Re: [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Cache platform frequency limits

["Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>]

On 7/21/2021 11:09 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21.07.2021 18:11, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>> Cache rp0, rp1 and rpn platform limits into SLPC structure
>> for range checking while setting min/max frequencies.
>>
>> Also add "soft" limits which keep track of frequency changes
>> made from userland. These are initially set to platform min
>> and max.
>>
>> v2: Address review comments (Michal W)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c   | 98 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h |  9 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h               |  3 +
>>   3 files changed, 110 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
>> index 8796a8929d89..134c57ca10b7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
>> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static int slpc_shared_data_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>>   		return err;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	slpc->max_freq_softlimit = 0;
>> +	slpc->min_freq_softlimit = 0;
>> +
>>   	return err;
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -121,6 +124,19 @@ static int guc_action_slpc_set_param(struct intel_guc *guc, u8 id, u32 value)
>>    	return intel_guc_send(guc, request, ARRAY_SIZE(request));
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int guc_action_slpc_unset_param(struct intel_guc *guc,
>> +					u8 id)
>> +{
>> +	u32 request[] = {
>> +		INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SLPC_REQUEST,
>> + 		SLPC_EVENT(SLPC_EVENT_PARAMETER_UNSET, 2),
>> +		id,
>> +	};
>> +
>> + 	return intel_guc_send(guc, request, ARRAY_SIZE(request));
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>>   static bool slpc_is_running(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>>   {
>>   	return (slpc_get_state(slpc) == SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_RUNNING);
>> @@ -164,6 +180,16 @@ static int slpc_set_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u8 id, u32 value)
>>   	return guc_action_slpc_set_param(guc, id, value);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int slpc_unset_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc,
>> +				u8 id)
> 
> likely can fit into one line

done.

> 
>> +{
>> +	struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
>> +
>> +	GEM_BUG_ON(id >= SLPC_MAX_PARAM);
>> +
>> +	return guc_action_slpc_unset_param(guc, id);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static const char *slpc_state_string(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>>   {
>>   	const char *str = NULL;
>> @@ -388,6 +414,55 @@ void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt)
>>   			   GEN6_PMINTRMSK, pm_intrmsk_mbz, 0);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int intel_guc_slpc_set_softlimits(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>> +{
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	/* Softlimits are initially equivalent to platform limits
>> +	 * unless they have deviated from defaults, in which case,
>> +	 * we retain the values and set min/max accordingly.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!slpc->max_freq_softlimit)
>> +		slpc->max_freq_softlimit = slpc->rp0_freq;
>> +	else if (slpc->max_freq_softlimit != slpc->rp0_freq)
>> +		ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(slpc,
>> +					slpc->max_freq_softlimit);
>> +
>> +	if (!slpc->min_freq_softlimit)
>> +		slpc->min_freq_softlimit = slpc->min_freq;
>> +	else if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit != slpc->min_freq)
>> +		ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc,
>> +					slpc->min_freq_softlimit);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void intel_guc_slpc_ignore_eff_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, bool ignore)
>> +{
>> +	if (ignore) {
>> +		/* A failure here does not affect the algorithm in a fatal way */
>> +		slpc_set_param(slpc,
>> +		   SLPC_PARAM_IGNORE_EFFICIENT_FREQUENCY,
>> +		   ignore);
>> +		slpc_set_param(slpc,
>> +		   SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
>> +		   slpc->min_freq);
>> +	} else {
>> +		slpc_unset_param(slpc,
>> +		   SLPC_PARAM_IGNORE_EFFICIENT_FREQUENCY);
>> +		slpc_unset_param(slpc,
>> +		   SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ);
> 
> hard to tell from mail client, but likely misalignment
> did you run checkpatch.pl ?

Yup, ran it this time.

> 
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void intel_guc_slpc_use_fused_rp0(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>> +{
>> +	/* Force slpc to used platform rp0 */
>> +	slpc_set_param(slpc,
>> +	   SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MAX_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
>> +	   slpc->rp0_freq);
>> +}
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * intel_guc_slpc_enable() - Start SLPC
>>    * @slpc: pointer to intel_guc_slpc.
>> @@ -405,6 +480,7 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>>   {
>>   	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
>>   	struct slpc_shared_data *data;
>> +	u32 rp_state_cap;
>>   	int ret;
>>   
>>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!slpc->vma);
>> @@ -442,6 +518,28 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>>   			slpc_decode_min_freq(slpc),
>>   			slpc_decode_max_freq(slpc));
>>   
>> +	rp_state_cap = intel_uncore_read(i915->gt.uncore, GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);
>> +
>> +	slpc->rp0_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RP0_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) *
>> +					GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
>> +	slpc->rp1_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RP1_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) *
>> +					GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
>> +	slpc->min_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RPN_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) *
>> +					GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
>> +
>> +	/* Ignore efficient freq and set min/max to platform min/max */
>> +	intel_guc_slpc_ignore_eff_freq(slpc, true);
>> +	intel_guc_slpc_use_fused_rp0(slpc);
>> +
>> +	ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_softlimits(slpc);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		drm_err(&i915->drm, "Set softlimits returned (%pe)\n",
> 
> "Failed to set SLPC softlimits (%pe)\n"
> 
>> +					ERR_PTR(ret));
> 
> should we continue after error ?

This is not a fatal error, does not leave the system in a bad state or 
anything.

Thanks,
Vinay.

> 
> Michal
> 
>> +
>> +	drm_info(&i915->drm,
>> +		 "Platform fused frequency values - min: %u Mhz, max: %u Mhz\n",
>> +		 slpc->min_freq,
>> +		 slpc->rp0_freq);
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
>> index c417992b1346..8c42562a28fc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
>> @@ -15,6 +15,15 @@ struct intel_guc_slpc {
>>   
>>   	struct i915_vma *vma;
>>   	struct slpc_shared_data *vaddr;
>> +
>> +	/* platform frequency limits */
>> +	u32 min_freq;
>> +	u32 rp0_freq;
>> +	u32 rp1_freq;
>> +
>> +	/* frequency softlimits */
>> +	u32 min_freq_softlimit;
>> +	u32 max_freq_softlimit;
>>   };
>>   
>>   #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index aa433ae8f5de..92392c1da0e6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -4086,6 +4086,9 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
>>   #define BXT_GT_PERF_STATUS      _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x7070)
>>   #define GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS	_MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5994)
>>   #define GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP	_MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5998)
>> +#define   RP0_CAP_MASK		REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
>> +#define   RP1_CAP_MASK		REG_GENMASK(15, 8)
>> +#define   RPN_CAP_MASK		REG_GENMASK(23, 16)
>>   #define BXT_RP_STATE_CAP        _MMIO(0x138170)
>>   #define GEN9_RP_STATE_LIMITS	_MMIO(0x138148)
>>   
>>