From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> To: Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, Satoru Moriya <smoriya@redhat.com>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>, "lwoodman@redhat.com" <lwoodman@redhat.com>, Seiji Aguchi <saguchi@redhat.com>, "hughd@google.com" <hughd@google.com>, "hannes@cmpxchg.org" <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:54:45 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20111011135445.f580749b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <65795E11DBF1E645A09CEC7EAEE94B9CB516CBFE@USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:23:22 -0400 Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com> wrote: > On 10/11/2011 03:55 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:32:11 -0400 > > Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com> wrote: > > > >> On 10/10/2011 06:37 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 20:08:19 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes > >>> <rientjes@google.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Rik van Riel wrote: > >> > >> Actually page allocator decreases min watermark to 3/4 * min > >> watermark for rt-task. But in our case some applications create a lot > >> of processes and if all of them are rt-task, the amount of watermark > >> bonus(1/4 * min watermark) is not enough. > >> > >> If we can tune the amount of bonus, it may be fine. But that is > >> almost all same as extra free kbytes. > > > > This situation is detectable at runtime. If realtime tasks are being > > stalled in the page allocator then start to increase the free-page > > reserves. A little control system. > > Detecting at runtime is too late for some latency critical systems. > At that system, we must avoid a stall before it happens. It's pretty darn obvious that the kernel can easily see the situation developing before it happens. By comparing a few integers. Look, please don't go bending over backwards like this to defend a bad patch. It's a bad patch! It would be better not to have to merge it. Let's do something better. > Also, if we increase the free-page reserves a.k.a min_free_kbytes, > the possibility of direct reclaim on other workloads increases. > I think it's a bad side effect. extra_free_kbytes has the same side-effect.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> To: Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, Satoru Moriya <smoriya@redhat.com>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>, "lwoodman@redhat.com" <lwoodman@redhat.com>, Seiji Aguchi <saguchi@redhat.com>, "hughd@google.com" <hughd@google.com>, "hannes@cmpxchg.org" <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:54:45 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20111011135445.f580749b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <65795E11DBF1E645A09CEC7EAEE94B9CB516CBFE@USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:23:22 -0400 Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com> wrote: > On 10/11/2011 03:55 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:32:11 -0400 > > Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com> wrote: > > > >> On 10/10/2011 06:37 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 20:08:19 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes > >>> <rientjes@google.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Rik van Riel wrote: > >> > >> Actually page allocator decreases min watermark to 3/4 * min > >> watermark for rt-task. But in our case some applications create a lot > >> of processes and if all of them are rt-task, the amount of watermark > >> bonus(1/4 * min watermark) is not enough. > >> > >> If we can tune the amount of bonus, it may be fine. But that is > >> almost all same as extra free kbytes. > > > > This situation is detectable at runtime. If realtime tasks are being > > stalled in the page allocator then start to increase the free-page > > reserves. A little control system. > > Detecting at runtime is too late for some latency critical systems. > At that system, we must avoid a stall before it happens. It's pretty darn obvious that the kernel can easily see the situation developing before it happens. By comparing a few integers. Look, please don't go bending over backwards like this to defend a bad patch. It's a bad patch! It would be better not to have to merge it. Let's do something better. > Also, if we increase the free-page reserves a.k.a min_free_kbytes, > the possibility of direct reclaim on other workloads increases. > I think it's a bad side effect. extra_free_kbytes has the same side-effect. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-11 20:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-09-01 14:52 [PATCH -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable Rik van Riel 2011-09-01 14:52 ` Rik van Riel 2011-09-01 17:06 ` Randy Dunlap 2011-09-01 17:06 ` Randy Dunlap 2011-09-01 19:26 ` [PATCH -v2 " Rik van Riel 2011-09-01 19:26 ` Rik van Riel 2011-09-01 21:58 ` Andrew Morton 2011-09-01 21:58 ` Andrew Morton 2011-09-01 22:08 ` David Rientjes 2011-09-01 22:08 ` David Rientjes 2011-09-01 22:16 ` Andrew Morton 2011-09-01 22:16 ` Andrew Morton 2011-09-02 16:31 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-09-02 16:31 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-13 7:33 ` Minchan Kim 2011-10-13 7:33 ` Minchan Kim 2011-10-13 8:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2011-10-13 8:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [not found] ` <E1FA588BC672D846BDBB452FCA1E308C2389B4@USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com> 2011-09-15 3:33 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-09-15 3:33 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-09-01 22:09 ` Andrew Morton 2011-09-01 22:09 ` Andrew Morton 2011-09-02 16:26 ` [PATCH -mm] fixes & cleanups for "add extra free kbytes tunable" Rik van Riel 2011-09-02 16:26 ` Rik van Riel 2011-09-30 21:43 ` [PATCH -v2 -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable Johannes Weiner 2011-09-30 21:43 ` Johannes Weiner 2011-10-08 3:08 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-08 3:08 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-10 22:37 ` Andrew Morton 2011-10-10 22:37 ` Andrew Morton 2011-10-11 19:32 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-11 19:32 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-11 19:54 ` Andrew Morton 2011-10-11 19:54 ` Andrew Morton 2011-10-11 20:23 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-11 20:23 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-11 20:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message] 2011-10-11 20:54 ` Andrew Morton 2011-10-12 13:09 ` Rik van Riel 2011-10-12 13:09 ` Rik van Riel 2011-10-12 19:20 ` Andrew Morton 2011-10-12 19:20 ` Andrew Morton 2011-10-12 19:58 ` Rik van Riel 2011-10-12 19:58 ` Rik van Riel 2011-10-12 20:26 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-12 20:26 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-21 23:48 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-21 23:48 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-23 21:22 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-23 21:22 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-25 2:04 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-25 2:04 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-25 21:50 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-25 21:50 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-26 18:59 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-26 18:59 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-12 21:08 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-12 21:08 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-12 22:41 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-12 22:41 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-12 23:52 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-12 23:52 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-13 0:01 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-13 0:01 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-13 5:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2011-10-13 5:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 2011-10-13 20:55 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-13 20:55 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-14 22:16 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-14 22:16 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-14 22:46 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-14 22:46 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-14 5:32 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-14 5:32 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-14 5:06 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-14 5:06 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-11 23:22 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-11 23:22 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-13 16:54 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-13 16:54 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-13 20:48 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-13 20:48 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-13 21:11 ` Rik van Riel 2011-10-13 21:11 ` Rik van Riel 2011-10-13 22:02 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-13 22:02 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-11 19:20 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-11 19:20 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-11 21:04 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-11 21:04 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-12 13:13 ` Rik van Riel 2011-10-12 13:13 ` Rik van Riel 2011-10-12 20:21 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-12 20:21 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-13 4:13 ` Rik van Riel 2011-10-13 4:13 ` Rik van Riel 2011-10-13 5:22 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-13 5:22 ` David Rientjes 2011-10-22 0:11 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-10-22 0:11 ` Satoru Moriya 2011-09-09 23:01 Satoru Moriya 2011-09-09 23:01 ` Satoru Moriya
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20111011135445.f580749b.akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=hughd@google.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \ --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \ --cc=riel@redhat.com \ --cc=rientjes@google.com \ --cc=saguchi@redhat.com \ --cc=satoru.moriya@hds.com \ --cc=smoriya@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.