All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jane.chu@oracle.com
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: len.brown@intel.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
	zwisler@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 3/9] device core: Consolidate locking and unlocking of parent and device
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:43:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <791408d3-bf97-0f54-adc5-9b06540015c6@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154170041590.12967.4367086895437513524.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com>

Hi, Alex,


On 11/08/2018 10:06 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> +/*
> + * __device_driver_lock - release locks needed to manipulate dev->drv

You meant to say __device_driver_unlock, right?

> + * @dev: Device we will update driver info for
> + * @parent: Parent device. Needed if the bus requires parent lock
> + *
> + * This function will release the required locks for manipulating dev->drv.
> + * Normally this will just be the the @dev lock, but when called for a
> + * USB interface, @parent lock will be released as well.
> + */
> +static void __device_driver_unlock(struct device *dev, struct device *parent)
> +{
> +	device_unlock(dev);
> +	if (parent && dev->bus->need_parent_lock)
> +		device_unlock(parent);
> +}

-jane
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jane.chu@oracle.com
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: len.brown@intel.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, pavel@ucw.cz,
	zwisler@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 3/9] device core: Consolidate locking and unlocking of parent and device
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:43:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <791408d3-bf97-0f54-adc5-9b06540015c6@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154170041590.12967.4367086895437513524.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com>

Hi, Alex,


On 11/08/2018 10:06 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> +/*
> + * __device_driver_lock - release locks needed to manipulate dev->drv

You meant to say __device_driver_unlock, right?

> + * @dev: Device we will update driver info for
> + * @parent: Parent device. Needed if the bus requires parent lock
> + *
> + * This function will release the required locks for manipulating dev->drv.
> + * Normally this will just be the the @dev lock, but when called for a
> + * USB interface, @parent lock will be released as well.
> + */
> +static void __device_driver_unlock(struct device *dev, struct device *parent)
> +{
> +	device_unlock(dev);
> +	if (parent && dev->bus->need_parent_lock)
> +		device_unlock(parent);
> +}

-jane

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jane.chu-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
To: Alexander Duyck
	<alexander.h.duyck-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Cc: len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org,
	linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	rafael-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	jiangshanlai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org,
	zwisler-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 3/9] device core: Consolidate locking and unlocking of parent and device
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:43:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <791408d3-bf97-0f54-adc5-9b06540015c6@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154170041590.12967.4367086895437513524.stgit-+uVpp3jiz/RcxmDmkzA3yGt3HXsI98Cx0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>

Hi, Alex,


On 11/08/2018 10:06 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> +/*
> + * __device_driver_lock - release locks needed to manipulate dev->drv

You meant to say __device_driver_unlock, right?

> + * @dev: Device we will update driver info for
> + * @parent: Parent device. Needed if the bus requires parent lock
> + *
> + * This function will release the required locks for manipulating dev->drv.
> + * Normally this will just be the the @dev lock, but when called for a
> + * USB interface, @parent lock will be released as well.
> + */
> +static void __device_driver_unlock(struct device *dev, struct device *parent)
> +{
> +	device_unlock(dev);
> +	if (parent && dev->bus->need_parent_lock)
> +		device_unlock(parent);
> +}

-jane

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-08 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-08 18:06 [driver-core PATCH v6 0/9] Add NUMA aware async_schedule calls Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 1/9] workqueue: Provide queue_work_node to queue work near a given NUMA node Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27  1:01   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  1:01     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:06 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific " Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 23:36   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:36     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:36     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-11 19:32   ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 19:32     ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 19:32     ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 19:53     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 19:53       ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 19:53       ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 20:35       ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 20:35         ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 20:35         ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 22:17         ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 22:17           ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 22:17           ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 23:27         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-11 23:27           ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-11 23:27           ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-11 19:59     ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-11 20:33       ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 20:33         ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 21:24         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-11 21:24           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-13 22:10         ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-27  1:10   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  1:10     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  1:10     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:06 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 3/9] device core: Consolidate locking and unlocking of parent and device Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 22:43   ` jane.chu [this message]
2018-11-08 22:43     ` jane.chu-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA
2018-11-08 22:43     ` jane.chu
2018-11-08 22:48     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 22:48       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27  1:44   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  1:44     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 4/9] driver core: Move async_synchronize_full call Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27  2:11   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  2:11     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 17:38     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 17:38       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 20:35       ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:35         ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 21:36         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 21:36           ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 22:26           ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 22:26             ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 22:26             ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 5/9] driver core: Establish clear order of operations for deferred probe and remove Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 23:47   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:47     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:47     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 6/9] driver core: Probe devices asynchronously instead of the driver Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 23:59   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:59     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27  2:48   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  2:48     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  2:48     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 17:57     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 17:57       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 18:32       ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 18:32         ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 7/9] driver core: Attach devices on CPU local to device node Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27  4:50   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  4:50     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  4:50     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 8/9] PM core: Use new async_schedule_dev command Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27  4:52   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  4:52     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  4:52     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device registration on node local to the device Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27  2:21   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  2:21     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  2:21     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 18:04     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 19:34       ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 19:34         ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:33         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 20:33           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 20:33           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 20:50           ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:50             ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:50             ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 21:22             ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 21:22               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 21:22               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 22:34               ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 22:34                 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 22:34                 ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=791408d3-bf97-0f54-adc5-9b06540015c6@oracle.com \
    --to=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.