From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, matthew@wil.cx, grundler@parisc-linux.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.xn--org-boa Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:44:37 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20051211194437.GB22537@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20051211193118.GR23349@stusta.de> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 08:31:18PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:21:10PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:52:12PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y. > > > > NACK. This changes other configuration options in addition, for example > > in collie_defconfig: > > > > -CONFIG_MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS=y > > -# CONFIG_MTD_AMDSTD is not set > > -CONFIG_MTD_SHARP=y > > -# CONFIG_MTD_JEDEC is not set > > That's not a problem introduced by my patch. It's a problem introduced by your patch because the resulting defconfig file becomes _wrong_ by your change, and other changes in the defconfig are thereby hidden. If you change any options in a defconfig file, and they're obviously not leaf options, you should check what impact they have on other options by running it through an "oldconfig" cycle. That's what I just did with this script: #!/bin/sh -e alias amake='make CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux- ARCH=arm' amake $1 O=../build/t >/dev/null 2>&1 mv ../build/t/.config ../build/t/.config.orig sed '/CONFIG_BROKEN/d;s,^# CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE is not set,CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=y,' < ../build/t/.config.orig > ../build/t/.config amake oldconfig O=../build/t >/dev/null 2>&1 diff -u ../build/t/.config.orig ../build/t/.config Hence I discovered that disabling CONFIG_BROKEN removes the above options for the collie case. BTW, it might be worth using something like the above script for all the changes to the defconfig files in your patch so that it correctly updates these files. It will also mean that any review of it is more meaningful because we can see the full extent of your changes. > Either the depency of MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS on BROKEN is correct (in which > case CONFIG_MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS=y wouldn't bring you anything), or the > dependency on BROKEN is not correct and should be corrected. That's something which collie folk need to comment on. However, what I can say is that the collie_defconfig builds successfully today: http://armlinux.simtec.co.uk/kautobuild/2.6.15-rc5-git1/collie_defconfig/zimage.log so it's quite possible that the Kconfig is out of sync with reality. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, grundler@parisc-linux.org, matthew@wil.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.xn--org-boa, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:44:37 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20051211194437.GB22537@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20051211193118.GR23349@stusta.de> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 08:31:18PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:21:10PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:52:12PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y. > > > > NACK. This changes other configuration options in addition, for example > > in collie_defconfig: > > > > -CONFIG_MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS=y > > -# CONFIG_MTD_AMDSTD is not set > > -CONFIG_MTD_SHARP=y > > -# CONFIG_MTD_JEDEC is not set > > That's not a problem introduced by my patch. It's a problem introduced by your patch because the resulting defconfig file becomes _wrong_ by your change, and other changes in the defconfig are thereby hidden. If you change any options in a defconfig file, and they're obviously not leaf options, you should check what impact they have on other options by running it through an "oldconfig" cycle. That's what I just did with this script: #!/bin/sh -e alias amake='make CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux- ARCH=arm' amake $1 O=../build/t >/dev/null 2>&1 mv ../build/t/.config ../build/t/.config.orig sed '/CONFIG_BROKEN/d;s,^# CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE is not set,CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=y,' < ../build/t/.config.orig > ../build/t/.config amake oldconfig O=../build/t >/dev/null 2>&1 diff -u ../build/t/.config.orig ../build/t/.config Hence I discovered that disabling CONFIG_BROKEN removes the above options for the collie case. BTW, it might be worth using something like the above script for all the changes to the defconfig files in your patch so that it correctly updates these files. It will also mean that any review of it is more meaningful because we can see the full extent of your changes. > Either the depency of MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS on BROKEN is correct (in which > case CONFIG_MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS=y wouldn't bring you anything), or the > dependency on BROKEN is not correct and should be corrected. That's something which collie folk need to comment on. However, what I can say is that the collie_defconfig builds successfully today: http://armlinux.simtec.co.uk/kautobuild/2.6.15-rc5-git1/collie_defconfig/zimage.log so it's quite possible that the Kconfig is out of sync with reality. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-11 19:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2005-12-11 18:52 [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y Adrian Bunk 2005-12-11 18:52 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-11 18:52 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-11 19:21 ` Russell King 2005-12-11 19:21 ` Russell King 2005-12-11 19:31 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-11 19:31 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-11 19:44 ` Russell King [this message] 2005-12-11 19:44 ` Russell King 2005-12-13 0:10 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 0:10 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 0:10 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 13:34 ` Simon Richter 2005-12-13 13:34 ` Simon Richter 2005-12-13 13:34 ` Simon Richter 2005-12-13 14:00 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 14:00 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 14:00 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 14:00 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 17:31 ` Russell King 2005-12-13 17:31 ` Russell King 2005-12-13 17:31 ` Russell King 2005-12-13 17:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2005-12-13 19:53 ` Russell King 2005-12-13 20:09 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 18:05 ` [2.6 patch] don't allow users to " Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 18:05 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 18:05 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 18:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2005-12-13 18:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2005-12-13 18:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2005-12-13 18:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2005-12-13 18:51 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 18:51 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 18:51 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 18:51 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 18:59 ` Jesper Juhl 2005-12-13 18:59 ` Jesper Juhl 2005-12-13 18:59 ` Jesper Juhl 2005-12-13 18:59 ` Jesper Juhl 2005-12-13 20:01 ` Russell King 2005-12-13 20:01 ` Russell King 2005-12-13 20:01 ` Russell King 2005-12-13 20:19 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 20:19 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 20:19 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 22:01 ` Russell King 2005-12-13 22:01 ` Russell King 2005-12-13 22:01 ` Russell King 2005-12-12 9:38 ` [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't " David Woodhouse 2005-12-12 9:38 ` David Woodhouse 2005-12-12 9:38 ` David Woodhouse 2005-12-13 0:05 ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] no longer mark MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS as BROKEN and remove broken MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS drivers Adrian Bunk 2005-12-13 0:06 ` Adrian Bunk 2005-12-14 11:50 ` [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y Richard Purdie
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20051211194437.GB22537@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \ --to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \ --cc=bunk@stusta.de \ --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \ --cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \ --cc=kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp \ --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \ --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.xn--org-boa \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \ --cc=matthew@wil.cx \ --cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \ --cc=paulus@samba.org \ --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.