All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 26/27] drm/i915/gt: Refactor mocs loops into single control macro
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 09:28:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191112092854.869-26-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191112092854.869-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

We repeatedly (and more so in future) use the same looping construct
over the mocs definition table to setup the register state. Refactor the
loop construct into a reusable macro.

add/remove: 2/1 grow/shrink: 1/2 up/down: 113/-330 (-217)
Function                                     old     new   delta
intel_mocs_init_engine.cold                    -      71     +71
offset                                         -      28     +28
__func__                                   17273   17287     +14
intel_mocs_init                              143     113     -30
mocs_register.isra                            91       -     -91
intel_mocs_init_engine                       503     294    -209

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 128 ++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
index e6f3f36a3988..63d0fdf67215 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
@@ -329,27 +329,6 @@ static bool get_mocs_settings(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 	return true;
 }
 
-static i915_reg_t mocs_register(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int index)
-{
-	switch (engine->id) {
-	case RCS0:
-		return GEN9_GFX_MOCS(index);
-	case VCS0:
-		return GEN9_MFX0_MOCS(index);
-	case BCS0:
-		return GEN9_BLT_MOCS(index);
-	case VECS0:
-		return GEN9_VEBOX_MOCS(index);
-	case VCS1:
-		return GEN9_MFX1_MOCS(index);
-	case VCS2:
-		return GEN11_MFX2_MOCS(index);
-	default:
-		MISSING_CASE(engine->id);
-		return INVALID_MMIO_REG;
-	}
-}
-
 /*
  * Get control_value from MOCS entry taking into account when it's not used:
  * I915_MOCS_PTE's value is returned in this case.
@@ -357,29 +336,47 @@ static i915_reg_t mocs_register(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int index)
 static u32 get_entry_control(const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table,
 			     unsigned int index)
 {
-	if (table->table[index].used)
+	if (index < table->size && table->table[index].used)
 		return table->table[index].control_value;
 
 	return table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value;
 }
 
-static void init_mocs_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
-			    const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table)
+#define for_each_mocs(mocs, t, i) \
+	for (i = 0; \
+	     i < t->n_entries ? (mocs = get_entry_control(t, i)), 1 : 0;\
+	     i++)
+
+static void __init_mocs_table(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
+			      const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table,
+			      u32 addr)
 {
-	struct intel_uncore *uncore = engine->uncore;
-	u32 unused_value = table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value;
 	unsigned int i;
+	u32 mocs;
+
+	for_each_mocs(mocs, table, i)
+		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, _MMIO(addr + i * 4), mocs);
+}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < table->size; i++)
-		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore,
-				      mocs_register(engine, i),
-				      get_entry_control(table, i));
+static u32 mocs_register(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+	static const u32 offset[] = {
+		[RCS0]  = 0x0c800,
+		[VCS0]  = 0x0c900,
+		[VCS1]  = 0x0ca00,
+		[VECS0] = 0x0cb00,
+		[BCS0]  = 0x0cc00,
+		[VCS2]  = 0x10000,
+	};
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(engine->id > ARRAY_SIZE(offset));
+	return offset[engine->id];
+}
 
-	/* All remaining entries are unused */
-	for (; i < table->n_entries; i++)
-		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore,
-				      mocs_register(engine, i),
-				      unused_value);
+static void init_mocs_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+			    const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table)
+{
+	__init_mocs_table(engine->uncore, table, mocs_register(engine));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -389,7 +386,7 @@ static void init_mocs_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 static u16 get_entry_l3cc(const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table,
 			  unsigned int index)
 {
-	if (table->table[index].used)
+	if (index < table->size && table->table[index].used)
 		return table->table[index].l3cc_value;
 
 	return table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].l3cc_value;
@@ -400,37 +397,23 @@ static inline u32 l3cc_combine(u16 low, u16 high)
 	return low | (u32)high << 16;
 }
 
+#define for_each_l3cc(l3cc, t, i) \
+	for (i = 0; \
+	     i < (t->n_entries + 1) / 2 ? \
+	     (l3cc = l3cc_combine(get_entry_l3cc(t, 2 * i), \
+				  get_entry_l3cc(t, 2 * i + 1))), 1 : \
+	     0; \
+	     i++)
+
 static void init_l3cc_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 			    const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table)
 {
 	struct intel_uncore *uncore = engine->uncore;
-	u16 unused_value = table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].l3cc_value;
 	unsigned int i;
+	u32 l3cc;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < table->size / 2; i++) {
-		u16 low = get_entry_l3cc(table, 2 * i);
-		u16 high = get_entry_l3cc(table, 2 * i + 1);
-
-		intel_uncore_write(uncore,
-				   GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i),
-				   l3cc_combine(low, high));
-	}
-
-	/* Odd table size - 1 left over */
-	if (table->size & 1) {
-		u16 low = get_entry_l3cc(table, 2 * i);
-
-		intel_uncore_write(uncore,
-				   GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i),
-				   l3cc_combine(low, unused_value));
-		i++;
-	}
-
-	/* All remaining entries are also unused */
-	for (; i < table->n_entries / 2; i++)
-		intel_uncore_write(uncore,
-				   GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i),
-				   l3cc_combine(unused_value, unused_value));
+	for_each_l3cc(l3cc, table, i)
+		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i), l3cc);
 }
 
 void intel_mocs_init_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -451,11 +434,9 @@ void intel_mocs_init_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		init_l3cc_table(engine, &table);
 }
 
-static void intel_mocs_init_global(struct intel_gt *gt)
+static void init_global_mocs(struct intel_gt *gt)
 {
-	struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
 	struct drm_i915_mocs_table table;
-	unsigned int index;
 
 	/*
 	 * LLC and eDRAM control values are not applicable to dgfx
@@ -463,29 +444,14 @@ static void intel_mocs_init_global(struct intel_gt *gt)
 	if (IS_DGFX(gt->i915))
 		return;
 
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GLOBAL_MOCS_REGISTERS(gt->i915));
-
 	if (!get_mocs_settings(gt->i915, &table))
 		return;
 
-	for (index = 0; index < table.size; index++)
-		intel_uncore_write(uncore,
-				   GEN12_GLOBAL_MOCS(index),
-				   table.table[index].control_value);
-
-	/*
-	 * Ok, now set the unused entries to the invalid entry (index 0). These
-	 * entries are officially undefined and no contract for the contents and
-	 * settings is given for these entries.
-	 */
-	for (; index < table.n_entries; index++)
-		intel_uncore_write(uncore,
-				   GEN12_GLOBAL_MOCS(index),
-				   table.table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value);
+	__init_mocs_table(gt->uncore, &table, 0x4000);
 }
 
 void intel_mocs_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
 {
 	if (HAS_GLOBAL_MOCS_REGISTERS(gt->i915))
-		intel_mocs_init_global(gt);
+		init_global_mocs(gt);
 }
-- 
2.24.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/27] drm/i915/gt: Refactor mocs loops into single control macro
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 09:28:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191112092854.869-26-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191112092853.2dytfYjEo1ydstToe-l10JF4_psfvXG-ZpGMKIGdC9c@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191112092854.869-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

We repeatedly (and more so in future) use the same looping construct
over the mocs definition table to setup the register state. Refactor the
loop construct into a reusable macro.

add/remove: 2/1 grow/shrink: 1/2 up/down: 113/-330 (-217)
Function                                     old     new   delta
intel_mocs_init_engine.cold                    -      71     +71
offset                                         -      28     +28
__func__                                   17273   17287     +14
intel_mocs_init                              143     113     -30
mocs_register.isra                            91       -     -91
intel_mocs_init_engine                       503     294    -209

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 128 ++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
index e6f3f36a3988..63d0fdf67215 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
@@ -329,27 +329,6 @@ static bool get_mocs_settings(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 	return true;
 }
 
-static i915_reg_t mocs_register(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int index)
-{
-	switch (engine->id) {
-	case RCS0:
-		return GEN9_GFX_MOCS(index);
-	case VCS0:
-		return GEN9_MFX0_MOCS(index);
-	case BCS0:
-		return GEN9_BLT_MOCS(index);
-	case VECS0:
-		return GEN9_VEBOX_MOCS(index);
-	case VCS1:
-		return GEN9_MFX1_MOCS(index);
-	case VCS2:
-		return GEN11_MFX2_MOCS(index);
-	default:
-		MISSING_CASE(engine->id);
-		return INVALID_MMIO_REG;
-	}
-}
-
 /*
  * Get control_value from MOCS entry taking into account when it's not used:
  * I915_MOCS_PTE's value is returned in this case.
@@ -357,29 +336,47 @@ static i915_reg_t mocs_register(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int index)
 static u32 get_entry_control(const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table,
 			     unsigned int index)
 {
-	if (table->table[index].used)
+	if (index < table->size && table->table[index].used)
 		return table->table[index].control_value;
 
 	return table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value;
 }
 
-static void init_mocs_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
-			    const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table)
+#define for_each_mocs(mocs, t, i) \
+	for (i = 0; \
+	     i < t->n_entries ? (mocs = get_entry_control(t, i)), 1 : 0;\
+	     i++)
+
+static void __init_mocs_table(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
+			      const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table,
+			      u32 addr)
 {
-	struct intel_uncore *uncore = engine->uncore;
-	u32 unused_value = table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value;
 	unsigned int i;
+	u32 mocs;
+
+	for_each_mocs(mocs, table, i)
+		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, _MMIO(addr + i * 4), mocs);
+}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < table->size; i++)
-		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore,
-				      mocs_register(engine, i),
-				      get_entry_control(table, i));
+static u32 mocs_register(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+	static const u32 offset[] = {
+		[RCS0]  = 0x0c800,
+		[VCS0]  = 0x0c900,
+		[VCS1]  = 0x0ca00,
+		[VECS0] = 0x0cb00,
+		[BCS0]  = 0x0cc00,
+		[VCS2]  = 0x10000,
+	};
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(engine->id > ARRAY_SIZE(offset));
+	return offset[engine->id];
+}
 
-	/* All remaining entries are unused */
-	for (; i < table->n_entries; i++)
-		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore,
-				      mocs_register(engine, i),
-				      unused_value);
+static void init_mocs_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+			    const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table)
+{
+	__init_mocs_table(engine->uncore, table, mocs_register(engine));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -389,7 +386,7 @@ static void init_mocs_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 static u16 get_entry_l3cc(const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table,
 			  unsigned int index)
 {
-	if (table->table[index].used)
+	if (index < table->size && table->table[index].used)
 		return table->table[index].l3cc_value;
 
 	return table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].l3cc_value;
@@ -400,37 +397,23 @@ static inline u32 l3cc_combine(u16 low, u16 high)
 	return low | (u32)high << 16;
 }
 
+#define for_each_l3cc(l3cc, t, i) \
+	for (i = 0; \
+	     i < (t->n_entries + 1) / 2 ? \
+	     (l3cc = l3cc_combine(get_entry_l3cc(t, 2 * i), \
+				  get_entry_l3cc(t, 2 * i + 1))), 1 : \
+	     0; \
+	     i++)
+
 static void init_l3cc_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 			    const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table)
 {
 	struct intel_uncore *uncore = engine->uncore;
-	u16 unused_value = table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].l3cc_value;
 	unsigned int i;
+	u32 l3cc;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < table->size / 2; i++) {
-		u16 low = get_entry_l3cc(table, 2 * i);
-		u16 high = get_entry_l3cc(table, 2 * i + 1);
-
-		intel_uncore_write(uncore,
-				   GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i),
-				   l3cc_combine(low, high));
-	}
-
-	/* Odd table size - 1 left over */
-	if (table->size & 1) {
-		u16 low = get_entry_l3cc(table, 2 * i);
-
-		intel_uncore_write(uncore,
-				   GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i),
-				   l3cc_combine(low, unused_value));
-		i++;
-	}
-
-	/* All remaining entries are also unused */
-	for (; i < table->n_entries / 2; i++)
-		intel_uncore_write(uncore,
-				   GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i),
-				   l3cc_combine(unused_value, unused_value));
+	for_each_l3cc(l3cc, table, i)
+		intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i), l3cc);
 }
 
 void intel_mocs_init_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -451,11 +434,9 @@ void intel_mocs_init_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		init_l3cc_table(engine, &table);
 }
 
-static void intel_mocs_init_global(struct intel_gt *gt)
+static void init_global_mocs(struct intel_gt *gt)
 {
-	struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
 	struct drm_i915_mocs_table table;
-	unsigned int index;
 
 	/*
 	 * LLC and eDRAM control values are not applicable to dgfx
@@ -463,29 +444,14 @@ static void intel_mocs_init_global(struct intel_gt *gt)
 	if (IS_DGFX(gt->i915))
 		return;
 
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GLOBAL_MOCS_REGISTERS(gt->i915));
-
 	if (!get_mocs_settings(gt->i915, &table))
 		return;
 
-	for (index = 0; index < table.size; index++)
-		intel_uncore_write(uncore,
-				   GEN12_GLOBAL_MOCS(index),
-				   table.table[index].control_value);
-
-	/*
-	 * Ok, now set the unused entries to the invalid entry (index 0). These
-	 * entries are officially undefined and no contract for the contents and
-	 * settings is given for these entries.
-	 */
-	for (; index < table.n_entries; index++)
-		intel_uncore_write(uncore,
-				   GEN12_GLOBAL_MOCS(index),
-				   table.table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value);
+	__init_mocs_table(gt->uncore, &table, 0x4000);
 }
 
 void intel_mocs_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
 {
 	if (HAS_GLOBAL_MOCS_REGISTERS(gt->i915))
-		intel_mocs_init_global(gt);
+		init_global_mocs(gt);
 }
-- 
2.24.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-12  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-12  9:28 [PATCH 01/27] drm/i915: Flush context free work on cleanup Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 02/27] drm/i915/gt: Try an extra flush on the Haswell blitter Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 03/27] drm/i915/gem: Silence sparse for RCU protection inside the constructor Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 04/27] drm/i915/selftests: Mock the engine sorting for easy validation Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 05/27] Revert "drm/i915: use a separate context for gpu relocs" Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 06/27] drm/i915: Use a ctor for TYPESAFE_BY_RCU i915_request Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 07/27] drm/i915: Drop GEM context as a direct link from i915_request Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 08/27] drm/i915: Push the use-semaphore marker onto the intel_context Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 09/27] drm/i915: Remove i915->kernel_context Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 10/27] drm/i915: Move i915_gem_init_contexts() earlier Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 11/27] drm/i915/uc: Use an internal buffer for firmware images Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 12/27] drm/i915/gt: Pull GT initialisation under intel_gt_init() Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 13/27] drm/i915/gt: Merge engine init/setup loops Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 14/27] drm/i915/gt: Expose engine properties via sysfs Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 15/27] drm/i915/gt: Expose engine->mmio_base " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-21 13:18   ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-11-21 13:18     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lionel Landwerlin
2019-11-21 13:23     ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-21 13:23       ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 16/27] drm/i915/gt: Expose timeslice duration to sysfs Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 17/27] drm/i915/gt: Expose busywait " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 18/27] drm/i915/gt: Expose reset stop timeout via sysfs Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 19/27] drm/i915/gt: Expose preempt reset " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 20/27] drm/i915/gt: Expose heartbeat interval " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 21/27] drm/i915: Flush idle barriers when waiting Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 22/27] drm/i915: Allow userspace to specify ringsize on construction Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 23/27] drm/i915/gem: Honour O_NONBLOCK before throttling execbuf submissions Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 24/27] drm/i915/gt: Set unused mocs entry to follow PTE on tgl as on all others Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12 14:13   ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-12 14:13     ` [Intel-gfx] " Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-12 14:39     ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-12 14:39       ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 25/27] drm/i915/gt: Tidy up debug-warns for the mocs control table Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/27] drm/i915/gt: Refactor mocs loops into single control macro Chris Wilson
2019-11-12 17:02   ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-12 17:02     ` [Intel-gfx] " Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-12 18:12     ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-12 18:12       ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28 ` [PATCH 27/27] drm/i915/selftests: Add coverage of mocs registers Chris Wilson
2019-11-12  9:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12 10:12 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/27] drm/i915: Flush context free work on cleanup Patchwork
2019-11-12 10:12   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-12 10:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-11-12 10:23   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-12 10:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-11-12 10:33   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-12 14:23 ` [PATCH 01/27] " Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-12 14:23   ` [Intel-gfx] " Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-12 14:39   ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-12 14:39     ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191112092854.869-26-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.