From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
luto@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/entry: Clear registers for 64bit exceptions/interrupts
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 10:17:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180206091727.GB15925@isilmar-4.linta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151787989146.7847.15749181712358213254.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:18:11PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>
> Clear the 'extra' registers on entering the 64bit kernel for exceptions
> and interrupts. The common registers are not cleared since they are
> likely clobbered well before they can be exploited in a speculative
> execution attack.
Could the clever trick from patch 3/3 (interleave xorq with movq) be
used here as well? Something like below (untested)? This includes removing
the (seemingly?) unused SAVE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_* macros, which probably needs to
become a spearate patch.
Thanks,
Dominik
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
index 3f48f695d5e6..7bdee6d14f0a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
@@ -101,49 +101,36 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is built with
addq $-(15*8), %rsp
.endm
- .macro SAVE_C_REGS_HELPER offset=0 rax=1 rcx=1 r8910=1 r11=1
- .if \r11
+ .macro SAVE_C_REGS offset=0
+ xorq %r11, %r11 /* nospec r11 */
movq %r11, 6*8+\offset(%rsp)
- .endif
- .if \r8910
movq %r10, 7*8+\offset(%rsp)
+ xorq %r10, %r10 /* nospec r10 */
movq %r9, 8*8+\offset(%rsp)
+ xorq %r9, %r9 /* nospec r9 */
movq %r8, 9*8+\offset(%rsp)
- .endif
- .if \rax
+ xorq %r8, %r8 /* nospec r8 */
movq %rax, 10*8+\offset(%rsp)
- .endif
- .if \rcx
movq %rcx, 11*8+\offset(%rsp)
- .endif
movq %rdx, 12*8+\offset(%rsp)
movq %rsi, 13*8+\offset(%rsp)
movq %rdi, 14*8+\offset(%rsp)
UNWIND_HINT_REGS offset=\offset extra=0
.endm
- .macro SAVE_C_REGS offset=0
- SAVE_C_REGS_HELPER \offset, 1, 1, 1, 1
- .endm
- .macro SAVE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_RAX_RCX offset=0
- SAVE_C_REGS_HELPER \offset, 0, 0, 1, 1
- .endm
- .macro SAVE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_R891011
- SAVE_C_REGS_HELPER 0, 1, 1, 0, 0
- .endm
- .macro SAVE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_RCX_R891011
- SAVE_C_REGS_HELPER 0, 1, 0, 0, 0
- .endm
- .macro SAVE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_RAX_RCX_R11
- SAVE_C_REGS_HELPER 0, 0, 0, 1, 0
- .endm
.macro SAVE_EXTRA_REGS offset=0
movq %r15, 0*8+\offset(%rsp)
+ xorq %r15, %r15 /* nospec r15 */
movq %r14, 1*8+\offset(%rsp)
+ xorq %r14, %r14 /* nospec r14 */
movq %r13, 2*8+\offset(%rsp)
+ xorq %r13, %r13 /* nospec r13 */
movq %r12, 3*8+\offset(%rsp)
+ xorq %r12, %r12 /* nospec r12*/
movq %rbp, 4*8+\offset(%rsp)
+ xorl %ebp, %ebp /* nospec rbp */
movq %rbx, 5*8+\offset(%rsp)
+ xorl %ebx, %ebx /* nospec rbx */
UNWIND_HINT_REGS offset=\offset
.endm
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index c752abe89d80..de19a46f40b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -1218,7 +1218,6 @@ ENTRY(error_entry)
SAVE_C_REGS 8
SAVE_EXTRA_REGS 8
ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER 8
- xorl %ebx, %ebx
testb $3, CS+8(%rsp)
jz .Lerror_kernelspace
@@ -1405,15 +1404,25 @@ ENTRY(nmi)
pushq %rcx /* pt_regs->cx */
pushq %rax /* pt_regs->ax */
pushq %r8 /* pt_regs->r8 */
+ xorq %r8, %r8 /* nospec r8 */
pushq %r9 /* pt_regs->r9 */
+ xorq %r9, %r9 /* nospec r9 */
pushq %r10 /* pt_regs->r10 */
+ xorq %r10, %r10 /* nospec r10 */
pushq %r11 /* pt_regs->r11 */
+ xorq %r11, %r11 /* nospec r11*/
pushq %rbx /* pt_regs->rbx */
+ xorl %ebx, %ebx /* nospec rbx*/
pushq %rbp /* pt_regs->rbp */
+ xorl %ebp, %ebp /* nospec rbp*/
pushq %r12 /* pt_regs->r12 */
+ xorq %r12, %r12 /* nospec r12*/
pushq %r13 /* pt_regs->r13 */
+ xorq %r13, %r13 /* nospec r13*/
pushq %r14 /* pt_regs->r14 */
+ xorq %r14, %r14 /* nospec r14*/
pushq %r15 /* pt_regs->r15 */
+ xorq %r15, %r15 /* nospec r15*/
UNWIND_HINT_REGS
ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-06 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-06 1:18 [PATCH v3 0/3] x86/entry: Clear registers to sanitize speculative usages Dan Williams
2018-02-06 1:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/entry: Clear extra registers beyond syscall arguments for 64bit kernels Dan Williams
2018-02-06 11:52 ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/entry/64: Clear extra registers beyond syscall arguments, to reduce speculation attack surface tip-bot for Dan Williams
2018-02-06 1:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/entry: Clear registers for 64bit exceptions/interrupts Dan Williams
2018-02-06 9:04 ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-06 10:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-06 9:17 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2018-02-06 10:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-06 10:57 ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-06 21:25 ` [PATCH tip-pti 1/2] x86/entry: remove SAVE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_* macros Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-06 22:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-06 21:32 ` [PATCH tip-pti 2/2] x86/entry: interleave XOR register clearing with PUSH/MOV instructions Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-06 22:30 ` Dan Williams
2018-02-06 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-06 23:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-06 23:54 ` Andi Kleen
2018-02-07 1:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-07 15:18 ` Andi Kleen
2018-02-07 17:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-07 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-06 12:00 ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/entry/64: Clear registers for exceptions/interrupts, to reduce speculation attack surface tip-bot for Dan Williams
2018-02-06 1:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] x86/entry: Clear registers for compat syscalls Dan Williams
2018-02-06 7:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-06 7:53 ` Dan Williams
2018-02-06 12:00 ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/entry/64/compat: Clear registers for compat syscalls, to reduce speculation attack surface tip-bot for Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180206091727.GB15925@isilmar-4.linta.de \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.