linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] vmscan: kill prev_priority completely
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:13:14 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100415131139.D177.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100415130212.D16E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

This patch is not related the patch series directly.
but [4/4] depend on scan_control has `priority' member.
then, I'm include this.

=============================================
Since 2.6.28 zone->prev_priority is unused. Then it can be removed
safely. It reduce stack usage slightly.

Now I have to say that I'm sorry. 2 years ago, I thghout prev_priority
can be integrate again, it's useful. but four (or more) times trying
haven't got good performance number. thus I give up such approach.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 include/linux/mmzone.h |   15 -------------
 mm/page_alloc.c        |    2 -
 mm/vmscan.c            |   54 ++---------------------------------------------
 mm/vmstat.c            |    2 -
 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index cf9e458..ad76962 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -339,21 +339,6 @@ struct zone {
 	atomic_long_t		vm_stat[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS];
 
 	/*
-	 * prev_priority holds the scanning priority for this zone.  It is
-	 * defined as the scanning priority at which we achieved our reclaim
-	 * target at the previous try_to_free_pages() or balance_pgdat()
-	 * invocation.
-	 *
-	 * We use prev_priority as a measure of how much stress page reclaim is
-	 * under - it drives the swappiness decision: whether to unmap mapped
-	 * pages.
-	 *
-	 * Access to both this field is quite racy even on uniprocessor.  But
-	 * it is expected to average out OK.
-	 */
-	int prev_priority;
-
-	/*
 	 * The target ratio of ACTIVE_ANON to INACTIVE_ANON pages on
 	 * this zone's LRU.  Maintained by the pageout code.
 	 */
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index d03c946..88513c0 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3862,8 +3862,6 @@ static void __paginginit free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
 		zone_seqlock_init(zone);
 		zone->zone_pgdat = pgdat;
 
-		zone->prev_priority = DEF_PRIORITY;
-
 		zone_pcp_init(zone);
 		for_each_lru(l) {
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zone->lru[l].list);
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index d392a50..dadb461 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1284,20 +1284,6 @@ done:
 }
 
 /*
- * We are about to scan this zone at a certain priority level.  If that priority
- * level is smaller (ie: more urgent) than the previous priority, then note
- * that priority level within the zone.  This is done so that when the next
- * process comes in to scan this zone, it will immediately start out at this
- * priority level rather than having to build up its own scanning priority.
- * Here, this priority affects only the reclaim-mapped threshold.
- */
-static inline void note_zone_scanning_priority(struct zone *zone, int priority)
-{
-	if (priority < zone->prev_priority)
-		zone->prev_priority = priority;
-}
-
-/*
  * This moves pages from the active list to the inactive list.
  *
  * We move them the other way if the page is referenced by one or more
@@ -1733,20 +1719,15 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 		if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
 			if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
 				continue;
-			note_zone_scanning_priority(zone, priority);
-
 			if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
 				continue;	/* Let kswapd poll it */
 			sc->all_unreclaimable = 0;
-		} else {
+		} else
 			/*
 			 * Ignore cpuset limitation here. We just want to reduce
 			 * # of used pages by us regardless of memory shortage.
 			 */
 			sc->all_unreclaimable = 0;
-			mem_cgroup_note_reclaim_priority(sc->mem_cgroup,
-							priority);
-		}
 
 		shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
 	}
@@ -1852,17 +1833,11 @@ out:
 	if (priority < 0)
 		priority = 0;
 
-	if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
-		for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx) {
-
+	if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
+		for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx)
 			if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
 				continue;
 
-			zone->prev_priority = priority;
-		}
-	} else
-		mem_cgroup_record_reclaim_priority(sc->mem_cgroup, priority);
-
 	delayacct_freepages_end();
 
 	return ret;
@@ -2015,22 +1990,12 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order)
 		.mem_cgroup = NULL,
 		.isolate_pages = isolate_pages_global,
 	};
-	/*
-	 * temp_priority is used to remember the scanning priority at which
-	 * this zone was successfully refilled to
-	 * free_pages == high_wmark_pages(zone).
-	 */
-	int temp_priority[MAX_NR_ZONES];
-
 loop_again:
 	total_scanned = 0;
 	sc.nr_reclaimed = 0;
 	sc.may_writepage = !laptop_mode;
 	count_vm_event(PAGEOUTRUN);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < pgdat->nr_zones; i++)
-		temp_priority[i] = DEF_PRIORITY;
-
 	for (priority = DEF_PRIORITY; priority >= 0; priority--) {
 		int end_zone = 0;	/* Inclusive.  0 = ZONE_DMA */
 		unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
@@ -2098,9 +2063,7 @@ loop_again:
 			if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
 				continue;
 
-			temp_priority[i] = priority;
 			sc.nr_scanned = 0;
-			note_zone_scanning_priority(zone, priority);
 
 			nid = pgdat->node_id;
 			zid = zone_idx(zone);
@@ -2173,16 +2136,6 @@ loop_again:
 			break;
 	}
 out:
-	/*
-	 * Note within each zone the priority level at which this zone was
-	 * brought into a happy state.  So that the next thread which scans this
-	 * zone will start out at that priority level.
-	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < pgdat->nr_zones; i++) {
-		struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
-
-		zone->prev_priority = temp_priority[i];
-	}
 	if (!all_zones_ok) {
 		cond_resched();
 
@@ -2600,7 +2553,6 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 		 */
 		priority = ZONE_RECLAIM_PRIORITY;
 		do {
-			note_zone_scanning_priority(zone, priority);
 			shrink_zone(priority, zone, &sc);
 			priority--;
 		} while (priority >= 0 && sc.nr_reclaimed < nr_pages);
diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
index fa12ea3..2db0a0f 100644
--- a/mm/vmstat.c
+++ b/mm/vmstat.c
@@ -761,11 +761,9 @@ static void zoneinfo_show_print(struct seq_file *m, pg_data_t *pgdat,
 	}
 	seq_printf(m,
 		   "\n  all_unreclaimable: %u"
-		   "\n  prev_priority:     %i"
 		   "\n  start_pfn:         %lu"
 		   "\n  inactive_ratio:    %u",
 		   zone->all_unreclaimable,
-		   zone->prev_priority,
 		   zone->zone_start_pfn,
 		   zone->inactive_ratio);
 	seq_putc(m, '\n');
-- 
1.6.5.2




  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-15  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-13  0:17 [PATCH] mm: disallow direct reclaim page writeback Dave Chinner
2010-04-13  8:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-13 10:29   ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-13 11:39     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-13 14:36       ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-14  3:12         ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-14  6:52           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  1:56             ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-14  6:52         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-14  7:36           ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-13  9:58 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 11:19   ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-13 19:34     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 20:20       ` Chris Mason
2010-04-14  1:40         ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-14  4:59           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-14  5:41             ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-14  5:54               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-14  6:13                 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-14  7:19                   ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-14  9:42                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-14 10:01                       ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-14 10:07                         ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-14 10:16                           ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-14  7:06                 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-14  6:52           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-14  7:28             ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-14  8:51               ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-15  1:34                 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-15  4:09                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  4:11                     ` [PATCH 1/4] vmscan: delegate pageout io to flusher thread if current is kswapd KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  8:05                       ` Suleiman Souhlal
2010-04-15  8:17                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  8:26                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 10:30                             ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-15 17:24                               ` Suleiman Souhlal
2010-04-20  2:56                               ` Ying Han
2010-04-15  9:32                         ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-15  9:41                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 17:27                           ` Suleiman Souhlal
2010-04-15 23:33                             ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-15 23:41                               ` Suleiman Souhlal
2010-04-16  9:50                               ` Alan Cox
2010-04-17  3:06                                 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-15  8:18                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 10:31                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 11:26                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  4:13                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-04-15  4:14                     ` [PATCH 3/4] vmscan: move priority variable into scan_control KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  4:15                     ` [PATCH 4/4] vmscan: delegate page cleaning io to flusher thread if VM pressure is low KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  4:35                     ` [PATCH] mm: disallow direct reclaim page writeback KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  6:32                       ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-15  6:44                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  6:58                           ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-15  6:20                     ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-15  6:35                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  8:54                         ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-15 10:21                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 10:23                             ` [PATCH 1/4] vmscan: simplify shrink_inactive_list() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 13:15                               ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 15:01                                 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-15 15:44                                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 16:54                                     ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-15 23:40                                       ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-16  7:13                                         ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 14:57                                         ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-17  2:37                                           ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-16 14:55                                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 18:22                                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-04-16  9:39                                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 10:24                             ` [PATCH 2/4] [cleanup] mm: introduce free_pages_prepare KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 13:33                               ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 10:24                             ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: introduce free_pages_bulk KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 13:46                               ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 10:26                             ` [PATCH 4/4] vmscan: replace the pagevec in shrink_inactive_list() with list KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15 10:28                   ` [PATCH] mm: disallow direct reclaim page writeback Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 13:42                     ` Chris Mason
2010-04-15 17:50                       ` tytso
2010-04-16 15:05                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19 15:15                         ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-16  4:14                     ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-16 15:14                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-18  0:32                         ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-18 19:05                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-18 16:31                             ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-18 19:35                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-18 19:11                             ` Sorin Faibish
2010-04-18 19:10                           ` Sorin Faibish
2010-04-18 21:30                             ` James Bottomley
2010-04-18 23:34                               ` Sorin Faibish
2010-04-19  3:08                               ` tytso
2010-04-19  0:35                           ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-19  0:49                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-19  1:08                               ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-19  4:32                                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-19 15:20                         ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-23  1:06                           ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-23 10:50                             ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-15 14:57                   ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-15  2:37                 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-15  2:43                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 23:56                     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-14  6:52         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-14 10:06         ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-14 11:20           ` Chris Mason
2010-04-14 12:15             ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-14 12:32               ` Alan Cox
2010-04-14 12:34                 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-14 13:23             ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-14 14:07               ` Chris Mason
2010-04-14  0:24 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-14  4:44   ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-14  7:54     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-16  1:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-16  4:18   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100415131139.D177.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).