All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] drm/i915/xehp/guc: enable compute engine inside GuC
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:55:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <055877c8-b99b-e8c0-d56b-c02ffd9d15c5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220228174245.1569581-9-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>



On 2/28/2022 9:42 AM, Matt Roper wrote:
> From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
>
> Tell GuC that CCS is enabled by setting a bit in its ADS.
>
> Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> Original-author: Michel Thierry
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h    | 3 +++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c | 5 +++++
>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> index 84f189738a68..e629443e07ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> @@ -1327,6 +1327,9 @@
>   #define   ECOBITS_PPGTT_CACHE64B		(3 << 8)
>   #define   ECOBITS_PPGTT_CACHE4B			(0 << 8)
>   
> +#define GEN12_RCU_MODE				_MMIO(0x14800)
> +#define   GEN12_RCU_MODE_CCS_ENABLE		REG_BIT(0)

Having the definition of this register in this patch is a bit weird, 
because we're save/restoring a register we're not programming. Maybe 
flip the order of this patch and the next one and move the register 
definition to that?

Daniele

> +
>   #define CHV_FUSE_GT				_MMIO(VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x2168)
>   #define   CHV_FGT_DISABLE_SS0			(1 << 10)
>   #define   CHV_FGT_DISABLE_SS1			(1 << 11)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c
> index 847e00390b00..9bb551b83e7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,10 @@ static int guc_mmio_regset_init(struct temp_regset *regset,
>   	ret |= GUC_MMIO_REG_ADD(regset, RING_HWS_PGA(base), false);
>   	ret |= GUC_MMIO_REG_ADD(regset, RING_IMR(base), false);
>   
> +	if (engine->class == RENDER_CLASS &&
> +	    CCS_MASK(engine->gt))
> +		ret |= GUC_MMIO_REG_ADD(regset, GEN12_RCU_MODE, true);
> +
>   	for (i = 0, wa = wal->list; i < wal->count; i++, wa++)
>   		ret |= GUC_MMIO_REG_ADD(regset, wa->reg, wa->masked_reg);
>   
> @@ -430,6 +434,7 @@ static void fill_engine_enable_masks(struct intel_gt *gt,
>   				     struct iosys_map *info_map)
>   {
>   	info_map_write(info_map, engine_enabled_masks[GUC_RENDER_CLASS], 1);
> +	info_map_write(info_map, engine_enabled_masks[GUC_COMPUTE_CLASS], CCS_MASK(gt));
>   	info_map_write(info_map, engine_enabled_masks[GUC_BLITTER_CLASS], 1);
>   	info_map_write(info_map, engine_enabled_masks[GUC_VIDEO_CLASS], VDBOX_MASK(gt));
>   	info_map_write(info_map, engine_enabled_masks[GUC_VIDEOENHANCE_CLASS], VEBOX_MASK(gt));


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/13] drm/i915/xehp/guc: enable compute engine inside GuC
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:55:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <055877c8-b99b-e8c0-d56b-c02ffd9d15c5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220228174245.1569581-9-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>



On 2/28/2022 9:42 AM, Matt Roper wrote:
> From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
>
> Tell GuC that CCS is enabled by setting a bit in its ADS.
>
> Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> Original-author: Michel Thierry
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h    | 3 +++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c | 5 +++++
>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> index 84f189738a68..e629443e07ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> @@ -1327,6 +1327,9 @@
>   #define   ECOBITS_PPGTT_CACHE64B		(3 << 8)
>   #define   ECOBITS_PPGTT_CACHE4B			(0 << 8)
>   
> +#define GEN12_RCU_MODE				_MMIO(0x14800)
> +#define   GEN12_RCU_MODE_CCS_ENABLE		REG_BIT(0)

Having the definition of this register in this patch is a bit weird, 
because we're save/restoring a register we're not programming. Maybe 
flip the order of this patch and the next one and move the register 
definition to that?

Daniele

> +
>   #define CHV_FUSE_GT				_MMIO(VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x2168)
>   #define   CHV_FGT_DISABLE_SS0			(1 << 10)
>   #define   CHV_FGT_DISABLE_SS1			(1 << 11)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c
> index 847e00390b00..9bb551b83e7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,10 @@ static int guc_mmio_regset_init(struct temp_regset *regset,
>   	ret |= GUC_MMIO_REG_ADD(regset, RING_HWS_PGA(base), false);
>   	ret |= GUC_MMIO_REG_ADD(regset, RING_IMR(base), false);
>   
> +	if (engine->class == RENDER_CLASS &&
> +	    CCS_MASK(engine->gt))
> +		ret |= GUC_MMIO_REG_ADD(regset, GEN12_RCU_MODE, true);
> +
>   	for (i = 0, wa = wal->list; i < wal->count; i++, wa++)
>   		ret |= GUC_MMIO_REG_ADD(regset, wa->reg, wa->masked_reg);
>   
> @@ -430,6 +434,7 @@ static void fill_engine_enable_masks(struct intel_gt *gt,
>   				     struct iosys_map *info_map)
>   {
>   	info_map_write(info_map, engine_enabled_masks[GUC_RENDER_CLASS], 1);
> +	info_map_write(info_map, engine_enabled_masks[GUC_COMPUTE_CLASS], CCS_MASK(gt));
>   	info_map_write(info_map, engine_enabled_masks[GUC_BLITTER_CLASS], 1);
>   	info_map_write(info_map, engine_enabled_masks[GUC_VIDEO_CLASS], VDBOX_MASK(gt));
>   	info_map_write(info_map, engine_enabled_masks[GUC_VIDEOENHANCE_CLASS], VEBOX_MASK(gt));


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-01 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-28 17:42 [PATCH v2 00/13] i915: Prepare for Xe_HP compute engines Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] drm/i915/xehp: Define compute class and engine Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] drm/i915/xehp: CCS shares the render reset domain Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] drm/i915/xehp: Add Compute CS IRQ handlers Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] drm/i915/xehp: compute engine pipe_control Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-03-01  6:54   ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-03-01  6:54     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] drm/i915/xehp: CCS should use RCS setup functions Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/13] drm/i915: Move context descriptor fields to intel_lrc.h Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` Matt Roper
2022-03-01  6:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/13] drm/i915/xehp: Define context scheduling attributes in lrc descriptor Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] drm/i915/xehp/guc: enable compute engine inside GuC Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-03-01 18:55   ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele [this message]
2022-03-01 18:55     ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] drm/i915/xehp: Enable ccs/dual-ctx in RCU_MODE Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/13] drm/i915/xehp: Don't support parallel submission on compute / render Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` Matt Roper
2022-03-01 19:04   ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2022-03-01 19:04     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] drm/i915/xehp: handle fused off CCS engines Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-03-01 22:54   ` Matt Roper
2022-03-01 22:54     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] drm/i915/xehp: Add compute workarounds Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-03-01 19:31   ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] drm/i915/xehpsdv: Move render/compute engine reset domains related workarounds Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 22:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915: Prepare for Xe_HP compute engines Patchwork
2022-02-28 22:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-28 23:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-01  9:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=055877c8-b99b-e8c0-d56b-c02ffd9d15c5@intel.com \
    --to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.