From: Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Satoru Moriya <smoriya@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"lwoodman@redhat.com" <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
Seiji Aguchi <saguchi@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
"hannes@cmpxchg.org" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH -v2 -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:06:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65795E11DBF1E645A09CEC7EAEE94B9CB4F747A9@USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110121654120.30123@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 10/12/2011 08:01 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
>> I understand what you concern. But in some area such as banking,
>> > stock exchange, train/power/plant control sysemts etc this kind
>> > of tunable is welcomed because they can tune their systems at
>> > their own risk.
>> >
> You haven't tried the patch that increases the priority of kswapd when
> such a latency sensitive thread triggers background reclaim?
No, not yet. I'll try it.
Thanks,
Satoru
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Satoru Moriya <smoriya@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"lwoodman@redhat.com" <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
Seiji Aguchi <saguchi@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
"hannes@cmpxchg.org" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH -v2 -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:06:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65795E11DBF1E645A09CEC7EAEE94B9CB4F747A9@USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110121654120.30123@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 10/12/2011 08:01 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
>> I understand what you concern. But in some area such as banking,
>> > stock exchange, train/power/plant control sysemts etc this kind
>> > of tunable is welcomed because they can tune their systems at
>> > their own risk.
>> >
> You haven't tried the patch that increases the priority of kswapd when
> such a latency sensitive thread triggers background reclaim?
No, not yet. I'll try it.
Thanks,
Satoru
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-14 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-01 14:52 [PATCH -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable Rik van Riel
2011-09-01 14:52 ` Rik van Riel
2011-09-01 17:06 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-09-01 17:06 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-09-01 19:26 ` [PATCH -v2 " Rik van Riel
2011-09-01 19:26 ` Rik van Riel
2011-09-01 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-01 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-01 22:08 ` David Rientjes
2011-09-01 22:08 ` David Rientjes
2011-09-01 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-01 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-02 16:31 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-09-02 16:31 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-13 7:33 ` Minchan Kim
2011-10-13 7:33 ` Minchan Kim
2011-10-13 8:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-13 8:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <E1FA588BC672D846BDBB452FCA1E308C2389B4@USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com>
2011-09-15 3:33 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-09-15 3:33 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-09-01 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-01 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-02 16:26 ` [PATCH -mm] fixes & cleanups for "add extra free kbytes tunable" Rik van Riel
2011-09-02 16:26 ` Rik van Riel
2011-09-30 21:43 ` [PATCH -v2 -mm] add extra free kbytes tunable Johannes Weiner
2011-09-30 21:43 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-10-08 3:08 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-08 3:08 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-10 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-10 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-11 19:32 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-11 19:32 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-11 19:54 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-11 19:54 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-11 20:23 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-11 20:23 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-11 20:54 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-11 20:54 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-12 13:09 ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-12 13:09 ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-12 19:20 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-12 19:20 ` Andrew Morton
2011-10-12 19:58 ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-12 19:58 ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-12 20:26 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-12 20:26 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-21 23:48 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-21 23:48 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-23 21:22 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-23 21:22 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-25 2:04 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-25 2:04 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-25 21:50 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-25 21:50 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-26 18:59 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-26 18:59 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-12 21:08 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-12 21:08 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-12 22:41 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-12 22:41 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-12 23:52 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-12 23:52 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-13 0:01 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-13 0:01 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-13 5:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-13 5:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-10-13 20:55 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-13 20:55 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-14 22:16 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-14 22:16 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-14 22:46 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-14 22:46 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-14 5:32 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-14 5:32 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-14 5:06 ` Satoru Moriya [this message]
2011-10-14 5:06 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-11 23:22 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-11 23:22 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-13 16:54 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-13 16:54 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-13 20:48 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-13 20:48 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-13 21:11 ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-13 21:11 ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-13 22:02 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-13 22:02 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-11 19:20 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-11 19:20 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-11 21:04 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-11 21:04 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-12 13:13 ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-12 13:13 ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-12 20:21 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-12 20:21 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-13 4:13 ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-13 4:13 ` Rik van Riel
2011-10-13 5:22 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-13 5:22 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-22 0:11 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-10-22 0:11 ` Satoru Moriya
2011-09-09 23:01 Satoru Moriya
2011-09-09 23:01 ` Satoru Moriya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65795E11DBF1E645A09CEC7EAEE94B9CB4F747A9@USINDEVS02.corp.hds.com \
--to=satoru.moriya@hds.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=saguchi@redhat.com \
--cc=smoriya@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.