Re: [PATCH v13 20/35] mtd: rawnand: tegra: Add runtime PM and OPP support

[Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>]

01.10.2021 17:24, Ulf Hansson пишет:
> On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 00:42, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The NAND on Tegra belongs to the core power domain and we're going to
>> enable GENPD support for the core domain. Now NAND must be resumed using
>> runtime PM API in order to initialize the NAND power state. Add runtime PM
>> and OPP support to the NAND driver.
>>
>> Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/tegra_nand.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/tegra_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/tegra_nand.c
>> index 32431bbe69b8..098fcc9cb9df 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/tegra_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/tegra_nand.c
>> @@ -17,8 +17,11 @@
>>  #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>  #include <linux/reset.h>
>>
>> +#include <soc/tegra/common.h>
>> +
>>  #define COMMAND                                        0x00
>>  #define   COMMAND_GO                           BIT(31)
>>  #define   COMMAND_CLE                          BIT(30)
>> @@ -1151,6 +1154,7 @@ static int tegra_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>
>>         ctrl->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctrl);
>>         nand_controller_init(&ctrl->controller);
>>         ctrl->controller.ops = &tegra_nand_controller_ops;
>>
>> @@ -1166,14 +1170,22 @@ static int tegra_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         if (IS_ERR(ctrl->clk))
>>                 return PTR_ERR(ctrl->clk);
>>
>> -       err = clk_prepare_enable(ctrl->clk);
>> +       err = devm_pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>> +       if (err)
>> +               return err;
>> +
>> +       err = devm_tegra_core_dev_init_opp_table_common(&pdev->dev);
>> +       if (err)
>> +               return err;
>> +
>> +       err = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
>>         if (err)
>>                 return err;
>>
>>         err = reset_control_reset(rst);
>>         if (err) {
>>                 dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Failed to reset HW: %d\n", err);
>> -               goto err_disable_clk;
>> +               goto err_put_pm;
>>         }
>>
>>         writel_relaxed(HWSTATUS_CMD_DEFAULT, ctrl->regs + HWSTATUS_CMD);
>> @@ -1188,21 +1200,19 @@ static int tegra_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>                                dev_name(&pdev->dev), ctrl);
>>         if (err) {
>>                 dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", err);
>> -               goto err_disable_clk;
>> +               goto err_put_pm;
>>         }
>>
>>         writel_relaxed(DMA_MST_CTRL_IS_DONE, ctrl->regs + DMA_MST_CTRL);
>>
>>         err = tegra_nand_chips_init(ctrl->dev, ctrl);
>>         if (err)
>> -               goto err_disable_clk;
>> -
>> -       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctrl);
>> +               goto err_put_pm;
>>
> 
> There is no corresponding call pm_runtime_put() here. Is it
> intentional to always leave the device runtime resumed after ->probe()
> has succeeded?
> 
> I noticed you included some comments about this for some other
> drivers, as those needed more tweaks. Is that also the case for this
> driver?

Could you please clarify? There is pm_runtime_put() in both probe-error
and remove() code paths here.

I assume you're meaning pm_runtime_disable(), but this patch uses
resource-managed devm_pm_runtime_enable(), and thus, explicit disable
isn't needed.

>>         return 0;
>>
>> -err_disable_clk:
>> -       clk_disable_unprepare(ctrl->clk);
>> +err_put_pm:
>> +       pm_runtime_put(ctrl->dev);
>>         return err;
>>  }
>>
> 
> [...]
> 
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>