[RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: intel_eval_slpc_support() can be static

All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
	Sundaresan Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: intel_eval_slpc_support() can be static
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 08:31:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210724003153.GA56920@793cd2865ea5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210721161120.24610-10-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c:67:6: warning: symbol 'intel_eval_slpc_support' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
 intel_guc_debugfs.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c
index 46b22187927bf..216b2f23dca11 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int guc_slpc_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 }
 DEFINE_GT_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(guc_slpc_info);
 
-bool intel_eval_slpc_support(void *data)
+static bool intel_eval_slpc_support(void *data)
 {
 	struct intel_guc *guc;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: intel_eval_slpc_support() can be static
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 08:31:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210724003153.GA56920@793cd2865ea5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210721161120.24610-10-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c:67:6: warning: symbol 'intel_eval_slpc_support' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
 intel_guc_debugfs.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c
index 46b22187927bf..216b2f23dca11 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int guc_slpc_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 }
 DEFINE_GT_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(guc_slpc_info);
 
-bool intel_eval_slpc_support(void *data)
+static bool intel_eval_slpc_support(void *data)
 {
 	struct intel_guc *guc;
 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: intel_eval_slpc_support() can be static
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 08:31:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210724003153.GA56920@793cd2865ea5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210721161120.24610-10-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 843 bytes --]

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c:67:6: warning: symbol 'intel_eval_slpc_support' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
 intel_guc_debugfs.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c
index 46b22187927bf..216b2f23dca11 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_debugfs.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int guc_slpc_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 }
 DEFINE_GT_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(guc_slpc_info);
 
-bool intel_eval_slpc_support(void *data)
+static bool intel_eval_slpc_support(void *data)
 {
 	struct intel_guc *guc;

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-24  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-21 16:11 [PATCH v2 00/14] drm/i915/guc: Enable GuC based power management features Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/guc: SQUASHED PATCH - DO NOT REVIEW Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Initial definitions for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 17:24   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 17:24     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-22  0:56     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-22  0:56       ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when SLPC is enabled Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Adding SLPC communication interfaces Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 17:25   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 17:25     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-23 19:26     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-23 19:26       ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allocate, initialize and release SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 17:26   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 17:26     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-23 19:30     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-23 19:30       ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable SLPC and add related H2G events Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 17:38   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 17:38     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-23 19:28     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-23 19:28       ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 23:44   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-21 23:44     ` kernel test robot
2021-07-21 23:44     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-22  2:36   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22  2:36     ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22  2:36     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-22 18:07   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22 18:07     ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22 18:07     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-22 18:07   ` [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: slpc_decode_min_freq() can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-22 18:07     ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22 18:07     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-23 13:04   ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable SLPC and add related H2G events kernel test robot
2021-07-23 13:04     ` kernel test robot
2021-07-23 13:04     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-24 16:30   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24 16:30     ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24 16:30     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add methods to set min/max frequency Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 17:42   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 17:42     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-23 19:35     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-23 19:35       ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add get max/min freq hooks Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 18:00   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 18:00     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-23 19:43     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-23 19:43       ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add debugfs for SLPC info Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 18:05   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 18:05     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-23 19:49     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-23 19:49       ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-22  1:29   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22  1:29     ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22  1:29     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-24  0:31   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24  0:31     ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24  0:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-24  0:31   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-07-24  0:31     ` [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: intel_eval_slpc_support() can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-24  0:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-25  2:57   ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add debugfs for SLPC info kernel test robot
2021-07-25  2:57     ` kernel test robot
2021-07-25  2:57     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable ARAT timer interrupt Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Cache platform frequency limits Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 18:09   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 18:09     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-23 22:25     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-23 22:25       ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Sysfs hooks for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 18:13   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 18:13     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-23 22:28     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-23 22:28       ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add SLPC selftest Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/guc/rc: Setup and enable GUCRC feature Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 18:21   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-21 18:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-23 22:29     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-23 22:29       ` [Intel-gfx] " Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-21 20:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/guc: Enable GuC based power management features Patchwork
2021-07-21 20:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-21 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-22  1:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

find likely ancestor, descendant, or conflicting patches for this message:
dfblob:46b22187927b dfblob:46b22187927b dfblob:46b22187927b
dfblob:216b2f23dca1 dfblob:216b2f23dca1 dfblob:216b2f23dca1
	(help)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210724003153.GA56920@793cd2865ea5 \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com \
    --cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.