All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
	"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>,
	"Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
	"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:21:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011142157.GC33537@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570733080-21015-12-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:44:39PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Since normal execution of any non-branch instruction resets the
> PSTATE BTYPE field to 0, so do the same thing when emulating a
> trapped instruction.
> 
> Branches don't trap directly, so we should never need to assign a
> non-zero value to BTYPE here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index 3af2768..4d8ce50 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,8 @@ void arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long size)
>  
>  	if (regs->pstate & PSR_MODE32_BIT)
>  		advance_itstate(regs);
> +	else
> +		regs->pstate &= ~(u64)PSR_BTYPE_MASK;

This looks good to me, with one nit below.

We don't (currently) need the u64 cast here, and it's inconsistent with
what we do elsewhere. If the upper 32-bit of pstate get allocated, we'll
need to fix up all the other masking we do:

[mark@lakrids:~/src/linux]% git grep 'pstate &= ~'
arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c:           regs->pstate &= ~PSR_AA32_E_BIT;
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:         regs->pstate &= ~PSR_SSBS_BIT;
arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c:     regs->pstate &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c:       pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1);       /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c:       pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1);       /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c:     regs->pstate &= ~PSR_D_BIT;
arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c:     regs->pstate &= ~DAIF_MASK;
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:     regs->pstate &= ~SPSR_EL1_AARCH32_RES0_BITS;
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:                     regs->pstate &= ~PSR_AA32_E_BIT;
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:     regs->pstate &= ~SPSR_EL1_AARCH64_RES0_BITS;
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:             regs->pstate &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
arch/arm64/kernel/ssbd.c:       task_pt_regs(task)->pstate &= ~val;
arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:      regs->pstate &= ~PSR_AA32_IT_MASK;

... and at that point I'd suggest we should just ensure the bit
definitions are all defined as unsigned long in the first place since
adding casts to each use is error-prone.

Thanks,
Mark.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
	"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>,
	"Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
	"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:21:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011142157.GC33537@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570733080-21015-12-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:44:39PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Since normal execution of any non-branch instruction resets the
> PSTATE BTYPE field to 0, so do the same thing when emulating a
> trapped instruction.
> 
> Branches don't trap directly, so we should never need to assign a
> non-zero value to BTYPE here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index 3af2768..4d8ce50 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,8 @@ void arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long size)
>  
>  	if (regs->pstate & PSR_MODE32_BIT)
>  		advance_itstate(regs);
> +	else
> +		regs->pstate &= ~(u64)PSR_BTYPE_MASK;

This looks good to me, with one nit below.

We don't (currently) need the u64 cast here, and it's inconsistent with
what we do elsewhere. If the upper 32-bit of pstate get allocated, we'll
need to fix up all the other masking we do:

[mark@lakrids:~/src/linux]% git grep 'pstate &= ~'
arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c:           regs->pstate &= ~PSR_AA32_E_BIT;
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:         regs->pstate &= ~PSR_SSBS_BIT;
arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c:     regs->pstate &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c:       pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1);       /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c:       pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1);       /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c:     regs->pstate &= ~PSR_D_BIT;
arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c:     regs->pstate &= ~DAIF_MASK;
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:     regs->pstate &= ~SPSR_EL1_AARCH32_RES0_BITS;
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:                     regs->pstate &= ~PSR_AA32_E_BIT;
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:     regs->pstate &= ~SPSR_EL1_AARCH64_RES0_BITS;
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:             regs->pstate &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
arch/arm64/kernel/ssbd.c:       task_pt_regs(task)->pstate &= ~val;
arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:      regs->pstate &= ~PSR_AA32_IT_MASK;

... and at that point I'd suggest we should just ensure the bit
definitions are all defined as unsigned long in the first place since
adding casts to each use is error-prone.

Thanks,
Mark.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: "Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
	"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
	"Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 15:21:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011142157.GC33537@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570733080-21015-12-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:44:39PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Since normal execution of any non-branch instruction resets the
> PSTATE BTYPE field to 0, so do the same thing when emulating a
> trapped instruction.
> 
> Branches don't trap directly, so we should never need to assign a
> non-zero value to BTYPE here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index 3af2768..4d8ce50 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,8 @@ void arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long size)
>  
>  	if (regs->pstate & PSR_MODE32_BIT)
>  		advance_itstate(regs);
> +	else
> +		regs->pstate &= ~(u64)PSR_BTYPE_MASK;

This looks good to me, with one nit below.

We don't (currently) need the u64 cast here, and it's inconsistent with
what we do elsewhere. If the upper 32-bit of pstate get allocated, we'll
need to fix up all the other masking we do:

[mark@lakrids:~/src/linux]% git grep 'pstate &= ~'
arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c:           regs->pstate &= ~PSR_AA32_E_BIT;
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:         regs->pstate &= ~PSR_SSBS_BIT;
arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c:     regs->pstate &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c:       pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1);       /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c:       pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1);       /* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c:     regs->pstate &= ~PSR_D_BIT;
arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c:     regs->pstate &= ~DAIF_MASK;
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:     regs->pstate &= ~SPSR_EL1_AARCH32_RES0_BITS;
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:                     regs->pstate &= ~PSR_AA32_E_BIT;
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:     regs->pstate &= ~SPSR_EL1_AARCH64_RES0_BITS;
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:             regs->pstate &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
arch/arm64/kernel/ssbd.c:       task_pt_regs(task)->pstate &= ~val;
arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:      regs->pstate &= ~PSR_AA32_IT_MASK;

... and at that point I'd suggest we should just ensure the bit
definitions are all defined as unsigned long in the first place since
adding casts to each use is error-prone.

Thanks,
Mark.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-11 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 145+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-10 18:44 [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: ARMv8.5-A: Branch Target Identification support Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] mm: Reserve asm-generic prot flag 0x10 for arch use Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] arm64: docs: cpu-feature-registers: Document ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 13:19   ` Alex Bennée
2019-10-11 13:19     ` Alex Bennée
2019-10-11 13:19     ` Alex Bennée
2019-10-11 14:51     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:51       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:51       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-21 19:18       ` Mark Brown
2019-10-21 19:18         ` Mark Brown
2019-10-21 19:18         ` Mark Brown
2019-10-22 10:32         ` Will Deacon
2019-10-22 10:32           ` Will Deacon
2019-10-22 10:32           ` Will Deacon
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06   ` [FIXUP 0/2] Fixups to patch 5 Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06     ` [FIXUP 1/2] squash! arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06     ` [FIXUP 2/2] " Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:06       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:10   ` [PATCH v2 05/12] " Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:10     ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:10     ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:25     ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:25       ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:25       ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:32       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:32         ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:32         ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:40         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:40           ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:40           ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:44           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:44             ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:44             ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:01             ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:01               ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:01               ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:42               ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:42                 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 16:42                 ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:05                 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:05                   ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:05                   ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 13:36                   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 13:36                     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 13:36                     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 17:20     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 17:20       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 17:20       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:10       ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:10         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:10         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 13:37         ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 13:37           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 13:37           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:16       ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:16         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:16         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:16         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 13:40         ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 13:40           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 13:40           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] elf: Allow arch to tweak initial mmap prot flags Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] arm64: elf: Enable BTI at exec based on ELF program properties Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing PSTATE Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:31   ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:31     ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:31     ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-11 15:33     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:33       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:33       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] arm64: traps: Fix inconsistent faulting instruction skipping Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 15:24   ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:24     ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 15:24     ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-15 15:21     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-15 15:21       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-15 15:21       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-15 16:42       ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-15 16:42         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-15 16:42         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-15 16:49         ` Dave Martin
2019-10-15 16:49           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-15 16:49           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 16:40           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 16:40             ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 16:40             ` Dave Martin
2019-10-22 11:09             ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-22 11:09               ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-22 11:09               ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] arm64: traps: Shuffle code to eliminate forward declarations Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:21   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-10-11 14:21     ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:21     ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:47     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:47       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:47       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 11:04       ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:04         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 11:04         ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-18 14:49         ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 14:49           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-18 14:49           ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: " Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-10 18:44   ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:24   ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:24     ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:24     ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 14:44     ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:44       ` Dave Martin
2019-10-11 14:44       ` Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191011142157.GC33537@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=esyr@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.elliott@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=sudi.das@arm.com \
    --cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.