* [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 @ 2010-01-26 5:45 Shi Weihua 2010-01-26 7:54 ` Garrett Cooper 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Shi Weihua @ 2010-01-26 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Garrett Cooper; +Cc: ltp-list Hi, Cooper I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined sa_sigaction in struct sigaction. http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64. ------------ Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction). ------------ But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64. On my x86_64, signal.h like this: ------------ #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ #ifdef __i386__ (sa_sigaction defined here) <-- #else /* __i386__ */ (no sa_sigaction defined) <-- #endif /* !__i386__ */ #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ ------------ your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation. Thank you very much. -- Shi Weihua ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 2010-01-26 5:45 [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 Shi Weihua @ 2010-01-26 7:54 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-01-26 8:25 ` Garrett Cooper 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-01-26 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shi Weihua; +Cc: ltp-list On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > Hi, Cooper > > I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined > sa_sigaction in struct sigaction. > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 > > As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64. > ------------ > Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction). > ------------ > But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64. > > On my x86_64, signal.h like this: > ------------ > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > > #ifdef __i386__ > (sa_sigaction defined here) <-- > #else /* __i386__ */ > (no sa_sigaction defined) <-- > #endif /* !__i386__ */ > > #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ > ------------ > your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in > LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation. Shi, I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken). Thanks, -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 2010-01-26 7:54 ` Garrett Cooper @ 2010-01-26 8:25 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-01-26 9:34 ` Shi Weihua 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-01-26 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shi Weihua, liubo; +Cc: ltp-list On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: >> Hi, Cooper >> >> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined >> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction. >> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 >> >> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64. >> ------------ >> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction). >> ------------ >> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64. >> >> On my x86_64, signal.h like this: >> ------------ >> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ >> >> #ifdef __i386__ >> (sa_sigaction defined here) <-- >> #else /* __i386__ */ >> (no sa_sigaction defined) <-- >> #endif /* !__i386__ */ >> >> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ >> ------------ >> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in >> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation. > > Shi, > I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and > revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state > (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken). Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick. Thanks, -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 2010-01-26 8:25 ` Garrett Cooper @ 2010-01-26 9:34 ` Shi Weihua 2010-01-26 16:43 ` Garrett Cooper 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Shi Weihua @ 2010-01-26 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Garrett Cooper; +Cc: ltp-list at 2010-1-26 16:25, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: >>> Hi, Cooper >>> >>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined >>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction. >>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 >>> >>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64. >>> ------------ >>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction). >>> ------------ >>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64. >>> >>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this: >>> ------------ >>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ >>> >>> #ifdef __i386__ >>> (sa_sigaction defined here) <-- >>> #else /* __i386__ */ >>> (no sa_sigaction defined) <-- >>> #endif /* !__i386__ */ >>> >>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ >>> ------------ >>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in >>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation. >> >> Shi, >> I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and >> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state >> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken). > > Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick. Do you will pick out some useful code from liubo's patch ? Previously, you said you would do that. (2009-12-22) ;-) > Thanks, > -Garrett > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 2010-01-26 9:34 ` Shi Weihua @ 2010-01-26 16:43 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-02-22 1:41 ` liubo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-01-26 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shi Weihua; +Cc: ltp-list On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > at 2010-1-26 16:25, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, Cooper >>>> >>>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined >>>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction. >>>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 >>>> >>>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64. >>>> ------------ >>>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction). >>>> ------------ >>>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64. >>>> >>>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this: >>>> ------------ >>>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ >>>> >>>> #ifdef __i386__ >>>> (sa_sigaction defined here) <-- >>>> #else /* __i386__ */ >>>> (no sa_sigaction defined) <-- >>>> #endif /* !__i386__ */ >>>> >>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ >>>> ------------ >>>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in >>>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation. >>> >>> Shi, >>> I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and >>> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state >>> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken). >> >> Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick. > > Do you will pick out some useful code from liubo's patch ? > Previously, you said you would do that. (2009-12-22) ;-) Yes, I did; I tried to apply the patch, almost all of the hunks failed to apply. Liubo, Please generate a new patch and attach it someone can apply it and test. Thanks, -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 2010-01-26 16:43 ` Garrett Cooper @ 2010-02-22 1:41 ` liubo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: liubo @ 2010-02-22 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Garrett Cooper; +Cc: ltp-list [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2151 bytes --] On 01/27/2010 12:43 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> at 2010-1-26 16:25, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, Cooper >>>>> >>>>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined >>>>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction. >>>>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 >>>>> >>>>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64. >>>>> ------------ >>>>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in struct sigaction). >>>>> ------------ >>>>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64. >>>>> >>>>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this: >>>>> ------------ >>>>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ >>>>> >>>>> #ifdef __i386__ >>>>> (sa_sigaction defined here) <-- >>>>> #else /* __i386__ */ >>>>> (no sa_sigaction defined) <-- >>>>> #endif /* !__i386__ */ >>>>> >>>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ >>>>> ------------ >>>>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in >>>>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation. >>>>> >>>> Shi, >>>> I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and >>>> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state >>>> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken). >>>> >>> Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick. >>> >> Do you will pick out some useful code from liubo's patch ? >> Previously, you said you would do that. (2009-12-22) ;-) >> > > Yes, I did; I tried to apply the patch, almost all of the hunks > failed to apply. > > Liubo, > Please generate a new patch and attach it someone can apply it and test. > Thanks, > -Garrett > > > Hi, Garrett, Sorry for replying so late. Sure, I'll generate a new patch based on the newest LTP version and send it then. Thanks, Liubo [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3194 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev [-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-22 3:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-01-26 5:45 [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 Shi Weihua 2010-01-26 7:54 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-01-26 8:25 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-01-26 9:34 ` Shi Weihua 2010-01-26 16:43 ` Garrett Cooper 2010-02-22 1:41 ` liubo
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.