From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: "Jesse Barnes" <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>, "Patrick Gefre" <pfg@sgi.com>
Cc: "Grant Grundler" <iod00d@hp.com>, "Colin Ngam" <cngam@sgi.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <matthew@wil.cx>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:06:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F022669A9@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
>Yeah, sorry, I shouldn't have said cleanup, fixup is better.
>Anyway, they
>need to be separate since they'll be going into the tree via
>Andrew not Tony.
A couple of days back I said that I'm ok pushing these drivers.
Although they don't have "arch/ia64" or "include/asm-ia64"
prefixes, they are only used by ia64. I'm even ok with the
qla1280.c change as the final version is only touching code
inside #ifdef CONFIG_IA64_{GENERIC|SN2) ... but I would like
to see a sign-off from the de-facto maintainer Christoph for
this file.
This is not a land-grab to expand my responsibilities, it just
seems to be the right thing to do to coordinate getting all
these interdependent pieces into the tree at the same time.
However ... there's a thread on LKML wailing about huge changes
going into "-rc" releases. Since there still seems to be
a lively discussion about the the right way to do the pci_root
bits of this patch, I'm very inclined to save this till *after*
Linus release 2.6.9-final. If there's a _mostly_ clean patch
presented to me before 2.6.10-rc1 shows up, I'll push that and
allow for some follow-on tidy-up patches to clean up.
-Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>, Patrick Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>
Cc: Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>, Colin Ngam <cngam@sgi.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:06:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F022669A9@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410042157.i94Lv7UC104750@fsgi900.americas.sgi.com>
>Yeah, sorry, I shouldn't have said cleanup, fixup is better.
>Anyway, they
>need to be separate since they'll be going into the tree via
>Andrew not Tony.
A couple of days back I said that I'm ok pushing these drivers.
Although they don't have "arch/ia64" or "include/asm-ia64"
prefixes, they are only used by ia64. I'm even ok with the
qla1280.c change as the final version is only touching code
inside #ifdef CONFIG_IA64_{GENERIC|SN2) ... but I would like
to see a sign-off from the de-facto maintainer Christoph for
this file.
This is not a land-grab to expand my responsibilities, it just
seems to be the right thing to do to coordinate getting all
these interdependent pieces into the tree at the same time.
However ... there's a thread on LKML wailing about huge changes
going into "-rc" releases. Since there still seems to be
a lively discussion about the the right way to do the pci_root
bits of this patch, I'm very inclined to save this till *after*
Linus release 2.6.9-final. If there's a _mostly_ clean patch
presented to me before 2.6.10-rc1 shows up, I'll push that and
allow for some follow-on tidy-up patches to clean up.
-Tony
next reply other threads:[~2004-10-07 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-07 17:06 Luck, Tony [this message]
2004-10-07 17:06 ` [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization Luck, Tony
2004-10-07 17:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 17:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 18:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-10-07 18:59 ` Jes Sorensen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-11 20:49 Luck, Tony
2004-10-11 20:49 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 20:34 Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 20:34 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-06 15:32 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 15:32 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 18:57 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 18:57 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 19:09 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 19:09 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 19:54 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 19:54 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 19:54 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 19:54 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:10 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 20:10 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 20:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 15:02 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-07 15:02 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-07 16:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 16:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:21 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:21 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 20:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 20:48 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 20:48 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 21:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 21:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 20:55 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:55 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 15:16 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 15:16 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 16:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-08 16:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-09 22:20 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-09 22:20 ` Grant Grundler
[not found] ` <4169A508.84FB19C7@sgi.com>
2004-10-11 14:03 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-11 14:03 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-08 22:37 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 22:37 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-05 19:16 Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 19:16 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 19:35 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 19:35 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 5:13 Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 5:13 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 15:43 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 15:43 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 16:22 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 16:22 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 17:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 17:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 19:00 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-05 19:00 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-05 19:10 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 19:10 ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 19:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 19:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 18:20 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 18:20 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 18:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 18:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-04 21:57 Pat Gefre
2004-10-04 21:57 ` Pat Gefre
2004-10-05 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 18:26 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 18:26 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 23:30 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 23:30 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F022669A9@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=cngam@sgi.com \
--cc=iod00d@hp.com \
--cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=pfg@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.