All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: "A.S. Dong" <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
Cc: "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, Andy Duan <fugang.duan@nxp.com>,
	Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>, Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>,
	"Y.B. Lu" <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add a more accurate baud rate calculation method
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:11:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcH0j3ddaZ3iStNO4QcAwJKZ7BAMwUTthum2no1ucs2ww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM3PR04MB3062F7BCE82860C377C214E80F10@AM3PR04MB306.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:18 PM, A.S. Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> wrote:

By some reason my previous message went privately.
It didn't have anything major anyway and here I'm suggesting
optimization of finding factors of the formula in use. See below.

>> > +       u32 sbr, osr, baud_diff, tmp_osr, tmp_sbr, tmp_diff, tmp;
>> > +       u32 clk = sport->port.uartclk;
>> > +
>> > +       /*
>> > +        * The idea is to use the best OSR (over-sampling rate) possible.
>> > +        * Note, OSR is typically hard-set to 16 in other LPUART
>> instantiations.
>> > +        * Loop to find the best OSR value possible, one that generates
>> minimum
>> > +        * baud_diff iterate through the rest of the supported values of
>> OSR.
>> > +        *
>> > +        * Calculation Formula:
>> > +        *  Baud Rate = baud clock / ((OSR+1) × SBR)
>> > +        */
>> > +       baud_diff = baudrate;
>> > +       osr = 0;
>> > +       sbr = 0;
>> > +
>>
>> > +       for (tmp_osr = 4; tmp_osr <= 32; tmp_osr++) {

I missed one thing, what happened by default to OSR? What is the value in use?

>> I _think_ you may simplify this and avoid for-loop if you reconsider
>> approach.

> But there is indeed a optimization way, see below.

> To optimize the looping, we probably could do:
> If (!baud_diff)
>         Break;

It's a small one, we may have more interesting approach.

So, the algo is the following:

Assume the ranges like this:
OSR = [4 ... 32]
SBR = [2 ... 8192]

Then:

1. Get ratio factor as
      ratio = CLK / desired baud rate
2. If ratio < 8192 * 9 / 2, just use (ratio / 4, 4) as (OSR, SBR)
setting. (Needs clarification on OSR < 4)
3. if ratio >= 8192 * 31, just use those two numbers (8192, 31). You
can't do anything better there.
4. Otherwise, get a minimum required factor of OSR
      osr_min = ratio / 8192
5. Start your loop from osr_min + 1 to 31.

6 (optional). Of course you may not consider baud_diff > osr_min, it's
I suppose obvious

P.S. Note, all divisions by 2^n are just simple right shifts. Diffs
are calculated as multiplication of OSR and SBR in comparison to
ratio. One division so far.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com (Andy Shevchenko)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add a more accurate baud rate calculation method
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:11:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcH0j3ddaZ3iStNO4QcAwJKZ7BAMwUTthum2no1ucs2ww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM3PR04MB3062F7BCE82860C377C214E80F10@AM3PR04MB306.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:18 PM, A.S. Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> wrote:

By some reason my previous message went privately.
It didn't have anything major anyway and here I'm suggesting
optimization of finding factors of the formula in use. See below.

>> > +       u32 sbr, osr, baud_diff, tmp_osr, tmp_sbr, tmp_diff, tmp;
>> > +       u32 clk = sport->port.uartclk;
>> > +
>> > +       /*
>> > +        * The idea is to use the best OSR (over-sampling rate) possible.
>> > +        * Note, OSR is typically hard-set to 16 in other LPUART
>> instantiations.
>> > +        * Loop to find the best OSR value possible, one that generates
>> minimum
>> > +        * baud_diff iterate through the rest of the supported values of
>> OSR.
>> > +        *
>> > +        * Calculation Formula:
>> > +        *  Baud Rate = baud clock / ((OSR+1) ? SBR)
>> > +        */
>> > +       baud_diff = baudrate;
>> > +       osr = 0;
>> > +       sbr = 0;
>> > +
>>
>> > +       for (tmp_osr = 4; tmp_osr <= 32; tmp_osr++) {

I missed one thing, what happened by default to OSR? What is the value in use?

>> I _think_ you may simplify this and avoid for-loop if you reconsider
>> approach.

> But there is indeed a optimization way, see below.

> To optimize the looping, we probably could do:
> If (!baud_diff)
>         Break;

It's a small one, we may have more interesting approach.

So, the algo is the following:

Assume the ranges like this:
OSR = [4 ... 32]
SBR = [2 ... 8192]

Then:

1. Get ratio factor as
      ratio = CLK / desired baud rate
2. If ratio < 8192 * 9 / 2, just use (ratio / 4, 4) as (OSR, SBR)
setting. (Needs clarification on OSR < 4)
3. if ratio >= 8192 * 31, just use those two numbers (8192, 31). You
can't do anything better there.
4. Otherwise, get a minimum required factor of OSR
      osr_min = ratio / 8192
5. Start your loop from osr_min + 1 to 31.

6 (optional). Of course you may not consider baud_diff > osr_min, it's
I suppose obvious

P.S. Note, all divisions by 2^n are just simple right shifts. Diffs
are calculated as multiplication of OSR and SBR in comparison to
ratio. One division so far.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-02 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-09  7:50 [PATCH 0/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add imx7ulp support Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50 ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50 ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] tty: serial: lpuart: introduce lpuart_soc_data to represent SoC property Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50   ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50   ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-10  3:50   ` Stefan Agner
2017-05-10  3:50     ` Stefan Agner
2017-05-10  6:06     ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-10  6:06       ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-10  6:06       ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add little endian 32 bit register support Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50   ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50   ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-10  3:58   ` Stefan Agner
2017-05-10  3:58     ` Stefan Agner
2017-05-10  6:19     ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-10  6:19       ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-10  6:19       ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: serial: fsl-lpuart: add i.MX7ULP support Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50   ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50   ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-12 20:12   ` Rob Herring
2017-05-12 20:12     ` Rob Herring
2017-05-12 20:12     ` Rob Herring
2017-05-09  7:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add imx7ulp support Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50   ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50   ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-10  4:10   ` Stefan Agner
2017-05-10  4:10     ` Stefan Agner
2017-05-10  6:14     ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-10  6:14       ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-10  6:14       ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-10 20:37       ` Stefan Agner
2017-05-10 20:37         ` Stefan Agner
2017-05-12 13:28         ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-12 13:28           ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add earlycon support for imx7ulp Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50   ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50   ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add a more accurate baud rate calculation method Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50   ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-09  7:50   ` Dong Aisheng
2017-05-28  0:04   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-28  0:04     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-31 14:18     ` A.S. Dong
2017-05-31 14:18       ` A.S. Dong
2017-06-02 17:11       ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2017-06-02 17:11         ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-09  8:01         ` A.S. Dong
2017-06-09  8:01           ` A.S. Dong
2017-06-09  9:26           ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-09  9:26             ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-09 14:20             ` A.S. Dong
2017-06-09 14:20               ` A.S. Dong
2017-06-09 15:48               ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-09 15:48                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-12 14:23                 ` A.S. Dong
2017-06-12 14:23                   ` A.S. Dong
2017-05-09 11:13 ` [PATCH 0/6] tty: serial: lpuart: add imx7ulp support Andy Duan
2017-05-09 11:13   ` Andy Duan
2017-05-09 11:13   ` Andy Duan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHp75VcH0j3ddaZ3iStNO4QcAwJKZ7BAMwUTthum2no1ucs2ww@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
    --cc=fugang.duan@nxp.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    --cc=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.