* [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64
@ 2010-01-26 5:45 Shi Weihua
2010-01-26 7:54 ` Garrett Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Shi Weihua @ 2010-01-26 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Garrett Cooper; +Cc: ltp-list
Hi, Cooper
I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined
sa_sigaction in struct sigaction.
http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64.
------------
Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction).
------------
But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64.
On my x86_64, signal.h like this:
------------
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
#ifdef __i386__
(sa_sigaction defined here) <--
#else /* __i386__ */
(no sa_sigaction defined) <--
#endif /* !__i386__ */
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
------------
your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in
LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation.
Thank you very much.
--
Shi Weihua
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64
2010-01-26 5:45 [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 Shi Weihua
@ 2010-01-26 7:54 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-01-26 8:25 ` Garrett Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-01-26 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shi Weihua; +Cc: ltp-list
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi, Cooper
>
> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined
> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction.
> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
>
> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64.
> ------------
> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction).
> ------------
> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64.
>
> On my x86_64, signal.h like this:
> ------------
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> #ifdef __i386__
> (sa_sigaction defined here) <--
> #else /* __i386__ */
> (no sa_sigaction defined) <--
> #endif /* !__i386__ */
>
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> ------------
> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in
> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation.
Shi,
I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and
revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state
(which means that x86_64 will once again be broken).
Thanks,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64
2010-01-26 7:54 ` Garrett Cooper
@ 2010-01-26 8:25 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-01-26 9:34 ` Shi Weihua
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-01-26 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shi Weihua, liubo; +Cc: ltp-list
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Cooper
>>
>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined
>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction.
>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
>>
>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64.
>> ------------
>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction).
>> ------------
>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64.
>>
>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this:
>> ------------
>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>
>> #ifdef __i386__
>> (sa_sigaction defined here) <--
>> #else /* __i386__ */
>> (no sa_sigaction defined) <--
>> #endif /* !__i386__ */
>>
>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>> ------------
>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in
>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation.
>
> Shi,
> I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and
> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state
> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken).
Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick.
Thanks,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64
2010-01-26 8:25 ` Garrett Cooper
@ 2010-01-26 9:34 ` Shi Weihua
2010-01-26 16:43 ` Garrett Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Shi Weihua @ 2010-01-26 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Garrett Cooper; +Cc: ltp-list
at 2010-1-26 16:25, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> Hi, Cooper
>>>
>>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined
>>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction.
>>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
>>>
>>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64.
>>> ------------
>>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction).
>>> ------------
>>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64.
>>>
>>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this:
>>> ------------
>>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>>
>>> #ifdef __i386__
>>> (sa_sigaction defined here) <--
>>> #else /* __i386__ */
>>> (no sa_sigaction defined) <--
>>> #endif /* !__i386__ */
>>>
>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>> ------------
>>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in
>>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation.
>>
>> Shi,
>> I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and
>> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state
>> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken).
>
> Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick.
Do you will pick out some useful code from liubo's patch ?
Previously, you said you would do that. (2009-12-22) ;-)
> Thanks,
> -Garrett
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64
2010-01-26 9:34 ` Shi Weihua
@ 2010-01-26 16:43 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-02-22 1:41 ` liubo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-01-26 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shi Weihua; +Cc: ltp-list
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> at 2010-1-26 16:25, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi, Cooper
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined
>>>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction.
>>>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
>>>>
>>>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64.
>>>> ------------
>>>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction).
>>>> ------------
>>>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64.
>>>>
>>>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this:
>>>> ------------
>>>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef __i386__
>>>> (sa_sigaction defined here) <--
>>>> #else /* __i386__ */
>>>> (no sa_sigaction defined) <--
>>>> #endif /* !__i386__ */
>>>>
>>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>>> ------------
>>>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in
>>>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation.
>>>
>>> Shi,
>>> I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and
>>> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state
>>> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken).
>>
>> Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick.
>
> Do you will pick out some useful code from liubo's patch ?
> Previously, you said you would do that. (2009-12-22) ;-)
Yes, I did; I tried to apply the patch, almost all of the hunks
failed to apply.
Liubo,
Please generate a new patch and attach it someone can apply it and test.
Thanks,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64
2010-01-26 16:43 ` Garrett Cooper
@ 2010-02-22 1:41 ` liubo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: liubo @ 2010-02-22 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Garrett Cooper; +Cc: ltp-list
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2151 bytes --]
On 01/27/2010 12:43 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> at 2010-1-26 16:25, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, Cooper
>>>>>
>>>>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined
>>>>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction.
>>>>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
>>>>>
>>>>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64.
>>>>> ------------
>>>>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction).
>>>>> ------------
>>>>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64.
>>>>>
>>>>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this:
>>>>> ------------
>>>>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>>>>
>>>>> #ifdef __i386__
>>>>> (sa_sigaction defined here) <--
>>>>> #else /* __i386__ */
>>>>> (no sa_sigaction defined) <--
>>>>> #endif /* !__i386__ */
>>>>>
>>>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>>>> ------------
>>>>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in
>>>>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation.
>>>>>
>>>> Shi,
>>>> I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and
>>>> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state
>>>> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken).
>>>>
>>> Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick.
>>>
>> Do you will pick out some useful code from liubo's patch ?
>> Previously, you said you would do that. (2009-12-22) ;-)
>>
>
> Yes, I did; I tried to apply the patch, almost all of the hunks
> failed to apply.
>
> Liubo,
> Please generate a new patch and attach it someone can apply it and test.
> Thanks,
> -Garrett
>
>
>
Hi, Garrett,
Sorry for replying so late.
Sure, I'll generate a new patch based on the newest LTP version and
send it then.
Thanks,
Liubo
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3194 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-22 3:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-26 5:45 [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 Shi Weihua
2010-01-26 7:54 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-01-26 8:25 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-01-26 9:34 ` Shi Weihua
2010-01-26 16:43 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-02-22 1:41 ` liubo
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.