Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] staging: rtl8723bs: include: Further clean up function declarations

[Aditya Jain <aditya.jainadityajain.jain@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:45 PM Aditya Jain
<aditya.jainadityajain.jain@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 10:45 PM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 17:02 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 07:50:12PM +0530, Aditya Jain wrote:
> > > > Cleaning up messy multiline function declarations in hal_phy_cfg.h
> > []
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/hal_phy_cfg.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/hal_phy_cfg.h
> > []
> Ok, I'll merge this patch with the previous one. Had separated the two
> to make the diffs smaller thinking they'll
> be easier to review. But yeah, I get the point.
> > > > -void
> > > > -PHY_SetSwChnlBWMode8723B(
> > > > -struct adapter *Adapter,
> > > > -u8                         channel,
> > > > -enum CHANNEL_WIDTH         Bandwidth,
> > > > -u8                         Offset40,
> > > > -u8                         Offset80
> > > > +void PHY_SetBWMode8723B(struct adapter *Adapter,
> > > > +                   enum CHANNEL_WIDTH Bandwidth,   /*  20M or 40M */
> > > > +                   unsigned char Offset    /*  Upper, Lower, or Don't care */
> > >
> > > Those comments should go at the top of the function declaration, in
> > > kernel doc format.
> >
> > Not every external function needs kernel-doc.
> >
> > This is a realtek staging driver that likely it will never be
> > moved out of staging.
> >
> >
> Should I just remove the comments then? Sorry, but I'm a newbie, and
> not really sure what the function is or supposed to do.
> I can try looking it up if kernel-doc is required here.
Hi all,

Any directions on how I should continue?
>
> Regards,
> Aditya Jain

Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Jain
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel