better to make
pci_root_ops non-static. Of course, it'd be better if SN2 used acpi to
discover its root busses, but I guess that'll take longer to implement.
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-06 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-05 20:34 [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 20:34 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-06 15:32 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 15:32 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 18:57 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 18:57 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 19:09 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 19:09 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 19:54 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 19:54 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 19:54 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 19:54 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:10 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 20:10 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 20:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 15:02 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-07 15:02 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-07 16:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 16:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:21 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:21 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:33 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2004-10-06 20:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 20:48 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 20:48 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 21:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 21:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 20:55 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:55 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 15:16 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 15:16 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 16:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-08 16:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-09 22:20 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-09 22:20 ` Grant Grundler
[not found] ` <4169A508.84FB19C7@sgi.com>
2004-10-11 14:03 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-11 14:03 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-08 22:37 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 22:37 ` Colin Ngam
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-11 20:49 Luck, Tony
2004-10-11 20:49 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-07 17:06 Luck, Tony
2004-10-07 17:06 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-07 17:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 17:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 18:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-10-07 18:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-10-05 19:16 Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 19:16 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 19:35 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 19:35 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 5:13 Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 5:13 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 15:43 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 15:43 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 16:22 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 16:22 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 17:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 17:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 19:00 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-05 19:00 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-05 19:10 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 19:10 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 19:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 19:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 18:20 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 18:20 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 18:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 18:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-04 21:57 Pat Gefre
2004-10-04 21:57 ` Pat Gefre
2004-10-05 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 18:26 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 18:26 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 23:30 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 23:30 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041006203330.GH16153@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=cngam@sgi.com \
--cc=iod00d@hp.com \
--cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pfg@sgi.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.