All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: "Patrick Gefre" <pfg@sgi.com>
Cc: "Colin Ngam" <cngam@sgi.com>,
	"Jesse Barnes" <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:49:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F022BEF32@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)

>We came to a resolution on the pci_root-ops issue, Jesse is OK 
>with the code, Jes and Christoph are 
>fine with the qla mod. I've added a couple of fixes from us as 
>well as removing a redundant check 
>pointed out in the review - see the full list below. So the 
>code is ready to go.
>
>Can you take this now Tony ?

Yes.  I applied those seven changesets to an local tree.  If any other
bug fixes turn up between now and 2.6.9-final you can send an 008-patch
that sits on top of those.

Yesterday on LKML Linus says he's aiming for 2.6.9 in a week or so.
When that happens I'll pull this into my tree and push to him (I don't
want to put it into my bkbits tree yet ... just in case I have some
other critical patch for ia64 that needs to go into 2.6.9).

-Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Patrick Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>
Cc: Colin Ngam <cngam@sgi.com>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:49:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F022BEF32@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410042157.i94Lv7UC104750@fsgi900.americas.sgi.com>

>We came to a resolution on the pci_root-ops issue, Jesse is OK 
>with the code, Jes and Christoph are 
>fine with the qla mod. I've added a couple of fixes from us as 
>well as removing a redundant check 
>pointed out in the review - see the full list below. So the 
>code is ready to go.
>
>Can you take this now Tony ?

Yes.  I applied those seven changesets to an local tree.  If any other
bug fixes turn up between now and 2.6.9-final you can send an 008-patch
that sits on top of those.

Yesterday on LKML Linus says he's aiming for 2.6.9 in a week or so.
When that happens I'll pull this into my tree and push to him (I don't
want to put it into my bkbits tree yet ... just in case I have some
other critical patch for ia64 that needs to go into 2.6.9).

-Tony

             reply	other threads:[~2004-10-11 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-11 20:49 Luck, Tony [this message]
2004-10-11 20:49 ` [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization Luck, Tony
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-07 17:06 Luck, Tony
2004-10-07 17:06 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-07 17:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 17:22   ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 18:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-10-07 18:59   ` Jes Sorensen
2004-10-05 20:34 Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 20:34 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-06 15:32 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 15:32   ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 18:57   ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 18:57     ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 19:09     ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 19:09       ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 19:54       ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 19:54         ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 19:54         ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 19:54           ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:10         ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 20:10           ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-06 20:44           ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:44             ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 15:02             ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-07 15:02               ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-07 16:52               ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-07 16:52                 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:27         ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:27           ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-06 20:21           ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:21             ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:33           ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 20:33             ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 20:48           ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 20:48             ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-06 21:05             ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 21:05               ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-06 20:55               ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-06 20:55                 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 15:16                 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 15:16                   ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 16:37                   ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-08 16:37                     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-09 22:20                   ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-09 22:20                     ` Grant Grundler
     [not found]                     ` <4169A508.84FB19C7@sgi.com>
2004-10-11 14:03                       ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-11 14:03                         ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-08 22:37                 ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-08 22:37                   ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-05 19:16 Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 19:16 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 19:35 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 19:35   ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05  5:13 Luck, Tony
2004-10-05  5:13 ` Luck, Tony
2004-10-05 15:43 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 15:43   ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 16:22   ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 16:22     ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 17:45     ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 17:45       ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 19:00       ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-05 19:00         ` Colin Ngam
2004-10-05 19:10       ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 19:10         ` Grant Grundler
2004-10-05 19:15         ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 19:15           ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-05 18:20 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 18:20   ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 18:34   ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-05 18:34     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-10-04 21:57 Pat Gefre
2004-10-04 21:57 ` Pat Gefre
2004-10-05 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 15:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 18:26   ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 18:26     ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 23:30   ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 23:30     ` Patrick Gefre
2004-10-05 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-05 15:50   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F022BEF32@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=cngam@sgi.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pfg@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.