All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	bvanassche@acm.org,
	Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	zwisler@kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device registration on node local to the device
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:21:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jmTbHZbs2KHhH2_S6=mxxkwdiJCDL6widexMzePhNFBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154170044652.12967.17419321472770956712.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:07 AM Alexander Duyck
<alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Force the device registration for nvdimm devices to be closer to the actual
> device. This is achieved by using either the NUMA node ID of the region, or
> of the parent. By doing this we can have everything above the region based
> on the region, and everything below the region based on the nvdimm bus.
>
> By guaranteeing NUMA locality I see an improvement of as high as 25% for
> per-node init of a system with 12TB of persistent memory.
>

It seems the speed-up is achieved with just patches 1, 2, and 9 from
this series, correct? I wouldn't want to hold up that benefit while
the driver-core bits are debated.

You can add:

    Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

...if the series needs to be kept together, but as far as I can see
the workqueue changes enable 2 sub-topics of development and it might
make sense for Tejun to take those first 2 and then Greg and I can
base any follow-up topics on that stable baseline.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	zwisler@kernel.org, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	bvanassche@acm.org
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device registration on node local to the device
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:21:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jmTbHZbs2KHhH2_S6=mxxkwdiJCDL6widexMzePhNFBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154170044652.12967.17419321472770956712.stgit@ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:07 AM Alexander Duyck
<alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Force the device registration for nvdimm devices to be closer to the actual
> device. This is achieved by using either the NUMA node ID of the region, or
> of the parent. By doing this we can have everything above the region based
> on the region, and everything below the region based on the nvdimm bus.
>
> By guaranteeing NUMA locality I see an improvement of as high as 25% for
> per-node init of a system with 12TB of persistent memory.
>

It seems the speed-up is achieved with just patches 1, 2, and 9 from
this series, correct? I wouldn't want to hold up that benefit while
the driver-core bits are debated.

You can add:

    Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

...if the series needs to be kept together, but as far as I can see
the workqueue changes enable 2 sub-topics of development and it might
make sense for Tejun to take those first 2 and then Greg and I can
base any follow-up topics on that stable baseline.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: alexander.h.duyck-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org,
	Linux-pm mailing list
	<linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Greg KH
	<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-nvdimm
	<linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	jiangshanlai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>,
	zwisler-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki"
	<rafael-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device registration on node local to the device
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:21:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jmTbHZbs2KHhH2_S6=mxxkwdiJCDL6widexMzePhNFBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154170044652.12967.17419321472770956712.stgit-+uVpp3jiz/RcxmDmkzA3yGt3HXsI98Cx0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:07 AM Alexander Duyck
<alexander.h.duyck-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> Force the device registration for nvdimm devices to be closer to the actual
> device. This is achieved by using either the NUMA node ID of the region, or
> of the parent. By doing this we can have everything above the region based
> on the region, and everything below the region based on the nvdimm bus.
>
> By guaranteeing NUMA locality I see an improvement of as high as 25% for
> per-node init of a system with 12TB of persistent memory.
>

It seems the speed-up is achieved with just patches 1, 2, and 9 from
this series, correct? I wouldn't want to hold up that benefit while
the driver-core bits are debated.

You can add:

    Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

...if the series needs to be kept together, but as far as I can see
the workqueue changes enable 2 sub-topics of development and it might
make sense for Tejun to take those first 2 and then Greg and I can
base any follow-up topics on that stable baseline.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-27  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-08 18:06 [driver-core PATCH v6 0/9] Add NUMA aware async_schedule calls Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 1/9] workqueue: Provide queue_work_node to queue work near a given NUMA node Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27  1:01   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  1:01     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:06 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 2/9] async: Add support for queueing on specific " Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 23:36   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:36     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:36     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-11 19:32   ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 19:32     ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 19:32     ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 19:53     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 19:53       ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 19:53       ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 20:35       ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 20:35         ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 20:35         ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 22:17         ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 22:17           ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 22:17           ` Dan Williams
2018-11-11 23:27         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-11 23:27           ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-11 23:27           ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-11 19:59     ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-11 20:33       ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 20:33         ` Greg KH
2018-11-11 21:24         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-11 21:24           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-13 22:10         ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-27  1:10   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  1:10     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  1:10     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:06 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 3/9] device core: Consolidate locking and unlocking of parent and device Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:06   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 22:43   ` jane.chu
2018-11-08 22:43     ` jane.chu-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA
2018-11-08 22:43     ` jane.chu
2018-11-08 22:48     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 22:48       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27  1:44   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  1:44     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 4/9] driver core: Move async_synchronize_full call Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27  2:11   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  2:11     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 17:38     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 17:38       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 20:35       ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:35         ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 21:36         ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 21:36           ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 22:26           ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 22:26             ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 22:26             ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 5/9] driver core: Establish clear order of operations for deferred probe and remove Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 23:47   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:47     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:47     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 6/9] driver core: Probe devices asynchronously instead of the driver Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 23:59   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-08 23:59     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27  2:48   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  2:48     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  2:48     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 17:57     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 17:57       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 18:32       ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 18:32         ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 7/9] driver core: Attach devices on CPU local to device node Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27  4:50   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  4:50     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  4:50     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 8/9] PM core: Use new async_schedule_dev command Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27  4:52   ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  4:52     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  4:52     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-08 18:07 ` [driver-core PATCH v6 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device registration on node local to the device Alexander Duyck
2018-11-08 18:07   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27  2:21   ` Dan Williams [this message]
2018-11-27  2:21     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27  2:21     ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 18:04     ` Alexander Duyck
2018-11-27 19:34       ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 19:34         ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:33         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 20:33           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 20:33           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 20:50           ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:50             ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 20:50             ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 21:22             ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 21:22               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 21:22               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-27 22:34               ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 22:34                 ` Dan Williams
2018-11-27 22:34                 ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPcyv4jmTbHZbs2KHhH2_S6=mxxkwdiJCDL6widexMzePhNFBg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.