[LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64

[LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64

[Shi Weihua]

Hi, Cooper

I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined 
sa_sigaction in struct sigaction.
http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7

As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64.
------------
Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction).
------------
But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64.

On my x86_64, signal.h like this:
------------
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__

#ifdef __i386__
	(sa_sigaction defined here)  <--
#else /* __i386__ */
	(no sa_sigaction defined)    <--
#endif /* !__i386__ */

#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
------------
your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in 
LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation.

Thank you very much.

--
Shi Weihua

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64

[Garrett Cooper]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi, Cooper
>
> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined
> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction.
> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
>
> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64.
> ------------
> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction).
> ------------
> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64.
>
> On my x86_64, signal.h like this:
> ------------
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> #ifdef __i386__
>        (sa_sigaction defined here)  <--
> #else /* __i386__ */
>        (no sa_sigaction defined)    <--
> #endif /* !__i386__ */
>
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> ------------
> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in
> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation.

Shi,
    I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and
revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state
(which means that x86_64 will once again be broken).
Thanks,
-Garrett

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64

[Garrett Cooper]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Cooper
>>
>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined
>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction.
>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
>>
>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64.
>> ------------
>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction).
>> ------------
>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64.
>>
>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this:
>> ------------
>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>
>> #ifdef __i386__
>>        (sa_sigaction defined here)  <--
>> #else /* __i386__ */
>>        (no sa_sigaction defined)    <--
>> #endif /* !__i386__ */
>>
>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>> ------------
>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in
>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation.
>
> Shi,
>    I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and
> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state
> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken).

    Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick.
Thanks,
-Garrett

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64

[Shi Weihua]

at 2010-1-26 16:25, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> Hi, Cooper
>>>
>>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined
>>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction.
>>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
>>>
>>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64.
>>> ------------
>>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction).
>>> ------------
>>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64.
>>>
>>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this:
>>> ------------
>>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>>
>>> #ifdef __i386__
>>>        (sa_sigaction defined here)  <--
>>> #else /* __i386__ */
>>>        (no sa_sigaction defined)    <--
>>> #endif /* !__i386__ */
>>>
>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>> ------------
>>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in
>>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation.
>>
>> Shi,
>>    I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and
>> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state
>> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken).
> 
>     Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick.

Do you will pick out some useful code from liubo's patch ?
Previously, you said you would do that. (2009-12-22) ;-)

> Thanks,
> -Garrett
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64

[Garrett Cooper]

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> at 2010-1-26 16:25, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi, Cooper
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined
>>>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction.
>>>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
>>>>
>>>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64.
>>>> ------------
>>>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction).
>>>> ------------
>>>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64.
>>>>
>>>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this:
>>>> ------------
>>>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef __i386__
>>>>        (sa_sigaction defined here)  <--
>>>> #else /* __i386__ */
>>>>        (no sa_sigaction defined)    <--
>>>> #endif /* !__i386__ */
>>>>
>>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>>> ------------
>>>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in
>>>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation.
>>>
>>> Shi,
>>>    I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and
>>> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state
>>> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken).
>>
>>     Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick.
>
> Do you will pick out some useful code from liubo's patch ?
> Previously, you said you would do that. (2009-12-22) ;-)

    Yes, I did; I tried to apply the patch, almost all of the hunks
failed to apply.

Liubo,
    Please generate a new patch and attach it someone can apply it and test.
Thanks,
-Garrett

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64

[liubo]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2151 bytes --]

On 01/27/2010 12:43 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>   
>> at 2010-1-26 16:25, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>     
>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Hi, Cooper
>>>>>
>>>>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined
>>>>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction.
>>>>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
>>>>>
>>>>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64.
>>>>> ------------
>>>>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction).
>>>>> ------------
>>>>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64.
>>>>>
>>>>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this:
>>>>> ------------
>>>>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>>>>
>>>>> #ifdef __i386__
>>>>>        (sa_sigaction defined here)  <--
>>>>> #else /* __i386__ */
>>>>>        (no sa_sigaction defined)    <--
>>>>> #endif /* !__i386__ */
>>>>>
>>>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>>>> ------------
>>>>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in
>>>>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation.
>>>>>           
>>>> Shi,
>>>>    I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and
>>>> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state
>>>> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken).
>>>>         
>>>     Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick.
>>>       
>> Do you will pick out some useful code from liubo's patch ?
>> Previously, you said you would do that. (2009-12-22) ;-)
>>     
>
>     Yes, I did; I tried to apply the patch, almost all of the hunks
> failed to apply.
>
> Liubo,
>     Please generate a new patch and attach it someone can apply it and test.
> Thanks,
> -Garrett
>
>
>   
  Hi, Garrett,
  Sorry for replying so late.
  Sure, I'll generate a new patch based on the newest LTP version and
send it then.

  Thanks,
  Liubo


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3194 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list