All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@hogyros.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, matthew@wil.cx,
	grundler@parisc-linux.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org,
	paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, lethal@linux-sh.org,
	kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:31:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051213173112.GA24094@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051213140001.GG23349@stusta.de>

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:00:01PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> defconfig files are virtually never a configuration for the kernel they 
> are shipped with since they aren't updated every time some configuration 
> option is changed.
> 
> Consider a defconfig with CONFIG_BROKEN=n, and a driver that is enabled 
> in this defconfig gets for some reason marked as broken in the Kconfig 
> file - this will give exactly the same result as the one you describe.

Adrian,

The defconfig files in arch/arm/configs are for platform configurations
and are provided by the platform maintainers as a _working_ configuration
for their platform.  They're not "defconfigs".  They got called
"defconfigs" as a result of the kbuild "cleanups".  Please don't confuse
them as such.

If, in order to have a working platform configuration, they deem that
CONFIG_BROKEN must be enabled, then that's the way it is.

Therefore, I request that either you leave the ARM platform configurations
well alone, or follow the advice I've given so that we can _properly_
assess the impact of your changes.

Thanks.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	grundler@parisc-linux.org, matthew@wil.cx,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	lethal@linux-sh.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp,
	parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:31:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051213173112.GA24094@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051213140001.GG23349@stusta.de>

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:00:01PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> defconfig files are virtually never a configuration for the kernel they 
> are shipped with since they aren't updated every time some configuration 
> option is changed.
> 
> Consider a defconfig with CONFIG_BROKEN=n, and a driver that is enabled 
> in this defconfig gets for some reason marked as broken in the Kconfig 
> file - this will give exactly the same result as the one you describe.

Adrian,

The defconfig files in arch/arm/configs are for platform configurations
and are provided by the platform maintainers as a _working_ configuration
for their platform.  They're not "defconfigs".  They got called
"defconfigs" as a result of the kbuild "cleanups".  Please don't confuse
them as such.

If, in order to have a working platform configuration, they deem that
CONFIG_BROKEN must be enabled, then that's the way it is.

Therefore, I request that either you leave the ARM platform configurations
well alone, or follow the advice I've given so that we can _properly_
assess the impact of your changes.

Thanks.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	grundler@parisc-linux.org, matthew@wil.cx,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	lethal@linux-sh.org, paulus@samba.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@hogyros.de>,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp,
	parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:31:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051213173112.GA24094@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051213140001.GG23349@stusta.de>

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:00:01PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> defconfig files are virtually never a configuration for the kernel they 
> are shipped with since they aren't updated every time some configuration 
> option is changed.
> 
> Consider a defconfig with CONFIG_BROKEN=n, and a driver that is enabled 
> in this defconfig gets for some reason marked as broken in the Kconfig 
> file - this will give exactly the same result as the one you describe.

Adrian,

The defconfig files in arch/arm/configs are for platform configurations
and are provided by the platform maintainers as a _working_ configuration
for their platform.  They're not "defconfigs".  They got called
"defconfigs" as a result of the kbuild "cleanups".  Please don't confuse
them as such.

If, in order to have a working platform configuration, they deem that
CONFIG_BROKEN must be enabled, then that's the way it is.

Therefore, I request that either you leave the ARM platform configurations
well alone, or follow the advice I've given so that we can _properly_
assess the impact of your changes.

Thanks.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-13 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-11 18:52 [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y Adrian Bunk
2005-12-11 18:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-11 18:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-11 19:21 ` Russell King
2005-12-11 19:21   ` Russell King
2005-12-11 19:31   ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-11 19:31     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-11 19:44     ` Russell King
2005-12-11 19:44       ` Russell King
2005-12-13  0:10       ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13  0:10         ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13  0:10         ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 13:34         ` Simon Richter
2005-12-13 13:34           ` Simon Richter
2005-12-13 13:34           ` Simon Richter
2005-12-13 14:00           ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 14:00             ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 14:00             ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 14:00             ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 17:31             ` Russell King [this message]
2005-12-13 17:31               ` Russell King
2005-12-13 17:31               ` Russell King
2005-12-13 17:38               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-12-13 19:53                 ` Russell King
2005-12-13 20:09                   ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:05               ` [2.6 patch] don't allow users to " Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:05                 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:05                 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:28                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-12-13 18:28                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-12-13 18:28                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-12-13 18:28                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-12-13 18:51                   ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:51                     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:51                     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:51                     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 18:59                   ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-13 18:59                     ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-13 18:59                     ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-13 18:59                     ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-13 20:01                 ` Russell King
2005-12-13 20:01                   ` Russell King
2005-12-13 20:01                   ` Russell King
2005-12-13 20:19                   ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 20:19                     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 20:19                     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13 22:01                     ` Russell King
2005-12-13 22:01                       ` Russell King
2005-12-13 22:01                       ` Russell King
2005-12-12  9:38     ` [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't " David Woodhouse
2005-12-12  9:38       ` David Woodhouse
2005-12-12  9:38       ` David Woodhouse
2005-12-13  0:05       ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] no longer mark MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS as BROKEN and remove broken MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS drivers Adrian Bunk
2005-12-13  0:06         ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-14 11:50       ` [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051213173112.GA24094@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=Simon.Richter@hogyros.de \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.