All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] don't allow users to set CONFIG_BROKEN=y
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:58:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060106185812.GZ12131@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0601061038130.11324@shark.he.net>

On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:39:30AM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> 
> > On 1/6/06, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 06:49:55PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > > On 1/6/06, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > > > > Do not allow people to create configurations with CONFIG_BROKEN=y.
> > > > >
> > > > > The sole reason for CONFIG_BROKEN=y would be if you are working on
> > > > > fixing a broken driver, but in this case editing the Kconfig file is
> > > > > trivial.
> > > > >
> > > > > Never ever should a user enable CONFIG_BROKEN.
> > > > >
> > > > I disagree (slightly) with this patch for a few reasons:
> > > >
> > > > - It's very convenient to be able to enable it through menuconfig.
> > >
> > > And when do you really need it?
> > >
> > Hmm, when I'm looking for broken stuff to fix ;)
> > I guess you are right, ordinary users don't need it.. Ok, count me in
> > as supporting this move.
> 
> I'm having a little trouble determining why it matters.
> 
> Are you trying to cut down on lkml bug reports or just make
> it harder on everyone?

I'm trying to remove a small trap for users.

> ~Randy

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-06 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-06 17:35 [2.6 patch] don't allow users to set CONFIG_BROKEN=y Adrian Bunk
2006-01-06 17:41 ` Russell King
2006-01-06 17:54   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-06 17:49 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-06 18:06   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-06 18:26     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-06 18:39       ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-06 18:58         ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-01-06 19:14       ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-06 21:11     ` David Lang
2006-01-06 22:37       ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-06 22:39         ` David Lang
2006-01-06 22:53           ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-06 22:25   ` Daniel Barkalow
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-19  1:40 Adrian Bunk
2005-12-11 18:52 [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't " Adrian Bunk
2005-12-11 19:21 ` Russell King
2005-12-11 19:31   ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-11 19:44     ` Russell King
2005-12-13  0:10       ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 13:34         ` Simon Richter
2005-12-13 14:00           ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 17:31             ` Russell King
2005-12-13 18:05               ` [2.6 patch] don't allow users to " Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:05                 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:05                 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:28                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-12-13 18:28                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-12-13 18:28                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-12-13 18:28                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-12-13 18:51                   ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:51                     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:51                     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:51                     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:59                   ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-13 18:59                     ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-13 18:59                     ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-13 18:59                     ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-13 20:01                 ` Russell King
2005-12-13 20:01                   ` Russell King
2005-12-13 20:01                   ` Russell King
2005-12-13 20:19                   ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 20:19                     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 20:19                     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 22:01                     ` Russell King
2005-12-13 22:01                       ` Russell King
2005-12-13 22:01                       ` Russell King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060106185812.GZ12131@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.