From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com> To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, drjones@redhat.com Cc: andre.przywara@arm.com Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 06/10] arm/arm64: gic: Check spurious and bad_sender in the active test Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:10:02 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <71a4e466-657d-c2ad-e174-9e15f649243c@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201125155113.192079-7-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> Hi Alexandru, On 11/25/20 4:51 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > The gicv{2,3}-active test sends an IPI from the boot CPU to itself, then > checks that the interrupt has been received as expected. The > ipi_clear_active_handler() clears the active state of the interrupt with a > write to the GICD_ICACTIVER register instead of writing the to EOI > register. > > When acknowledging the interrupt it is possible to get back an spurious > interrupt ID (ID 1023), and the interrupt handler increments the number of > spurious interrupts received on the current processor. However, this is not > checked at the end of the test. Let's also check for spurious interrupts, > like the IPI test does. > > For IPIs on GICv2, the value returned by a read of the GICC_IAR register > performed when acknowledging the interrupt also contains the sender CPU > ID. Add a check for that too. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Eric > --- > arm/gic.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c > index bcb834406d23..5727d72a0ef3 100644 > --- a/arm/gic.c > +++ b/arm/gic.c > @@ -125,12 +125,12 @@ static void check_spurious(void) > } > } > > -static void check_ipi_sender(u32 irqstat) > +static void check_ipi_sender(u32 irqstat, int sender) > { > if (gic_version() == 2) { > int src = (irqstat >> 10) & 7; > > - if (src != IPI_SENDER) > + if (src != sender) > bad_sender[smp_processor_id()] = src; > } > } > @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused) > */ > if (gic_version() == 2) > smp_rmb(); > - check_ipi_sender(irqstat); > + check_ipi_sender(irqstat, IPI_SENDER); > check_irqnr(irqnr); > smp_wmb(); /* pairs with smp_rmb in check_acked */ > ++acked[smp_processor_id()]; > @@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ static void ipi_clear_active_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused) > > writel(val, base + GICD_ICACTIVER); > > + check_ipi_sender(irqstat, smp_processor_id()); > check_irqnr(irqnr); > ++acked[smp_processor_id()]; > } else { > @@ -394,6 +395,7 @@ static void run_active_clear_test(void) > report_prefix_push("active"); > setup_irq(ipi_clear_active_handler); > ipi_test_self(); > + check_spurious(); > report_prefix_pop(); > } > >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com> To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, drjones@redhat.com Cc: andre.przywara@arm.com Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 06/10] arm/arm64: gic: Check spurious and bad_sender in the active test Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:10:02 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <71a4e466-657d-c2ad-e174-9e15f649243c@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201125155113.192079-7-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> Hi Alexandru, On 11/25/20 4:51 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > The gicv{2,3}-active test sends an IPI from the boot CPU to itself, then > checks that the interrupt has been received as expected. The > ipi_clear_active_handler() clears the active state of the interrupt with a > write to the GICD_ICACTIVER register instead of writing the to EOI > register. > > When acknowledging the interrupt it is possible to get back an spurious > interrupt ID (ID 1023), and the interrupt handler increments the number of > spurious interrupts received on the current processor. However, this is not > checked at the end of the test. Let's also check for spurious interrupts, > like the IPI test does. > > For IPIs on GICv2, the value returned by a read of the GICC_IAR register > performed when acknowledging the interrupt also contains the sender CPU > ID. Add a check for that too. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Eric > --- > arm/gic.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c > index bcb834406d23..5727d72a0ef3 100644 > --- a/arm/gic.c > +++ b/arm/gic.c > @@ -125,12 +125,12 @@ static void check_spurious(void) > } > } > > -static void check_ipi_sender(u32 irqstat) > +static void check_ipi_sender(u32 irqstat, int sender) > { > if (gic_version() == 2) { > int src = (irqstat >> 10) & 7; > > - if (src != IPI_SENDER) > + if (src != sender) > bad_sender[smp_processor_id()] = src; > } > } > @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused) > */ > if (gic_version() == 2) > smp_rmb(); > - check_ipi_sender(irqstat); > + check_ipi_sender(irqstat, IPI_SENDER); > check_irqnr(irqnr); > smp_wmb(); /* pairs with smp_rmb in check_acked */ > ++acked[smp_processor_id()]; > @@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ static void ipi_clear_active_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused) > > writel(val, base + GICD_ICACTIVER); > > + check_ipi_sender(irqstat, smp_processor_id()); > check_irqnr(irqnr); > ++acked[smp_processor_id()]; > } else { > @@ -394,6 +395,7 @@ static void run_active_clear_test(void) > report_prefix_push("active"); > setup_irq(ipi_clear_active_handler); > ipi_test_self(); > + check_spurious(); > report_prefix_pop(); > } > > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-03 13:11 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-11-25 15:51 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 00/10] GIC fixes and improvements Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 01/10] lib: arm/arm64: gicv3: Add missing barrier when sending IPIs Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 16:37 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-01 16:37 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-01 17:37 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 17:37 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 02/10] lib: arm/arm64: gicv2: " Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 16:37 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-01 16:37 ` Auger Eric 2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 03/10] arm/arm64: gic: Remove memory synchronization from ipi_clear_active_handler() Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 16:37 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-01 16:37 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-02 14:02 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-02 14:02 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-02 14:14 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-02 14:14 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-03 9:41 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-03 9:41 ` Auger Eric 2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 04/10] arm/arm64: gic: Remove unnecessary synchronization with stats_reset() Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 16:48 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-01 16:48 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-02 14:06 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-02 14:06 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-03 13:10 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-03 13:10 ` Auger Eric 2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 05/10] arm/arm64: gic: Use correct memory ordering for the IPI test Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-03 13:10 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-03 13:10 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-03 13:21 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-03 13:21 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 06/10] arm/arm64: gic: Check spurious and bad_sender in the active test Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-03 13:10 ` Auger Eric [this message] 2020-12-03 13:10 ` Auger Eric 2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 07/10] arm/arm64: gic: Wait for writes to acked or spurious to complete Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-03 13:21 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-03 13:21 ` Auger Eric 2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 08/10] arm/arm64: gic: Split check_acked() into two functions Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-03 13:39 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-03 13:39 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-10 14:45 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-10 14:45 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-15 13:58 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-15 13:58 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-16 11:40 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-16 11:40 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-16 12:37 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-16 12:37 ` Auger Eric 2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 09/10] arm/arm64: gic: Make check_acked() more generic Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-03 14:59 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-03 14:59 ` Auger Eric 2020-11-25 15:51 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 10/10] arm64: gic: Use IPI test checking for the LPI tests Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-25 15:51 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-26 9:30 ` Zenghui Yu 2020-11-26 9:30 ` Zenghui Yu 2020-11-27 14:50 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-27 14:50 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-30 13:59 ` Zenghui Yu 2020-11-30 13:59 ` Zenghui Yu 2020-11-30 14:19 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-30 14:19 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 15:09 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-01 15:09 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-11-30 17:48 ` Auger Eric 2020-11-30 17:48 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-03 14:59 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-03 14:59 ` Auger Eric 2020-12-09 10:29 ` Alexandru Elisei 2020-12-09 10:29 ` Alexandru Elisei
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=71a4e466-657d-c2ad-e174-9e15f649243c@redhat.com \ --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \ --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \ --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \ --cc=drjones@redhat.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.