All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	drjones@redhat.com
Cc: andre.przywara@arm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 07/10] arm/arm64: gic: Wait for writes to acked or spurious to complete
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:21:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179b4f5f-8bdf-1922-f79a-930bde2ed103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125155113.192079-8-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Hi Alexandru,

On 11/25/20 4:51 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> The IPI test has two parts: in the first part, it tests that the sender CPU
> can send an IPI to itself (ipi_test_self()), and in the second part it
> sends interrupts to even-numbered CPUs (ipi_test_smp()). When acknowledging
> an interrupt, if we read back a spurious interrupt ID (1023), the handler
> increments the index in the static array spurious corresponding to the CPU
> ID that the handler is running on; if we get the expected interrupt ID, we
> increment the same index in the acked array.
> 
> Reads of the spurious and acked arrays are synchronized with writes
> performed before sending the IPI. The synchronization is done either in the
> IPI sender function (GICv3), either by creating a data dependency (GICv2).
> 
> At the end of the test, the sender CPU reads from the acked and spurious
> arrays to check against the expected behaviour. We need to make sure the
> that writes in ipi_handler() are observable by the sender CPU. Use a DSB
> ISHST to make sure that the writes have completed.
> 
> One might rightfully argue that there are no guarantees regarding when the
> DSB instruction completes, just like there are no guarantees regarding when
> the value is observed by the other CPUs. However, let's do our best and
> instruct the CPU to complete the memory access when we know that it will be
> needed.
> 
> We still need to follow the message passing pattern for the acked,
> respectively bad_irq and bad_sender, because DSB guarantees that all memory
> accesses that come before the barrier have completed, not that they have
> completed in program order.
I guess the removal of the smp_rmb in check_spurious should belong to
that patch?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Besides, AFAIU

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>

Thanks

Eric
> ---
>  arm/gic.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
> index 5727d72a0ef3..544c283f5f47 100644
> --- a/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/arm/gic.c
> @@ -161,8 +161,10 @@ static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>  		++acked[smp_processor_id()];
>  	} else {
>  		++spurious[smp_processor_id()];
> -		smp_wmb();
>  	}
> +
> +	/* Wait for writes to acked/spurious to complete */
> +	dsb(ishst);
>  }
>  
>  static void setup_irq(irq_handler_fn handler)
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	drjones@redhat.com
Cc: andre.przywara@arm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 07/10] arm/arm64: gic: Wait for writes to acked or spurious to complete
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:21:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179b4f5f-8bdf-1922-f79a-930bde2ed103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125155113.192079-8-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Hi Alexandru,

On 11/25/20 4:51 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> The IPI test has two parts: in the first part, it tests that the sender CPU
> can send an IPI to itself (ipi_test_self()), and in the second part it
> sends interrupts to even-numbered CPUs (ipi_test_smp()). When acknowledging
> an interrupt, if we read back a spurious interrupt ID (1023), the handler
> increments the index in the static array spurious corresponding to the CPU
> ID that the handler is running on; if we get the expected interrupt ID, we
> increment the same index in the acked array.
> 
> Reads of the spurious and acked arrays are synchronized with writes
> performed before sending the IPI. The synchronization is done either in the
> IPI sender function (GICv3), either by creating a data dependency (GICv2).
> 
> At the end of the test, the sender CPU reads from the acked and spurious
> arrays to check against the expected behaviour. We need to make sure the
> that writes in ipi_handler() are observable by the sender CPU. Use a DSB
> ISHST to make sure that the writes have completed.
> 
> One might rightfully argue that there are no guarantees regarding when the
> DSB instruction completes, just like there are no guarantees regarding when
> the value is observed by the other CPUs. However, let's do our best and
> instruct the CPU to complete the memory access when we know that it will be
> needed.
> 
> We still need to follow the message passing pattern for the acked,
> respectively bad_irq and bad_sender, because DSB guarantees that all memory
> accesses that come before the barrier have completed, not that they have
> completed in program order.
I guess the removal of the smp_rmb in check_spurious should belong to
that patch?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Besides, AFAIU

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>

Thanks

Eric
> ---
>  arm/gic.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
> index 5727d72a0ef3..544c283f5f47 100644
> --- a/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/arm/gic.c
> @@ -161,8 +161,10 @@ static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>  		++acked[smp_processor_id()];
>  	} else {
>  		++spurious[smp_processor_id()];
> -		smp_wmb();
>  	}
> +
> +	/* Wait for writes to acked/spurious to complete */
> +	dsb(ishst);
>  }
>  
>  static void setup_irq(irq_handler_fn handler)
> 

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-03 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-25 15:51 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 00/10] GIC fixes and improvements Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 01/10] lib: arm/arm64: gicv3: Add missing barrier when sending IPIs Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-01 16:37   ` Auger Eric
2020-12-01 16:37     ` Auger Eric
2020-12-01 17:37     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-01 17:37       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 02/10] lib: arm/arm64: gicv2: " Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-01 16:37   ` Auger Eric
2020-12-01 16:37     ` Auger Eric
2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 03/10] arm/arm64: gic: Remove memory synchronization from ipi_clear_active_handler() Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-01 16:37   ` Auger Eric
2020-12-01 16:37     ` Auger Eric
2020-12-02 14:02     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-02 14:02       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-02 14:14       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-02 14:14         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-03  9:41         ` Auger Eric
2020-12-03  9:41           ` Auger Eric
2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 04/10] arm/arm64: gic: Remove unnecessary synchronization with stats_reset() Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-01 16:48   ` Auger Eric
2020-12-01 16:48     ` Auger Eric
2020-12-02 14:06     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-02 14:06       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-03 13:10   ` Auger Eric
2020-12-03 13:10     ` Auger Eric
2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 05/10] arm/arm64: gic: Use correct memory ordering for the IPI test Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-03 13:10   ` Auger Eric
2020-12-03 13:10     ` Auger Eric
2020-12-03 13:21     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-03 13:21       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 06/10] arm/arm64: gic: Check spurious and bad_sender in the active test Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-03 13:10   ` Auger Eric
2020-12-03 13:10     ` Auger Eric
2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 07/10] arm/arm64: gic: Wait for writes to acked or spurious to complete Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-03 13:21   ` Auger Eric [this message]
2020-12-03 13:21     ` Auger Eric
2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 08/10] arm/arm64: gic: Split check_acked() into two functions Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-03 13:39   ` Auger Eric
2020-12-03 13:39     ` Auger Eric
2020-12-10 14:45     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-10 14:45       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-15 13:58       ` Auger Eric
2020-12-15 13:58         ` Auger Eric
2020-12-16 11:40         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-16 11:40           ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-16 12:37           ` Auger Eric
2020-12-16 12:37             ` Auger Eric
2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 09/10] arm/arm64: gic: Make check_acked() more generic Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-03 14:59   ` Auger Eric
2020-12-03 14:59     ` Auger Eric
2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 10/10] arm64: gic: Use IPI test checking for the LPI tests Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25 15:51   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-26  9:30   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-11-26  9:30     ` Zenghui Yu
2020-11-27 14:50     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-27 14:50       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-30 13:59       ` Zenghui Yu
2020-11-30 13:59         ` Zenghui Yu
2020-11-30 14:19         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-30 14:19           ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-01 15:09           ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-01 15:09             ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-30 17:48     ` Auger Eric
2020-11-30 17:48       ` Auger Eric
2020-12-03 14:59   ` Auger Eric
2020-12-03 14:59     ` Auger Eric
2020-12-09 10:29     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-09 10:29       ` Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=179b4f5f-8bdf-1922-f79a-930bde2ed103@redhat.com \
    --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.