From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
zwisler@kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device registration on node local to the device
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:22:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1543353746.185366.90.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hya0ASfVue6GH3ZXKJOzytQXDqtEWxvrEdCTcb545tYg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 12:50 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Thanks Bart, so tying this back to Alex's patches, does the ordering
> problem that Alex's patches solve impact the SCSI case? I'm looking
> for something like "SCSI depends on asynchronous probing and without
> 'driver core: Establish clear order of operations for deferred probe
> and remove' probing is often needlessly serialized". I.e. does it
> suffer from the same platform problem that libnvdimm ran into where
> it's local async probing implementation was hindered by the driver
> core?
(+Martin)
Hi Dan,
Patch 6/9 reduces the time needed to scan SCSI LUNs significantly. The only
way to realize that speedup is by enabling more concurrency. That's why I
think that patch 6/9 is a significant driver core improvement.
Bart.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
zwisler@kernel.org, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device registration on node local to the device
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:22:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1543353746.185366.90.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hya0ASfVue6GH3ZXKJOzytQXDqtEWxvrEdCTcb545tYg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 12:50 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Thanks Bart, so tying this back to Alex's patches, does the ordering
> problem that Alex's patches solve impact the SCSI case? I'm looking
> for something like "SCSI depends on asynchronous probing and without
> 'driver core: Establish clear order of operations for deferred probe
> and remove' probing is often needlessly serialized". I.e. does it
> suffer from the same platform problem that libnvdimm ran into where
> it's local async probing implementation was hindered by the driver
> core?
(+Martin)
Hi Dan,
Patch 6/9 reduces the time needed to scan SCSI LUNs significantly. The only
way to realize that speedup is by enabling more concurrency. That's why I
think that patch 6/9 is a significant driver core improvement.
Bart.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-nvdimm
<linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Greg KH
<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list
<linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
jiangshanlai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>,
zwisler-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
alexander.h.duyck-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device registration on node local to the device
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 13:22:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1543353746.185366.90.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hya0ASfVue6GH3ZXKJOzytQXDqtEWxvrEdCTcb545tYg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 12:50 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Thanks Bart, so tying this back to Alex's patches, does the ordering
> problem that Alex's patches solve impact the SCSI case? I'm looking
> for something like "SCSI depends on asynchronous probing and without
> 'driver core: Establish clear order of operations for deferred probe
> and remove' probing is often needlessly serialized". I.e. does it
> suffer from the same platform problem that libnvdimm ran into where
> it's local async probing implementation was hindered by the driver
> core?
(+Martin)
Hi Dan,
Patch 6/9 reduces the time needed to scan SCSI LUNs significantly. The only
way to realize that speedup is by enabling more concurrency. That's why I
think that patch 6/9 is a significant driver core improvement.
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-27 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-08 18:06 [driver-core PATCH v6 0/9] Add NUMA aware async_schedule calls Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 1/9] workqueue: Provide queue_work_node to queue work near a given NUMA node Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 1:01 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 1:01 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:06 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific " Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 23:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-11 19:32 ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 19:32 ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 19:32 ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 19:53 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 19:53 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 19:53 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 20:35 ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 20:35 ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 20:35 ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 22:17 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 22:17 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 22:17 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 23:27 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-11 23:27 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-11 23:27 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-11 19:59 ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-11 20:33 ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 20:33 ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 21:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-11 21:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-13 22:10 ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-27 1:10 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 1:10 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 1:10 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:06 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 3/9] device core: Consolidate locking and unlocking of parent and device Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 22:43 ` jane.chu
2018-11-08 22:43 ` jane.chu-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA
2018-11-08 22:43 ` jane.chu
2018-11-08 22:48 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 22:48 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 1:44 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 1:44 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 4/9] driver core: Move async_synchronize_full call Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 2:11 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 2:11 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 17:38 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 17:38 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 20:35 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:35 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 21:36 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 21:36 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 22:26 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 22:26 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 22:26 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 5/9] driver core: Establish clear order of operations for deferred probe and remove Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 23:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 6/9] driver core: Probe devices asynchronously instead of the driver Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 23:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 2:48 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 2:48 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 2:48 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 17:57 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 17:57 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 18:32 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 18:32 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 7/9] driver core: Attach devices on CPU local to device node Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 4:50 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 4:50 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 4:50 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 8/9] PM core: Use new async_schedule_dev command Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 4:52 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 4:52 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 4:52 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device registration on node local to the device Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 2:21 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 2:21 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 2:21 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 18:04 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 19:34 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 19:34 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 20:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 20:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 20:50 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:50 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:50 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 21:22 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-11-27 21:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 21:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 22:34 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 22:34 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 22:34 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1543353746.185366.90.camel@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.