From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@bitdefender.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@tklengyel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] minor (formatting) fixes
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 01:06:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5763BD7802000078000F5E55@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe1304e4-6f07-28c4-5593-d4d52fb73e49@bitdefender.com>
>>> On 16.06.16 at 21:19, <czuzu@bitdefender.com> wrote:
> On 6/16/2016 5:24 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 16.06.16 at 16:06, <czuzu@bitdefender.com> wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c
>>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>>
>>> #include <xen/vm_event.h>
>>> #include <asm/hvm/event.h>
>>> +#include <asm/paging.h>
>>> #include <asm/monitor.h>
>>> #include <asm/vm_event.h>
>>> #include <public/vm_event.h>
>>> diff --git a/xen/common/monitor.c b/xen/common/monitor.c
>>> index d950a7c..b30857a 100644
>>> --- a/xen/common/monitor.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/monitor.c
>>> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
>>> #include <xen/monitor.h>
>>> #include <xen/sched.h>
>>> #include <xsm/xsm.h>
>>> -#include <public/domctl.h>
>>> #include <asm/monitor.h>
>>> #include <asm/vm_event.h>
>> These two adjustments clearly don't fit title / description. I certainly
>> don't mind unnecessary inclusions to be dropped, but the addition of
>> one clearly needs explanation (after all thing build fine without it).
>
> Sorry, that was done out of reflex, should have stated the reasoning.
> Generally, if:
> - event.c includes event.h
> - event.c needs paging.h
> - event.h -doesn't need- paging.h
> then I prefer to include paging.h in event.c, not in event.h (include
> strictly -where- needed).
> Also since xen/paging.h included asm/paging.h and event.c only needs the
> asm/paging.h part, I also changed xen/paging.h inclusion -> asm/paging.h
> inclusion (include strictly -what's- needed).
> But I can revert that if you want me to (not that important and these
> little things are better done with automatic tools anyway), or should I
> leave the change and update the commit message?
Well, I'd leave the ultimate decision to the maintainers, but I'd say
this doesn't belong in a patch dealing with formatting issues. I.e.
I'm fine with the cleanup, but either under a different title (and
with at least an abbreviated version of what you said above), or
in a separate patch. Considering that you appear to do the same
in later patches, perhaps consolidating all the #include adjustments
into one patch would a good idea?
>>> --- a/xen/include/xen/vm_event.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/vm_event.h
>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ void vm_event_monitor_guest_request(void);
>>>
>>> #endif /* __VM_EVENT_H__ */
>>>
>>> -
>>> /*
>>> * Local variables:
>>> * mode: C
>> Why don't you remove the other stray blank line at once?
>
> What stray line? Shouldn't there be -one- blank line between the #endif
> and the local vars block?
> Looking @ other files that rule seems to hold...
Oh, you're right. I thought I had frequently seen it the other way
around (and it would seem more logical to me), but I must have been
misremembering.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-17 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-16 14:04 [PATCH 0/7] vm-event: Implement ARM support for control-register writes Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] minor (formatting) fixes Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:24 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-16 19:19 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17 7:06 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2016-06-17 10:46 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 16:02 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-17 8:33 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17 8:36 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-06-17 9:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-17 9:35 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 9:33 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 9:36 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-06-17 9:40 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 9:42 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-06-17 19:05 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-16 14:07 ` [PATCH 2/7] vm-event: VM_EVENT_FLAG_DENY requires VM_EVENT_FLAG_VCPU_PAUSED Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 16:11 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-17 8:43 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-21 11:26 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-21 15:09 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-22 8:34 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/7] vm-event: introduce vm_event_vcpu_enter Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:51 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-16 20:10 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 20:33 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-06-17 10:41 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17 7:17 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 11:13 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17 11:27 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 12:13 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 16:17 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-17 9:19 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17 8:55 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-17 11:40 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17 13:22 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-16 14:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] vm-event/x86: use vm_event_vcpu_enter properly Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 15:00 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-16 20:20 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17 7:20 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 11:23 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 16:27 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-17 9:24 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86: replace monitor_write_data.do_write with enum Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:12 ` [PATCH 6/7] vm-event/arm: move hvm_event_cr->common vm_event_monitor_cr Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 15:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 8:25 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17 8:38 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-17 11:31 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-21 7:08 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-21 7:20 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-21 15:22 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-22 6:33 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-16 16:55 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-17 10:37 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:13 ` [PATCH 7/7] vm-event/arm: implement support for control-register write vm-events Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 14:26 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-16 19:24 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 21:28 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-17 11:46 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-16 16:49 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-17 10:36 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-17 13:18 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-22 16:35 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-22 17:17 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-22 18:39 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-22 19:37 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-22 19:41 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-23 5:31 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-23 5:49 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-23 11:11 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-24 9:32 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-06-23 11:00 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5763BD7802000078000F5E55@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=czuzu@bitdefender.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tamas@tklengyel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).