All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: Tim Hockin <thockin@hockin.org>
Cc: Mike Waychison <Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM>,
	Jim Carter <jimc@math.ucla.edu>,
	autofs mailing list <autofs@linux.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:30:06 +0800 (WST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0401130928480.10047-100000@wombat.indigo.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040112225023.GA21399@hockin.org>

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Tim Hockin wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:26:30AM -0500, Mike Waychison wrote:
> > /usr   /man1   server:/usr/man1   \
> >          /man2   server:/usr/man2
> >
> > is the same as the two distinct entries:
> >
> > /usr/man1   server:/usr/man1
> > /usr/man2   server:/usr/man2
> >
> > Now that I think about it, the discussion in my proposal paper about
> > multimounts with no root offsets probably isn't required.
>
> The latter requires /usr/man1 and /usr/man2 to exist.  The former only
> requires /usr to exist, right?
>

That's one possibility, but man1 and man2 could simply not call filler in
the readdir call.

Ian



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: Tim Hockin <thockin@hockin.org>
Cc: autofs mailing list <autofs@linux.kernel.org>,
	Mike Waychison <Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:30:06 +0800 (WST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0401130928480.10047-100000@wombat.indigo.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040112225023.GA21399@hockin.org>

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Tim Hockin wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:26:30AM -0500, Mike Waychison wrote:
> > /usr   /man1   server:/usr/man1   \
> >          /man2   server:/usr/man2
> >
> > is the same as the two distinct entries:
> >
> > /usr/man1   server:/usr/man1
> > /usr/man2   server:/usr/man2
> >
> > Now that I think about it, the discussion in my proposal paper about
> > multimounts with no root offsets probably isn't required.
>
> The latter requires /usr/man1 and /usr/man2 to exist.  The former only
> requires /usr to exist, right?
>

That's one possibility, but man1 and man2 could simply not call filler in
the readdir call.

Ian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-13  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-06 19:55 [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs Mike Waychison
2004-01-06 19:55 ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-06 21:01 ` [autofs] " H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-06 21:01   ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-06 21:44   ` [autofs] " Mike Waychison
2004-01-06 21:44     ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-06 21:50   ` [autofs] " Tim Hockin
2004-01-06 21:50     ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-06 22:06     ` [autofs] " H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-06 22:06       ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-06 22:17       ` [autofs] " Tim Hockin
     [not found]       ` <20040106221502.GA7398@hockin.org>
2004-01-06 22:20         ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-06 22:20           ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-07 16:19           ` [autofs] " Mike Waychison
2004-01-07 16:19             ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-07 17:55             ` [autofs] " H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-07 21:13               ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-06 22:28       ` name spaces good (was: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs) Dax Kelson
2004-01-06 22:48         ` name spaces good H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-06 22:48           ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-07 21:14 ` [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs Jim Carter
2004-01-07 21:14   ` Jim Carter
2004-01-07 22:55   ` [autofs] " Mike Waychison
2004-01-07 22:55     ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-08 12:00     ` [autofs] " Ian Kent
2004-01-08 12:00       ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 15:39       ` [autofs] " Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 18:20         ` Ian Kent
2004-01-09 18:20           ` Ian Kent
2004-01-09 20:06           ` [autofs] " Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 20:06             ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-10  5:43             ` [autofs] " Ian Kent
2004-01-12 13:07               ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-12 16:01                 ` raven
2004-01-12 16:26                   ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-12 22:50                     ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-12 23:28                       ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-13  1:30                       ` Ian Kent [this message]
2004-01-13  1:30                         ` Ian Kent
2004-01-12 16:28                   ` [autofs] " raven
2004-01-12 16:58                     ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-13  1:54                       ` Ian Kent
2004-01-13  1:54                         ` Ian Kent
2004-01-13 19:01                         ` [autofs] " Mike Waychison
2004-01-13 19:01                           ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-14 15:58                           ` [autofs] " raven
2004-01-14 19:32                             ` running out of mount points Greg Bradner
2004-01-19 15:48                               ` Greg Bradner
2004-01-19 17:11                                 ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-19 19:07                                   ` Greg Bradner
2004-01-20 19:15                                 ` Jim Carter
2004-01-13 18:46                   ` [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs Mike Waychison
2004-01-13 18:46                     ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 20:51           ` [autofs] " Jim Carter
2004-01-09 20:51             ` Jim Carter
2004-01-10  5:56             ` [autofs] " Ian Kent
2004-01-08 17:34       ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-08 19:41         ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-08 23:42         ` Michael Clark
2004-01-09 20:28           ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 20:28             ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 20:54             ` [autofs] " H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-09 20:54               ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-09 21:43               ` [autofs] " Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 21:43                 ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 18:32         ` [autofs] " Ian Kent
2004-01-09 18:32           ` Ian Kent
2004-01-09 20:52           ` [autofs] " Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 20:52             ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-10  6:05             ` [autofs] " Ian Kent
2004-01-08 12:29     ` Olivier Galibert
2004-01-08 13:20       ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-01-08 16:23       ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-08 12:35     ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 13:08       ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 18:20     ` Jim Carter
2004-01-08 21:01       ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-08  0:48   ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08  0:48     ` Ian Kent
2004-01-06 22:28 [autofs] " Ogden, Aaron A.
2004-01-06 22:41 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-06 22:47 ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-06 22:53 ` Paul Raines
2004-01-07 23:14 ` Jim Carter
2004-01-07 23:32   ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-08 12:52     ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 12:52       ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 18:31       ` viro
2004-01-09 18:43         ` Ian Kent
2004-01-09 19:41         ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 19:57           ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-09 21:31             ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 21:36               ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-06 23:34 Ogden, Aaron A.
2004-01-06 23:47 ` Tim Hockin
     [not found] <1b5GC-29h-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <1b6CO-3v0-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-01-07  4:21   ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-07 17:50     ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-07 21:04       ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-07 21:11         ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-07 23:40           ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-07 21:24         ` Jeff Garzik
2004-01-07 23:47           ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-07 23:56             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-01-12 16:57               ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-13  7:39                 ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 19:32 trond.myklebust
2004-01-08 19:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-08 20:08   ` trond.myklebust
2004-01-08 21:13     ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-08 22:20       ` J. Bruce Fields
2004-01-08 22:24         ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-09 20:37       ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 21:02         ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-09 21:52           ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 20:16   ` Mike Waychison

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0401130928480.10047-100000@wombat.indigo.net.au \
    --to=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM \
    --cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
    --cc=jimc@math.ucla.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thockin@hockin.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.