[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[carsten.haitzler]

Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
the PHY and thus displays can work too.

Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 30516dc0b70e..87edd79dac99 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -469,6 +469,7 @@ CONFIG_I2C_TEGRA=y
 CONFIG_I2C_UNIPHIER_F=y
 CONFIG_I2C_RCAR=y
 CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
+CONFIG_I2C_CADENCE=m
 CONFIG_SPI=y
 CONFIG_SPI_ARMADA_3700=y
 CONFIG_SPI_BCM2835=m
@@ -678,7 +679,9 @@ CONFIG_VIDEO_OV5645=m
 CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS=m
 CONFIG_DRM=m
 CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X=m
+CONFIG_DRM_HDLCD=m
 CONFIG_DRM_MALI_DISPLAY=m
+CONFIG_DRM_KOMEDA=m
 CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS5433_DECON=y
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[carsten.haitzler]

Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
the PHY and thus displays can work too.

Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 30516dc0b70e..87edd79dac99 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -469,6 +469,7 @@ CONFIG_I2C_TEGRA=y
 CONFIG_I2C_UNIPHIER_F=y
 CONFIG_I2C_RCAR=y
 CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
+CONFIG_I2C_CADENCE=m
 CONFIG_SPI=y
 CONFIG_SPI_ARMADA_3700=y
 CONFIG_SPI_BCM2835=m
@@ -678,7 +679,9 @@ CONFIG_VIDEO_OV5645=m
 CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS=m
 CONFIG_DRM=m
 CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X=m
+CONFIG_DRM_HDLCD=m
 CONFIG_DRM_MALI_DISPLAY=m
+CONFIG_DRM_KOMEDA=m
 CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS5433_DECON=y
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Sudeep Holla]

+ Liviu, Robin

On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 01:55:10PM +0100, carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com wrote:
> Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
> older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
> out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
> the PHY and thus displays can work too.
> 

While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950

Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Sudeep Holla]

+ Liviu, Robin

On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 01:55:10PM +0100, carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com wrote:
> Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
> older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
> out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
> the PHY and thus displays can work too.
> 

While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950

Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 475 bytes --]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950

> Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
> needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.

Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 475 bytes --]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950

> Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
> needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.

Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Robin Murphy]

On 2022-05-10 12:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
>> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
> 
>> Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
>> needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
> 
> Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
> just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.

Yeah, DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X and I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM are what's needed 
for Juno, and they've been enabled already for a long time now, so we're 
good.

Thanks,
Robin.

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Robin Murphy]

On 2022-05-10 12:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
>> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
> 
>> Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
>> needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
> 
> Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
> just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.

Yeah, DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X and I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM are what's needed 
for Juno, and they've been enabled already for a long time now, so we're 
good.

Thanks,
Robin.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Sudeep Holla]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:56:15PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2022-05-10 12:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > 
> > > While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
> > 
> > > Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
> > > needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
> > 
> > Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
> > just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.
> 
> Yeah, DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X and I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM are what's needed for
> Juno, and they've been enabled already for a long time now, so we're good.
> 

Ah my bad, so I haven't refreshed my listed then. I just append to defconfig,
which must have complained for duplicates and I am ignoring 🙁. Thanks
for the info and sorry for the noise then.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Sudeep Holla]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:56:15PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2022-05-10 12:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > 
> > > While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
> > 
> > > Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
> > > needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
> > 
> > Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
> > just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.
> 
> Yeah, DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X and I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM are what's needed for
> Juno, and they've been enabled already for a long time now, so we're good.
> 

Ah my bad, so I haven't refreshed my listed then. I just append to defconfig,
which must have complained for duplicates and I am ignoring 🙁. Thanks
for the info and sorry for the noise then.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Sudeep Holla]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:27:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
> > While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
> 
> > Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
> > needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
> 
> Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
> just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.

Indeed, Robin mentioned the same. I am just adding it blindly every time
I need to test HDLCD without noticing any warnings.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Sudeep Holla]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:27:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
> > While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
> 
> > Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
> > needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
> 
> Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
> just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.

Indeed, Robin mentioned the same. I am just adding it blindly every time
I need to test HDLCD without noticing any warnings.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

On 5/10/22 13:07, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:27:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>>> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
>>
>>> Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
>>> needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
>>
>> Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
>> just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.
> 
> Indeed, Robin mentioned the same. I am just adding it blindly every time
> I need to test HDLCD without noticing any warnings.
> 

Yup - those were already there. I was just adding these for our new 
Morello board - all it needed was I2C Cadence enabled as a module and 
presto... it "just works". As it's just a module it's not really a bad 
"cost" so defconfig additions seemed the right thing to do. Just chasing 
up this patch as I sent it earlier this year and it was not merged or 
denied... :)

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

On 5/10/22 13:07, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:27:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>>> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
>>
>>> Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
>>> needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
>>
>> Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
>> just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.
> 
> Indeed, Robin mentioned the same. I am just adding it blindly every time
> I need to test HDLCD without noticing any warnings.
> 

Yup - those were already there. I was just adding these for our new 
Morello board - all it needed was I2C Cadence enabled as a module and 
presto... it "just works". As it's just a module it's not really a bad 
"cost" so defconfig additions seemed the right thing to do. Just chasing 
up this patch as I sent it earlier this year and it was not merged or 
denied... :)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Sudeep Holla]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:34:00PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/10/22 13:07, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:27:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > 
> > > > While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> > > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> > > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
> > > 
> > > > Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
> > > > needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
> > > 
> > > Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
> > > just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.
> > 
> > Indeed, Robin mentioned the same. I am just adding it blindly every time
> > I need to test HDLCD without noticing any warnings.
> > 
> 
> Yup - those were already there. I was just adding these for our new Morello
> board - all it needed was I2C Cadence enabled as a module and presto... it
> "just works". As it's just a module it's not really a bad "cost" so
> defconfig additions seemed the right thing to do. Just chasing up this patch
> as I sent it earlier this year and it was not merged or denied... :)

Was it sent to soc@kernel.org earlier as well ? If so, let me know. I am
not sure if the SoC team expects this to come from some platform maintainer
or atleast an ack from them so that they can pick up. We can just say it
is need for Arm Ltd platforms and provide an ack(me or Liviu).

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Sudeep Holla]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:34:00PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/10/22 13:07, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:27:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > 
> > > > While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> > > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> > > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
> > > 
> > > > Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
> > > > needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
> > > 
> > > Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
> > > just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.
> > 
> > Indeed, Robin mentioned the same. I am just adding it blindly every time
> > I need to test HDLCD without noticing any warnings.
> > 
> 
> Yup - those were already there. I was just adding these for our new Morello
> board - all it needed was I2C Cadence enabled as a module and presto... it
> "just works". As it's just a module it's not really a bad "cost" so
> defconfig additions seemed the right thing to do. Just chasing up this patch
> as I sent it earlier this year and it was not merged or denied... :)

Was it sent to soc@kernel.org earlier as well ? If so, let me know. I am
not sure if the SoC team expects this to come from some platform maintainer
or atleast an ack from them so that they can pick up. We can just say it
is need for Arm Ltd platforms and provide an ack(me or Liviu).

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

On 5/10/22 15:51, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:34:00PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>
>> On 5/10/22 13:07, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:27:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
>>>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
>>>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
>>>>> Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
>>>>> needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
>>>> Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
>>>> just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.
>>> Indeed, Robin mentioned the same. I am just adding it blindly every time
>>> I need to test HDLCD without noticing any warnings.
>>>
>> Yup - those were already there. I was just adding these for our new Morello
>> board - all it needed was I2C Cadence enabled as a module and presto... it
>> "just works". As it's just a module it's not really a bad "cost" so
>> defconfig additions seemed the right thing to do. Just chasing up this patch
>> as I sent it earlier this year and it was not merged or denied... :)
> Was it sent to soc@kernel.org earlier as well ? If so, let me know. I am
> not sure if the SoC team expects this to come from some platform maintainer
> or atleast an ack from them so that they can pick up. We can just say it
> is need for Arm Ltd platforms and provide an ack(me or Liviu).
>
Yup- I sent there earlier. Arnd has picked it up. I missed his reply 
earlier and was hunting git repos for it. So don't worry about this 
patch - it's on it's way in.

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

On 5/10/22 15:51, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:34:00PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>
>> On 5/10/22 13:07, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:27:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
>>>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
>>>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
>>>>> Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
>>>>> needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
>>>> Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably
>>>> just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno.
>>> Indeed, Robin mentioned the same. I am just adding it blindly every time
>>> I need to test HDLCD without noticing any warnings.
>>>
>> Yup - those were already there. I was just adding these for our new Morello
>> board - all it needed was I2C Cadence enabled as a module and presto... it
>> "just works". As it's just a module it's not really a bad "cost" so
>> defconfig additions seemed the right thing to do. Just chasing up this patch
>> as I sent it earlier this year and it was not merged or denied... :)
> Was it sent to soc@kernel.org earlier as well ? If so, let me know. I am
> not sure if the SoC team expects this to come from some platform maintainer
> or atleast an ack from them so that they can pick up. We can just say it
> is need for Arm Ltd platforms and provide an ack(me or Liviu).
>
Yup- I sent there earlier. Arnd has picked it up. I missed his reply 
earlier and was hunting git repos for it. So don't worry about this 
patch - it's on it's way in.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Liviu Dudau]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> + Liviu, Robin
> 
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 01:55:10PM +0100, carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com wrote:
> > Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
> > older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
> > out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
> > the PHY and thus displays can work too.
> > 
> 
> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950

I would not enable by default TDA9950 as that one is for CEC, which Juno doesn't
implement so you get warnings everytime time tda998x probes.

Best regards,
Liviu

> 
> Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
> needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Sudeep

-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Liviu Dudau]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> + Liviu, Robin
> 
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 01:55:10PM +0100, carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com wrote:
> > Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
> > older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
> > out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
> > the PHY and thus displays can work too.
> > 
> 
> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950

I would not enable by default TDA9950 as that one is for CEC, which Juno doesn't
implement so you get warnings everytime time tda998x probes.

Best regards,
Liviu

> 
> Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are
> needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Sudeep

-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 549 bytes --]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:55:13PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

> > While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950

> I would not enable by default TDA9950 as that one is for CEC, which Juno doesn't
> implement so you get warnings everytime time tda998x probes.

If it's generating a warning due to the config option being enabled
that doesn't sound good - kernels are supposed to be multiplatform.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 549 bytes --]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:55:13PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

> > While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950

> I would not enable by default TDA9950 as that one is for CEC, which Juno doesn't
> implement so you get warnings everytime time tda998x probes.

If it's generating a warning due to the config option being enabled
that doesn't sound good - kernels are supposed to be multiplatform.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

On 5/10/22 14:05, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:55:13PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
>>> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
> 
>> I would not enable by default TDA9950 as that one is for CEC, which Juno doesn't
>> implement so you get warnings everytime time tda998x probes.
> 
> If it's generating a warning due to the config option being enabled
> that doesn't sound good - kernels are supposed to be multiplatform.

is it the:

[    7.471809] tda9950 0-0034: driver requires an interrupt

that you're talking about Liviu?

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

On 5/10/22 14:05, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:55:13PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
>>> While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
> 
>> I would not enable by default TDA9950 as that one is for CEC, which Juno doesn't
>> implement so you get warnings everytime time tda998x probes.
> 
> If it's generating a warning due to the config option being enabled
> that doesn't sound good - kernels are supposed to be multiplatform.

is it the:

[    7.471809] tda9950 0-0034: driver requires an interrupt

that you're talking about Liviu?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Liviu Dudau]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 03:05:21PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/10/22 14:05, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:55:13PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > 
> > > > While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> > > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> > > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
> > 
> > > I would not enable by default TDA9950 as that one is for CEC, which Juno doesn't
> > > implement so you get warnings everytime time tda998x probes.
> > 
> > If it's generating a warning due to the config option being enabled
> > that doesn't sound good - kernels are supposed to be multiplatform.
> 
> is it the:
> 
> [    7.471809] tda9950 0-0034: driver requires an interrupt
> 
> that you're talking about Liviu?

Yes, that is the warning.

Best regards,
Liviu


-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Liviu Dudau]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 03:05:21PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/10/22 14:05, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:55:13PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > 
> > > > While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC.
> > > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X
> > > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950
> > 
> > > I would not enable by default TDA9950 as that one is for CEC, which Juno doesn't
> > > implement so you get warnings everytime time tda998x probes.
> > 
> > If it's generating a warning due to the config option being enabled
> > that doesn't sound good - kernels are supposed to be multiplatform.
> 
> is it the:
> 
> [    7.471809] tda9950 0-0034: driver requires an interrupt
> 
> that you're talking about Liviu?

Yes, that is the warning.

Best regards,
Liviu


-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 834 bytes --]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:19:04PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 03:05:21PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:

> > is it the:

> > [    7.471809] tda9950 0-0034: driver requires an interrupt

> > that you're talking about Liviu?

> Yes, that is the warning.

That doesn't look too worrying TBH, if it's causing confusion we should
just either fix the tda998x driver to not instantiate the tda9950 unless
it has an interrupt or lower the severity of the log message in the
tda9950 code.  It's certanly not something that should block use in a
defconfig.

Ideally we'd not be using the wildcard compatible in the tda998x and
would know if the CEC functionality was there but I think that ship has
disappeared over the horizon at this point, and in any case someone
might just not want to support CEC for some reason.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 834 bytes --]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:19:04PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 03:05:21PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:

> > is it the:

> > [    7.471809] tda9950 0-0034: driver requires an interrupt

> > that you're talking about Liviu?

> Yes, that is the warning.

That doesn't look too worrying TBH, if it's causing confusion we should
just either fix the tda998x driver to not instantiate the tda9950 unless
it has an interrupt or lower the severity of the log message in the
tda9950 code.  It's certanly not something that should block use in a
defconfig.

Ideally we'd not be using the wildcard compatible in the tda998x and
would know if the CEC functionality was there but I think that ship has
disappeared over the horizon at this point, and in any case someone
might just not want to support CEC for some reason.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Liviu Dudau]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:31:11PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:19:04PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 03:05:21PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 
> > > is it the:
> 
> > > [    7.471809] tda9950 0-0034: driver requires an interrupt
> 
> > > that you're talking about Liviu?
> 
> > Yes, that is the warning.
> 
> That doesn't look too worrying TBH, if it's causing confusion we should
> just either fix the tda998x driver to not instantiate the tda9950 unless
> it has an interrupt or lower the severity of the log message in the
> tda9950 code.  It's certanly not something that should block use in a
> defconfig.
> 
> Ideally we'd not be using the wildcard compatible in the tda998x and
> would know if the CEC functionality was there but I think that ship has
> disappeared over the horizon at this point, and in any case someone
> might just not want to support CEC for some reason.

The quickest way is to harmonise the treatment of IRQs between tda998x and tda9950.
The former treats the IRQ as optional, the later as mandatory. Given that (according
to comments in the code) TDA998X is actually a TDA9989+TDA9950, it makes sense to
treat the lack of IRQ the same way (make it optional, IMHO).

I agree that that should not block adding the two config options to the defconfig.
It's just that using Juno as an argument for doing so when tda9950 returns ENXIO on
that platform can confuse people.

Best regards,
Liviu

-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Liviu Dudau]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:31:11PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:19:04PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 03:05:21PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 
> > > is it the:
> 
> > > [    7.471809] tda9950 0-0034: driver requires an interrupt
> 
> > > that you're talking about Liviu?
> 
> > Yes, that is the warning.
> 
> That doesn't look too worrying TBH, if it's causing confusion we should
> just either fix the tda998x driver to not instantiate the tda9950 unless
> it has an interrupt or lower the severity of the log message in the
> tda9950 code.  It's certanly not something that should block use in a
> defconfig.
> 
> Ideally we'd not be using the wildcard compatible in the tda998x and
> would know if the CEC functionality was there but I think that ship has
> disappeared over the horizon at this point, and in any case someone
> might just not want to support CEC for some reason.

The quickest way is to harmonise the treatment of IRQs between tda998x and tda9950.
The former treats the IRQ as optional, the later as mandatory. Given that (according
to comments in the code) TDA998X is actually a TDA9989+TDA9950, it makes sense to
treat the lack of IRQ the same way (make it optional, IMHO).

I agree that that should not block adding the two config options to the defconfig.
It's just that using Juno as an argument for doing so when tda9950 returns ENXIO on
that platform can confuse people.

Best regards,
Liviu

-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 897 bytes --]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:06:52PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:

> The quickest way is to harmonise the treatment of IRQs between tda998x and tda9950.
> The former treats the IRQ as optional, the later as mandatory. Given that (according
> to comments in the code) TDA998X is actually a TDA9989+TDA9950, it makes sense to
> treat the lack of IRQ the same way (make it optional, IMHO).

The check in tda9950 is sensible enough, the device relies on interrupts
to report the status of CEC operations so we'd need to poll constantly
which doesn't seem great.  It wouldn't be *so* bad for things initiated
by the device but given that CEC is a network and we might get messages
from other devices in the system at any time we'd need to poll
constantly even when otherwise idle which doesn't seem good.  I sent a
patch to lower the level of the log message, hopefully that's OK for
people.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 897 bytes --]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:06:52PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:

> The quickest way is to harmonise the treatment of IRQs between tda998x and tda9950.
> The former treats the IRQ as optional, the later as mandatory. Given that (according
> to comments in the code) TDA998X is actually a TDA9989+TDA9950, it makes sense to
> treat the lack of IRQ the same way (make it optional, IMHO).

The check in tda9950 is sensible enough, the device relies on interrupts
to report the status of CEC operations so we'd need to poll constantly
which doesn't seem great.  It wouldn't be *so* bad for things initiated
by the device but given that CEC is a network and we might get messages
from other devices in the system at any time we'd need to poll
constantly even when otherwise idle which doesn't seem good.  I sent a
patch to lower the level of the log message, hopefully that's OK for
people.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

On 5/11/22 14:13, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:06:52PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> 
>> The quickest way is to harmonise the treatment of IRQs between tda998x and tda9950.
>> The former treats the IRQ as optional, the later as mandatory. Given that (according
>> to comments in the code) TDA998X is actually a TDA9989+TDA9950, it makes sense to
>> treat the lack of IRQ the same way (make it optional, IMHO).
> 
> The check in tda9950 is sensible enough, the device relies on interrupts
> to report the status of CEC operations so we'd need to poll constantly
> which doesn't seem great.  It wouldn't be *so* bad for things initiated
> by the device but given that CEC is a network and we might get messages
> from other devices in the system at any time we'd need to poll
> constantly even when otherwise idle which doesn't seem good.  I sent a
> patch to lower the level of the log message, hopefully that's OK for
> people.

Ah - well either way- job done. :) No need to spin up a patch then :)

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

On 5/11/22 14:13, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:06:52PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> 
>> The quickest way is to harmonise the treatment of IRQs between tda998x and tda9950.
>> The former treats the IRQ as optional, the later as mandatory. Given that (according
>> to comments in the code) TDA998X is actually a TDA9989+TDA9950, it makes sense to
>> treat the lack of IRQ the same way (make it optional, IMHO).
> 
> The check in tda9950 is sensible enough, the device relies on interrupts
> to report the status of CEC operations so we'd need to poll constantly
> which doesn't seem great.  It wouldn't be *so* bad for things initiated
> by the device but given that CEC is a network and we might get messages
> from other devices in the system at any time we'd need to poll
> constantly even when otherwise idle which doesn't seem good.  I sent a
> patch to lower the level of the log message, hopefully that's OK for
> people.

Ah - well either way- job done. :) No need to spin up a patch then :)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

On 5/10/22 17:31, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:19:04PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 03:05:21PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 
>>> is it the:
> 
>>> [    7.471809] tda9950 0-0034: driver requires an interrupt
> 
>>> that you're talking about Liviu?
> 
>> Yes, that is the warning.
> 
> That doesn't look too worrying TBH, if it's causing confusion we should

Looks un-worrying to me. It (to my eyes) looks like an overzealous 
driver that should silently fail to load if no interrupt can be found as 
obviously the hardware can't exist, or the DT is misconfigured badly 
enough so it can never be driven until it's fixed. At best this is some 
info or so level printk to turn on in debugging your DT or something.

> just either fix the tda998x driver to not instantiate the tda9950 unless
> it has an interrupt or lower the severity of the log message in the
> tda9950 code.  It's certanly not something that should block use in a
> defconfig.

I agree.

> Ideally we'd not be using the wildcard compatible in the tda998x and
> would know if the CEC functionality was there but I think that ship has
> disappeared over the horizon at this point, and in any case someone
> might just not want to support CEC for some reason.

Right now the best "bang for buck" change would be to lower than 
complaint to an info level so s/dev_err/dev_info/ or maybe dev_notice 
there in tda9950.c for that specific complaint. Any preferences?

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

On 5/10/22 17:31, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:19:04PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 03:05:21PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 
>>> is it the:
> 
>>> [    7.471809] tda9950 0-0034: driver requires an interrupt
> 
>>> that you're talking about Liviu?
> 
>> Yes, that is the warning.
> 
> That doesn't look too worrying TBH, if it's causing confusion we should

Looks un-worrying to me. It (to my eyes) looks like an overzealous 
driver that should silently fail to load if no interrupt can be found as 
obviously the hardware can't exist, or the DT is misconfigured badly 
enough so it can never be driven until it's fixed. At best this is some 
info or so level printk to turn on in debugging your DT or something.

> just either fix the tda998x driver to not instantiate the tda9950 unless
> it has an interrupt or lower the severity of the log message in the
> tda9950 code.  It's certanly not something that should block use in a
> defconfig.

I agree.

> Ideally we'd not be using the wildcard compatible in the tda998x and
> would know if the CEC functionality was there but I think that ship has
> disappeared over the horizon at this point, and in any case someone
> might just not want to support CEC for some reason.

Right now the best "bang for buck" change would be to lower than 
complaint to an info level so s/dev_err/dev_info/ or maybe dev_notice 
there in tda9950.c for that specific complaint. Any preferences?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[carsten.haitzler]

Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
the PHY and thus displays can work too.

Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 30516dc0b70e..87edd79dac99 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -469,6 +469,7 @@ CONFIG_I2C_TEGRA=y
 CONFIG_I2C_UNIPHIER_F=y
 CONFIG_I2C_RCAR=y
 CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
+CONFIG_I2C_CADENCE=m
 CONFIG_SPI=y
 CONFIG_SPI_ARMADA_3700=y
 CONFIG_SPI_BCM2835=m
@@ -678,7 +679,9 @@ CONFIG_VIDEO_OV5645=m
 CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS=m
 CONFIG_DRM=m
 CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X=m
+CONFIG_DRM_HDLCD=m
 CONFIG_DRM_MALI_DISPLAY=m
+CONFIG_DRM_KOMEDA=m
 CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS5433_DECON=y
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[carsten.haitzler]

Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
the PHY and thus displays can work too.

Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 30516dc0b70e..87edd79dac99 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -469,6 +469,7 @@ CONFIG_I2C_TEGRA=y
 CONFIG_I2C_UNIPHIER_F=y
 CONFIG_I2C_RCAR=y
 CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
+CONFIG_I2C_CADENCE=m
 CONFIG_SPI=y
 CONFIG_SPI_ARMADA_3700=y
 CONFIG_SPI_BCM2835=m
@@ -678,7 +679,9 @@ CONFIG_VIDEO_OV5645=m
 CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS=m
 CONFIG_DRM=m
 CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X=m
+CONFIG_DRM_HDLCD=m
 CONFIG_DRM_MALI_DISPLAY=m
+CONFIG_DRM_KOMEDA=m
 CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS5433_DECON=y
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 1:42 PM <carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>
> Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
> older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
> out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
> the PHY and thus displays can work too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>

I applied this patch on Apr 27 after you first sent it. There is normally an
automated confirmation email after it gets uploaded, but I think this did not
happen here because there was a small context mismatch -- the patch
still applied but patchwork did not detect it.

        Arnd

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 1:42 PM <carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>
> Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
> older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
> out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
> the PHY and thus displays can work too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>

I applied this patch on Apr 27 after you first sent it. There is normally an
automated confirmation email after it gets uploaded, but I think this did not
happen here because there was a small context mismatch -- the patch
still applied but patchwork did not detect it.

        Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

On 5/9/22 15:34, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 1:42 PM <carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
>> older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
>> out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
>> the PHY and thus displays can work too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
> 
> I applied this patch on Apr 27 after you first sent it. There is normally an
> automated confirmation email after it gets uploaded, but I think this did not
> happen here because there was a small context mismatch -- the patch
> still applied but patchwork did not detect it.

Aaaah cool. Sorry - I was hunting it down in git trees and didn't find 
it... never mind the follow-on mails then. :)

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

On 5/9/22 15:34, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 1:42 PM <carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
>> older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
>> out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
>> the PHY and thus displays can work too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
> 
> I applied this patch on Apr 27 after you first sent it. There is normally an
> automated confirmation email after it gets uploaded, but I think this did not
> happen here because there was a small context mismatch -- the patch
> still applied but patchwork did not detect it.

Aaaah cool. Sorry - I was hunting it down in git trees and didn't find 
it... never mind the follow-on mails then. :)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[carsten.haitzler]

From: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>

Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
the PHY and thus displays can work too.

Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 30516dc0b70e..87edd79dac99 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -469,6 +469,7 @@ CONFIG_I2C_TEGRA=y
 CONFIG_I2C_UNIPHIER_F=y
 CONFIG_I2C_RCAR=y
 CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
+CONFIG_I2C_CADENCE=m
 CONFIG_SPI=y
 CONFIG_SPI_ARMADA_3700=y
 CONFIG_SPI_BCM2835=m
@@ -678,7 +679,9 @@ CONFIG_VIDEO_OV5645=m
 CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS=m
 CONFIG_DRM=m
 CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X=m
+CONFIG_DRM_HDLCD=m
 CONFIG_DRM_MALI_DISPLAY=m
+CONFIG_DRM_KOMEDA=m
 CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS5433_DECON=y
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[carsten.haitzler]

From: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>

Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
the PHY and thus displays can work too.

Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 30516dc0b70e..87edd79dac99 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -469,6 +469,7 @@ CONFIG_I2C_TEGRA=y
 CONFIG_I2C_UNIPHIER_F=y
 CONFIG_I2C_RCAR=y
 CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
+CONFIG_I2C_CADENCE=m
 CONFIG_SPI=y
 CONFIG_SPI_ARMADA_3700=y
 CONFIG_SPI_BCM2835=m
@@ -678,7 +679,9 @@ CONFIG_VIDEO_OV5645=m
 CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS=m
 CONFIG_DRM=m
 CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X=m
+CONFIG_DRM_HDLCD=m
 CONFIG_DRM_MALI_DISPLAY=m
+CONFIG_DRM_KOMEDA=m
 CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m
 CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS5433_DECON=y
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

Ping - has anyone looked at this?

On 1/28/22 10:07, carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com wrote:
> From: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
> 
> Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
> older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
> out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
> the PHY and thus displays can work too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> index 30516dc0b70e..87edd79dac99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> @@ -469,6 +469,7 @@ CONFIG_I2C_TEGRA=y
>   CONFIG_I2C_UNIPHIER_F=y
>   CONFIG_I2C_RCAR=y
>   CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
> +CONFIG_I2C_CADENCE=m
>   CONFIG_SPI=y
>   CONFIG_SPI_ARMADA_3700=y
>   CONFIG_SPI_BCM2835=m
> @@ -678,7 +679,9 @@ CONFIG_VIDEO_OV5645=m
>   CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS=m
>   CONFIG_DRM=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X=m
> +CONFIG_DRM_HDLCD=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_MALI_DISPLAY=m
> +CONFIG_DRM_KOMEDA=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS5433_DECON=y

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Carsten Haitzler]

Ping - has anyone looked at this?

On 1/28/22 10:07, carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com wrote:
> From: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
> 
> Key devices that support displays on SoCs like the Komeda DRM driver, the
> older HDLCD were not enabled by default and should be so displays can work
> out of the box on defconfig. Also Candence I2C support should be enabled so
> the PHY and thus displays can work too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> index 30516dc0b70e..87edd79dac99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> @@ -469,6 +469,7 @@ CONFIG_I2C_TEGRA=y
>   CONFIG_I2C_UNIPHIER_F=y
>   CONFIG_I2C_RCAR=y
>   CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
> +CONFIG_I2C_CADENCE=m
>   CONFIG_SPI=y
>   CONFIG_SPI_ARMADA_3700=y
>   CONFIG_SPI_BCM2835=m
> @@ -678,7 +679,9 @@ CONFIG_VIDEO_OV5645=m
>   CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_CAMSS=m
>   CONFIG_DRM=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X=m
> +CONFIG_DRM_HDLCD=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_MALI_DISPLAY=m
> +CONFIG_DRM_KOMEDA=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS5433_DECON=y

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/04/2022 14:09, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> Ping - has anyone looked at this?

Hi,

defconfig changes are going via SoC platform maintainers, so judging by
title (arm displays) this will be someone from ARM?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/04/2022 14:09, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> Ping - has anyone looked at this?

Hi,

defconfig changes are going via SoC platform maintainers, so judging by
title (arm displays) this will be someone from ARM?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel