From: "Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Sysfs hooks for slpc
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:38:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ac94843-ae76-dd2d-87b7-92f6748f4116@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11439c24-118c-1dc2-17cd-5b7f9bcd97de@intel.com>
On 7/10/2021 11:20 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>
>
> On 10.07.2021 03:20, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>> Update the get/set min/max freq hooks to work for
>> slpc case as well. Consolidate helpers for requested/min/max
>> frequency get/set to intel_rps where the proper action can
>> be taken depending on whether slpc is enabled.
>
> 2x s/slpc/SLPC
done.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h | 5 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c | 71 +++------------
>> 5 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
>> index e858eeb2c59d..88ffc5d90730 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ static struct intel_uncore *rps_to_uncore(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> return rps_to_gt(rps)->uncore;
>> }
>>
>> +static struct intel_guc_slpc *rps_to_slpc(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps);
>> + return >->uc.guc.slpc;
>
> either add empty line between decl/code or make it one-liner
done.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> static bool rps_uses_slpc(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> {
>> struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps);
>> @@ -1960,6 +1966,135 @@ u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> return freq;
>> }
>>
>> +u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps);
>> +
>
> drop empty line
done.
>
>> + u32 pureq = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RPNSWREQ);
>> +
>> + return pureq;
>> +}
>> +
>> +u32 intel_rps_get_req(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pureq)
>> +{
>> + u32 req = pureq >> GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + return req;
>> +}
>> +
>> +u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> +{
>> + u32 freq = intel_rps_get_req(rps, intel_rps_read_punit_req(rps));
>> +
>> + return intel_gpu_freq(rps, freq);
>> +}
>> +
>> +u32 intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> +{
>> + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
>> + return intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(rps);
>> + else
>> + return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->cur_freq);
>> +}
>> +
>> +u32 intel_rps_get_max_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
>> +
>> + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
>> + return slpc->max_freq_softlimit;
>> + else
>> + return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->max_freq_softlimit);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int intel_rps_set_max_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
>> + return intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(slpc, val);
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
>> +
>> + val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
>> + if (val < rps->min_freq ||
>> + val > rps->max_freq ||
>> + val < rps->min_freq_softlimit) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (val > rps->rp0_freq)
>> + DRM_DEBUG("User requested overclocking to %d\n",
>
> use drm_dbg
Done.
Thanks,
Vinay.
>
> Michal
>
>> + intel_gpu_freq(rps, val));
>> +
>> + rps->max_freq_softlimit = val;
>> +
>> + val = clamp_t(int, rps->cur_freq,
>> + rps->min_freq_softlimit,
>> + rps->max_freq_softlimit);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We still need *_set_rps to process the new max_delay and
>> + * update the interrupt limits and PMINTRMSK even though
>> + * frequency request may be unchanged.
>> + */
>> + intel_rps_set(rps, val);
>> +
>> +unlock:
>> + mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +u32 intel_rps_get_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
>> +
>> + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
>> + return slpc->min_freq_softlimit;
>> + else
>> + return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->min_freq_softlimit);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int intel_rps_set_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
>> + return intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, val);
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
>> +
>> + val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
>> + if (val < rps->min_freq ||
>> + val > rps->max_freq ||
>> + val > rps->max_freq_softlimit) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rps->min_freq_softlimit = val;
>> +
>> + val = clamp_t(int, rps->cur_freq,
>> + rps->min_freq_softlimit,
>> + rps->max_freq_softlimit);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We still need *_set_rps to process the new min_delay and
>> + * update the interrupt limits and PMINTRMSK even though
>> + * frequency request may be unchanged.
>> + */
>> + intel_rps_set(rps, val);
>> +
>> +unlock:
>> + mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* External interface for intel_ips.ko */
>>
>> static struct drm_i915_private __rcu *ips_mchdev;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
>> index 1d2cfc98b510..9a09ff5ebf64 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
>> @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ int intel_gpu_freq(struct intel_rps *rps, int val);
>> int intel_freq_opcode(struct intel_rps *rps, int val);
>> u32 intel_rps_get_cagf(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 rpstat1);
>> u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
>> +u32 intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
>> +u32 intel_rps_get_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
>> +int intel_rps_set_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val);
>> +u32 intel_rps_get_max_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
>> +int intel_rps_set_max_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val);
>>
>> void gen5_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_rps *rps);
>> void gen6_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pm_iir);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
>> index 34d37d46a126..a896bec18255 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
>> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ frequency_sample(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned int period_ns)
>>
>> if (pmu->enable & config_mask(I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY)) {
>> add_sample_mult(&pmu->sample[__I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_REQ],
>> - intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->cur_freq),
>> + intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(rps),
>> period_ns / 1000);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index 7d9e90aa3ec0..8ab3c2f8f8e4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -9195,6 +9195,8 @@ enum {
>> #define GEN9_FREQUENCY(x) ((x) << 23)
>> #define GEN6_OFFSET(x) ((x) << 19)
>> #define GEN6_AGGRESSIVE_TURBO (0 << 15)
>> +#define GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT 23
>> +
>> #define GEN6_RC_VIDEO_FREQ _MMIO(0xA00C)
>> #define GEN6_RC_CONTROL _MMIO(0xA090)
>> #define GEN6_RC_CTL_RC6pp_ENABLE (1 << 16)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
>> index 873bf996ceb5..f2eee8491b19 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
>> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_cur_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev,
>> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev);
>> struct intel_rps *rps = &i915->gt.rps;
>>
>> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->cur_freq));
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(rps));
>> }
>>
>> static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> @@ -326,9 +326,10 @@ static ssize_t vlv_rpe_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev,
>> static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> {
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev);
>> - struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt.rps;
>> + struct intel_gt *gt = &dev_priv->gt;
>> + struct intel_rps *rps = >->rps;
>>
>> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->max_freq_softlimit));
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_rps_get_max_frequency(rps));
>> }
>>
>> static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
>> @@ -336,7 +337,8 @@ static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
>> const char *buf, size_t count)
>> {
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev);
>> - struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt.rps;
>> + struct intel_gt *gt = &dev_priv->gt;
>> + struct intel_rps *rps = >->rps;
>> ssize_t ret;
>> u32 val;
>>
>> @@ -344,35 +346,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
>> -
>> - val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
>> - if (val < rps->min_freq ||
>> - val > rps->max_freq ||
>> - val < rps->min_freq_softlimit) {
>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> - goto unlock;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (val > rps->rp0_freq)
>> - DRM_DEBUG("User requested overclocking to %d\n",
>> - intel_gpu_freq(rps, val));
>> -
>> - rps->max_freq_softlimit = val;
>> -
>> - val = clamp_t(int, rps->cur_freq,
>> - rps->min_freq_softlimit,
>> - rps->max_freq_softlimit);
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * We still need *_set_rps to process the new max_delay and
>> - * update the interrupt limits and PMINTRMSK even though
>> - * frequency request may be unchanged.
>> - */
>> - intel_rps_set(rps, val);
>> -
>> -unlock:
>> - mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
>> + ret = intel_rps_set_max_frequency(rps, val);
>>
>> return ret ?: count;
>> }
>> @@ -380,9 +354,10 @@ static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
>> static ssize_t gt_min_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> {
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev);
>> - struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt.rps;
>> + struct intel_gt *gt = &dev_priv->gt;
>> + struct intel_rps *rps = >->rps;
>>
>> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->min_freq_softlimit));
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_rps_get_min_frequency(rps));
>> }
>>
>> static ssize_t gt_min_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
>> @@ -398,31 +373,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_min_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
>> -
>> - val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
>> - if (val < rps->min_freq ||
>> - val > rps->max_freq ||
>> - val > rps->max_freq_softlimit) {
>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> - goto unlock;
>> - }
>> -
>> - rps->min_freq_softlimit = val;
>> -
>> - val = clamp_t(int, rps->cur_freq,
>> - rps->min_freq_softlimit,
>> - rps->max_freq_softlimit);
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * We still need *_set_rps to process the new min_delay and
>> - * update the interrupt limits and PMINTRMSK even though
>> - * frequency request may be unchanged.
>> - */
>> - intel_rps_set(rps, val);
>> -
>> -unlock:
>> - mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
>> + ret = intel_rps_set_min_frequency(rps, val);
>>
>> return ret ?: count;
>> }
>>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-20 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-10 1:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/16] Enable GuC based power management features Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/guc: Squashed patch - DO NOT REVIEW Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Initial definitions for slpc Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 14:27 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-12 18:40 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-12 23:43 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when slpc is enabled Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Lay out slpc init/enable/disable/fini Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 14:35 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-13 0:37 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Adding slpc communication interfaces Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 15:52 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-13 23:22 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allocate, initialize and release slpc Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 16:05 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-14 1:40 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable slpc and add related H2G events Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 17:37 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-15 1:58 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 17:36 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add methods to set min/max frequency Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 3:07 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 5:17 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 17:47 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-16 18:00 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add get max/min freq hooks Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 17:52 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-20 22:08 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add debugfs for slpc info Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 18:08 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-20 23:00 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable ARAT timer interrupt Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Cache platform frequency limits for slpc Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 18:15 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-17 19:30 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-20 23:05 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update slpc to use platform min/max Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Sysfs hooks for slpc Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 6:18 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 7:30 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-10 7:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: intel_rps_read_punit_req() can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-10 13:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Sysfs hooks for slpc kernel test robot
2021-07-10 18:20 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-20 23:38 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay [this message]
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/guc/slpc: slpc selftest Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 18:29 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 1:06 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/guc/rc: Setup and enable GUCRC feature Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-10 18:41 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 1:11 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-10 1:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Enable GuC based power management features Patchwork
2021-07-10 1:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-10 2:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ac94843-ae76-dd2d-87b7-92f6748f4116@intel.com \
--to=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).