All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>,
	Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
	Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
	Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] drm/i915/xehp: handle fused off CCS engines
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 14:54:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh6kNJtQpqt0SArs@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220228174245.1569581-12-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 09:42:43AM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> 
> HW resources are divided across the active CCS engines at the compute
> slice level, with each CCS having priority on one of the cslices.
> If a compute slice has no enabled DSS, its paired compute engine is not
> usable in full parallel execution because the other ones already fully
> saturate the HW, so consider it fused off.
> 
> v2(José):
> - moved it to its own function
> - fixed definition of ccs_mask
> 
> Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c      | 17 ++++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h      |  4 +++-
>  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> index 92f4cf9833ee..4fa3adc15b08 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -592,6 +592,29 @@ bool gen11_vdbox_has_sfc(struct intel_gt *gt,
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static void engine_mask_apply_compute_fuses(struct intel_gt *gt)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
> +	struct intel_gt_info *info = &gt->info;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If all DSS in a quadrant are fused off, the corresponding CCS
> +	 * engine is not available for use.
> +	 */
> +	if (fls(CCS_MASK(gt)) > 1) {

I think it might make more sense to do a

        if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) < IP_VER(12, 50))
                return;

at the top of this function and then omit the fls() condition here.
Xe_HP platforms that have compute engines will all have four CCS engines
listed in the device info structure, and then the logic below will take
care of adjusting that based on fusing; I'll include that change when I
resend the series.


Matt

> +		int ss_per_ccs = info->sseu.max_subslices / I915_MAX_CCS;
> +		const unsigned long ccs_mask = intel_slicemask_from_dssmask(
> +			intel_sseu_get_compute_subslices(&info->sseu),
> +			ss_per_ccs);
> +
> +		for_each_clear_bit(i, &ccs_mask, I915_MAX_CCS) {
> +			info->engine_mask &= ~BIT(_CCS(i));
> +			drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "ccs%u fused off\n", i);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Determine which engines are fused off in our particular hardware.
>   * Note that we have a catch-22 situation where we need to be able to access
> @@ -673,6 +696,8 @@ static intel_engine_mask_t init_engine_mask(struct intel_gt *gt)
>  		vebox_mask, VEBOX_MASK(gt));
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(vebox_mask != VEBOX_MASK(gt));
>  
> +	engine_mask_apply_compute_fuses(gt);
> +
>  	return info->engine_mask;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> index 29118c652811..4ac0bbaf0c31 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ intel_sseu_subslice_total(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
>  	return total;
>  }
>  
> -u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice)
> +static u32
> +_intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
> +			  const u8 *subslice_mask, u8 slice)
>  {
>  	int i, offset = slice * sseu->ss_stride;
>  	u32 mask = 0;
> @@ -40,12 +42,21 @@ u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice)
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(slice >= sseu->max_slices);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < sseu->ss_stride; i++)
> -		mask |= (u32)sseu->subslice_mask[offset + i] <<
> -			i * BITS_PER_BYTE;
> +		mask |= (u32)subslice_mask[offset + i] << i * BITS_PER_BYTE;
>  
>  	return mask;
>  }
>  
> +u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice)
> +{
> +	return _intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, sseu->subslice_mask, slice);
> +}
> +
> +u32 intel_sseu_get_compute_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
> +{
> +	return _intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, sseu->compute_subslice_mask, 0);
> +}
> +
>  void intel_sseu_set_subslices(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int slice,
>  			      u8 *subslice_mask, u32 ss_mask)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> index 60882a74741e..8a79cd8eaab4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> @@ -103,7 +103,9 @@ intel_sseu_subslice_total(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu);
>  unsigned int
>  intel_sseu_subslices_per_slice(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice);
>  
> -u32  intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice);
> +u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice);
> +
> +u32 intel_sseu_get_compute_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu);
>  
>  void intel_sseu_set_subslices(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int slice,
>  			      u8 *subslice_mask, u32 ss_mask);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/13] drm/i915/xehp: handle fused off CCS engines
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 14:54:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh6kNJtQpqt0SArs@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220228174245.1569581-12-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 09:42:43AM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> 
> HW resources are divided across the active CCS engines at the compute
> slice level, with each CCS having priority on one of the cslices.
> If a compute slice has no enabled DSS, its paired compute engine is not
> usable in full parallel execution because the other ones already fully
> saturate the HW, so consider it fused off.
> 
> v2(José):
> - moved it to its own function
> - fixed definition of ccs_mask
> 
> Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c      | 17 ++++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h      |  4 +++-
>  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> index 92f4cf9833ee..4fa3adc15b08 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -592,6 +592,29 @@ bool gen11_vdbox_has_sfc(struct intel_gt *gt,
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static void engine_mask_apply_compute_fuses(struct intel_gt *gt)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
> +	struct intel_gt_info *info = &gt->info;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If all DSS in a quadrant are fused off, the corresponding CCS
> +	 * engine is not available for use.
> +	 */
> +	if (fls(CCS_MASK(gt)) > 1) {

I think it might make more sense to do a

        if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) < IP_VER(12, 50))
                return;

at the top of this function and then omit the fls() condition here.
Xe_HP platforms that have compute engines will all have four CCS engines
listed in the device info structure, and then the logic below will take
care of adjusting that based on fusing; I'll include that change when I
resend the series.


Matt

> +		int ss_per_ccs = info->sseu.max_subslices / I915_MAX_CCS;
> +		const unsigned long ccs_mask = intel_slicemask_from_dssmask(
> +			intel_sseu_get_compute_subslices(&info->sseu),
> +			ss_per_ccs);
> +
> +		for_each_clear_bit(i, &ccs_mask, I915_MAX_CCS) {
> +			info->engine_mask &= ~BIT(_CCS(i));
> +			drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "ccs%u fused off\n", i);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Determine which engines are fused off in our particular hardware.
>   * Note that we have a catch-22 situation where we need to be able to access
> @@ -673,6 +696,8 @@ static intel_engine_mask_t init_engine_mask(struct intel_gt *gt)
>  		vebox_mask, VEBOX_MASK(gt));
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(vebox_mask != VEBOX_MASK(gt));
>  
> +	engine_mask_apply_compute_fuses(gt);
> +
>  	return info->engine_mask;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> index 29118c652811..4ac0bbaf0c31 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ intel_sseu_subslice_total(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
>  	return total;
>  }
>  
> -u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice)
> +static u32
> +_intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
> +			  const u8 *subslice_mask, u8 slice)
>  {
>  	int i, offset = slice * sseu->ss_stride;
>  	u32 mask = 0;
> @@ -40,12 +42,21 @@ u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice)
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(slice >= sseu->max_slices);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < sseu->ss_stride; i++)
> -		mask |= (u32)sseu->subslice_mask[offset + i] <<
> -			i * BITS_PER_BYTE;
> +		mask |= (u32)subslice_mask[offset + i] << i * BITS_PER_BYTE;
>  
>  	return mask;
>  }
>  
> +u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice)
> +{
> +	return _intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, sseu->subslice_mask, slice);
> +}
> +
> +u32 intel_sseu_get_compute_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
> +{
> +	return _intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, sseu->compute_subslice_mask, 0);
> +}
> +
>  void intel_sseu_set_subslices(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int slice,
>  			      u8 *subslice_mask, u32 ss_mask)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> index 60882a74741e..8a79cd8eaab4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> @@ -103,7 +103,9 @@ intel_sseu_subslice_total(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu);
>  unsigned int
>  intel_sseu_subslices_per_slice(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice);
>  
> -u32  intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice);
> +u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice);
> +
> +u32 intel_sseu_get_compute_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu);
>  
>  void intel_sseu_set_subslices(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int slice,
>  			      u8 *subslice_mask, u32 ss_mask);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-01 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-28 17:42 [PATCH v2 00/13] i915: Prepare for Xe_HP compute engines Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] drm/i915/xehp: Define compute class and engine Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] drm/i915/xehp: CCS shares the render reset domain Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] drm/i915/xehp: Add Compute CS IRQ handlers Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] drm/i915/xehp: compute engine pipe_control Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-03-01  6:54   ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-03-01  6:54     ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] drm/i915/xehp: CCS should use RCS setup functions Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/13] drm/i915: Move context descriptor fields to intel_lrc.h Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` Matt Roper
2022-03-01  6:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/13] drm/i915/xehp: Define context scheduling attributes in lrc descriptor Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] drm/i915/xehp/guc: enable compute engine inside GuC Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-03-01 18:55   ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2022-03-01 18:55     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] drm/i915/xehp: Enable ccs/dual-ctx in RCU_MODE Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/13] drm/i915/xehp: Don't support parallel submission on compute / render Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` Matt Roper
2022-03-01 19:04   ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2022-03-01 19:04     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] drm/i915/xehp: handle fused off CCS engines Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-03-01 22:54   ` Matt Roper [this message]
2022-03-01 22:54     ` Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] drm/i915/xehp: Add compute workarounds Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-03-01 19:31   ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2022-02-28 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] drm/i915/xehpsdv: Move render/compute engine reset domains related workarounds Matt Roper
2022-02-28 17:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2022-02-28 22:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915: Prepare for Xe_HP compute engines Patchwork
2022-02-28 22:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-28 23:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-01  9:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yh6kNJtQpqt0SArs@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    --cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.